Image provided by: Clackamas Community College; Oregon City, OR
About The print. (Oregon City, Oregon) 1977-1989 | View Entire Issue (Jan. 18, 1984)
Sports Owings knows what it takes to be champion Even if he wanted, Larry Owings couldn’t shake his past. People still ask ques tions, and in wrestling circles he is still regarded as a sort of hero. Many remember him on ly as the guy who beat Olym pic wrestling champion Dan. Gable. But Owings is content to leave past glories behind and go on with life as a father, teacher, and assistant wrestl ing coach at Clackamas Com munity College. It’s been two decades since Owings began his wrestl ing career, a career that brought him to the nation’s headlines in 1970 after lie pin ned the undefeated Gable to claim the NCAA national championship at 142 pounds. Although he did not win another national title while at the University of Washington, he placed second twice before the competition in 1972. He has amassed an astounding career record of 322 wins, 20 losses, and one tie in two state high school championships, three Pacific 8 conference championships, two national Wrestling Federation titles as well as his NCAA ac complishments. Owings was born in Oregon City and grew up near Hubbard with four older brothers and two sisters. He was met with a challenge at an early age that motivated him to his future successes. All four brothers held state titles while wrestling at Canby High School, their full tally being eight championships. Owings said that he “just naturally fell into their steps.” “My older brothers always gave me a bad time and in fact, they spread the rumor that they had a brother coming up who wouldn’t be a wrestler,” he said. As a matter of sibling rivalry he set out to prove them wrong. A rocky freshman year in high school was almost his undoing until his coach helped him conquer what Owings termed a lack of confidence. “I kind of owe my wrestl ing career in a way to my high school coach, Larry Wright,” Owings said. The match with Gable, which ended in a 13-11 deci sion, has been called the greatest match in college wrestling history. It was the unseating of a three-time na tional champion with a 181-0 record by a relatively unknown wrestler. It’s also what Owings must tell about most often. But he now seems quite unmoved by it. “I don’t really look back at it and think about it that often,” he said. “It’s kind of hard for me to look back and think of it as a glorious thing. It was very glorious but I guess it’s difficult for me to accept that.” Although it’s an accepted assumption that Owings could have qualified for the 1972 Olympic team, he didn’t try out. The fact that he didn’t is puzzling to some, but Owings cites personal reasons for not doing so. “I didn’t go (to the Olym pics) in ’72 because after eight years of solid wrestling I was kind of burned-out, and plus I just graduated from college and didn’t have a job. I had a wife to support and a baby to be born any day so that was another consideration,” he said. “I can provide the coaching and the technique and on-the-mat experience,” he said of his role at the Col lege. “I’ve been in national competition before, I know what It takes.” “I just can’t seem to stay away from it,” Owings said. FORMER NATIONAL CHAMP— Larry Owings is considered by many to be Oregon’s greatest wrestling product. Owings now channels his energies into helping Norm Berney develop this school’s young wrestlers. Clark College defense crosses up Kiser 's crew By Doug Vaughan defense,” Kiser said. “It has to be tenacious. When you play good defense, it allows you to stay in the game even if your offense is not producing.” Of The Print Coach Royce Kiser’s team went to Clark Community College hoping to get revenge after losing to the Vancouver, Wash., team by five points earlier in the season. Their hopes were not fulfilled as the Clackamas Community Col lege Cougars dropped the game, 107-94. “We played very well but we had a 6 minute period in the latter first half which enabled them to gain a ten point lead, and we never could catch up,” Kiser said. The problems for the Cougars came when Clark switched from a man-to-man to a zone defense, Kiser said. Along with the switch in defense was a switch into a zone-trap press. “The switches took time to adjust to. Sometimes it takes a minute or two and that can be the game,” the coach said. “Once they built the lead up, that was the ball game.” Bob Nippert led the Cougars with a 26 point ef fort, even though he hit only 6 of 18 shots from the field. The sophomore forward made up for it at the line, hitting 12 of 14. He also added five re bounds. Assistant Coach Paul Fiskum noted the play of Mike Wednesday, January 18, 1984 With a lead of eleven at the intermission, Clark con trolled the tempo in the second half, but never pulled away. The Cougars cut the lead to eight at one point, but let it slip to 18 at another. “It was basically a 10-point game the second half. The 13 points they won by was because we had to go for the ball and committed some fouls,” Kiser said. The Cougars tried everything they could in the se cond half, but Clark, playing with extreme confidence after two consecutive 20-plus point wins over Mt. Hood and Chemeketa Community Col lege, would not budge. “We threw everything at them to cut the lead, but they adjusted to everything,” Kiser said. “You name it, we did it, but we could not overcome the ten point lead.” Kiser also noted the play of the Cougar backcourt in breaking the press, with a special note to point guard Doug Coffman. “Even though their (Clark) guards played better than ours, I still think they did an exceptional job,” Kiser said. The Cougars next com petition will be against the junior varsity squad from Lewis and Clark College, at home tonight, with tipoff at 7 p.m. Royce Kiser Peregrin, who gave his strongest performance of the season. Peregrin poured in 18 points while collecting 12 re bounds to anchor the front court for Clackamas. As a team, the Cougars shot a healthy 81 percent from the line hitting 17 of 21. Despite only connecting on 12 of 43 attempts from the field in the first half, the Cougars’ second half surge in offense brought their mark up to 42 percent. Kiser thought that the Cougars’ offense in the second half was excellent, but their defense did not allow them to catch up. “We have to play better Page 7