Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Northwest labor press. (Portland , Ore.) 1987-current | View Entire Issue (Oct. 16, 2015)
NORTHWEST LABOR PRESS | October 16 , 2015 | PAGE 5 Oregon governor names IBEW 48’s Gary Young to Port Commission Young replaces ILWU’s Bruce Holte as one of two labor reps on the nine-member commission. Oregon Gov. Kate Brown has appointed IBEW Local 48 Busi- ness Manager Gary Young to a seat on the nine-member Port of Portland Commission. Young takes the spot that was held by former International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Local 8 Presi- dent Bruce Holte, whose second four-year term expired Aug. 1. The Port Commission sets policy and oversees manage- ment of the Port of Portland. Port of Portland runs the Port- land International Airport, four marine terminals, and several industrial parks. It’s a public agency supported by property taxes, and has a mission of re- gional eco- nomic devel- opment. Young was installed at the commis- sion’s Oct. 14 meeting (af- ter this issue went to Gary Young press). He’ll serve along- side Oregon AFL-CIO President Tom Chamberlain on a body that is otherwise peopled by business representatives. The Port of Portland is vitally important to organized labor, and not just to ILWU, which has about 500 members who load and unload ships. As a commer- cial property manager, the Port is a major employer of building trades union members. The Port is also landlord to numerous union manufacturing enterprises at the Swan Island Industrial Park, Rivergate Industrial Dis- trict and other industrial proper- ties. Hundreds of airline union members work at the airport. And about 30 IBEW Local 48 members work year-round maintaining equipment at the airport and at marine terminals. The Port has also been the site of several recent labor disputes. Service Employees International (SEIU), the Machinists union, ...Trans-Pacific Partnership From Page 1 site says. The public has only the ad- ministration’s word for that, for now. The text of the agreement will continue to be classified un- til it’s released in about a month. In his 2008 presidential cam- paign, Obama said he’d preside over the most transparent admin- istration ever. But his trade talks were even more secret than those of the Bush years. Almost everything about the talks was classified. Even members of Congress had to go to a special room just to see what the U.S. was proposing in the talks — and they weren’t allowed to take notes or pictures. What does Froman’s TPP web site say about that? “President Obama made the TPP negotiations the most trans- parent in American history.” Arthur Stamoulis is executive director of the labor-backed Cit- izens Trade Campaign in Wash- ington, D.C. Reached by phone, he chuckles wearily when asked if he thinks TPP has strong worker protections. “Nobody in labor is buying it,” Stamoulis says. Judging by the details so far released, Stamoulis says the claim of strong workers’ rights protections looks pretty flimsy for two reasons. First, TPP na- tions would commit to meet the core labor standards of the Inter- national Labor Organization, but TPP negotiators chose to define those standards by the broad principles of the ILO’s “Decla- ration on Fundamental Princi- ples and Rights at Work” — not the specific enforceable lan- guage of ILO Conventions. Sec- ond, it’s enforcement that mat- ters, not pretty promises. To protect foreign investor rights, TPP lets foreign investors sue governments directly in special dispute resolution panels. But workers and unions wouldn’t have a similar right to sue gov- ernments when they violate TPP worker rights provisions: Only governments can make those complaints. And the past record doesn’t inspire confidence, Sta- moulis says. The Bush Adminis- tration lauded CAFTA for its “enforceable” workers rights standards before it passed in 2005. Today CAFTA-signatory Guatemala is one of the dead- liest countries on earth for trade union organizers, and has faced no meaningful sanction under CAFTA. “We’ve heard it before: ‘Trust us; this is going to do a better job on labor and environment.’” Sta- moulis said. TPP is also said to be better for workers than past agree- ments because it would require countries — like Vietnam — to have a legal minimum wage; it doesn’t say how high, just that they have a law. “Can you imagine the Obama Administration going to PhRMA [the pharmaceutical in- dustry lobby group] and saying this is a good agreement because we require them to have patent laws?” Stamoulis said. And there are other reasons besides weak worker protections to oppose TPP, Stamoulis said. Its Investor-State Dispute Reso- lution process would create in- centives to offshore. Its govern- ment procurement rules would seriously limit efforts to buy American or buy local. And its rules-of-origin provisions are worse than those of NAFTA — it would treat autos as “Japanese made,” even when they have lots of Chinese parts. “We already know enough to oppose the TPP,” Stamoulis said. “It’s going to offshore jobs and drive down wages.” UA Local 290 to politicians: Which side are you on? A resolution passed by members of Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 290 asks members of Congress to oppose TPP. “The world cannot afford a ‘NAFTA of the Pacific,’” the resolution declares. “There- fore … be it resolved, our organization will not endorse, fund or support any candidate for political office that votes for … the TPP.” After the TPP was final- ized, Local 290 members delivered copies of the resolution to the Vancouver offices of U.S. Senators Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray and Congresswoman Jaime Herrera-Beutler. See the resolution on- line at bit.ly/1jZhpaw and UNITE HERE have waged organizing campaigns among airport workers. And SEIU and UNITE HERE have called on the Port Commission to raise workplace standards — though without nearly the success simi- lar campaigns have had at other major West Coast airports. Meanwhile, ILWU and the Port itself have been at odds over the union’s dispute with ICTSI — the company the Port contracted with to manage Ter- minal 6. ILWU is accused of or- chestrating a workplace slow- down at Terminal 6. That contributed to shippers Hanjin and Hapag-Lloyd pulling out of the terminal, which ended nearly all container shipping in Portland. On Sept. 24, the Na- tional Labor Relations Board in Washington, D.C., upheld a 2013 administrative law judge’s ruling that ILWU committed an unfair labor practice when it en- couraged the slowdown and took other actions targeting ICTSI. ILWU is reportedly planning to appeal the decision in federal circuit court. Despite those frictions, Holte says he was honored to be part of the Port Commission, one of the highlights of his life. He said he takes pride in Port accom- plishments he was part of, in- cluding the building of a new Port of Portland headquarters, and installation of new baggage and de-icing systems. ...Health costs rising faster than wages From Page 1 grew between 1999 and 2005. The average annual pre- mium for single coverage is $6,251, of which workers on average pay $1,071 ($89 a month). The average family premium is $17,545, with workers on average contribut- ing $4,955 ($413 a month). That means workers contribute on average 18 percent of the premium for single coverage and 29 percent for family cov- erage. Those percentages have remained about the same since 2000. There are still some workers who don’t pay out-of- pocket for the employer-pro- vided coverage: 16 percent of covered workers with single coverage and 6 percent of cov- ered workers with family cov- erage work for a firm that pays 100 percent of the premium. The deductible Since 2010, both the share of workers with deductibles and the size of those deductibles have increased sharply. About 81 percent of covered workers today are in plans with a gen- eral annual deductible. And since 2010, deductibles have risen almost three times as fast as premiums and about seven times as fast as wages and in- flation. For single coverage, average deductibles were $584 in 2006, $917 in 2010, and $1,318 in 2015. Co-pay and coinsurance Of covered workers who are admitted to a hospital, about 65 percent pay coinsurance (a percentage), while about 14 percent pay a copayment. The coinsurance rates average 19 percent. The copayment aver- ages $308 per hospital admis- sion. The same goes for visits to a primary care physician of- fice. There, 68 percent of cov- ered workers have a copay- ment, averaging $24; and 23 percent have coinsurance, av- eraging 18 percent. Goodbye to retiree coverage Of large firms (200 or more workers) that offer health ben- efits to their employees, just 23 percent offer retiree coverage in 2015. That’s down from 66 percent in 1988, and 34 per- cent in 2006. ONLINE EXTRA See the complete report online at http://kaiserf.am/1iKCViK