Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The Observer. (La Grande, Or.) 1968-current | View Entire Issue (Dec. 27, 2019)
LOCAL 2A — THE OBSERVER FRIDAY, DECEMBER 27, 2019 Wallowa County Council considers vendor fee rate hike By Steve Tool EO Media Group EO Media Group fi le photo Secretary of State Bev Clarno has rejected two proposed ballot measures that would force Oregon to transition to carbon-free sources of electricity in the next 25 years. Oregon Secretary of State rejects energy initiatives JOSEPH — Part-time vendors in the city of Joseph may get a shock when they apply for a license in 2020. The city is considering a substantial jump in fees for the coming year. City Administrator Larry Braden brought up the subject at the city’s council meeting Dec. 12. The vendor fee hike is a part of city resolution 2019-23, which covers fees for the city’s administrative services, including administrative, business and land use services. The vendor fees fall under the business category. The city staff suggested the annual license fee for non-commercial food vendors (such as raw fruit or vegetable sales) at $375 while commercial food vendors (such as prepared foods) pay $475 per year. Mayor Teresa Sajonia said the $375 fee matched with the low end of Chief Joseph Days vendor fees. She asked Becky Rushton, co-owner of the Outlaw Restaurant and Saloon, who said food vendors pay $375 while booth fees vary. “That’s just way too low for a whole annual year,” Rushton said. “Those people (the CJD vendors) do it for four days, and to think you’re going to do it on an annual basis for that amount of money, I just think that seems really, really, really low.” Sajonia, who owns Embers Brew House in Joseph, agreed and said she had the same response, even though she admitted the suggested fees were at the high end of what other munici- palities levy against vendors. Rushton took it one step further. “I think if we put moratoriums on other things, we should put them on that too,” Rushton said. “In other words, if you can’t have air bnb’s and that sort of thing, then I don’t think we should have transient vendors.” Rushton remained defi ant. “It’s no different than people not want- ing parks,” she said and giggled. An ensu- ing discussion with Sajonia revealed the city of Bend charges $110 per year less than Joseph’s prospective vendor fees. The mayor said the vendor fees were instituted so the city can recoup fees. She added it was the city’s re- sponsibility to protect local businesses from vendors who operate only during lucrative summertime months while permanent businesses pay street, sewer and water fees, even during winter months. Rushton said as head of the CJD booths, she often has local business own- ers ask how much money the city is mak- ing from vendors while local businesses lose money on the biggest weekend of the year. ■ For the second time in recent weeks, Bev Clarno rebuffs petitioners trying to get measures on the Oregon ballot next year By Dirk VanderHart Oregon Public Broadcasting SALEM — Secretary of State Bev Clarno has rejected two proposed ballot measures that would force Oregon to transition to car- bon-free sources of electricity in the next 25 years. Setting up a second po- tential confl ict with environ- mental groups, Clarno ruled Thursday the two proposals violated a constitutional requirement that they stick to a “single subject.” “Both measures speak for themselves, if read carefully, that the issues presented are not limited to a single subject,” Deputy Secretary of State Rich Vial said of Clarno’s most recent rul- ing. “The secretary has the responsibility to make that constitutional decision.” That’s the same contro- versial rationale Clarno used earlier this year when she rejected three separate proposals aimed at protect- ing state forests. In that in- stance, her decision led to an unsuccessful court challenge from environmentalists that is currently being appealed. “There is now a pattern of fl agrant abuse of power by this secretary of state, far outside the norms for any Democrat or Republican who has held the offi ce,” said Tera Hurst, executive director of the group Renew Oregon, which is backing the rejected clean energy measures. “The secretary of state is siding with the oil industry, corporate polluters and anti-worker special interests to block the ability of the voters to decide their clean air future.” The two proposals Clarno rejected Thursday, initiative petitions 48 and 49, are seen as a backstop Renew Oregon and its allies can turn to if Oregon lawmakers fail to regulate greenhouse gas emissions next year. If passed by voters, the measures would require Oregon to source all of its electricity from carbon-free or renewable energy sources by 2045. That’s a standard Hawaii and at least six other states have adopted since 2015. But the petitions also in- clude a number of provisions that opponents argue make them too broad. Both IP 48 and 49 require construction projects related to the new standards pay a prevailing wage, offer benefi ts and meet a number of other bench- marks. IP 49 also requires electric utilities to invest in “benefi cial electrifi cation programs” that help the state meet its emissions reduction goals. In comments on the pro- posals, opponents Willis Van Dusen and Janet Steele said Oregon AG: ‘ACA is still law of the land’ SALEM — Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum issued a statement Thursday after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Texas v. U.S. involving the legality of the Affordable Care Act. A coalition of 21 at- torneys general, includ- ing Oregon, defended the ACA and the health care of millions of Americans in the Fifth Circuit in July. The at- torneys general argued every provision of the ACA remains valid. According to the Rosenblum’s state- ment, the result of the decision means that, for now, all the provisions of the ACA, except the individual mandate, continue in effect. “Even with yester- day’s adverse decision, I want all Oregonians to know that the ACA is still the law of the land,” according to Rosen- blum. “It is an integral part of our health care system, and we will not stop fi ghting for the health care of millions of Americans and all Oregonians. We are hard at work with other states involved in this litigation and we intend to seek U.S. Supreme Court review promptly.” they “include extensive new labor practice requirements likely appealing to members of the proponents’ voting co- alition who otherwise might not support the measure.” The provisions violate a constitutional requirement that initiative petitions deal with “one subject only,” they argued. Clarno evidently agreed, though Vial would not give specifi cs about her decision. The rulings mark the sec- ond time Clarno has tossed initiative petitions based on her reading of Oregon’s “single subject” requirement. When she rejected the three forest-related proposals in September, the decision was questioned by both envi- ronmentalists and Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, who made clear she didn’t agree with Clarno’s strict interpretation of the law. However, when the group Oregon Wild challenged the decision, a Marion County judge ruled that Clarno was correct. That ruling is being appealed, and attorneys for the Oregon Legislative As- sembly say it could have ma- jor implications for Oregon’s legislative process if upheld. SWITCH & GET A SMARTPHONE WITH NO ACTIVATION FEES Promotional pricing requires an Unlimited Even Better Plan, new line, port-in, credit approval, qualified smartphone purchase and Device Protection+ and comes via monthly bill credit on a 30-month Retail Installment Contract. Taxes, fees and additional restrictions apply. Things we want you to know: New consumer or small business (25 lines or less) and Unlimited Even Better Plan and port-in required. Purchase of a qualifying device via 0% APR 30-month Retail Installment Contract (RIC), credit approval and Device Protection+ required. Tax due at sale. A Regulatory Cost Recovery Fee applies; this is not a tax or government required charge. Additional fees, taxes, terms, conditions and coverage areas may apply and vary by plan, service and phone. The Unlimited Even Better Plan includes 50GB of prioritized data. Video streams at up to 1080p (HD quality). During times of congestion data may be temporarily slowed. Once the plan reaches 50GB of usage, data may be temporarily slowed further. Device Protection+ starts at $9.99/month per smartphone. A service fee/deductible per approved claim applies. You may cancel anytime. Property insurance is underwritten by American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida and provided under a Master Policy issued to U.S. Cellular. You will be the certificate holder on U.S. Cellular’s Master Policy for loss/theft benefits. Service Contract Obligor is Federal Warranty Service Corporation in all states except CA (Sureway, Inc.) and OK (Assurant Service Protection, Inc.). Limitations and exclusions apply. See an associate for complete details. Offer Details: New devices eligible for offer are iPhone 11, 11 Pro, 11 Pro Max ($700); Samsung Galaxy S10e, S10, S10+ ($750); $750 trailing credit for Galaxy S10e can be applied toward Note10, Note10+, Google Pixel 4, Pixel 4 XL. Offer applies to base model and memory only. Bill credit will be divided into 30 equal credits and comes via monthly bill credit on a 30-month RIC; 0% APR, $0 down. Bill credit applied within three bill cycles and ends when balance is paid. Line must remain in good standing with required price plan for entire 30-month RIC. Customer may lose bill credit if price plan is changed. In the event of cancellation of service, customer will be responsible for the entire RIC balance. The early upgrade program is not available with this offer. Kansas Customers: In areas in which U.S. Cellular receives support from the Federal Universal Service Fund, all reasonable requests for service must be met. Unresolved questions concerning services availability can be directed to the Kansas Corporation Commission Office of Public Affairs and Consumer Protection at 1-800-662-0027. Limited-time offer. While supplies last. Trademarks and trade names are the property of their respective owners. Offers valid at participating locations only and cannot be combined. See store or uscellular.com for details. ©2019 U.S. Cellular