Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Oregon daily emerald. (Eugene, Or.) 1920-2012 | View Entire Issue (Jan. 30, 1987)
Ducks come from behind to win See Page 8 Oregon Daily Emerald Friday. January 30. 1987 Eugene, Oregon Volume 88. Number 91 IFC turns down proposal to raise incidental fees By Sheri Metzier Of the Kmerald The incidental Fee Committee voted last night not to in crease fees and discussed the procedure for upcoming budget hearings. "There is no way that groups can ask to raise student fees," said committee member Jim Randall. "We can’t afford increases with our government.” Each group is allowed a 30-minute hearing before the IFC votes on its budget. The committee decided to first hear the goals and then the amounts that each group wants. If the group does not get the amount of money it requests, the ap peals process will be explained at the end of the hearings. Kari Rothi, co-director of the Women’s Referral and Resource Service, asked the IFC to transfer funds from a defunct women’s escort account and the conference account into the speaker's account to help fund an upcoming concert. The committee decided instead to loan the WRRS the funds. “Incidental fees are not normally spent on fund-raising events,” IFC chairwoman Jodie Mooney said. The committee moved to transfer surplus funds into the deficit Office of Student Advocacy account. That account ran into debt during October and November of 1986. The over-realized monies committee, which addresses funds to physical and cultural interests that benefit students as a group, asserted that the money should not be used to sup plement salaries, course requirements or academic needs. Also, the money is not to be used in any way for ad ministration because it wouldn’t benefit as many students. Former University student files suit against Emerald By Sarah Kitchen Of the Emerald Paul Sturtz, a former Univer sity student, has filed a lawsuit against the Oregon Daily Emerald Publishing Co. Inc., claiming the newspaper is guil ty of wrongful dismissal and reverse sexual discrimination. Sturtz is suing for $109,000, loss of agreed salary, general damages and punitive damages. On April 21 last year, Sturtz was appointed by the Emerald’s board of directors to be Emerald editor starting May 1. But two weeks later, the board reversed its decision and appointed Michelle Brence as editor, a position she currently holds. The board appointed Brence after reviewing a grievance she submitted contesting Sturtz’s appointment on the basis of sex ual discrimination, in which she said she was a more qualified candidate. Brence has written for the Emerald since 1984. She also has served as editorial page editor and managing editor. In response to Brence’s grievance, the board formed an independent, three-member committee, consisting of staff from the journalism school, University relations and person nel services to review both the hiring process and the qualifica tions of the applicants. According to a statement released from the board, “due to the committee's criticism of the selection criteria, and based upon the direction of discussion within the board itself, Michelle Paul Sturtz Brence has been named editor of the Emerald with the full sup port of the board.” Sturtz had four years’ ex perience as a freelance writer as well as two months as an associate editor with the Emerald. He also had worked as an intern research assistant at Mother Jones magazine. Sturtz claims he was dismiss ed without cause and in breach of the contract into which he entered. “The Oregon Daily Emerald Publishing Co., Inc., committed an unlawful employ ment practice in that it discharged plaintiff (Sturtz) from employment on account of his male sex,” according to the suit. In the suit against the Oregon Daily Emerald Publishing Co. Inc., it is stated the Emerald has Turn to Lawsuit, Page 3 2 Senate bills introduced to boost state's chances of attracting SSC By Shawn Wirtz Of the Kmrrald Two bills were introduced in the Oregon Senate Thursday that may boost Oregon’s chance at being selected as the site for a federal high energy atom smasher, said Sen. Mae Yih. Oregon is competing with 25 other states to win the Department of Energy’s proposed Super conducting Super Collider, which would allow physicists to smash protons into each other and study the resulting fundamental particles. Former Gov. Vic Atiyeh's task force recom mended a site 35 miles north of Eugene near (.ebanon for the $4 billion project. The bill would place the siting, development and operation of the SSC under the jurisdiction of the Economic Development Department. ‘‘The governor will review the former task force recommendations and make his own deci sion," Yih said. The bill would also exempt the site from land use regulations. A second bill would authorize tax credits for contributions to recruit the project and tax deduc tions for contributions to site acquisition and I preparation or operation. " The bill has the effect of getting Oregon ready for proposals." Yih said. Since the 1X3K may give states only two to three months to sub mit proposals when it decides to initiate the pro ject, "it will behoove us to be ready." she said. I he two bills will show Oregon’s level of commitment to the project. Yih said. "When the Knergy Department usks for a proposal, you have to make very clear which part will be developed by the state." she said. While Texas, Colorado and California have spent millions of dollars preparing preliminary studies. Oregon has spent about $101).000 so far in initial geological studies, said David Fiskum. deputy director of the state Economic Develop ment Department. Dospite the stiff competition. Oregon has a good chance of winning the project, said Rep. Tom Mason, one of several sponsors of the hi 11 along with Yih. "Oregon is objectively a relatively viable site Turn to Colliders, Page 3 1 KWStS EXTRA RVMSIS EXTRA r U Bi: i i s 1: | 4 « | * 1 L. ■. ^ * * M M Photo by |ohn (11011111141 rhe use of condoms is being promoted as an effective prevention against contracting the AIDS virus. TV stations consider airing condom ads By Carolyn Lamberson Of the Kmerald Last fall, the IJ.S. Surgeon General an nounced that aside from abstinence, the use of condoms during intercourse is the best way to control the spread of Acquired Immune Defi ciency Syndrome. Because of this announcement, the latest in a long line of AIDS-related controversies has arrived — the advertising of condoms as an AIDS prevention method on television. Television station KRON in San Francisco announced earlier this month that it would ac cept advertising for condoms on a six-month trial basis, said javier Valencia, station spokesman. But there are a few conditions the adver tisements must abide by in order to be aired, he said. “The ads must be in good taste, and they have some time restrictions as to when they can be run.” Valencia said. “They cannot lx; aired during children's programming and must mention the use of condoms as a method of preventing AIDS.” The station also is donating all of the revenue generated from the sale of advertising time to AIDS research and requires the manufacturer to make an equal contribution. Valencia said. Valencia said the reaction from the public has been mostly positive, with San Francisco right-to-life groups and the Catholic church voicing concern against the idea on moral grounds. Religious leaders in the Kugene area were Turn to Condoms, Page 5