Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Just out. (Portland, OR) 1983-2013 | View Entire Issue (Dec. 16, 2005)
DECEMBER 16, 2005 JUStpUt 21 The crowd raises a glass at Basic Rights Oregon's anniversary party. A Year in Marriage Rights across the country and across the globe by Bob Roehr his is the decade of marriage for supporters attend hearings on the measure, the sexual minorities communi and no one believes its chance of passage has ty. And while the roller coaster of improved since the votes in Congress last year ups and downs was not quite as fell short. But look for the rabid right to push rapid or dramatic as last year, it for a vote next year in an attempt to use it as a came as no surprise that the issue contin cudgel during the midterm elections. T ued to dominate the news of 2005. Texas joined the swarm of states amending Spain grabbed the headlines when the their constitutions to ban gay marriage when ruling Socialist Party moved to legalize gay 76 percent of voters in a low-turnout special marriage. The Vatican threw a hissy fit election in November said yes. It did not sur even ordered the cardinals into the street prise those who knew that Texas continued to along with the faithful. But that didn’t deter ban interracial marriage and sodomy until the the Cortes, which overrode a veto by the upper chamber at the end of June, and lavender wedding bells began to ring July 3. U.S. Supreme Court said those practices were From left, Multnomah County Commissioners Lisa Raito, Maria Rojo de Steffey and Serena Cruz toast couples celebrating their first anniversaries in March. In Canada, the 2003 court ruling in unconstitutional. The message was more mixed from some other parts of the country. In February, Ontario in favor of same-sex marriage spread to other provinces, encompassing a Manhattan court ruled that the law prohibiting same-sex marriage violated the the entire nation by July 20. The vote of no confidence for the governing liberal due process and equal protection clauses of the New York Constitution, but an coalition has resulted in national elections scheduled for Jan. 23, and social con appeals court reversed that in December. All parties have long believed that the servatives are sure to crank up their rhetoric against gay marriage in an attempt matter will be resolved only by the state’s highest court, on final appeal. to score points with the voters. However, polls suggest Canadians on the whole have adapted rather well to the idea of gay marriage. California seemed on the brink of enacting gay marriage when the Legislature, after much political maneuvering and arm-twisting, passed the measure in The United Kingdom has taken a slower approach with civil partnerships, which September. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed it, leaving the matter to the courts. are virtually indistinguishable from civil marriage, for same-sex couples. The meas A San Francisco judge had struck down the ban as having no rational basis in a rul ure finally made it through the House of Lords late last year and received a nod ing in March, and that is wending its way through the appeals process. from the queen. In February the government said it would take effect Dec. 21. New Jersey and Washington also have marriage cases in the appeals process. South Africa is set to become the first nation on that continent to authorized The Connecticut Legislature tried to defuse the pressure for marriage by pass same-sex marriage. The Constitutional Court, the highest in the nation, has incre ing domestic partnership legislation. The response from the community has been mentally increased the rights of same-sex couples and ruled Dec. 1 that it is un tepid; most gay and lesbian couples appear to be waiting for the real thing. constitutional to deny the right to marry to gay people. Eleven judges ordered The Massachusetts beachhead of marriage equality continued to deepen and Parliament to amend marriage laws within the next year to include gays; the 12th strengthen. Even politicians opposed to the idea began to soften after more than a would have imposed the change immediately. year in which thousands of gay and lesbian couples had wed. Marriage traveled a decidedly rockier road in the United States in 2005, though A September joint meeting of the Legislature, sitting as a constitutional conven at a modulated pace from the year before. It lacked both the exhilaration of wed tion, took a second look at a proposed state constitutional amendment to ban gay ding ceremonies at San Francisco City Hall and the ensuing morning-after legal marriage and decided to reverse itself and vote it down. That didn’t stop right-wing clampdown in that city and elsewhere. opponents who have submitted petitions to get the issue on the ballot in 2008. But The renamed Marriage Protection Amendment to the Constitution, to ban gay marriage, is a political zombie—dead but still somehow moving. Not even its When an ordinary Realtor simply won’t do... that has bought time, and polls show that public opinion is consistently moving to favor allowing gay marriages to continue. __ ffl SJ 3144 SE Belmont Portland, OR 97214 office: 503-238-7617