Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Oregon daily emerald. (Eugene, Or.) 1920-2012 | View Entire Issue (May 6, 2002)
COMMENTARY . Graduate standardized tests receive low marks (U-WIRE) LOS ANGELES — Remember the days in high school after you decided where you wanted to go to college? You were free from stu pid standardized tests like the SAT and you thought that you would never again have to face the laborious process of college applications. But many of you were wrong. A few years later, you will have to go through the same impersonal process for graduate school. This time the standardized tests go by different names — LSAT, MCAT and GRE — but their inability to ac curately measure you as a student remains the same. Although the SAT has been scru tinized recently, the graduate school exams have had an aura of sanctity around them. Nobody wants to criticize the LSAT, MCAT, and the GRE — until now. These exams can be summed up using my own acronym: RCRAR I'm not opposed to all standard ized testing. But the tests do not measure what they are supposed to measure; they are given too much weight by graduate schools, and the test-taking and application processes can be amended in a way that will benefit the students and graduate schools. The graduate school exams are not taken under uniform circum stances. Some students study 500 hours and spend $1,000 studying for the exams, but many other students cannot afford to do that. According to some test-prep lit erature, the MCAT is supposed to measure, “the high-order thinking skills necessary for success in med ical school, including analytical reasoning, abstract thinking and Guest Commentary David Burke problem-solving. ” How can the MCAT measure any of those factors if the only piece of information that medical schools receive is a person's score? What does a 35 mean? That’s a good score, but what if the student who earned a 35 spent his entire sum mer studying for the exam and an other student who did not study at all got a 32? An MCAT score is completely inadequate for measuring “ab stract thinking” abilities. Instead, it actually measures ability to study and memorize pre-ordered methods of thinking. There is a large body of evidence that indicates student scores on the MCAT or the LSAT can improve with studying. On the LSAT, I know someone whose score fluctu ated within a 23-point range! That's the difference between Harvard and Huckleberry State. Inherent abilities are overshad owed by the amount of time put into exam preparation. Although study skills are important, these tests overemphasize that factor, focusing on a student's ability and willingness to study for them. One of the primary criteria for admission should not be a score on a piece of paper that is not indicative of the student's ability for preparation. Luckily, there are many ways to improve the exams and the appli cation process. The exams should all use uniform standards for preparation. New exams could be continuously created but not re leased to test-prep groups or to the public so students cannot study for them. Or, if the graduate schools would like students to study first, they can create test prep courses that everyone must complete before taking the exam. This would level the playing field. The admissions process should shift away from standardized tests in order to give admissions officers a bet ter picture of the actual person that they are considering for admittance. Most law schools do not require interviews, but they should. The best way to know a student is to ac tually meet them. Graduate schools should focus more on discovering what their ap plicants’ lives are like with more personal essay questions. Do schools want a 4.0 student who soils himself when thrust into a so cial situation but is the world's best Counterstrike player, or a 3.6 stu dent who writes for his college newspaper, plays intramural sports and actively participates in a few campus organizations? A change in the graduate school exams and a shift toward actually understanding the daily lives of students will ensure that more de serving students get into the schools to which they apply. I know that it is not easy or cheap to change test and admissions processes, but it is the right thing to do, and everyone will benefit. This column is courtesy of David Burke of the Daily Bruin, the newspaper of the University of California in Los Angeles, His opinions do not necessarily represent those of the Bruin or the Emerald. Nate Beeler Knight-Ridder Tribune American Institute of Certified Public Accountants As Senior VP of Financial Planning at a MAJOR MOVIE STUDIO YOU COULD! O.K. A $93 MILLION BUDGET Hire 7,5DD extras Rent 273 palm trees * (AND 1 BIG FAN TO MAKE THEM SWAY) Haw aa you get a jdb like this? www.startHereGoPlaces.com/bizib Go here and take the first step toward the career you want. Start here. Go PLACES. If you know business and accounting, you can get a job anywhere. Because the skills you learn in business - strategic and analytical thinking, communication, and leadership - are always in demand. In some of the coolest industries in the world. Even in the movies.
