Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Street roots. (Portland, OR) 1998-current | View Entire Issue (Aug. 14, 2015)
Street Roots • Aug. 14-20, 2015 News Page 7 Tree loss spurs residents to action As development increases in Portland, neighborhood associations are organizing to save prominent trees and asking the city to change how it regulates the city's canopy BY A M A N D A WALDROUPE trees were issued by the city between Jan. 1 and June 3O.There has been a loss of 25,000 square feet of canopy since the hree towering sequoias in Eastmoreland. A Paradox walnut near interim rule was enacted. Approximately 16,000 square feet of canopy has been Mount Tabor, one of the densest and largest deciduous trees in all of Portland. All replanted since the rule was enacted, but that leaves a net loss of 9,000 square feet are 150-year-old trees that have become Before the interim rule took effect 2.4 flashpoints for how Portlanders are trees were replanted for every tree responding to the city’s white-hot real removed. Since the rule has been in effect, estate market and development the rate has dropped to 0.8 tree for each Longtime Portlanders are watching sleek tree removed, according to a report by condo buildings go up along a formerly Portland Parks and Recreation. gritty Division Street. In many “There is not a whole lot of data out neighborhoods, developers are purchasing there y et It’s a small window of time. To older craftsman-style homes that are call it a trend is a little generous,” demolished to build a new, Jenn Cairo, the city’s forester, larger single-unit house on a said at a Tree Code Oversight single lot or split lots, Advisory Committee meeting on "There Is not a making hundreds of thousands of dollars in profit whole lo t data Aug. 10. “There is a suggestion Along with the demolition out there yet« It's that there could be greater cumulative canopy impacts than comes cutting down trees — a sm all window has been seen.” “tree removal,” as it is Jim Labbe, an urban of tim e. To ca ll It known. Depending on the a trend is a little conservationist for the Audubon circumstances, a single tree is removed or the entire lot générons. There Society of Portland, said the amount of tree removal due to is clear-cut to make way for is a suggestion development and construction is new construction. tha t there could unprecedented. It’s a trend that has be greater cu “It’s very concerning,” he said. rankled residents who live Those who seek stronger m ulative canopy near such developments, im pacts tha n has protections for Portland’s oldest neighborhood associations, trees say doing so is more than environmentalists and been seen." saving a tree here or there. conservationists. JENN CAIRO, Portland is inevitably changing “The developers often Ï P O R T L A N D 'S U R B A N FORESTER and growing and developing. But prefer to build the entire lo t how Portland develops is what is It leaves very little green on residents’ minds — and space and certainly very few whether elected officials and trees,” «said Robert policymakers will guide development with McCullough, chair of Southeast Uplift, the the thought and intention necessary to neighborhood coalition of inner Southeast protect something that defines Portland. Portland, and the Eastmoreland Neighborhood Association. “There is a wide level of outrage around this.” People are increasingly looking to the hen it comes to urban canopy, the city’s tree code as both the culprit for tree amount of tree cover in a city when loss and the potential white knight for viewed from above, Portland’s is one of the Portland’s oldest, largest and most densest in the country. According to ecologically important trees. Portland Parks and Recreation, The city’s tree code, which underwent a approximately 29.9 percent of Portland was massive rewrite in 2011 and became covered by tree canopy in 2010, a steady effective at the beginning of this year, increase over decades. The canopy is higher regulates tree removal and planting and in residential areas and open spaces. aims to protect the city’s urban forest In Portland earned the nickname April, an interim rule was established to “Stumptown” in the late 1800s when the provide standards for tree replacement city grew so quickly that the stumps of cut However, contrary to the code’s intent of trees weren’t removed, given the haste to canopy preservation, the new regulations build and develop. appear to be leading to canopy loss. Now, Portland’s trees and close For the first time, Hie city is able to track relationship to the environment symbolize The three Eastmoreland neighborhood sequoias on Southeast Martins Street that have so fa r the number of trees being cut down. A total been spared removal to make way for development. The largest one is 2 0 feet in diameter. of 1,346 perm its to remove and/or replant See TREES, page 10 C O N T R IB U T IN G W R IT E R S W