Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Daily capital journal. (Salem, Or.) 1903-1919 | View Entire Issue (Nov. 20, 1911)
DAILY CAPITA!. JOCTtXAL, BtT.FM, OREGON. MONDAY NOVEMBER 20, 1011. PAGB THRO CPTrs. Jane J&KenzieMl Send for theKC COOK'S BOOK Its FREE.. Read Carefully n wonderful KCCak'sBook,Mrs. Janet' ninKnTi I Till ri-. n , J fc fame, teUs every housewife how to become a'n expert cook-how' tf nri WoWTm 8 6P'y over whl? folTt The K C Cook's Book lis Mustrated In 9 colors,' contains 90 tested and yiutcu imjs uub nui uc jMcccjjut c i cry tiineil the few simple suggestions are followed. The K C Cook's Book has been prepared at an expense of many thousands of dollars, and if purchased at a store wonld easily cost 50 cents, yet we give it absolutely free as we want you to know exactly what K C Bakmg rowder is and what it will do for you in yonr own kitchen. You need this won. ilerlul book it fs of vital Importance co every liousewile. How to get the Cook's BooK Write your name and address plainly on tnis coupon. At tach tne colored ceruhcate II enclose ccrtlficnte. ,T ' Send the Cookl BoolX sending both to ns. ' FRISK. You will be mighty eladyoa bnicaMs 1 jAQtTB3 Mfg. Co. I Cb.icaex. i.ume x Adiln-w Y ICAN GUARANTE; Kg QUESrTraca I 21 OREGON SUPREME COURT DECISIONS Fall Text Published bj Courtesy of I. A. Turner, Reporter of the Supreme Court Froeltstel t. Trout and Donaldson, above set forth and under the follow Multiioiimh County. lng conditions, to-wit: Decided, November 7, 1911. if said note be not paid when due, H. 0. Proebstel, plaintiff and re- with interest and other charges due fipondent, v. V. A. Trout, defendant thereon, In full, then said certificate and appellant, and 8. J. Donaldson, and shares of stock shall belong ab defendant and respondent. Appeal solutely to said Florence Rucker, from the circuit court for Multnomah and the secrtary of said Portland county. Hon. C. U. Gantenbein, Collapsible Box company, or other judge Argued and submitted, Octo- proper official Is .hereby authorized ber 19, 1911. Oral argument by A. and directed to transfer to the said E. Clark (Collier & Collier and A. E. Florence Rucker on the books of said Clark on the brief) for W. A. Trout, company and to do any and all things Oral argument by G. Evert Baker for necessary to a full, correct and legal Proebstel. L. E. Huntsman on the transfer of the ownership of said brief for Donldson. Burnett, J. Af-j stock or certificates thereof from the firmed. 'undersigned to the said Florence The substance of the complaint In Rucker. this suit is that about December 8, 1 In witness whereof, I have this day 1908, the defendant Trout borrowed j set my hand this 8th day of Decem- from Florence Rucker $1,000, giving ber, 1908. his note therefor, cd at the same time executed and delivered to her the following writing (Signed) W. A. Trout." It Is further alleged, in substance, that on July 12, 1909, Florence Ruck- "Whereas I, the undersigned, W. A. er sold, assigned and transferred the Trout, secured a loan from Florence debt then due from defendant, Trout, Rucker this 8th day of December, to G. C. Donaldson and thereafter on 190S. In the amount of S1.000. and:the 21st of July. G. C. Donaldson due on or before six months from ' for a valuable consideration sold, as date, as evidenced by a certain prom-1 signed transferred and delivered said issory note signed by me and payable j debt to one S. J. Donaldson, one of to said Florence Rucker and due In i the defendants herein, said amount and due at said time, I It seems that about this time Flor and being desirous of securing the ence Rucker and G. C. Donaldson In Tayment of said note, we do hereby Itermarried and on July 21st, 1909, deposit with said Florence Rucker ; they endorsed and signed upon the 20,000 shares of the stock of the back of the pledge contract the fol Portland Collapsible Box company, 'lowing writing: incorporated under the laws of the "We, the undersigned, for value re state of Oregon, as collateral secur-'ceived, hereby sell, assign and trans Ity for the payment of said note. (fer all right, title and Interest In Said stock being evidenced by certl- i and to the within contract and to the fleate No. 74 to Walter A. Trout for stock therein described and set forth, 20,000 shares. with full power to have said stock Said stock is deposited with said transferred on the books of the corn Florence Rucker for the purpose pany, as agreed on In said contract by Walter A. Trout to S. J. Donaldson." The plaintiff alleges the subse quent assignment to himself of the debt and contract of pledge; that no part of the debt has been paid by the defendant Trout, and further; thatS. J. Donaldson, one of the defendants, claims to own an equity in the cer tificate of stock mounting to 6950 shares. The usual prayer is made for a decree against the defendant Trout for the sum of $ 1,000 and In terest and that tha stock be sold for the satisfaction of the decree. la the answer of the defendant Trout he "admits that on or about the 8th day of December, 1908, he borrowed from one Florence Rucker the sum of $1,000. In this connection the defendant alleges that he execut ed his promissory note therefor, due June 8, 1909, payable to the said Rucker, and bearing Interest at the rate of JO per cent per annum, and further admits that he delivered to Rucker at the time of the execution of the contract a certificate for 20 000 shares of the capital stock of the Portland Collapsible Box company for the purposes set forth In said contract, 'mat said contract was executed and the said stock certifi cate delivered solely as security for the payment of the promissory note mentioned In paragraph I. of this an swer." Otherwise the defendant Trout de nies every allegation of the conv plaint. Further In his answer the defendant Trout alleges that on July 23, 1909, he was ready, willing and able to pay the full amount due on the promissory note described, and on that day he duly tendered to Florence Rucker also to S. J. Donaldson, men tioned In the complaint, the full amount, with all accrued Interest due upon the said promissory note and demanded the return to him of the certificate for the said corporate stock. It will be noted In passing that he does not allege what amount of money he tendered at the time mentioned. He further states: "that, long prior to the commencement of this suit, the owner and holder of the foresaid promissory note surrend ered, cancelled and delivered up the said note to the defendant and the said note was then and there satis- fled, discharged and cancelled." He prays that the plaintiff take nothing by this suit and further prays an affirmative order of the court directing and requiring the plaintiff to dellved up the certificate for 20,000 shares of the capital stock of the company. The new mat ter In Trout's answer Is traversed In the reply. The answer of the defendant, S. J. Donaldson, asserts title In himself to 6950 of the 20,000 shares named In the certificate of stock and alleges that at the time he transferred the note and contract of pledge to the plaintiff he gave the latter notice of that claim. The new matter In the answer of the defendant S. J. Donaldson is not controverted by anyone, either the plaintiff or the co-defendant Trout so far as we can discover from the transcript or abstract of record be fore us. After a trial on the Issues Involved, the circuit court rendered a decree according to the prayer of the com plaint, directing a sale of the 13,050 shares of the stock owned by Trout to be made first to satisfy the decree and If that were Insufficient that the 6,950 shares belonging to Donaldson be next sold. The defendant Trout alone appeals. Burnett, J. The plea of tender made by the defendant Trout can avail him nothing In this suit for the reason that he does not state the amount of money vtiieh he tendered to Donaldson on the date he men tions. To make the plea of tender effectual the' amount tendered must be stated, because without this, it is impossible for the court to reach the conclusions which the pleader draws that the full sum was tendered. The allegation of the answer, that the money tendered was the full sum due, amounts only to a conclusion of law. The fact of the exact amount tendered must be stated In order for the court to draw the same conclu sions that the pleader has reached In his statement Goss v. Bowen, 104 Ind. 207; Dickerson v. Hayes, 26 Minn. 100; Knight v. Abbott, 30 Vt 577; Chase t. Welch 7 N. W. 895. Moreover, the defendant Trout does not, in his answer, give the court sufficient data by which, the balance due could be calculated even tf his allegation In that respect was suffl clent, for although he admits giving a note on the 8th day of December, maturing June 8th following and that the note bears Interest at the rate of 10 per cent per annum, he does not Btate whether the note was to bear interest from date or from maturity Hence, If we were permit ted to compute the sum then due when the tender was made, as al leged, there Is not sufficient material In the answer to enable us to reach a correct conclusion on the matter. As to the tender we are satisfied that the same result must be reached upon the merits, for although on July 23, 1909, the defendant Trout offered In writing to pay S. J. Donaldson $1,063 without stating to what the payment was to be applied and de manding that the certificate of stock be delivered up to him; still the evi dence shows that he was not then In position to have made good his of fer of payment even If it had been accepted. He says himself that he had not the money and that he had only negotiated with a friend to sup ply him the money. Even this friend does not say that he had the money where it could be Immediately fur nished but that he would have had to make further arrangements for It Hence, we think that although the writing Itself may have dispensed with, the immediate . offer of the money, in specie, yet It must have been made in good faith and that It would not dispense with the defen dant's actual ability and readiness to pay the money. In short tho effect of the conduct of the defendant Trout on that subject, as disclosed In the evidence was In reality a mere pre tense or skirmish for advantage. A strong presumption that the defen dant Trout was not acting In good faith when he made the offer In writ ing is drawn from the fact that he has not brought the money Into court so as to keep the tender good. Conceding, without deciding, that an Issue Is raised as to the ownership of the defendant Donaldson in 6,950 shares of the stock In question, we think his ownership Is sustained by the "weight of the testimony on the merits of that controversy lust rated by the following authori ties: Texas v. Hardenberg, 10 Wall. (C. S.) 89; Craig t. Leslie, S Wheat (U. S.) 578; Campbll v. Freeman, 99 Cal. 546; Dofld v. Wilson, 4 Delch 114. 408; Sandeford r. Lewis, 6SGa. 4S4; Pomeroy v. Benton, 57 Mo. 551; Hardin v. Emmons, 63 Pac. 854; Stockton t. Central R. Co. 50 N. J. Eq. 73; Meier v Cardlngton, 55 Ohio St 460; Frlnk v. Cole, 10 111.339; Bennettv. Minott 2S Ore. 339. With this rule In mind let us examine the facta as disclosed by the testimony. S. J. Donaldson became the owner of the note and its accompanying collateral by virtue of the endorse ment of the payee and her then hus band, G. C. Donaldson. Being thus in possession of the note, and it hav ing matured and become past due as suming, perhaps, that he could fore close the mortgage by Its terms, he took the note and delivered It to the defendnt Trout, who was at the time secretary of the corporation, and de manded that in accordance with the letter of the collateral contract he should transfer the 20,000 shares named In the certificates to the de fendant Donaldson. Trout took the note and said in substance he would attend to It soon, but Instead of transferring the stock he made the offer In writing to which njluslon has already been made, although he retained possession of the note. Trout contends that the surrender of the note extinguished not only the note Itself, but also the debt which It rep resented. All the circumstances of this case show that no such Intention can be derived from the conduct of either of the parties. Donaldson was evidently attempting to foreclose the pledge and realize upon the security and not to discharge the debt until that end was accomplished. That Trout did not so Intend the transac tion Is shown by his offer at a sub sequent time on the same day to pay the money, evidently upon that debt although It Is unspecified In his of fer. We conclude that at least in eqully the debt Itself was 'not extin guished. ' - Being In possession of tne pledged property, after default In payment of the debt for which the stock was pledged, S. J. Donaldson had a quail tied property in the stock. Relnstln v. Roberts, 34 Ore. 87; Swank v. Ell wert. 55 Ore. 487; 105 Pac. 902. Be ing the owner of the debt Itself and having this qualified property In pledge, Donaldson could convey that to the plaintiff either as the absolute owner of the same or bo as to give him authority to collect It for the We think the main question In this! f? 1 Ofl! FfftCf case should be decided according to the maxim that equity regards the substance rather than the form. "By force of this principle, equity goes behind the form of a transaction In order to give effect to the Intention of the parties either, to aid an act abortive at law because formally de fective or to Impose a liability as against an evasion by a formal con cealment of Its true character." 16 Cyc. 134. This general prlnclpl Is further II- If you watch a man spraying his lawn for about two minutes you can tell whether he has confidence in the hose or not. If he keeps glancing from one end of It to the other you can depend that he'i getting nervoui and it watching for a wetting. Don 't take chances when you can buy Electric Hose and be absolutely suie of the highest efficiency. Klectrlc Hose will not burst, crack or split. It's made of seamless seine twine jackets and rubber tubes. SALO HAUIHYAIIE COMPANY A 25c Bottle of "Swissco" Hair and Scalp Remedy to t$e oiven Away. Take the Coupon to J. C. Perry and They Will Give You a 25c Bottle Free. "Swissco" Grows Hair, Brings Back Its Original Color, and Removes Dandruff and Scalp Diseases. First W'k. Third Week. SY1SSC0" DID IT. Fifth Week, The free 23 bottle or Hwtaco" Vvn tl ' used a directed, will aatoiilsb yuu. It 1. a Nbw UK MM ( " latest and best preparation before the public. It is tie r t years of Investigation and reseorcu Into the reason why. T of the hair preparations bare failed In tte P-'t ' J demanded of them. It Is marvel, Id It. nM. d1h;?Y1 have received ninazlns results Just from the free borne r s them for the asking. ,i,i., , nnP ,. Uf from AnmetlllniC Because you niay not l'' r; "', ' cn(,Ion eveml,i wea wW:;..., baited .he zrz Rwlssoo." .VK and l.'H. a bottle I -r i, ,t ..dPta .Tew. will re,,.ve free bottle, prepaid, on receipt or 1 t-"r,i"n a'lrm ,g me H.-i.svo f?Ter expense of packinf. V,1.? Xinu.il, Ohio. you ise by all J. c (.mill'' FKLE DOTTLE 101 TO.N ,1 f.,r one bottle only, .it J. : IVrry. 1".-, (.,uth r' lai street, when name und a.Mrew t jr"l-rijr filleil a'Cttt'le ""en.!!,, 'l- cent- la a-.m,.. or .liver dir.. t ? " . , ii,.ir Itemed i- ' .. 4TM V. . Mare. Oiidiiiiatl. 1 . .. i.u.-blntr vl i- -M Will Bill'J'iJ -,l - lllll'J III I li.l If hllf use it Glre full address; write plainly. SMOKE LA CORONA 10c CIGAR Standard of Quality Tashmoo Bon Ton 12 l-2c 5c Aug. Huckenstein, Mfr Salem, Ore. . Beautiful New Cloth Dresses ! for Women and Misses These Dresses are ex quisitely handsome in de- sitn, rich in materials S-JJ and perfect in workman- ' ship. p They come in high neck TK and Dutch neck styles, ( ( maoe ot frencn serge, Velvet and Henrietta. Entire line at greatly re duced prices. OUR THANKSGIVING SALE is a Saving Event for Everyone. All Coats Reduced. All Dresses Reduced. All Silk Slips Reduced. All Suits Reduced. All Silk Petticoats Reduced. All Furs Reduced. All Linens Reduced. 7 i" -'A 1 1 w U. G. Shipley Company j y utility I'o pillar r GO 145-147 North Liberty Street, s MEUCHAXDISE PKICES t I 4 benefit of Donalduon, We think tbe acta of the parties, as detailed. In the testimony and their Intent to lie drawn therefrom, show that the prop erty waa regularly transferred to ProobHtel for tho purpose of enabling Iilm to collect It for the benefit ot the defendant Donaldson and that for the purposes of this suit Proeb stel stands In the same right that his grantor Donaldson stood. On tho merits, Propbstel Is shown to be acting In good faith for the rea son that he had another cause ot Butt against said Trout In connection with stock In that corporation and It was thought best to Include the two In the wuiie complaint In the first In stance. From a legal standpoint as well as from the substantial equities of the caBe we think the defense ot tho defendant Trout Is without merit and the decree of the court below should be affirmed. When at Portland! Go to the 8ii!s.M,js.aJLt .. . J .-. A mm m &$,:tt n m f ,,... . M vM SAVE YOURSELF There is no reason why you should always be a slave. If you are desliotis of saving yourself or a friend from a drunk ard's grave, you cannot afford to overlook the opportunity offered at the Hot Lake Sanatorium for the cure of the liquor and drug habit. Hot Lake mineral baths prepare the body for the treatment and then sooth the nerves and actually remove the deBlre for the liquor or drug. Hundreds of happy homes In Oregon and Washing ton today bear witness to the efllctency of the Hot Lake treatment One week will In most cases effect a cure. Sometimes longer Is re quired, but not often. Tbe bent of care Is given the patients. For full Information, address Hot Lake Sanatorium, "rlgon6' WALTER X. FIEKCE Pre, and Mgr. BOWERS Rates $1,00 up, Break fast and lunch 50c, Din ner $1,00, Also a la Carte service In grill, One block from Oregon Elec tric on 11th and Wash ington streets, Salem people cordially invited to make our house their headquarters, I F. P. WILLIAMS, formerly with Marion f - CAPITAL GARAGE VlfK IlltOS., Proprietors Storage, Ropalrlng, Supplies. We carry In stock Goodrich Tires, Preut O Llte'Tunks, Ever-ready Ilattorles, Weed Chains, and a full lino of Auto Supplies. Agents for Locomobile, Ohio, Hudson, Oak land and Elmore Cars.. Call for catalogues and demonstrations. 13 South Liberty Street. I'lioue Main 783. M - . Morris' Avenue Cash Feed and Grocery Store Corner Morris Avenue and Fair Ground Road PHONE .tr.ll ll!7 6 gul. Kerosene (bring can) Cue Nice Sugar Cured limns, lb 17c 14 lbs. best Cane Sugar 1 1 .00 ft lbH. beut White lleuiis 25c Nice Sugar Cured llacon, lb 17c Nice SiiKiir Cured I. N. Hams 12c Two 1-lb. papers A. & II. Soda l'c 2 lbs. bent Tillamook Cheese 35c r. lbs. Albers Cream Kolled Oats 25c 10 lb. suek Corn Meal ; 25c H bars Crystal White Soap 5Uc 11 bars Sunny Monday Soap 50c 11 bars A. 11. Naptlia Soap 50c I have the best 25c Coffee In Salem. Perfection Flour, sai-k $1.10 Highland Wend 1125 Yakima Uest U-35 I will pay your street car fare on $5.00 or over purchase Come and see me; I will save you money. FREE DELIVERY ; V h) MM Ml: ! i i i i i i t U M: t: , ' ' ;V. : iiair Jiemeuj i. v., -