Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Northwest labor press. (Portland , Ore.) 1987-current | View Entire Issue (June 1, 2018)
PAGE 10 | June 1, 2018 | NORTHWEST LABOR PRESS ...Outside In staff vote overwhelmingly to join AFSCME From Page 1 health issues. Services include health care, drug treatment, tran- sitional housing assistance, job training, even tattoo removal. Today, the organization has grown to about 170 employees, and an annual budget of nearly $12 million. The effort to unionize picked up momentum in January, after workers formed an organizing committee and began working with Oregon AFSCME. The or- ganizing committee decided Oregon AFSCME was a good fit because it represents workers at similar nonprofits, including Transition Projects and Central City Concern. In February, committee mem- bers laid out what they’re seek- ing in a mission statement: “As workers at Outside In, we care deeply about our clients,” the statement says. “To that end, we are coming together to form a union and harness the power of collective bargaining to raise standards for the workers of Outside In and across the indus- try so that social service jobs can be good jobs with less turnover Last November, a violent attack at Portland homeless teen nonprofit Outside In laid bare the gulf between top management and front-line employees. and more stability for our clients. … We ask that our co-workers come together and stand with us in solidarity to fight for an open, compassionate and democratic workplace that values every in- dividual that comes in contact with our programs.” That client-focused message resonated with staff, says clinic operations assistant Eddie Charl- ton. “How you treat your care workers is a direct reflection of the value of the care you pro- vide,” Charlton said. “And turnover has become a hin- drance to the mission of our or- ganization.” “Below a supervisory level, there’s only a handful of people that were there when I started [two years ago],” Charlton told the Labor Press. “We’re losing time, money and resources con- stantly training new staff. And we have trouble hiring for posi- tions because they aren’t being listed at a market rate.” With the union campaign un- der way, Outside In executive di- rector Kathy Oliver announced plans to retire in June after 38 years. And she began sending emails to staff arguing against unionization. “Outside In’s leadership does not believe a union would ulti- mately benefit Outside In, its employees, and its clients,” Oliver wrote in a mid-March email to staff that was shared with the Labor Press. But a majority of the workers disagreed, and signed cards say- ing they wanted to join AF- SCME. Workers asked Oliver to voluntarily recognize their union; she declined. So on April 27, AFSCME asked the National Labor Rela- tions Board to schedule a union election. Though Oliver expressed her opinion in multiple emails to staff, Outside In didn’t hire union-busting consultants or wage a full-fledged anti-union campaign like many employers do. “I appreciated that they were pretty straightforward and did not spend client resources on consultants or attorneys,” said Oregon AFSCME organizer Doug Lantz. The union election took place May 15-16, and the result was an overwhelming 88 to 18 vote in favor of unionizing. The newly unionized unit will consist of about 125 workers in about 50 separate classifications — from physicians and psychi- atrists to bookkeepers and inter- preters. Alongside the vote to unionize, Outside In employees who hold advanced degrees also voted 21 to 7 to be in the same bargaining unit as their non-pro- fessional co-workers. Now the two sides will meet to negotiate a union contract. What do workers want to see in such an agreement? For starters, concrete emergency procedures, to allow people to react quickly. Better trainings for de-escalation, maybe even self defense courses. And better wages and regular wage in- creases — to curb staff turnover. “We’d like to create a contract with Outside In that allows us to retain our highly qualified work- ers,” Charlton says, “in order to more sustainably serve our clients.” ... Uber driver standards From Page 4 so at a moment’s notice we could be earning even less.” Drivers also have no recourse in the event of an unfair deactivation or other grievance, Christofferson said. “The TNCs have unilateral authority to determine our ability to work, and us as drivers have no ability to hold them account- able for their actions.” The commissioners then heard an hour of public testimony from taxi drivers feeling squeezed by the TNCs, from TNC drivers in Transportation Fairness Portland who support the resolution, and from TNC drivers wearing Lyft T-shirts who oppose it. Opponents said things are fine the way they are. Drivers can speak for themselves in dealing with Uber and Lyft and don’t need a city board or a union to speak for them, several said. Full-time TNC driver Douglas Wright, who’s driven for Uber and Lyft for six months, said he saw no need for an oversight body, even though he at times earned less than minimum wage when he started. Wright said he had no sympathy for any TNC driver complaining — if they don’t like it they should do some- thing else. That drew an ani- mated reaction from Commis- sioner Fish. “When I hear, and you’re not alone, people come before this body, and essentially say that the claims of other drivers are in- valid, and that they don’t need to have a forum to have those issues addressed, it almost sounds to me like the taxpayer who says ‘I’m never going to have a fire, so why do we have a fire bureau?’ … or maybe even Zsa Zsa Ga- bor’s first husband saying, ‘We love each other; I don’t need a pre-nup.” “I’m persuaded that TNC drivers do not have a meaningful voice in the workplace,” Fish said later, explaining his vote in favor of the resolution. “Corporations do a great job looking out for their own inter- ests,” added Commissioner Eu- daly. “Workers, whether they are employees or independent con- tractors. have a right to organize and advocate for their rights, and it’s our duty as elected represen- tatives to look out for their rights.” —Don McIntosh