Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Street roots. (Portland, OR) 1998-current | View Entire Issue (Jan. 18, 2013)
Street roots 4 Jan. 18, 2013 KOTEK, from page 1 services across the board - programs for seniors, safety net services, TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) - all those things that have taken significant cuts. It’s the usual - how do we do it all with the little dollars we have? What I’m hoping we’re going to be able to do is a balanced approach to the budget that does make some changes to PER S, not probably to the depth some people are asking for, but we have a problem with PER S, so we have to fix some of that. We still have problems in our tax system. And the biggest issue for us is tax credits and tax giveaways. We just had the Nike conversation, and we’re frustrated about that. But how do we look at our tax credits and make them more fair? So we have to do more around tax credits and tax loopholes. And we need to look at government efficiencies. Until we do comprehensive tax reform, we’re never going to have all the dollars we need. J.Z.: W ho’s going to be the winners and losers at the end o f this session? T.K.: Middle-class Oregonians are going to win. And by middle-class I think working folks, I think it’s schools and kids and seniors. J.Z.: A n d who antes up? T.K.: I don’t think it’s an either/or. I think there are plenty of tax credits right now for businesses. It’s not about taking away from business; it’s about reinvesting in people. Because that helps business, it helps everybody. We’ve all been losing. We’ve all been suffering. Businesses complain. People have been out of work for three years. If we don’t have good livable communities where people have access to jobs, we’re in trouble. That’s where we have to focus. J.Z.: These programs - T A N F, fo r example - they’re not ju st cut-a-check assistance programs. They’re helping the person who takes care o f their grandmother so she doesn’t have to go into a n u rsin g home, fo r example. Are we going to see these services restored? T.K.: Even though we’re in a steady recovery, there’s still a lot of need out there. So if you look at how we prioritize dollars, the answer has to be yes. The caseload in TANF - these are parents with kids who have basically no income — is going up and up and up. They’re not going to succeed well in schools. They’re going to have a hard time getting back into the workforce. They can’t stay on the caseload forever. J.Z.: A n d it adds pressure to the schools ... T.K.: It adds pressure to the schools. People want government to spend the dollars wisely, and prioritize, but they also get prevention. That if we spend the money to get the family back to work, then they’re not going to be on assistance any more. Everybody for the last five years has either suffered from the economic downturn or knows somebody who did. So I like to think that that’s a new understanding of what the role of the public system is in terms of helping people when they’re down and out. I’d like to think that people have gone through this, they’re a little more sympathetic, they get that we have to help each other because they know what it’s like. J.Z.: That we’re a little wiser because it touched more people. T.K.: I would hope so. Because I do think we are in our own little worlds. Until you are living next to the foreclosed property, you didn’t realize there was a problem. That’s a rude awakening for people, even if it’s not you. Or you’ve had family members couch surfing at your place because they didn’t have housing. That’s why I think the next two years are critical. We can all go back to our little silos and talk about ‘I’ve got mine, everything’s fine.’ Or we say, what do we want the state to look like for everybody, and how do we build to a different future. We finally have some money, we’re not going to have enough, but more money to build again, and not just protect. right to refuse leasing to a Section 8 voucher recipient. T.K.: Right. We allow for a landlord to say “I don’t want to take someone with a that’s showing up in my emergency rooms is homeless individuals, maybe I should get them housed. If they’re housed and they have supportive services, they’re not going to show up in the emergency department, which is very expensive. So we’ve given CCO s the flexibility to say, “What I don’t need are emergency rooms, but what I need is housing.” They could spend their money on housing. If they’re thinking ahead, they’re going to come back to social workers, or housing or getting people to their appointments. voucher.” We want to make the program work as well as it can for landlords. We’re trying to push housing authorities to make the program as flexible as possible so they want J.Z.: C a lls fo r tax reform permeated this to be a part of the program. But on the last election cycle. Are we going to see real tax other hand, you can’t just routinely reform come out o f this session? discriminate against someone just because they have a voucher. You at least have to T.K.: Probably not out of this session but J.Z.: I t ’s a labor issue sweeping the nation: take the application. the discussion is going to start. To do The other thing the bill is going to do is Are we going to become a “right-to-work” state comprehensive reform, you’ve got to go to recognize that there is a connection anytime soon? the voters. And the governor is sitting down between the housing authorities and the T.K.: If there was a different majority in with business leaders and labor leaders and state. The housing authorities are going to the house, I’m sure it would happen. It’s not pretty much the people who will bankroll have to report to the state on how their going to happen with a democratic majority anything that goes. H e’s trying to figure out Section 8 program is working. They don’t do if there is an agreement between those in the House. that now - there’s no connection. They The whole right to work movement is a groups. report to the feds. No one at the state has There will probably be a conversation political attempt to undermine the power of any idea what the housing authorities are about property taxes. Since we did property labor unions? Plain and simple. I’m a big doing. They get money from H U D , and then caps 15-20 years ago, we’re looking at how believer in labor unions. I believe in they run their programs. they’re affecting services and public schools. collective bargaining because it’s about We’re not trying to make it difficult on We’ll continue to review tax credits. All the having a right at the table to talk with your the housing authorities, but I think the state tax credits now have expiration dates so employer. In some cases it’s not even about should know: How’s your voucher program every two years a group of new tax credits how much you get paid, it’s about how you going? How many people are renting? How has to get reapproved. One of the biggest get treated in the work place. And I’m very many are returning them? If it takes three ones this year is the Earned Income Credit. supportive of continuing efforts to organize people to use one voucher in your program, It’s a good credit, but it costs money, so the the private sector, there certainly most of there’s a problem in your program. We want question is, can we afford to re-up it. the labor unions are public sector people to get housed right away when they I think whatever goes forward will have to employees. But the real challenge is in the get a voucher. have be a proposal that both business and private sector. The work that SE IU Local 49 Hopefully, we’re going to put some new labor can get with. If there’s going to be a does to organize janitors and facility people money into a new fund so that when people plan, it won’t happen until 2014. Because it here is really, really important. And it’s not are in a crisis, we keep them housed — has to go to the voters. It’s got to be an “us vs. them.” Business has a role. Labor before they become homeless. There is a something that can survive on the ballot if has a role. I ’d like to see more workers very, very limited pot of money for someone refers it. unionized. I think it’s beneficial - it trains emergency rental assistance. So maybe more leaders, there’s more engagement. somewhere down the line we talk about J.Z.: What will this legislative session having a state voucher program, similar to produce that will alleviate homelessness and J.Z.: The National Mortgage Settlement Section 8, but before we get there, we need improve access to affordable housing? delivered $29 m illion to the Oregon state more emergency rental dollars. It’s a lot government. It h a sn ’t all been spent, a n d in cheaper to keep them in the house they T.K.: I’ve been doing poverty and social fact only $12 m illion was p u t toward have than let them become homeless. justice work for decades in this state. I don’t mediation and related foreclosure efforts. What think the state has really been 100-percent do you say to affordable housing advocates who J.Z.: A n d studies show that fam ilies with focused on the housing issue. A lot of that is want to see this spent on affordable housing? children are a rapidly growing population done locally, but I understand that if am ong people experiencing homelessness, here individuals don’t have access to good T.K.: There was the money going back to an d nationally. housing, quality, affordable housing, if homeowners and the money that the state they’re ill they won’t get better, if they’re got. So when we were finalizing the budget, T.K.: The big piece for me is the students and they’re homeless, they can’t we did put some of it into housing homeless population among students. If learn in school. And yet we talk about health counselors and foreclosure legal assistance. your family is in crisis and you’re going to care and we talk about education, we talk I think some went back into the General lose your housing, you’re not going to show about all these things and we forget housing. Fund. I understand that advocates were up to school the next day. People say that So, my goal is to talk more about housing, upset that not all of it went to housing. there are all different kinds of populations, so that’s why you see that we now have a but I think we need to focus on families Human Services and Housing committee. J.Z.: Is that money gone from affordable right now, and keep them stable so their We’ve never really had a committee where housing concerns at this point? kids c,an stay in school. To me it’s a we know where housing bills are going to connection with the success we want to see T.K.: I don’t know. go. We do now in the House. in schools. And I represent North Portland The governor has put a renewed - I have a very high poverty set of schools. J.Z.: A n d the m ediation bureau h a sn ’t been emphasis on poverty, which I really They’re not going to graduate if they’re not as engaged as expected. appreciate. In his budget, the one agency in school, and that’s the goal. So the that handles housing at the state level, the T.K.: The banks have refused to housing piece is an educational goal, Oregon Housing and Community Services, keeping kids housed and families stable. participate in the program. The goal of the is now going to go through an evaluation. foreclosure legislation was to give people They’re starting a public conversation on J.Z.: The previous legislature set up the the opportunity to have a face-to-face what the agency should look like. Right now new M edicaid delivery system with coordinated conversation with their lender - if they’re they do the affordable Housing Trust Fund care organizations. How much control do you pursuing a foreclosure outside the court and some of the safety net services through have to tweak those organizations to system. And then the M E R S ruling came community action agencies. Over the next incorporate housing and other supportive down, and the simultaneous fact that we’re two years, people are going to be talking services? saying you need to meet with people and about what is the role of state in housing. that M E R S ruling that if you had a house T.K.: If I’m a coordinated care Should it be in one agency? Should it be through M E R S, you had to go to the courts. organization handling the Medicaid divied up? What’s the goal? It’s a really big So the banks said, fine, they’re all doing population, and I haven’t talked about deal and one of the biggest conversations judicial foreclosures in the courts. housing, than I’m going to have a problem. that’s going to happen over the next couple If you want to keep your person on the of years. J.Z.: Which is an end-run around the health plan with a chronic condition and get mediation. them healthier, you make sure they’re J.Z.: A n d you introduced your H ou sin g housed, which is a really big issue for the Choice bill on Monday. T.K.: Yes. So the banking industry wants folks here. T.K.: To me, if you’re going to provide some changes on the mediation bill. They We said we’re going to give you an housing choice — and by choice we mean say a few changes to make it more feasible integrated pot of money, both physical and the ability of individuals to live close to for them to participate. I haven’t seen the mental health, and go serve your population. where they work, to where they want their changes yet, but I’m open to having it In prenatal care for example, only about 30 kids to go to school, closer to where they changed so more people can get the non percent of the women who are on the can afford the services that they need — judicial process. I am not going to give up Oregon Health Plan who are pregnant, only than we have to make sure there’s more with the fact that people should have a righ 30 percent have had prenatal care their first choice. And one of the ways we do that is to be face-to-face with their agent. The trimester. We’ve got to fix that because we the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher banks should be sitting down with their deliver half the babies in this state through program. It’s not our program, but it’s the homeowners and trying to get them into a the OHP. If only 30 percent are getting largest housing program in the state, that better situation. Right now, the biggest prenatal care, what’s wrong with that the state has nothing to do with it. problem we have is people don’t know picture? / CCOs: we’re going to give them a budget. J.Z.: Other than it allows a landlord the If I’m the head of a CC O , and the population See KOTEK, page 5