Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Just out. (Portland, OR) 1983-2013 | View Entire Issue (April 18, 2003)
hat exactly does sexual oriental tion have to do with war? Nothing, really, except that it does lend itself to some amusing innuendoes. (Insert your favorite rocket launcher and/or “Lick Bush” joke here.) Seriously, though, it stands to reason that the gay rights movement has crossed paths with the peace movement. Both are concerned with achieving justice for all, whether you’re a queer student killed in a Midwest hate crime or an Iraqi mother killed in a Mideast war crime. According to a nationwide survey conduct ed in February, only 31 percent of sexual minority adults have confidence that the White House will “make the right decisions” regarding the use of U .S. troops in Iraq. (Het- ero support was twice that amount.) More than two-thirds of queer respondents believe Presi dent Bush prefers a war rather than trying to achieve his main goals without a military attack. (Barely half o f the straight folks felt the same way.) Last month the Am erican Friends Service Com m ittee and N ational Youth Advocacy Coalition released the issue brief “ Is O ppos ing the War an L G B T Issue?” T he publica tion examines the side effects o f the U .S. response to terrorism— racial profiling, a crackdown on immigration, loss o f privacy rights— and concludes that “ if ever there were a time for L G B T organizations to under stand, speak out against and resist the vio lence of law enforcement and militarization, that time is now.” Locally, several queer groups have taken official stances against the war: Basic Rights Oregon, Pride at Work Oregon, Love Makes Sexual minorities community reacts to the conflict in Iraq by Jim Radosta a Family and the Lesbian Community Proj ect. N ation al organizations such as the N ational G ay and Lesbian Task Force and Soulforce also are lending their voices to the push for peace. Although these nonprofits might he stray ing from their mission statements by publicly opposing the war, they are part of a growing trend in the gay rights movement to work in “coalition” (not that coalition— the good kind) with others in seeking common goals. For example, last year’s Creating Change confer ence in Portland addressed racism— not a queer-specif ic issue, hut a prob lem that activists believe must he tackled in order to build bridges with like-minded progressives. rank Dixon serves as co- chairman of the Basic Rights Ore gon hoard, which voted Feb. 26 to join the Win With out War coalition. The gay man— who spent 20 years in the U.S. Army Reserve, retiring as a major— also is F involved in Veterans for Human Rights, a non profit formed in 1992 to promote equality for active, reserve and veter an members of the U.S. Armed Forces. D ixon supported B R O ’s decision because o f the “radical nature” o f President Bush’s insis tence on ignoring the U .N . inspection process and launching a pre em ptive strike on a Frank Dixon nation. He says this type o f foreign policy runs counter to U .S. military tradition. “That was a close call," he admits. “But this was, in my mind, a dramatic turning point in the country and potentially has ramifications for years for the gay and lesbian community.... You can't morally justify war in that manner, and I think over the long run it’s a very dan gerous place for the United States to be in terms of foreign policy and its relationship with the rest of the world.... Who knows what’s next. There’s Korea...Iraq, Iran. Where is it gonna end?” Dixon says the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist at tacks created an atmosphere that allowed oppor tunistic politicians to exploit the fears of U.S. citizens. Now that the war is under way, he pre dicts people will he pressured to remain silent. “There is a strong tendency on the part of Am ericans to just sort o f circle the wagons