Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Street roots. (Portland, OR) 1998-current | View Entire Issue (Sept. 13, 2013)
Street roots Sept. 13, 2013 CHANGING from page 4 percent from what it was. And that that number will be 30 percent by mid-century. That’s pretty profound, if you think about it. That s pretty much the most basic measure of what humans need to do, have to do, want to do. For somebody who can just escape into an air-conditioned office and sit in front of a computer, it’s not as immediate. But for people who are on the streets or who are in a Bengali field, Liberian market garden, or on a plantation at work, it’s harder than it used to be. S.Z.: In your April 2013 piece in the Warriors, traditional warriors from every country, had the slogan “We’re not drowning, we’re fighting.” You should Google it because the videos of these guys are amazing. They’re in as tough a situation as it gets. They’re in poor countries to begin with, a couple of meters above sea level. They understand that they have to reach out. They can’t do it by themselves so that’s why they’re involved in big global network like 350.org. S.Z.: You founded 350.org. Tell me about the organization. Rolling Stone, “The Fossil Fuel Resistance” B.M.: It was designed by necessity to fit you referenced a study from the University of with the world in which we now live. It’s Delaware from December that showed that by dispersed. We run these big days of action 2030 “we could affordably power the nation where we’ll have 5,000 99.9 percent of the demonstrations in time on renewable 5,000 places around energy.” Why doesn’t the globe. We leverage every home and those to make them business in America ^Radicals w ork at o il more than the sum of utilize solar and wind companies« T b e /re w illin g their parts. We’ve power? been quite successful to alter chemical in the educational B.M.: Because the com position of the bent. I think we’ve had system that we have atmosphere even though we about 20,000 makes it difficult to now fatow it has melted the demonstrations. make this transition. In the last couple of The thing that makes A rctic and It w ill i o l^OOO sure that system other te rrib le things« Mo '60s years, we’ve tried hard to also take that never changes is the radical had am bitions education and make it enormous fossil fuel r* anywhere near that big. really tell, make it industry. Their really turn into some political power and kind of power. So their ability to force we’ve fought very hard the status quo into a on this fight over the kind of stalemate are Keystone Pipeline. profound. That’s why we fight hard against the fossil fuel industry in an effort to break that stalemate. S.Z.: What’s the significance of the number 350? S.Z.: Germany set a fantastic example recently. B.M.: Yeah Germany, having been responsible for more than its share of 20th century woes, is doing it’s best to step up and solve some of this century’s biggest problem. It really is impressive to go there. There are, by last count, more solar panels in Bavaria than there are in the United States. This in a country that really isn’t well known for its sun. Very few people set out for their sun soaked vacation on the shores of Ulrich, Germany. S.Z.: For which geographic locations is it too late in terms of climate change? B.M.: I’m uncomfortable announcing doom for everybody because everybody everywhere (in the world) is trying really hard and nobody wants to think of themselves as a victim. Our friends that we work with a lot on the islands of the Pacific Nation of the Indian Ocean are adamant. They did a great day of action this spring across the Pacific Island. B.M .: 350 is probably the most important number in the world, but nobody knew it until about 2008. That’s when our premier climate scientist Jim Hansen and his team at NASA published a paper saying we now know how much carbon in the atmosphere is too much. Any value for the CO2 greater than 350 parts per million is not compatible to the planet on which civilization developed and to which life on earth is adapted. Yikes! We took that number (as our name) because we wanted to dramatize how serious the problem was. We are already past 350. We are past 400 this year. That’s why the Arctic (glacier) is melting. But we also needed a name that would work around the globe and Arabic numerals do that. People around the globe now understand that we’re too high. We have too much carbon in the atmosphere. S.Z.: Not only that, but as I understand it, the resources that governments have that they are planning to use far exceed anything viable. B.M.: If we did what governments have currently announced they are planning to do, that number will reach 550, 650 parts per million in our lifetime. At the moment, as a planet, we’re not planning a serious response to climate change. S.Z.: You are one of the few employees of (demand). Radicals work at oil companies. They’re willing to alter chemical composition of the atmosphere even though we now know it has melted the Arctic and it will do 1,000 other terrible things. No '60s radical had ambitions anywhere near that big. 350.org that is over 30 years old. S.Z.: The efforts you have led, or B.M. There are only a few of us. And I’m not an employee - I’m a volunteer. S.Z.: Why the focus on youth? B.M. That’s just where we started. 350 started (with) myself and 700 graduates of Middlebury College in Vermont - which is where I hang out. And they now run the whole operation. Basically, they always did. They’ve just kept hiring young people, mostly because we don’t have much in the way of money. But also because our style and way of organizing is, as I said, very dispersed and young people have an almost visceral understanding of the connected world because they grew up with the Internet in a way that I didn’t. So they are aware of the possibilities. It doesn’t daunt them as it would have daunted me to have to go out and be in Vermont at the age of 22 and figure out how to organize all of East Asia by yourself — 1,000 demonstrations in the course of a year. They have a sense of the world that allows them to do that. S.Z.: What kind of footprint do the electronic devices that we covet and use and own leave on the planet? B.M.: More than they need to. And we can design them more efficiently. But, in general, they are pretty good substitutes. For instance, you can do a 1,000 Google searches with the amount of energy that it takes you to drive your car about half a mile. Learning to travel via mouse rather than car or plane would be a big improvement. S.Z.: Civil disobedience. You are borrowing a page from history and the civil rights movement. Tell me a bit about some of the actions that you have been a part of. B.M.: It’s one tool in the activist toolkit. As with all tools, you don’t want to overuse them because they become dull. We pulled off what was the largest civil disobedience action in this country in 30 years when we did the first round of arrests around the Keystone XL Pipeline. It was very civil, civil disobedience. Everybody was in dress or jacket and tie. One of the reasons was we wanted to show that this was a big, powerful moral issue. At the same time, we wanted to demonstrate that we were not radicals in any way. I mean, all we’re asking for is a planet that works a little bit like the one that all human beings know about - all human beings of the last 10,000 years, which is how far back our history goes. That’s really not a radical demand. It’s pretty much a conservative participated in, have been responsible for the stalling and blocking of the Keystone XL Pipeline. B.M.: So f a r ... S.Z.: So far. Then there is Enbridge and the Eastern Gulf Pipeline and another Trans Canada project that was announced recently to bring a pipeline East across Canada. B.M.: I don’t think they are going to get any of these built. I certainly don’t think they will get any of them built without huge opposition. They’ll keep trying. There are trillions of dollars of crude up there in Alberta. So Koch Brothers, et. al., will keep trying to make their investments pay off. But they are being fought at every turn. The Canadians have already beaten the only other pipeline that had any other real chance of being built. The so-called, Northern Gateway Pipeline. The rest are just proposals on paper someplace. And there is a huge, sprawling coalition of indigenous people that are involving all of the rest of us and making life hard (for the fossil fuel proponents) at every turn. We can’t, however, just play defense against bad projects. We also have to fight offense against this industry. We have a big divestment campaign, which is spread widely. S.Z. What does our future look like, in your opinion, 100 years from now if we do nothing? B.M.: Hot and damp and pretty miserable. Basically, our civilization will be mostly in a kind of an emergency response mode. S.Z.: And if we take climate change seriously? B.M.: Hopefully what it looks like is a much more localized world - with dispersed energy instead of centralized energy. That’s a beautiful, much more democratic kind of world. S.Z.: What can the average person do to make change on a small, but meaningful level to address climate change in his or her community? B.M.: They can organize. S.Z.: What about the naysayers? B.M.: This is why we have science. We are able to study and look at what all of the thermometers tell us around the world. That’s the useful thing about science.