Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About The nugget. (Sisters, Or.) 1994-current | View Entire Issue (Feb. 26, 2020)
16 Wednesday, February 26, 2020 The Nugget Newspaper, Sisters, Oregon DEVELOPMENT: Site plan review will be required in future Continued from page 1 was for preliminary approval of these uses, which acts as a placeholder. More detailed review of the development will occur at the time of site- plan review when the actual elevations, placement, and floor plans will be submitted. The MPD does not include the parcel containing the Dollar General store now under construction. The project is located w i t h i n t h e H i g h w a y Commercial Zone and is greater than five acres, requiring the MPD applica- tion and review. Subsequent site-plan review applications and approvals are required as a condition of approval of the Master Plan. All site-plan review applications must be submitted prior to the expi- ration of the Master Plan approval, which is three years from now. Approval of the Master Plan now makes the property more marketable to devel- opers who are interested in purchasing part or all of the MPD. The parcel can be divided up and sold to differ- ent parties, meaning it could be a phased development. As a condition of the approval, Threewind Partners will record a deed restric- tion on the property and all future lots and parcels cre- ated, noting their inclusion in the approved MPD. That requires future developers to adhere to all the requirements and conditions of approval by the City and other public agencies. Local architect Chris Mayes, working on behalf of the Threewinds Partners, has been working with City staff for two years. The application approved by the Planning Commission was the 14th version of the MPD. According to Mayes, Threewind Partners LLC of Eugene has owned the prop- erty since the late 1980s. He pointed out that the MPD is considered an infill project in the city, avoiding the need to increase the Urban Growth Boundary and avoiding urban sprawl. A neighborhood meeting was held by the applicant on January 21 at The Pines clubhouse, with about eight residents, to discuss the con- cept plan with the applicant and the owner9s team. Key issues discussed at that time included: building orienta- tion to increase privacy for residents of The Pines sub- division; dark skies compli- ant lighting; parking; garbage and recycling access; and connections to existing city streets. After the meeting, Mayes provided a revised set of drawings reflecting public agencies and informal public comments. Last Thursday for the pub- lic hearing, the Council cham- ber was full of residents from The Pines, the 55-plus devel- opment directly behind the MPD, and several residents from other parts of Sisters. Those not neighborhood resi- dents raised broader concerns such as whether Sisters needs this development, why allow it, and asking why can9t the City put a moratorium on this type of development. The City can9t institute a moratorium unless all the land zoned for this type of development is built out or the infrastructure can9t sup- port the development. If the proposed development meets the City9s zoning, develop- ment code, and building codes, it will be approved. <Once a property is zoned a certain way, we9re required to approve it with possible modifications,= said Community Development Director Patrick Davenport. Another concern raised was that <Sisters is begin- ning to look more and more like California= and that <we should be paying more atten- tion to the beauty of Sisters and the quality of life.= Someone else asked what the actual vision for Sisters is regarding developments. She suggested that traffic routes and flow need to be improved before proceeding with more developments. T h e P in e s re sid e n ts expressed concerns about traffic congestion both around and within the MPD, the accuracy of the traffic study, the proximity of the multi- family buildings to The Pines property lines, and where the children living in the apart- ments will be able to safely play. The commissioners made changes to two of the 41 con- ditions of approval put forth by staff. One had to do with ODOT9s requirement to align the entrance into the MPD off of West Hood Avenue with the entrance into the east portal across Hood. Commissioners wanted to allow the developer to have more time to meet with ODOT to deal with the alignment issue during the site-plan review. The second condition calls for construction of the full 24-foot wide through- street from McKinney Butte to Hood Avenue at one time. The applicant would like to be able to construct the vehic- ular and pedestrian routes in a phased manner to spread the cost out over a longer time period. There were three possible outcomes after the hearing. The Planning Commission could either approve the MPD application as presented, it could be approved with con- ditions, or it could be denied on the basis of whether the applicable standards and cri- teria can be satisfied either as submitted, or as miti- gated through conditions of approval. Based on the information and findings contained in their report, staff concluded that the requested MPD sat- isfied the approval criteria and recommended that the Planning Commission vote to approve the request, with the 41 conditions, which the Commission agreed with. The next step in the pro- cess is for staff to do a site- plan review, once the detailed drawings are submitted. Tasty THURSDAY Thurs., Feb. 27, 5 to 7 p.m. LIVE MUSIC Sat., Feb. 29, 6:30-8:30 p.m. Brian Odell & Fiddler Bob Baker 391 1 W. W . Cascade Casca Ca C scade de Ave. d Ave | 541-549-2675 A 541-5 541 54 1 1-549- 5 49 549 49-267 2675 267 67 5 corkcellarswinebistro.com k ll b WHERE IN THE WORLD IS The Nugget N E W S PA P E R ? Thanks, Adam Rudnick, for sharing your photo! Think you know where Adam is reading The Nugget? Visit facebook.com/NuggetNews and take a guess. Take The Nugget with you on your travels and send your pics to editor@nuggetnews.com. We’ll post on Facebook so readers can try to guess where in the world you were!