Image provided by: State Library of Oregon; Salem, OR
About The Chemawa American (Chemawa, Or.) 19??-current | View Entire Issue (Nov. 26, 1930)
Page 3 The CH EM A W A A M E R IC A N T R U E PROPORTIONS ARROWS Jr&h •the LONGBOW — jg- — X3— — - (F rom the Q uiver of B aruch S pinoza ) W hat greater m isfortune for a state can be conceived th an th a t honorable men should be sent like crim inals into exile, because they hold diverse opinions w hich th ey cannot disguise. 3MB3» ■■■' >» H ow m any evils spring from lu x u ry , envy, avarice, drunkenness, and th e like, yet these are to lerated— vices as they are—because th ey cannot be prevented by legal enactm ents. I do not deny th a t there are some doctrines w hich, w hile they are apparently only concerned w ith abstract tru th s and falsehoods, are yet propounded and pub lished w ith unw orthy motives. N ot even th e most experienced, to say nothing of th e m ultitude, know how to keep silence. M en’s common failing is to confide th eir plans to others, th o u g h there be need for secrecy. Moses, not by fraud, but by D ivine virtue, gained hold over the popular judgm ent th a t he was accounted superhum an, and believed to speak and act th ro u g h the in spirations of th e Deity: nevertheless he could n o t escape m urm ers and evil interpretations. H e th a t know s him self to be u p rig h t does not fear th e death of a crim inal, and shrinks from no punish m ent; his m ind is not w rung w ith remorse for any disgraceful deed; he holds th a t death in a good cause is no punishm ent, but an honor, and th a t death for freedom is glory. If m en ’s m inds were as easily controlled as their tongues, every k in g w ould sit safely on his throne, and governm ent by com pulsion would cease. For every subject w ould shape his life according to the intentions of his rulers, and would esteem a th ing tru e or false, good or evil, ju st or u n ju st, in obedience to th eir dictates. T h e object for governm ent is not to change men from rational beings into beasts or puppets, but to en able them to develop th eir m inds and bodies in secur ity , and to employ th e ir reason unshackled; neither show ing hatred, anger, or deceit, nor w atched w ith th e eyes of jealousy and injustice. In fact, the tru e aim of governm ent is liberty. An inferiority complex is not by any means; a d e s ir able state of m ind, b ut in m any instances it is better th an a superiority com plex. To under estim ate one’s powers is to chain one-self to a certain level from w hich it is difficult or impossible to rise, w hereas, on the other hand over-estim ation of one’s powers or im por tance may lead to m any a hard knock and m uch h u m iliation. It scarcely m atters w hat th e project is it seems wise to pursue the m iddle course—to keep in th e m iddle of the road. Make haste slowly b ut surely, step by step, and then one is safe. It is a com m end able th in g to be know n as a “ plo d d er.” T he world tu rn s instinctively from an egotistical person. For m any reasons he is persona non grata— he does not m ix. His egotism is a handicap to him . On th e other hand tru e m odesty keeps one w ithin bounds, shields him from ridicule, and renders him companionable, and gains for him the respect and confidence of all. W henever we see a fellow who sizes him self up by the shadow he casts on a late afternoon we are rem inded of one of A esop’s fables, “ T he W olf and the D ion.” It runs as follows: “ A W olf, ro a m in g by th e m o u n ta in ’s side, saw h is ow n shad ow, as th e sun was se ttin g , becom e greatly e x te n d ed ^nd m agnified, a n d he said to h im self, ‘W hy should I, being of such im m ense size, and ex te n d in g n early an acre in le n g th , be afraid of Lions? O ught I not be acknow ledged as K ing of all th e collected beasts? W hile he was in d u lg in g in these p ro u d th o u g h ts, a Lion fell upon him an d k ille d him . H e exclaim ed w ith a too late re p en tan c e , ‘W retched me! T his over-estim ation of m yself is th e cause of d e stru c tio n .’ ” O R I G I N OF C H E H A L I S T he following little “ In dian S to ry ” was w ritten for us by Ducy Billy, a member of our 1 Oth grade class, b ut she says th a t she does not know positively the origin of the story: It was in th e days when the Indians had no p a r ticular boundaries to places, although the places had nam es. T here was a m an who came down from Canada and inter-m arried. H is bride was from what is now called the State of W ashington. A fter several years they had a son. T h e man felt lonesome and he told his wife th a t he wished to visit his hom eland for aw hile. H is wife consented, so one day they started on their journey tow ard the north«. T he baby refused to go and he cried so th a t they- couldn’t stop him. As was custom ary w ith th e Indians,, th e m other rocked him on her back from side to side,, b u t he w ouldn’t stop. H e finally gave up w hen his. parents w ouldn’t tu rn back. A fter a few years’ visit they started for th e ir W ashington hom e and took the very same path by w hich they had left it. T hey found a river th a t they had crossed some years before. T his river they called th e tear river, w hich I suppose is the translation of Chehalis.