Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The nugget. (Sisters, Or.) 1994-current | View Entire Issue (Oct. 7, 2020)
12 Wednesday, October 7, 2020 The Nugget Newspaper, Sisters, Oregon Commentary... 1619 vs. 1776 — history education is a battleground By Jim Cornelius Editor in Chief <There are two things that I believe to be true. First, that America has a long history of brutal and shameful mistreatment of racial minorities 4 with black Americans its chief victims. And second, that America is a great nation, and that American citizens (and citizens of the world) should be grateful for its founding. Perhaps no nation has done more good for more people than the United States. It was and is a bea- con of liberty and prosperity in a world long awash in tyr- anny and poverty.= 4 David French, The National Review History is always a bat- tleground. Ideologues mine it for raw materials that can be fashioned into weapons to deploy in contemporary culture wars. Given how intense our political and cul- tural conflicts have grown in the past few years, it9s not surprising that there is furi- ous dustup underway over what history is taught to young people. In this corner, we have the 1619 Project; in the opposite corner we have the 1776 Commission. The 1619 Project was launched in August 2019 by The New York Times and framed thus: <In August of 1619, a ship appeared on this horizon, near Point Comfort, a coastal port in the English colony of Virginia. It carried more than 20 enslaved Africans, who were sold to the colonists. No aspect of the country that would be formed here has been untouched by the years of slavery that followed. In the 400th anniversary of this fateful moment, it is finally time to tell our story truthfully.= The 1619 Project was hailed in some quarters as a long-overdue refocusing on the centrality of slavery and the Black experience in the creation of America. Critically, the Project asserts that this past is not dead 4 and not even past 4 that the legacy of slavery is part of the warp and weft of the American fabric, taint- ing its culture and all of its institutions. Nikole Hannah-Jones, the reporter who con- ceived of the Project and wrote its framing essay was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary. The Project is being proposed in some quarters as founda- tional material for teaching American history. The 1619 Project has been heavily criticized 4 and not just by people who are ideologically hostile to its premise. It took particu- larly telling hits for distort- ing the influence of slavery in motivating the American Revolution. Hannah-Jones acknowledged that her essay9s bald assertion to that effect was too strong. <I think someone reading that would assume that this was the case: all 13 colonies and most people involved,= she told an Atlantic reporter. <And I accept that criticism, for sure.= The 1619 Project9s focus on the continuity and per- sistence of racism creates a fundamental pessimism that shortchanges the truly radi- cal nature of the moment in 1776 when the American colonies declared their inde- pendence from Great Britain. In writing the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, a slaveholder, set a bar that he himself failed to meet 4 recognizing that all men are created equal. But the fact remains that the bar was set. Whatever progress we have made in racial justice can be laid to the imperative to 4 as Martin Luther King, Jr. put it 4 <be true to what you said on paper.= As Gordon S. Wood, author of <The Radicalism of the American Revolution= points out, <The notion of equality was really crucial. When the Declaration says that all men are created equal, that is no myth. It is the most powerful statement ever made in our history, and it lies behind almost every- thing we Americans believe in and attempt to do.= There is no question that there is a deep ideological tinge to the 1619 Project. Hannah-Jones is an advo- cate for reparations for the descendants of slaves. Many of the essays are loaded with a profound hostility to capitalism. This inevitably has led to a no less ideologically freighted backlash. President Trump announced last month the formation of a <1776 Commission= to promote <patriotic education= and a <pro-American= curriculum. He stated that, <Critical race theory, the 1619 Project, and the crusade against American history is toxic propaganda, ideological poi- son that, if not removed, will dissolve the civic bonds that tie us together. It will destroy our country.= We need to be careful here. Simply returning to the kind of triumphalist narra- tive that once fed Americans a heavily sanitized, feel- good version of our history is no antidote to pessimism. It9s a recipe for cynicism, because we can no longer hide from the darkness in our past. There is no honest version of American his- tory that can step around the original sins of chattel slav- ery and the displacement of indigenous peoples in the ethnic cleansing of the North American continent. But we should be at a point where we grasp hold of paradoxes, like that outlined by David French above, without melting down. In an op-ed for The Scotsman, Professor Richard Finlay and Dr. Alison Cathcart wrote of the Scots (who have their own con- temporary battles over his- tory): <One feature of a mature democracy is the respect it accords to its past, which means accepting it in its entirety, warts and all. There are good points and bad points in all national histories and accepting both is vital to avoiding the pit- falls of narrow, triumphalist chauvinism or debilitating defeatism. Neither of which is healthy.= There9s a question as to whether the United States qualifies as a <mature democracy.= The repub- lic certainly is venerable in age 4 but our current con- duct of its business cannot be described as <mature.= Perhaps according respect to the past would improve our efforts 4 but that means truly engaging with it. Sisters students get some Oregon history in elemen- tary school, and a couple of years of U.S. history instruc- tion in 8th and 10th grade. Maybe they need a lot more, plumbed to greater depth. That9s not so easy to deliver in an educational climate that is short on time and resources 4 but it9s worth it. I9m biased by my love for the subject, but, truly, it pro- vides knowledge and insight you can use every single day. As writer James Carlos Blake notes, <History is human nature writ large, and the better you understand the past, the better you9ll under- stand people in general, including those of our own day.= And knowing our his- tory helps us think critically about the narratives we9re fed by culture warriors working agendas that may threaten the integrity of that <beacon of liberty and pros- perity in a world long awash in tyranny and poverty.= OF CENTRAL OREGON Fall 2020 | NuggetNews.com Spirit of Central Oregon | Fall 2020 • 1 LOOK FOR YOUR COPY IN THE OCTOBER 14 ISSUE OF THE NUGGET!