Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Oregon daily emerald. (Eugene, Or.) 1920-2012 | View Entire Issue (June 19, 1973)
Planners reject student bid to save two older houses By KATHLEEN GLANVILLE Of the Emerald Is the campus area doomed to be surrounded by high-rise apartment buildings at the cost of older, single family dwellings? This was one of the issues raised last week when the Eugene Planning Commission rejected an appeal by three University students to deny a Conditional Use Permit to a Eugene developer. Frank Wail, former ASUO Housing director, Lynn Shepard, and John Cubit appealed a decision approved by the City Planning Office to build a twenty-unit apartment complex on land now oc cupied by two houses on Ferry Street between 11th and 12th Avenues. The proposed construction by J.S. Kuykendall would be similar to the existing Kirkwood apartment building located at 12th and Ferry. The appellants described the proposed building as “an obnoxious and cold structure, totally out of scale and design with the surrounding neigh borhood.” The appellants raised issues concerning the design of the building, traffic problems, and the preservation of existing older housing. Wall em phasized that students have long preferred houses as opposed to multi-family apartment structures. Although he conceded that it is inevitable that many existing houses will be destroyed in the future and replaced, Wall said that the transition should be gradual and the structures torn down should be replaced with developments of good quality. The appellants asserted that the proposed Kuykendall development did not appear to meet any of their requirements. The Planning Commission upheld the hearing official in his decision to grant the Conditional Use Permit, declaring that the students had no legal grounds but they approved many points made by the appellants. “One of the things they dealt with in this appeal and testimony was the design of the building,” said Jim Saul, Planning Commission member, “Most of us agreed; it was a lousy design.” “The problem is the city, meaning the city council and the Planning Commission, is somewhat reluctant to enter design criticism. It is a subjective area. For instance, the attorney representing the builder tried to argue that the building was beautiful—and a lot of people probably feel that way.” The district in which the proposed building is to be located is zoned C-2, community commercial. The Conditional Use Permit, required because of the zoning, was never intended to regulate design, according to Saul. As to whether or not a citizens group could stop construction of an objectionable building, Saul explained that they probably could not... not on the basis of design. “Construction could be blocked only if they could find something in the health, safety and general welfare codes,” explained Saul, “There is a very strong legal tradition established that you cannot use zoning to achieve aesthetic con siderations. “The assumption in the Planned Unit Development procedure is that the developer will be interested in having a good design,” said Saul, “He may be, but it’s normally a secondary factor; his primary purpose is to make a profit.” “The area between the University and the downtown district has been designated appropriate for high density living,” said Saul, “and the city has had a policy of encouraging high-density development in this area to accommodate the housing need generated by the University of Oregon.” The appellants stated that they were concerned about the “continuing destruction of neighborhoods, especially when they are replaced by barren, motel like complexes.” You won’t be able to visit the elk and deer at Hen dricks Park anymore. If you want to see them, you’ll have to drive to the World Wildlife Safari in Winston, Ore. The reason? Too much vandalism has wiiwwwii ■ .■mum ..w u —ww—iuuwwiwmluuwujujiiwu—iujiihiiiiwuijwii: Photo by Steve Twedt caused the Eugene Park system to go out of the zoo business. Most of the animals were transported to their new home last week. The rest will be leaving soon. mwiw wy JICYC I WCUI Reynolds with time capsule treasure Seal move yields old *school sprit * The construction crew working on the addition to the EMU has uncovered a piece of the spirit of a bygone era at the University. When the workers dug the University seal from its place in front of the EMU, they found a tin box, ravaged by Oregon rains for the past 23 years, and full of the “school spirit” of the Class of 1912. The Class of 1912 bought and installed the seal from their class funds. The seal was originally placed somewhere near Villard Hall, but when the center of the campus moved, the seal was also moved. Members of the Class of 1912 were asked by postcard ballot if they favored the move, and also if they were in favor of “soliciting the Class for funds to pay for removing it to the new site.” The ballots were placed in the tin box under the seal. Also in the box was a clipping from Old Oregon magazine, so much deteriorated that the date is no longer on it, but which is headlined, “Wish of Class of 1912 to be...with moving of seal to new location.” The seal was rededicated June 9,1950 at its new location. The tin box even contained fragments of a telegram from one member of the Class of 1912 who sent his regrets for not at tending the rededication. Dick Reynolds, director of the EMU, says the seal will be moved to the courtyard created by the new addition to the EMU. Reynolds says the opinions and contributions of the Class of 1912 were not solicited for the current move. Reynolds told the Emerald he does not know what he will do with the tin box, but he may put it on display in one of the EMU showcases sometime during the summer.