Jacksonville post., June 29, 1912, Image 3

Assessment No. 165—W. T. Grieve.! M E. Church, owner or reputed owner. Amount. $679.68.
owner or reputed owner. Tract front­ Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and south V4 of Lots
Assessment No. 225—Mrs. O. Kee­
ing 125 Vi feet on north side of Cali­ 7 and 8, Block 23. Amount $188.80.
gan. owner or reputed owner. Tract
fornia street, extending back to and
Assessment No. 197—Mrs. S. C. Wil­ fronting on the north side of Academy
fronting 125 Vi feet on south side of cox. owner or reputed owner. South Street and described in Volume 41,
“C” street. Being described in Volume V4 of Lots 5 and 6, Block 23. Amount page 628, and in Volume 42, page
68, page 518, and in Volume 76, page $37.76.
259, Deed Records of Jackson county.
551, of the Deed Records of Jackson
Assessment No. 198—Luke Ryan, Oregon. Amount $1*1.04.
County, Oregon. Amount $189.56.
B» EVAN B. M'KNICHT
'owner or reputed owner. North Vi of
Assessment No. 226—Dora Har-!
Assessment No. 166—Laura
O. I Lots 5 and 6, Block 23. Amount $37.76. bough, owner or reputed owner. Tract ,
Gould, owner or reputed owner. Tract
Assessment No. 199—Eva Hocken- fronting 100 feet on north side of j There’s no use tn a man's being an­
fronting 190 feet on north side of yous, owner or reputed owner. North Academy street described in Volume ’ noyed with the temluiue peculiarities
California street and 190 feet on the 14 of Lots 7 and 8, Block 23. Amount 15. page 3, Deed Records of Jackson of his wife. The best way tor him to
south side of ”C" street. Described $37.76.
do is to get used to them. I sup|>ose
county. Oregon. Amount $75.52.
in Volume 90, page 392, Deed Records
Assessment No. 200—Joseph Kitto,
Assessment No. 227—M. L. Norris. the reverse of this Is true- that a wo
of Jackson County, Oregon. Amount administrator of estate of W. C. Kitto, owner or reputed owner, Tract situ- ! man may as well get used to the pe­
$286.98.
deceased, owner or reputed owner. ated along east side of Blackstone al- ■ culiarities ot her husband; but. being
Assessment No. 167—Mrs. J. Klippel, Lots 1 and 2, and south 25 feet of ley and fronting on north side of a man, 1 dou't know anything about
owner or reputed owner. Tract front­ Lots 5 and 6, in Block 24. Amount Academy street, described in Volume that part of it.
ing 50 feet on north side of California $94.40.
The first thing 1 noticed about my
57, page 545, Deed Records of Jackson
street, extending back along Eighth
wife after marriage that 1 didn't like
Assessment No. 201—Joseph Kitto, county, Oregon Amount, $151.04.
street and fronting 50 feet on south administrator estate of W. C. Kitto,
Assessment No. 228—A. E. Reames, j was that she opened my letters and
side of “C” street, Described in Vol- deceased, owner or reputed owner. Owner or reputed owner. A triangular . read them with as mu< b complacency
I
ume 10, page 68, Deed Records of North 38 feet of Lots 3 and 4. and tract abutting on north side of R. R. as if they were her owu. There was
Jackson County, Oregon. Amount south 25 feet of Lots 7 and 8, Block V. Ry. Co.'s right of way, described | nothing In them to Injure me Hi her
$75.52.
24. Amount $47.58.
as follows: Beginning at a point on . Estimation, but that didn't make their
Assessment No. 168—Mrs. R. L. Par­
Assessment No. 202—Mrs. E. Maeg- the south line of "D” street 100 feet j opening by her any more agreeable to
ker. owner or reputed owner. All of ley, owner or reputed owner. South eastwardly from the east line of Sixth | me. When i a man has reached middle
Block 64. Amount $302.08.
62 feet of Lots 3 and 4, Block 24. street, and running thence eastward- age without having any one dare to
Assessment No. 169—Joseph Kitto, Amount $46.82.
ly along said south line of ”D’’ street j read what belongs to him alone. Imv
administrator, estate of W. C. Kitto,
Assessment No. 203—Mrs. M. E. about 135 feet to right of way of the l ing from childhood considered such mi
deceased, owner or reputed owner. Dunnington, owner or reputed owner. R. R. V. Ry., thence westerly along act highly discreditable, not to say dis
Tract fronting about 250 feet on north North 75 feet of Lots 5, 6. 7 and 8 said right of way to the east line of honorable, to have bis wife do stu it a
thing grates on bitu terribly.
side of C street and five feet on the Block 24. Amount $113.28.
the M. F. Wilson lot; thence along | 1 boi>ed that when Lena uotlced that
east side of Sixth street, lying between
Assessment No. 204—Mrs. C. Reuter, east line of said M. F. Wilson lot to i I never opened any letter of hers she
C street and R. R. V. Ry. right of owner or reputed owner.
North 80 the point of beginning. Amount $52.87. would refrain from opening mine
way, described in Volume 60, page 557, feet of Block 67. Amount $120.83.
Assessment No. 229—M. F Wilson, Wheu she came down to breakfast
Deed Records of Jackson county, Or­
Assessment No. 205—George Mc­ owner or reputed owner. A triangular later than 1 and tbe postman had de
egon. Amount, $135.94.
Donough, owner or reputed owner. tract fronting 68 feet on east side of llvered tbe morning mall 1 would bam.
Assessment No. 170—M. F. Wilson, South 120 feet of Block 67. Described Sixth street, bounded on the north by her ber letters Intact. Sometimes she
owner or reputed owner. Tract front­ in Deed Records of Jackson County, lot described in Volume 14, page 380, would say “This Is from Aunt Cla
ing 100 feet on south side of “D” street Volume 10, at page 131. Amount Deed Records of Jackson county, Or­ rissa” or Cousin Surnb or bet sister or
a brother. "Why didn't you open It?”
and 100 feet on east side of Sixth $158.59.
egon, and on south by right of way whereupon I would say seutentiously,
street. Described in Volume 14, page
Assessment No. 206—Samuel Walsh, of the R. R. V. Ry. Co. Amount, ”1 have uever beeu accustomed to
380, Deed Records of Jackson County, owner or reputed owner. Lots 1 and $25.68.
open another person's letters "
Oregon. Amount $75.52.
Assessment No 230—A. E. Reames.
But Lena didn't take the bint or any
2, Block 68. Amount $75.52.
Assessment No. 171—Joseph Kitto,
Assessment No. 207—C. C. Beekman owner or reputed owner. East 100 other bint I gave ber. Just keeping on
administrator estate of W. C. Kitto, owner or reputed owner. Lots 3, 4, 5 feet of tract fronting on west side of breaking the seals ot my correspond
deceased, owner or reputed owner. 8. 9 and 10, block 68. Amount. Valley road or Fifth street, described ents' epistles till at last 1 concluded to
give ber a more marked bint than any
Lots 1, 2, 3. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in Block $226.56.
in Volume 49, page 242, Deed Records 1 had thus far devised I wrote a note
63. Amount $188.80.
Assessment No. 208—George McDon­ of Jackson county, Oregon. Amount, to myself from a mythical Horace
Assessment No. 172—Jackson Coun­ ough, owner or reputed owner. Lots $209.94.
Dunn, telling me In confidence of tils
ty, Oregon, owner or reputed owner. 6 and 7, block 68. Amount, $75.52.
Assessment No. 231—H. Klippel. engagement to Julia Halley, an inti
All of Block 19. Amount $302.08.
Assessment No. 209—C. C. Beek­ owner or reputem owner. South 100 mate friend of my wife As I expect
Assessment No. 173—Jacksonville man. owner or reputed owner. All feet of a tract fronting on north side ed. Lena opened the letter; but, finding
Catholic Church, owner or reputed of block 69. Amount, $302.08.
of Valley road or Fifth street, de­ in it a confidence one which very
owner. Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block
Assessment No. 210—Joseph Kitto, scribed in Volume 2, page 550, Deed much Interested her -she sealed It up
agaiu, saying nothing to me about the
18. Amount $226.56.
administrator of estate of W. C. Records of Jackson county, Oregon. matter.
Assessment No. 174—Luke Ryan, Kitto, deceased, and J. Hartman Amount. $173.70.
Maybe there wasn't a hot time when
owner or reputed owner. North Va of owners or reputed owners.
Assessment No. 232—Peter N. Fick, Lena congratulated her friend on bet
Lots 7
Lots 3 and 4, Block 18. Amount, and 8. block 39. Amount, $75.52.
owner or reputed owner. Tract de­ engagement, l^-na asked me who tbe
$37.76.
Assessment No. 211—Roy Ulrich, scribed as follows: Beginning at a scoundrel was who bad claimed to be
Assessment No. 175—J. R. Neil, own- owner or reputed owner. I-ots I 3 and point on the north line of Valley road engaged to tier friend without udmlt
er or reputed owner. South V4 of Lots 4, block 39. Amount, $75.52.
or Fifth street at the intersection of ting that she had opened (lie letter the
3 and 4, Block 18. Amount $37.76.
Assessment No. 212—Alpha Hart­ said north line of Valley road with a man bad wrltteu me and tlieu deeel v
by sealing It again. For some
Assessment No. 176—Luke Ryan, man, owner or reputed owner. Lots line running northwesterly through ed me saw by her demeanor tliui her
time 1
owner or reputed owner. South Vi of 5. 6, 7 and 8, block 40. Amount. the center of blocks 75 and 77, and friend was not satisfied to have the
running thence northwesterly and at matter hushed up and insisted on timl
lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 17. Amount $151.04.
$75,52.
Assessment No. 213—T. T. Shaw right angles to north line of said ing out who the man was who claimed*
Assessment No. 177—E. S. Wilson owner or reputed owner. Lots 1, 2, 3, Valley road. 100 feet; thence south­ to be engaged to her Finally, when
owner or reputed owner. North Vi of 4. block 40. Amount $151.04.
westerly and parallel with said north my wife could withstand tbe pressure
Lots 1 and 2, Block 17. Amount $37.76.
Assessment No. 214—G. Elksnat, line of Valley road, 230 feet; thence no longer, Bhe made a confession and
Assessment No. 178—Mrs. S. P. owner or reputed owner. Block 73. south to north line of Valley road; demanded the required Information
time had come, 1 told her that
Jones, owner or reputed owner. North Amount, $117,06.
thence northeasterly along north line the My lady
to whom the writer claimed
V4 or Lots 3 and 4, Block 17. Amount
Assessment No. 215—J. Louden, of Valley road. 300 feet to point of ta be engaged was not her frleud at
$37.7«.
beginning.
Amount,
$130.65.
owner or reputed owner. All of
all, but another person ot the same
Assessment No. 233—Hattie Neuber, name. Then I proceeded to give her n
Assessment No. 179—Luke Ryan, block 76. Amount, $151.04.
owner or reputed owner. South Vi
Assessment No. 216- Issie McCully, owner or reputed owner. Tract de­ lecture on the practice ot interfering
of Lots 7 and 8, Block 17. Amount owner or reputed owner. Tract front­ scribed as follows: Beginning at the with any one vise’s correspondence,
$37.76.
ing 52 feet on south side of valley intersection of the north boundary even ber liusbiiiid's. "By doing so.” 1
Assessment No. 180—Mrs. R. Ken­ road, or Fifth street, described In Vol- line of F street with the east bound­ said, “you lutve caused a great den:
ot unnecessary trouble Hud you left
ney, owner or reputed owner, Lots 5 ume 62, page 231, Deed Records of ary line of Fifth street, and running me tbe sole reudet ot my letter ill»
and 6, and north Vi ot Lots 7 and 8, Jackson county, Oregon. Amount, thence along said east line of Fifth error would not have been made.”
street northerly and northeasterly to
Block 17. Amount $113.28.
$39.27.
This bad only an Irritating effect
Assessment No. 181—Mrs. P. Hines,
Assessment No. 217—F. M. Tungate, the west line of Blockstone alley; on my wife, who vowed she would not
owner or reputed owner, South 80 owner or reputed owner. Tract front­ thence along west boundary line of again touch one ot my letters even
feet of Lots 1 and 2, Block 16. Amount ing 132 feet on south side of Valley Block«tone alley, south to the north with a poker and tor a time banded
$60.42.
road, or Fifth street, and desoribed boundary Hue of F street; thence uie my mall unopened In high dudgeon
Assessment No. 182—Mrs. P. Hines, in Volume 48, page 28, and in Volume along north boundary line ot F street But she soon fell Into her old tiubit.
lustead of riccepilng tbe situation, as
owner or reputed owner. North 46 68, page 516, Deed Records of Jackson to the place of beginning. Amount, 1 should have done. I concluded to lay
$302.08,
—
\
fset of Lots 3 and 4, Block 16. Amount county. Oregon. Amount. $99.69.
another trap 1 wrote myself another
Assessment No. 234—R. A. Miller letter which I asked a friend to post
$34.74.
Assessment
No. 218—A. Elmer,
Assessment No. 183—Fred J. Fick, owner or reputed owner. Tract front­ owner or reputed owner. Tract front­ in a distant city from utroilier mythical
owner or reputed owner. South 54 ing on south side of Valley road or ing on north side of Valley road or friend of mine, confessing that be had
feet of Lot 4, Block 16. Amount Fifth street, and extending southerly Fifth street, described in Volume 24 embezzled some money and asking me
$20.39.
along Blackstone alley, being de­ at page s04. Deed Records of Jackson what under heaven lie should do to e«
cape state prison lie added that It
Assessment No. 184—G. S. Epper­ scribed in Volume 40. page 25, Deed county, Oregon. Amount, $80.81.
Further notice is hereby given that any one except myself should see bis
son. owner or reputed owner. Lots Records of Jackson county, Oregon.
confession tbe ruin lie dreaded wo* Id
on the 20th day of July 1912, at tbe be sure to cotne.
5 and 6, and north 20 feet ef Lots Amount, $157.84.
1 and 2, Block 16. Amount $90.63.
Assessment No. 219—Ruby Stout hour of 8 o’clock P. M. of said day and
T-enri opened this letter and. finding
Assessment No. 185—Joseph Apple­ owner or reputed owner. Tract front­ at such other times as council may that she trad stumbled upon another
baker, owner or reputed owner. Lots ing on south side of Valley road or adjourn said meeting, at the Council secret, made up ber mind to reseal tbe
7 and 8, Block 16. Amount $75.52.
Fifth street, and described in Volume Chambers in the City Hall at Jackson­ letter and this time keep silent on a
Assessment No. 186—Bertha Bar­ 86, page 598, Deed Records of Jack- ville, Jackson County, State of Ore­ matter that wits of no personal Inter
est to her But just as sue was about
num. owner or reputed owner. Lots son county, Oregon. Amount, $74.01. gon, the Citv Council of said Citj’ will to do so there was a smell ot smoke
meet
and
consider
said
proposed
assess
­
3 and 4. Block 15. Amount $75.52.
Assessment No. 220—Mrs. A. Pool
from the laundry, mid, leaving tiie
Assessment No. 187—T. B. Kent, owner or reputed owner. Lot 1 and ment and apportionment and will at note and Its envelope side by side on
that
time
hear
any
and
all
objections
owner or reputed owner. Lots 7 and part of lot 2. in block 71, described in
ber desk with letters of her own. she
8, in Block 15. Amount $75.52.
Volume 87 at page 335, Deed Records that may be made to said proposed ran downstairs to learn It the bouse
Assessment No. 188—Kate Hoffman, of Jackson county, Oregon. Amount. apportionment and proposed assess­ was on fire. Klie found an incipient
ment and will then proceed to ascer­ blaze, which with some trouble wn.<
owner or reputed owner. Lots 3 and $37.76.
tain and finally determine the amount pot out Then she went buck to her
4, Block 20. Amount $75.52.
Assessment No. 221—Luke Ryan of special and peculiar benefits accru­ desk and did us sbe bad Intended with
Assessment No. 189—Iowa Lumber owner or reputed owner. Part of
ing to each lot or part thereof or par­ my letter.
ft Box Co., owner or reputed owner. block 71, fronting on east side of
When 1 came In and found the letter,
cel of land and to assess such amount
Lots 7 and 8. Block 20. Amount $75.52. Blackstone alley and south side of upon and against said property at said apparently untouched. I tore it open
and took out a letter to my wife from
Assessment No. 190—Claude Emme, Academy street, described In Volume time and place aforesaid.
one ot her friends containing n contl
owner or reputed owner. Lots 1 and 58. at page 229, of the Deed Records
H enry G. D ox ,
dence 1 bad no right to posse«« 1
1, Block 21. Amount $75.52.
of Jackson county, Oregon. Amount,
City Recorder.
handed the note to Ix>nn. demanding
Assessment No. 191—Owner Un­ $52.87.
to know how a private letter to her
known. South Vi of Lots 3 and 4,
Don’t be ¿.srprised if you have an attack had come In an envelope addressed tn
Assessment No. 222—Henry Wendt,
Block 21. Amount $37.76.
rheumatism thia spring. Just rub the ue.
owner or reputed owner. Lots 5 and of
affected parts freely with Chamberlain's Lin­
1 shall never forget the frightened
Assessment No. 192—Solomon Hum­ 6J In block 77. Amount, $75.52.
iment and it will soon disappear. Sold by took that came over her face. Intend
phrey. owner or reputed owner. North
all
dealers.
Assessment No. 223—M. H. Round-,
ing to slip my letter hack Into Its en
Vi of Lots 3 and 4, Block 21. Amount
tree, ov ner or reputed owner. Tract
velnpe. having t»eer> rattled on sceoniit
$37.7«.
of the blaze In the laundry, she bad
extending along the east side of Sixth
Assessment No. 193—Minnie Oben- street from the north boundary of "E"
taken up the wrong tettvt.
cbafn Lewis, owner or reputed owner. street to south boundary of “F"
I took ber In mt arms and said to
Raises
her; “My dear. I find yon bare again
South Vi of Lots 5. 6, 7 and 8. Block street, described in Volume 3, page
deceived me But so long as yon don t
the
21. Amount $75.52.
142. Deed Records of Jackson county.
aecelve me In any more serious way
Assessment No. 194—Luke Ryan, Oregon. Amount, $120.83.
than this I forgive you. Hereafter
North Vi 1 Assessment No. 224—Jacksonville
owner or reputed owner.
<
open my letters wlien ton like If is
ot Lots 5, 6. 7 8, in Block 21. Amount Schorl District No. 1. owner or re­
a womanly weakness mid in a measure
I
excusable '
$75.52.
puted owner. Tract situated on west
Prom Hint time i have not cared
Assessment No. 193
1 —M, O. Lewis. side of Park street and fronting on
Pound Can
whet Her l-eiia ofe-na tn» letter« or not
owner or reputed owner. Ail of Block south side of Academy street de­
AU Grocer«
But she doesn L
Eliwrienee has
22. Amount $302.08.
scribed in Volume 4, page 421, Deed
taught ber that it Isn't best tor ber to
Assessment No. 19«—Jacksonville Records of Jupkson county, Oregon.
do so.
___ .
A FAMILY
MATTER
Dough
Better!
25c
I
Greatest Parade in Southern Ore
gon's Hist or g
Free Barbacue for all Comers
Thrilling Auto and Motor Races
Bucking Contests and Wild West
Stunts
Baseball, Ashland Against Medford
Militia Sham Battle and Shooting
Contest
Grand Carnival and Dance at Night
Southern Oregon Chautauqua
Session
in
»
Swimming Exhibitions at Two Na
tatoriums
Music All Dag bg Three Bands
Trains From Giants Pass at
7:30 a.m., 9:00 a.m., 9:38 a.m.,
5:30 p.m.
Special Returning From Ash
land to Grants Pass 10:30 p.m.