Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Just out. (Portland, OR) 1983-2013 | View Entire Issue (Jan. 16, 1998)
just out ▼ January 16, 1998 ▼ 13 On hold Plans to institute HIV names reporting in Oregon have met with a few snags by Inga Sorensen regon health officials have scrapped a plan, at least temporarily, to re quire the names of people who test positive for HIV to be reported to the Oregon Health Division and county health departments. “Let’s say the proposal is on the shelf for an undetermined period of time,” says Steve Modesitt, manager of OHD’s HIV surveillance section. He cites pending personnel shifts at OHD and some negative community feedback on the plan as reasons for the decision. Modesitt, along with Dr. Anthony Marfin, the state’s HIV/STD medical epidemiologist, had publicly touted the proposal, speculating it would have painted a more accurate portrait of the disease’s reach and provided an opportunity to get needed care to more people who test positive. The plan generated heated opposition from many community activists, AIDS service organi zations and civil rights groups, though, all of whom expressed concerns about possible confi dentiality breaches and increased discrimination. To further complicate matters, since Just Out first reported on the plan on Nov. 21, Marfin has announced his intentions to leave OHD. A search is currently underway for his replacement. “[Marfin] wrote the actual proposal and he’s since decided he’s leaving,” says Modesitt, add ing that the issue will likely be placed on hold for several months until someone new is installed in Marfin’s place and “can lead the way on this.” OHD had initially hoped to have a county health endorsed proposal by January, and wanted to see a plan implemented by April. Now that timeline is history. “We still think names reporting is the way to go,” says Modesitt, who nonetheless admits OHD’s process in gathering community input and nurturing support was less than stellar. “Maybe if we had talked with people earlier about why we needed this, it would have made a difference,” he says. “This has been an educa tional process for us.... I think it’s not a bad idea that we back off for a while and ask people what they want.” O A « "or Prevention’s HIV/AIDS surveillance branch, along with Lawrence O. Gostin, a director of the Georgetown University-Johns Hopkins Univer sity Program on Law and Public Health, and A. Cornelius Baker, executive director of the Na tional Association for People with AIDS, a lead ing constituency group based in Washington. Each state must report AIDS cases. But until now, many states, including Oregon, have re frained from widespread reporting efforts for people with HIV. The authors said in the article that the advent of more promising treatments for HIV disease makes it imperative to better track HIV infections and link people to care. They argued that because fewer people are progressing to AIDS, AIDS data is no longer an accurate gauge of HIV prevalence. They wrote: “Unless we revise our surveil lance system, health authorities will not have reliable information about the prevalence, inci dence and future directions of HIV infection, the kinds of behavior that currently increase the risk of HIV transmission, or the heightened impact on specific subpopulations, such as racial and ethnic minorities and women. To correct these deficits, we propose all states require HIV case reporting.” The CDC reportedly planned to release rec ommendations early this year about whether the he issue exploded into the public conscious names of people with HIV should be reported to ness back in October, following the publi health departments. cation of an article in the New England Journal of Medicine that proposed a national The CDC can’t force states and cities to com ply with its recommendations, because it is not a system of mandatory HIV names reporting. The regulatory agency. However, it provides funding piece was authored by Dr. John W. Ward, chief of for most AIDS surveillance efforts, and could the federal Centers for Disease Control and T "(I piede fa (W1 information to contact those with HIV to offer assistance in obtaining medical and social support. Both in Oregon and nationally, opponents of names reporting voiced myriad concerns. For example, on the same day the New England Jour nal of Medicine article was released the American Civil Liberties Union issued a 22-page document entitled “HIV Surveillance and Name Reporting: A Public Health Case for Protecting Civil Liber ties,” which blasted HIV names reporting and argued that such a plan would undermine both public health and civil liberties. The report concluded that HIV names report ing would discourage a significant portion of the public from being tested, thereby hampering HIV tracking. Additionally, the ACLU found that legal protection against HIV discrimination was far from secure, despite the passage a few years back of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. “In sum, the fears that drive people away from HIV testing with names reporting are not ground less. To eliminate them, we need more than edu include such a requirement as a condition of cation; we need solid anti-discrimination protec receiving federal funds. tion and real availability of treatment for the poor Before issuing its recommendations the CDC and uninsured,” the report said. said it planned to study the effectiveness of unique Meanwhile the Human Rights Campaign, the identifier (also called coded identification) sys nation’s largest lesbian and gay political organi tems in two states, as well as examine public zation, called upon the CDC to fully explain and attitudes toward HIV testing in nine other states. justify the need for an expanded HIV surveillance Many advocacy groups favor unique identifi system. ers instead of names reporting. The former would It said confidentiality and privacy concerns assign a unique alphanumeric code at random to were legitimate, and argued that the use of unique each person who gets tested for HIV. Proponents identifiers must be fully explored as an option. If say such a system would preserve confidentiality names are to be used, HRC said, the CDC must and provide better epidemiological data by en demonstrate that they are an essential part of the couraging testing and minimizing duplicate names. surveillance system. OHD, meanwhile, crafted its own proposal, Some Oregonians echoed that sentiment, which called for names reporting. Modesitt told among them Susan Stoltenberg, executive direc Just Out in November that he thought creating a tor of Cascade AIDS Project. unique identifier system might prove administra She, along with a number of advocates for tively cumbersome and expensive. those with HIV and AIDS, said OHD provided no or more than a decade, people in Oregon evidence that names reporting would lead to bet ter data collection. Stoltenberg also criticized who have tested positive for HIV have been anonymously reported to OHD, although OHD for failing to solicit broad-based input from the public. the state does require limited names reporting in special circumstances for those with HIV regard As for news that the state has tabled the plan, less of the disease’s progression (the list includes Stoltenberg says: “I guess I have mixed feelings. convicted sex offenders and children younger I would have liked for us all to continue to discuss the matter.” than age 6). The new plan would have exponentially ex Despite that, Stoltenberg says a coalition of panded the scope of those required to be reported HIV/AIDS activists is forming and will continue, among other actions, to research issues related to by name, and would have mandated that health names reporting and unique identifiers in order to providers report all newly diagnosed HIV- be prepared when and if OHD’s proposal eventu infected people as they do AIDS cases. ally gets dusted off. Under the proposal, counties were to use the F Putting our professional Posner to work for you is our passion. Let our Home Team of Portland natives show you the inside moves. With an area-wide computer search plus our intimate knowledge of Portland's metro region, our realtors can show you property listed by any agent. Whether you’re buying or selling, our team personally provides the facts and support you need to get you from home selection or marketing to closing. Call now for a free consultation. HOME & INVESTMENT PROPERTY PURCHASE 4 SALES PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LICENSED TAX CONSULTATION 4 PREPARATION Serving the entire Portland metro area with pride since 1979. bender, properties 9981 SE 32nd Avenue (503) 653-8378 fax (503) 786-1227 Milwaukie, Oregon 97222 -Corporate supporter of 1997/98 Portland Power Women's Basketball, ABL-