Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The united American : a magazine of good citizenchip. (Portland, Or.) 1923-1927 | View Entire Issue (June 1, 1926)
THE UNITED merican A MAGAZINE OF GOOD CITIZENSHIP Devoted to the Cause of Vol. 4 Americanization, Assimilation and Group Elimination; Pointing the way to a Constitutional Americanism, to Equality in Citizenship, and a better understanding between Native born and Foreign bom. vo“umeous 22 June, 1926 Number 9 THE TOLL WE PAY ONBROKEN PROMISES A DRAIN ON OUR RESERVOIR OF NATIONAL INTEGRITY By H. J. LANGOE TA ID YOU EVER make a promise and, suddenly changing your mind, neglect to keep it? Well, what of it if you did, it’s a common occur rence, anyway you probably didn’t think that it was necessary for you to feel obliged to live up to a verbal bargain any more than those who have bargained similarly, time and again, with you and without any seeming scruples broke their promises and left you waiting in vain at the appointed time and place. Probably at first you had a troubled conscience, but its sensitiveness wore off by constant and re peated practice until you most likely became an adept at making promises of the kind that helped to clinch the bargains you were driving — promises you never intended to keep, but glibly made with the intention of breaking them. No doubt you gained your experience where other unscrupulous individuals had bargained with you at the sacred fountain of faith, where promises are taken at face value. No doubt, you cashed in at a sacrifice, became bitter and vowed that you would get even. Eventually, as you took it all in, you came to regard it as a good lesson in “sharp practices” and finally resolved that if others could get away with it, treating you that way — promising you this and that, as a matter of business convenience, breaking their promises without any compunction or evidence of moral scruples — there was no good reason why you should stand “licked.” Well, that’s probably the way you came to play “the game,” making money by plausible misrepresentation and bad promises. All in all, perhaps it has been a fascinating game, with plenty of thrills, especially when you took desperate chances with the law; but, you have to admit that it has left you bereft of that joy that is his who has lived up to his promises and never taken an undue advantage of anyone who placed trust and confidence in his integrity. The foreign born as much as the native born citi zen has been discounting his assets in this respect, and taken profit by placing a mortgage on his integ rity, honor and manhood. It is such a common thing to do in business and politics that the precedent justifies the offence in the minds of those who are clinching “deals” by unsavory methods. The tainted business game that is sustained by deception and the damnable practices of fraud and misrepresentation is publicly frowned upon, yet, somehow, it cannot be gainsaid that it has obtained a position of apparent respectability in the mart of business, and, there is a margin for the Contention that only those who are foolish make good on verbal promises- This breaking down of our moral principles in business is the reason for the present day necessity of putting every agreement and every promise in writing so that a record, “black on white,” can make the business bargain a reasonable certainty. A promise, a pledge, an obligation, a vow and an oath are practically all in the same category. The sacredness attaching to their origin has been turned into promiscuous violations no less unwarranted than alarming. Promises must be kept, and oaths never violated, Such is the language of the business and political code of morals handed down to us from an earlier* period of time. Adherence to this .rule, records tell, was common, as violations were classed as excep tions. In principle this rule stands acclaimed today, and men pay homage, in public places, to those who most eloquently espouse the cause of strict integrity. In theory the principle stands as inviolable today as any time, notwithstanding our shabby practices of deception, our flaunting disregard of the sacredness of an obligation and the wanton way in which we violate an oath. May we call to mind a once very popular “toast,” it may be a discourtesy to recite such ancient and stale phrases, but the old fashioned citizen may be