Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The times. (Portland, Or.) 191?-19?? | View Entire Issue (Dec. 16, 1911)
■ » . T ---- ' THE TIMES IV .V .V V V .V .V .V .V .V V .V .V .V . Î from you. and if you do not speak C U S S LEGISLATION I you lose the right to complain if his conduct opposes your proper FOR INDUSTRY interests. The great industrial questions (By James A. Emery.) in which you are interested and I feel that in addressing you which have been presented more this morning upon the general variously, frequently and insist legislative situation, 1 do so under ently during this session than any circumstances that, quite apart preceding one, bears a direct, deli from the merit of my remarks, cate. and sometimes embarrassing insure your interest and attention. relation to the individual Con The storm that gathered over gressman, to his party, his execu Washington some ten days ago. tive (his party leader), and to the anil dissipated in sheet lightning, general country. So lie has pres has re-formed its injunction sure both from within and from clouds during the past thirty-six without, from the suggestions of hours and is rumbling threats over party policy and his notion of the the devoted heads of your Con wishes of his constituency. So the gressional representatives. This expression of your opinion in most recent of continuously insist measures touching the labor rela ent efforts to secure anti-injunc tion not only affects the actions tion legislation is probably the last of individual public men, but re desperate movement of a session acts to modify party policies. abounding in similar attempts. Your interest or your indifference The proponents of class legislation becomes a measure of the political have presented their demands in value of contemplated party ac a variety of forms so closely re tion. • lated that it would be impossible A Word About Injunctions. to present any one of them to you intelligently, unless all are sum Having suggested the personal equation in legislation, let us now moned into your presence. What Influences Congressmen. consider the so-called “ labor measures” presented for Congres The legislative situation at sional action. Years of continu Washington will become clear ous agitation and discussion have only when you realize the personal familiarized you with their mean position of the average represen ing beyond the generality of men. tative. Our Congressmen proceed Perhaps the chief and most insist to Washington from every part of ent demand of organized labor has the United States. Their term is been for a modification of the ex so short that almost before grate isting practice in the issuance of ful congratulations upon election writs of injunction, based upon a have died away, a nerve-wearing loudly asserted charge that this struggle for renomination is in great writ is constantly issued in progress. The Congressman is labor disputes improvidently, and therefore almost continuously en enforced with injustice and op gaged in a contest to retain his pression; claiming that instead of seat. securing protection against irre The number and variety of sub parable injury to property or mix jects upon which he is required to ed property and personal rights legislate render it impossible for- the injunction has in numerous in him to know all about more than stances wrought grievous wrongs a few'measures, and leaves him of to the rights of those against necessity in practical ignorance of whom such writs have run. If the details of numerous others. To there be merit in that accusation, meet this very condition the vari it indeed demands immediate con ous committees of Congress exist, sideration. If the conservators of each giving special consideration justice have become doers of in to a particular class of subjects justice. if courts work wrongs and and recommending them favor judges attack the rights they ex ably or unfavorably, or often not ist to protect, the very elements at all, to the general body. Under of civil security are threatened. these circumstances the great But if the charge is unsupported struggles that determine the fate by facts and is repeated, not only of a bill take place in committee without the slightest evidence, but and, generally speaking, the judg without visible effort to secure or ment of the committee determines offer it, then, be they who utter the life or death of a proposed it high or low, this assault upon measure. The members of the the conduct of our Federal judges more important committees are necessarily weakening by repeti the busiest of men, frequently tion of unproved and improvable working longer hours than those charges, the confidence of our peo of closest application in private ple in the last refuge of constitu life. It is in these committees that tional government finds no lan the individual ability and charac guage too strong to rebuke its ter of a member, perhaps unno malicious authors, or those who, ticed to any great extent in gen with far greater responsibility, eral debate, counts most. It is lend the influence of a great office there that your representatives to the circulation of an indefensi are most potential and do most to ble slander. influence the general policy of So long as courts exist and Congress. causes are tried, disappointed liti Your Congressman desires to gants will voice the resentful crit'i help his constituents and his party cisms of defeat. Organized labor, in such a way that he will help checked in its efforts to violate or himself. He performs in Wash evade law with impunity, might ington ; he lives in his district. be pardoned an exhibition of tem What he thinks his district thinks per, but its slanderous criticism is a great factor in shaping his has long passed the stage of spas conduct, just as what his district modic anger and become a habit thinks he thinks is the great fac of deliberate attack upon the judi tor in securing his election. It is cial character. Such charges from only natural that he should pay a body seeking to become a fav most attention to those from ored class of wrong-doers, arous whom he most frequently hears. ing the resentment of all good citi But a small percentage of the peo zens. could not have obtained seri ple who vote for him give inti ous consideration had not the mate care to his public action or Chief Executive echoed and re communicate with him concerning echoed the assertions of bitter and it. and if he heeds those who heed baffled violators of law. (Note: him, it is because he has every This was spoken in May, 1908.) reasonable ground to assume that You know that we are a govern those who endeavor to influence ment of three distinct and separ his action will take an equal in terest in voting in one way or an ate powers; we have executive, other on his future election; and legislative and judicial depart if an unusual number of people ments, co-ordinate and exclusive address him upon a particular in the exercise of their separate subject it is very easy for him to functions, nor can either trespass believe they represent a large and upon or exercise the powers of the interested sentiment in his com other. Each is the agent of the munity. So the average Congress people, possessing only such pow man becomes more or less of an ers as they have conferred, and adept in receiving, measuring and beyond the delegated right of that acting on “ word from home.” and agency, holding no authority. The if in any issue of importance he is legislative department cannot in persistently importuned by the trude upon the judicial nor the proponents of a measure, and judicial upon the legislative, nor hears little or nothing in opposi the executive upon either, and we tion to it. being human like the have so willed in the language of rest of mankind, he is likely to the Commonwealth of Massachu follow the line of least resistance. setts. declared by Webster to be He is impressed by what reaches the greatest words of any public him. He measures the opinion of utterance, that they may be a his district by its expression, your “ government of laws and not of interest in anything he does by men.” Nothing, then, can be more what you say, and there is no way serious than a reflection by one to be "sure of right action on his department on the actions of an part unless you give impressive other. and if duty requires it. the evidence of right and determined most complete evidence should views. He cannot be expected to back the criticism. For more than hear the silent, or be himself af two years President Roosevelt in fected or react upon others, by his messages to Congress has iter things unwritten or unsaid. Or ated and reiterated his belief that ganized labor is his regular cor there has been a continuous im respondent. He hears from it on proper and oppressive use of the every occasion, and frequently writ of injunction in labor dis when there is none. If you are putes by courts of the United equally interested he should hear States. Summing up these serious ► * • • • « • • • • < E ast 33 B 7118 DON’T BE A HORSE’S I ENEMY T elep h o n es M ain 6 9 8 0 A 3322 IK) YOUR SHOPPING EARLY LATE HOURS MAKE SLEEPY DELIVERIES gj loin the !♦ ! . . . •*: •: Portland Horse-Owners Association :• :: I s' Î* •I See, Phone or Write PH ILIP S. BATES Sec., 215 Oregonian Bldg, 3 „ ___ $ * vw.v*v.v.v.v.v.w.*.v.v.v.v^.v.v.v.v.v.v.v.vv.v.wv. statements, he declared in his spe putes. Now. are all of these cial message of April 27, 1908: twenty complained of? The 308 ‘ ‘ F irs t, us to th e pow er o f in ju n c writs issued to guard patents, to tio n a n d o f p u n ish m e n t fo r co n tem p t. suppress unfair competition, to I n c o n te m p t cases, sav e w h ere im m ed i abate nuisances and to protect a a te ac tio n is im p e ra tiv e , th e tr ia l should be b e fo re a n o th e r ju d g e. As r e great variety of rights iii varying g a rd s in ju n c tio n s, some such le g isla tio n circumstances, excite no indigna as th a t 1 h av e p rev io u sly recom m ended tion, but the forlorn and isolated should bo en acted . T h ey are b lin d w ho twenty, do they all arouse the re fa il to re a liz e th e e x tre m e b itte rn e s s caused am ong la rg e bodies o f w o rth y sentment of organized labor? Is c itiz e n s by th e use t h a t h as been r e each a cause of executive accusa p e a te d ly m ade o f th e pow er of in ju n c tion? If so, in what respect? tio n in la b o r d isp u tes. T hose in whose President Roosevelt offers no bill ju d g m e n t w e h av e m ost rig h t to tr u s t, a re o f th e opinion th a t w hile m uch of of particulars. The attorney-gen th e co m p lain t a g a in s t th e use o f th e eral, Bonaparte, with access to the in ju n c tio n is u n w a ra a n te d , y e t th a t it records of every circuit court, pro is u n q u e stio n a b ly tr u e t h a t in a num fesses himself unable to give infor b e r of cases th is po w er h as been used to th e g ra v e in ju ry o f th e r ig h ts of mation concerning the abuse of la b o rin g men. I ask t h a t i t be lim ite d injunctions to inquiring members in some such w ay as t h a t I h av e a l of Congress, and is, apparently, re a d y p o in te d o ut in m y p rev io u s m es without facts for either the exec sages, f o r th e v ery reaso n th a t I do n ot w ish to see an e m b itte re d effort m ade utive or the legislature. to d e stro y i t . ,f During three years of argument Now, sirs, let us inquire upon before the judiciary committee of what facts are these grave reflec the House on various proposals to tions predicated. Surely the high limit or withdraw the writ of in est official of the nation cannot ut junction in labor disputes, con ter them without warrant. Cer stant effort lias been made, both tainly, he must possess facts to by your representatives and by verify this declaration. Has be members of the committee, to se supplied them to Congress, as at cure specific statements as to the other ' lines and in other eases he alleged improper use of the writ. has offered evidence to substanti We have repeatedly said to the ate the wisdom of his recommen opponents of such legislation: dations? Do those to whose pro “ You are before the Law Commit test he alludes, offer proof of the tee of the House. You make as numerous abuses to which they sertions that reflect upon the very have been subjected? We have integrity of the judiciary. Upon heard the indictment, let us ex what facts do you base them? amine the evidence. Where are the injunctions improv The average man might really idently issued and oppressively believe from the clamorous denun enforced? What are the judicial ciation of “ government by injunc decisions against which you pro tion,” that the Federal courts do test? File them with the commit little but issue injunctions in la tee and let us have evidence, not bor disputes. One would imagine vague, loose and declamatory their approaches jammed with statements upon which to base dis jostling employers, petition in cussion, for never in our history hand, the judge distributing re has a single judge, much less the straining orders as a bill-boy scat judiciary of the nation, been im tors circulars. But, sirs, with the peached without a specific plead record spread open, before we con ing.” And in response to these sider how frequently the writ is requests we have bad isolated in sues, let us pause to ask ourselves junctions occasionally presented, what it is. The writ of injunction and much disjointed criticism is an extraordinary remedy. It based upon misapprehension of does not issue with the frequency adjudications, and frequent mis of a summons or subpoena. It is statements of circumstances, the an order of a eourt of competent evidence of which exists in the jurisdiction generally prohibiting records of numerous hearings be the doing of certain things, but fore the Judiciary Committee. sometimes assuming a mandatory But about May 1, 1908, twenty- form to require the doing of three restraining orders, com others. It proceeds from an equity plaints and a number of decisions tribunal whose chief function is were filed with the Judiciary Com to prevent the doing of wrong, an mittee as the basis for these years office in which it is distinguished of continuous demand for reme from courts of law, whose purpose dial legislation. Among their is to cr mpel compensation after number arc fourteen of the twenty barm lias been inflicted, and since injunctions issued during the past the very essence of equity power five years, to which I have refer exercised through tills writ is pre red, but in no case does the com vention rather than cure, it acts plaint upon which they were is upon the presentation of allega sued accompany them, and in no tion of fact, supported by affida instance are the errors alleged or vits and such other evidence as it the wrongs asserted even suggest may require, not merely to pre ed, much less arc they definitely vent future irreparable injury, specified. Indeed, when asked if but that which is immediately they would not accompany their present and threatening, atid records with their criticism, the might e<ther destroy or impair the representatives of organized labor subject matter of controversy be declined to do so. So it must be fore the court could adjudicate assumed that they protest against upon it. or would work irremedi the injunctions presented, not for able harm while the plaintiff was specific error, but because they proving the danger of bis posi were issued at all. With this con tion. As it is the office of a court tention it is useless to argue, as it of law to bear and give judgment is not a legitimate subject of dis in compensation for injury suf cussion or an issue raised by any fered in the past, so it is the very but the extreme and radical with nature and purpose of an equity out serious support in any respon court to interpose its arm to pre sible quarter. Nor is the right of vent the commission of an injury a court to issue an cx parte order immediately menacing and for under proper circumstances ques which law courts can provide tioned in the most recent legisla neither adequate protection nor tive proposals, as I shall presently adequate compensation, and as the show you. and this despite the de great Lord Coke said. “ The pre mands of organized labor, the rec vention of wrong is far more im ommendation of the Executive, or portant than its compensation.” the opinions of politicians. (Continued in Next Issue. To return now to our inquiry as to the frequency with whmh this writ is applied. How often Pension bill of $40.000.000, think you. does it issue in the in num erable cases brought to the I which passed the House at Wash attention of Federal courts ington. and no doubt will pass the After carefully examining all the Senate, is a worthy bill. injunctions appearing in the rec Though we may think, on first ords of the circuit courts of the conclusions, this a vast amount to United States in the five years obligate the Government, but let from January 1. 1903, to the pres us consider if the 100,000,000 peo ent (May. 1908' we find only 32* ple in the country were asked to instances in which injunctions of contribute fifty cents each to the any kind have issued, and of these man or family giving up or offer 328 writs issued in five years, only ing his life for his country, we all twenty are involved in labor dis would be pleased to do so. 201 The Baggage & Omnibus East Water Street Transfer Co. PORTLAND EAST COR. EAST YAMHILL 63 u. s. General Transfering and Storage Laundry Company 180 Grand Avenue PORTLAND C. J. W IL S O N C om m ercial A rtist B ag g ag e S to red T h re e D ays F re e an d C arto o n ist 348 MARKET STREET P h o n e M a in 5645. Res. P h o n e E 6185. B ag g ag e C h eck ed a t Resi> dence, D irect to D estination O v er A ll Lines Arthur D. Monteith Civil and Hydraulic Engineer 587 E . 15th S t. N. P o rtla n d , Ore. G en eral S u rv e y in g , L an d sc a p e En g in e e rin g , C o n stru c tio n S u p e rin te n dence, R e p o rts an d E stim a te s on P r o j ects, W a te r S u p p ly , Irr ig a tio n , S e w e r age. N ow L u m b e r E x c h an g e B ldg. Your business should bo repre- ] Banted in T H E TIMES. We in terest ninety-two and one-half per cent. TH E TIM ES will give you the best run for your money you ever had. Figure it out with Main Office and Warehouse Park and Davis St». PORTLAND, OREGON s i v » a m ? . w ^ & m w A v . v . ,i 8 j You can quench your in- J, ward fire with just as good »J § “ hootch” at the following •»*, OPEN SHOP bars, and not ¡jj have the enjoyment les- sened by a big union card. These life-saving stations are classed as not being fair by labor publications. Web ster says fair means ‘ ‘ pleas- ing to the eye—beautiful.” We claim that these places Phoae or Write A £ \ jg > I j. •] Government :• Standard % 8 qualify according to Web- .J *♦ ster• 8 Hofbrau 128 6th St. Powders Company a g L o tu s 127 6th St. ^ PORTLAND Louvre 4th and Alder A And Have an Ex ■: Perkins 5th and Washington a pert Explain Our a *5 a Schultz | 5th and Washington 4 Ninely- Quelle 6th and Stark Money Maker Main First St. A £ Your business should tie repre sented in TH E TIMES. Wo in terest ninety-two and one-half The per capita wine consump [s-r cent. T H E TIMES will give tions of both the United States you the best run for your money and the United Kingdom are sur you ever had. Figure it out with us. prisingly small. t .V .V .V .V .V .V .V A V .V .W .V .1