Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Street roots. (Portland, OR) 1998-current | View Entire Issue (Feb. 13, 2015)
Page 8 News Sin state Street Roots « February 13-19, 2015 A by-the-numbers look at how bad habits become big revenue fo r the state o f Oregon BY EMILY GREEN S T A F F W R IT E R A s Oregon adds marijuana to its list of taxable sins, Street Roots examines the JLfinancial impact of the state’s excise taxes, also known as "sin taxes.” How much revenue do sin taxes generate for the state and what do the taxed sins ultimately cost residents? While sin taxes are, in part, used to fund programs that offer treatment and prevention of alcohol abuse, problem gambling and tobacco use, much of the revenue goes toward programs that have nothing, to do with these vices — programs that are paid for through the state’s general fund. That means tobacco smokers, gamblers and drinkers — and soon pot smokers — are paying additional taxes for programs, such as education, that benefit all Oregonians. Sin taxes make up about 4 percent of the state’s annual budget, landing Oregon among the 10 states that draw the most funding per capita from sin. Proponents argue they are a necessary evil. Some argue the additional cost discourages people from buying harmful products, such as cigarettes and alcohol. But opponents say governments shouldn’t profit from products they are charged with regulating. According to national Campaign for Tobacco- Free Kids, tobacco taxes are a “win-win-win” because they help states in fiscal crisis, reduce smoking rates and earn public support. It says for every 10 percent increase in cigarette prices, youth smoking is reduced by 7 percent. Critics argue the taxes hit poor Oregonians disproportionately and do not act as a deterrent to those who are addicted. They will simply find the money to pay for price increases by cutting down on other areas of spending. According to the Oregon Health Authority, 1 out of every 3 Oregonians who makes less than $15,000 a year smokes cigarettes. This is in comparison to 1 in 10 Oregonians who make more than $50,000 per year who smoke. Additionally, the average household income of a problem gambler is about $20,000 a year less than the state’s median household income. “If you listen to legislators in hearings down in Salem, which I’ve done a number of times, you hear them say ‘smoking is bad for you, marijuana is bad for you, you shouldn’t gamble,’ but then they tax these things,” says Steve Buckstein, founder of the Portland-based nonpartisan public policy research group, Cascade Policy Institute. “But then they become addicted themselves to the revenue that those taxes carry, so they have created a moral hazard for themselves. On the one hand, they don’t want you to do those things, but on the other hand, they hope you do them so they can get the tax revenue to spend on whatever their projects are,” says Buckstein. “It’s the majority picking on the minority. The same thing will happen, I predict, with marijuana. Legislators say they don’t want people to smoke it, but they’re hungry for the revenue.” I X $9.9 billion Amount Oregonians stuck into Oregon Lottery operated video slot and poker machines in fiscal year 2013. $846 million Oregon Lottery’s revenue in 2014 after prize payouts. 71 percent $478 of Oregon Lottery’s revenue comes from video gaming machines. $2,193 $257.6 million Amount Oregon collected in tobacco taxes in 2014. Estimated amount spent annually on cigarette taxes by a pack-a-day smoker after 2015 tax increase. Average annual amount spent by Oregon video gaming player. 89 percent ^■086 lastyear. Tobacco-related deaths in Oregon of Oregon’s problem a gamblers in treatment prefer video-machine games including video poker, video line games and slots. 5 O M Amount Oregon spent on tobacco prevention in 2014. $23,919 Average debt of Oregon’s problem gamblers seeking treatment. $31,068 Average household income of an Oregon problem gambler in treatments $2.5 billion Annual statewide health and economic cost of tobacco use in Oregon. J 25 percent Level to which Oregon funds tobacco prevention and education compared with the recommended level from the $4.1 million 64 percent Amount spent by t state of Oregon on probleir treatment and prevention, 30 percent Estimated reduction in pe r capita cigarette consumpion Oregon would see withbr 1Q years if it funded tobacco tie GDC recommended levels..................... prevention and education programs at of Oregon problem gamblers in treatment are at risk of suicide. Sources: Oregon Lottery, Oregon Heatlh Authority and the 2614 Gambling Program Evaluation Report I 1 Source: The Oregon Health Authority, Oregon Public Health Division