Image provided by: Silverton Country Historical Society; Silverton, OR
About Torch of reason. (Silverton, Oregon) 1896-1903 | View Entire Issue (June 28, 1900)
T H E TORCH OF REA SO N , SIL V E R T O N , OREGON, JU N E 28, 1900. for the favour of her param our, produced by thoughts, though dim Says Mommsen, “ a wager m ight and confused, of this power with its be made th a t the more lax a creative and sustaining and its de woman was, the more piously she structive forces, seem to me as BY B. F. UNDERWOOD. w orshipped Isis.” A Rom an youth fundam ental and a6 universal as T he editor of the Free Church entreated H ercules to hasten the an y th in g we can discover in the re Record sends me a copy of I)r. Ab death of a rich uncle th a t he m ight ligions of the world. Dr. Abbot bot’s essay on “ S ectarianism ,” or inherit his fortune. Today m ulti- says: “ In precise phrase U niversal Inclusiveness and Exclusiveness in ' tudes continue in wrongdoing, he« S p iritu al Religion is the genus of R eligion,” with a request th at I re lieving th a t by the C hristian atone- which Special H istorical Religions m ent, by the death of C hrist, they are sim ply the various ‘species’ ” view the work. I recognize the earnest sp irit, th e will escape the n atu ral consequences This being so we can hardly more ability and lofty thought of the of their crim es and vices. A bank- expect these different religious spe- essay, and concur in its practical ru p t salvation scheme is the very, cies to come together in common •coiclusions and main purpose, but essence of the C hristian theology, I work or for a common purpose than I I am not prepared to accept u n Says Dr. SchafT (in the Princeton we can hope, th at the different spe- qualifiedly the au th o r’s definition Review of September, 1879), “ The cies of the zoological world will tv er of religion or all his theoretical negroes are very religious by na- co-operate in a common m oral aim . ture, and infidelity is scarcely Yet we may indulge the hope th at conceptions based thereon. In stead of saying th a t religion, known am ong them , but their in the remote future the more a d as it is known historically and sci m oral sense of honesty and chas vanced system s and the more en entifically, is “ actually living up tity is w eak.” Dr. W illis, Spin lightened sects of th e religious w ard ” or is “ m an’s effort to perfect oza’s biographer, referring to the w orld—aud this is probably w hat him self,” I am disposed to regard association of religion w ith crim e Dr. A bbot m eans— will unite in an religion as an expression of m an’s and im m orality (as well as the effort to com bine the highest m or relation to the Cosmos, or to the highest m oral excellences), says: ality with the most ratio n al in te r “ The piety— the religion— displayed pretation of n atu ra l phenom ena, Cause or Basis of all phenom ena. Religion begins with m an’s feel is a perfectly tru th fu l m anifesta including the life and thought of ing of dependence upon the power tion of the em otional elem ent in m an, though the patience of [a] god which causes and sustains hum an the n atu re of m an, which seeks and is needed to base practical, effort on life. Feeling precedes thought, and finds satisfaction in acts im plying the expectation of such a realiza it is prim ary in religion. I t is m ere intercourse with Deity, but neither tion. M eanwhile, the Free Church ly anim al. L ater come emotions seeks nor finds satisfaction in acts of Tacoma, and all other free re which result from reflection, from of honesty and virtuous life in the ligious societies, have sufficient rea recognition of the unseen cause or world. We have here an e x p la n a son for their existence and for the causes of phenom ena, with the cor tion of how it happens th a t our “ strenuous effort” to support their responding impressions. As seen penitentiaries are filled with the work, in the urgent need of educa today, religion is fund am en tally a ' worst sort of crim inals, whose lives, tive and directive influence during predisposition to worship, to rever prior to the detection of their the present transition from the theo ence the unseen cause of phe crim es, were characterized by em logical to the scientific, ethical and nom ena; and secondarily, a body inent piety and a strict regard for rational stage of th o u g h t.— [Free Church Record. or system of doctrine in regard to religious observance.” Often religious belief is strong, the unseen and unknow n. Ac cording to the doctrine of evolu and religious feeling, the devotional For the Torch of Reason. Church U nity. tion, religion, both as a predispo disposition, is dom inant in persons sition and as a belief, is experiential whose m oral nature is but little BY F. S. MATTESON. — is a product of observation and developed or perverted. Says Lange: “ U nusual piety is reflection, and also of heredity. If The Legal Adviser of May, 1900, m an was evolved from the anim al, iu the popular eyes either genuine there was a time when m an was saintship or a wicked cloak for all printed in Chicago, 111., contains without religion, or when his relig tb a t is vile. For the psychological an article on “ Lines of Church ion was indistinguishable from the subtlety of the m ixture of genuine U nity,” which appears to me to be feelings and thoughts of the ap e religious em otion with coarseselfisli- a good subject to quote and com- like creature from which he as ness and vicious habits, th e o rd in a ry ment on. m ind has no ap p reciatio n .” T h at “ The Rev. Algernon Crapsey, cended. W hether religion is universal which is universal in religion is not, rector of St. A ndrew ’s (P ro t. E pis.) am ong men today depends, as L u b it seems to me, thinking, feeling and church, Rochester, N. Y., is the bock observes, upon the definition living upw ard, so much as the re- au th o r of a pam phlet on church cognition of power above m an and unity, in an appendix to which he given to religion. F ear and desire to escape the beyond his control, to w h i'h ’ ? form ulates the lines along which pains and perils of life were most sustains a relation of dependence, he believes such union m ight, and prom inent in the early religious Religion is but one of the m any should, proceed. These lines are life of man. L ater the moral n a elem ents which unite to com plete quoted, with approbation, in the ture and with it the social ideals the complex n atu re of m an; and ‘Ascension Record,’ the editor of and the higher moral and spiritual the extent to which it infuses or is which is the Rev. Percy G ran t, sec- asp iration appeared. These were intim ately associated with m oral retary and com panion of Bishop m erely “ p o ten tial” iu prim itive thought, feeling and conduct, is Potter in a recent oriental to u r.' m an. W hen religion is defined by determ ined by the moral develop- They are as follows: M atthew A rnold as “ m orality m ent and education of individuals “ F irst. S ubordination of the touched by em otion,” or by M ar- and nations. If man is an evolved Official organization of the church, tineau as the “ cu lm in atin g m erid product of the m odifications of low- from the highest to the lowest of ian of m orals,” or by Abbot as the er forms of life, both m orality and its m em bers, to the church itself, “ effort of m an to perfect him self,” religion have existed in every stage as practiced in the prim itive the higher aspects of religion only of prograss; and both m ust have church, as decreed by the W estern are considered. Neither in thought been developed from conditions Church in the Council of Constance, nor in conduct are religion and which are regarded as unm oral and and as affirmed by the principles of m orality necessarily connected. In unreligious. the P rotestant R eform ation.” ancient Rome the thief prayed for A feeling of weakness, of depend- Here is direct legislation: Church success in his contem plated crim e ence upon the power m anifested iu governm ent by and of the people. and the adulteress im plored Venus , the world, and later the em otions The priestly, autocratic regime of Dr. Abbot’s Definition hgion. of Re. m odern C h ristian ity appears to be wearing out and to need m ending, and the second proposition points to the patch to put on. “ Second. The pastoral, rath er th an the priestly, conception of the m in istry .” T h at is, more of a feeding care taker and less of a shearing “ boss.” It would appear th a t the “ sheep” are beginning to th in k . And then the Rev. Algernon Crapsey, rector, etc., gets off th is surprising propo sition as his “ th ird ly .” ‘ T h ird . T he statem ent of C hris tian doctrine so th a t it will be in accord with the facts of the visible universe, as these are discovered and form ulated by the process of inductive th o u g h t.” Here is an adm ission th a t C hris tian doctrine does not accord with the facts of the visible universe. C onsequently, either th eir Bible is not “ inspired,” or else they, or their God, has made a blunder which it has become necessary to rectify. B ut if C hristians accept the views of F reeth in k ers, the la t ter will not object. B ut the “ fo u rth ly ” of the Rev. Algernon Crapsey is a stunner. “ F o u rth . T he statem ent of C hristian doctrine so th a t it will not conflict with the great prim al instincts of the hu m an heart, the in stin cts for justice, mercy and tru th . No m an will be compelled to believe such a doctrine as th a t of everlasting punish m en t as tau g h t by St. A ugustine, or th e doctrine of predestination as tau g h t by John C alvin.” This is Secularism , pure and sim ple, as far as it goes. But please note the adm ission th at “ C hristian doctrine” does “conflict w ith the great prim al instincts of the hum an h eart (m ind), the in stinct for justice, mercy and tru th .” Aud the “ d o ctrin e” of the “ fall of m a n ” is a fraud. The “ doctrine” of “ to tal d e p ra v ity ” is a deception and a snare; and all th is “ redem p tio n ” preachee-preachee is only a “ dam ned barren ideality.” Surely these preachers should be “ a class of meu widely renowned for breadth of cheek and strength of gall. T ru ly , the n a tu ra l “ great primal in stin cts of the hum an heart (m ind) are for justice, mercy and tru th , and alw ays were and are so wherever the pernicious and de m oralizing “ C hristian doctrine” has not perverted them . C hristi anity has m uch to answ er for. But the Rev. A lgernon C rapsey’s “ fifthly” is a paralyzer. “ F ifth. Absolute intellectual free dom w ithin the church (w ait a m om ent, please, till I catch m y . breath), so th a t every opinion shall have a hearing (rest) and be taken for w hat it is w’o rth ; (hear, hear!) to have the force of its au th o r’s personal character, learning and wisdom; (bravo, bravo!) and to es tablish itself by its own tru th fu l ness or not at all.” (G reat ap plause.)