Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The Northman. (Portland, Or.) 1920-192? | View Entire Issue (April 29, 1920)
z--------------- — April 29, 1920 THE NORTHMAN 8 'i Foreign Language Press From the Oregon Voter. <_______ _ ___________________________ .___ / [C. C. Chapman, editor of the Oregon Voter, is one of the best known writers and publicists of Oregon. He has for many years been engaged in constructive, civic and political work in the development of the state and his publication is widely accepted as an impartial review and re ference work on men and measures touching the public welfare.] E confess that seldom in a quarter century of experience in listening to public adresses W have we been as deeply impressed as we were recently in hearing Haakon J. Langoe before the Portland Press Club. Mr. Langoe is editor of Pacific Skandinaven, a foreign language news paper of Portland. With an eloquence born of intense feeling and a diction that could have been acquired only by familiarity with English classics, he pleaded for the Americanization of the foreign language press in the manner prescribed by the much-discussed Norblad law hastily enacted at the recent legislative session. While Mr. Langoe did not convert us to the conviction that the law was completely just or fair under all the cir cumstances, he presented a viewpoint which for lofty Americanism and high principle commanded our profoundest respect. Heart interest was imparted to his remarks by his simple relation of the parting admonition of his father when the young man left Northern Norway at the age of 19 to seek his fortune in the land of the Free. The fact that the day before the address, the speaker had received a cablegram announcing the death of this beloved parent, lent tragic emphasis to the personal incident he related. “My father’s last words to me at the steamship dock when I was about to part from my native land were: ‘My son, be a good citizen of the country to which you are going to make your home.’ And again, at the same dock after I had finished my one return visit to my birthplace, he repeated almost the same words: ‘My son, re member; always be a good citizen of the land in which you have made your home.’ ” That the speaker had endeavored to live up to this ideal was felt by every listener to his burning words. All felt that except in birth he was as genuine an American as any citizen of this republic could be, and that in the intensity of his patriotic ideals he was setting an example which all of native birth could take to heart as an inspiration to better Americanism. A conception that was new to us was conveyed by him in clear language with reference to the obligations conferred by American citizenship. “We must eradicate”, said he, “the erroneous belief that being law-abiding alone constitutes the essential qualification of citizenship in America.” ■ He told of the applicant for naturalization, who in his contact with the machinery whereby foreign born are transformed into American citizens, gained the notion that the one supreme obligation of conduct as a citizen was to “obey the law.” “In other words,” as he put it, “to keep out of jail,—by not committing a crime an American is as good an American as is required by his naturalization oath, aside merely from the renunciation of old allegiance and the vow of new allegiance. To keep out of the clutches of the police or the sheriff—that is what to his mind is the embodiment of the essential qualifica tion.” “American citizenship has a deeper meaning,” he declared with fervor, “and confers a fuller obligation and duty than mere obedience to law.” Mr. Langoe also analyzed the situation with reference to what he characterized as “com munities within communities,”—meaning the communities of foreign-born people, with their foreign ideals perpetuated in the midst of the broader American community from which they separate themselves mainly by failure to realize the duty of adapting themselves to the full point of view of American citizenship and its deeper obligations. “While the mind of the American public during every day that passes finds itself confronted with many new problems, political and social, that must be dealt with,” said he, “there is one problem that stands foremost and must not be confused with other issues. That problem is the Americanization (not mere naturalization) of the foreign born. “Out of the war struggle has come to the American consciousness a deeper meaning of citizenship. With this there has been the growing conviction that a thoughtless policy has been pursued heretofore in permitting and encouraging the establishment of racial and nationality com munities within communities. These communi ties within communities must be absorbed into the larger community of American nationality. “As a step, the foreign language press in America should be discouraged rather than encouraged. The true conception of the duties and qulifications that are vital to American citizenship will not be conveyed to a foreign born citizen in a publication printed in his native tongue. This true concept can only come to a man who learns to understand them through the language of this nation—the American language, as I prefer to call it. “To make of America one nation in its deeper meaning, the community within a community must forsake its identity in language. Its broader activities,' social and religious, must take on the language of America in order to discharge its obligation. The America of today must move towards a more conscious conception of national ism than that which has marked its past if the American institutions and form of government given us by birth or adoption are to be preserved and transmitted as a heritage to future genera tions. / “Efforts to control the freedom of the foreign language press in America, as set forth in the King bill in Congress, were defeated on the ground that the measure was infringement of rights of free speech and free press as guaranteed by the constitution. This defect has been remedied in spirit in the Norblad bill, enacted at the recent special session in Oregon, whereby it is proposed to regulate the foreign language press in this state by making it compulsory upon such publications to present in each issue a true translation of its contents in parallel columns. “This bill is to be tested as to its constitu tionality at the instance of those who oppose its enforcement. In its defense it will be urged that while a state may not abridge a constitutional right, it may regulate any business that claims its protection, and this measure is entirely regulatory. “It is unfortunate but true nevertheless that no particular qualification has ever been considered a necessary requisite for a foreign language editor in America other than he had an education in his native language obtained in his native country. Conduct of so vital an American insti tution as the press entails special responsibilities when a publication is written, edited and printed in a foreign tongue. Such publications, assum ing to teach American ideals and American spirit to foreign born in their foreign tongue, may rightly be regulated as to the form if not the substance of what they publish. “The treasured cultural values we of Scandi navian birth brought with us from our native soil—the traditions of the races and nations of our origin—will be better preserved and under stood when we adapt ourselves in our press to the American language. Then we shall never again have to explain in translation our stand on issues affecting the American people and the attitude of our people towards the same.” Mr. Langoe has made a strong case in behalf of the feature of the Norblad bill requiring translation in parallel columns, although the wisdom of adopting such a drastic measure with out public hearing or discussion may properly be called in question. To another feature of the Norblad bill, Mr. Langoe so far as we are aware has not addressed ' himself in justification—that is, the prohibition of the “display or sale” of a foreign language paper which may have been printed outside the State of Oregon or even out- A SAGA OF ORKNEY. Many men of the A. E. F. may have occasion to recall the port of Kirkwall, in the Orkney Islands. It was a strategic point in the naval affairs of the allies and particularly Eng land. In historical interest the old town of Kirkwall ranks with those of first importance in the world. A series of Sagas of the Orkneys center ing in Kirkwall will appear in The Northman beginning in an early issue. >. i ■ ............................... .. i - side the United States, unless it is published with the translation in parallel columns. It must be obvious that this requirement, strictly enforced, would shut all European newspapers, magazines and pamphlets (other than English), out of the public news stands of the state. We doubt whether the framer of this hastily prepared bill had any such object in mind or that Mr. Langoe would advocate prohibiting the display and sale of the principal literary, art and scientific maga zines and pamphlets of the non-English world on the public news stands of Oregon. True, these are details compared with the major issues so inspiringly stated by Mr. Langoe, but it is by detail that severe irritation is inflicted, and the errors in the Norblad bill deserve acknowledg ment by its friends and correction at the next legislative session. ks to the major issues raised by Mr. Langoe, thu people of Oregon and the Nation should address themselves to them—not in a spirit of bigotry and certainly not with hasty and ill- digested restrictions of a drastic character. Deliberation is essential to justice, and haste with best intent too often is the instrument of injustice, tyranny and oppression. The question is as big as Mr. Langoe proves it to be,—far too big for the arbitrary solution offered by the Nor blad bill. THE COMMON STOCK. Dr. Frank Crane We are told by gentlemen with a scien tific flourish and a professional cocksure ness that we are never going to get fine humans until we breed for fine men as carefully as cattle are bred to get fine beeves. Our race is demonstrated to be running to cretins and riminals because brides and grooms are selected by moon light and by holding hands, and are not nominated by the state board of health. But somewhere in the chain of reasoning which is supposed to carry the conclusions of the shorthorn pedigree book over into human nature, somewhere there is a miss ing link. For, as a cold, unscientific fact, the best stock of the human race is the common stock- For some reason when the great man arises he always grows out in the woods-pasture and never in the hothouse. Instances: Napoleon, Lincoln, Wagner, Beethoven, all the artists from Giotto to Whistler and all the writers from Homer to Kipling. TEACH THIS TO THE BOYS. This incident occured before the war on a ship coming home from Europe, but the point and lesson it contains was not de stroyed in the conflict: Australian lady was bringing her son to America to be educated. It was thought strange that she should want the boy brought here for an education, with so many world-famous institutions of learn ing in Europe, on being questioned, she replied: “I want my son to be taught considera tion for women.” After having observed conditions in several countries on the continent, one might well understand the reason of this high opinion of American chivalry. Ridicule and abuse are not argument. They are resorted to only in the absence of argument. THE NATION BUILDERS Ralph Waldo Emerson Not gold, but only men, can make A people great and strong; Men who, for truth and honor’s sake Stand fast and suffer long, Brave men who work while others sleep— Who dare while other fly— They build a nation’s pillars deep, And lift them to the sky.