■M
APRIL 20
1905.
Exposition Notes
Says Gold Has Moral Quality.
set forth fact» .uftieiPnt to .how that the w it of review has ever inued an 1. sec.
WILL REMAIN “DRY.”
N
ew Y' okk .-April 17.—“ There is a
“Hit the Trail” at tb > Lewis and
inferior court in the exerewe of judicial o id. that the attempt ■* liiretn made to
funtioiiH, appear, to have exercised *uch |:eview a purely tnini.teria! act of the moral quality in money. Judas sold the Clark Exposition, opening in Port
Writ of Review on Local Op
Savior tor 30 pieces ot silver. That is land, June 1.
function« erroneounly and to have ex c u itv co^irt.
Work ou the Culifornia Building at
tion Election Would not
The
judge
took
the
matter
under
ad
$5.10 in our money. Do you suppose
ceeded its jurisdiction to the injury of j
the Lewis and Clark Exposition is
Hold Water.
some bubstantial right of the plaintiff visement until this morning, when Mr. Judas is the only person who lias be progressing rapidly, and the building
and not otherwise. The order made by Talmage came into court to dismiss traved the Savior for $5 10? Elery will be completed by May 1.
Circuit c<»ur» convened on Monday,
the Honorable Judge of thia court, bear i all proceedings subsequent to the order man who takes tioney from his neigh
with Judge Galloway on the bench, and
Captive baloons, airships and an
ing date December 18tli, 19t)4, contains for the writ of review and for a new bor without equivaleut is lietravinx his aerodrome will prove very interesting
all the case* have been disposed ol with
certain recitals, but it does not show order to issue a writ of review. As Mr. master,''declared Rev. George 1-. Pente features of the Lewis and Clark Expo
the exception of the two cases against
that it has tieen made to appear to the Eddy did not object to that the coin t cost in a sermon at the Mndison-Avenue sition. A number of flying contests
the estate of Henry Alderman, which
Baptist Church on the subject of so- ate being atrunged.
Judge that any error had been com made an order to that effect.
are taken under advisement until Friday
Hon. Cariosy Cotflgny, secrefaty of
mitted,
to
the
injury
of
any
substantial
called
" Tainted money.”
morning.
Gets a Fortune.
•• Some people,” he continued, " ask state of Cuba and a number of bis
right of the plaintiff, or otherwise, and
State of Oregon, plaintiff, vs. Frank
distinguished countrymen have an
Severance, administrator of Herman
said order, instead of directing the is
Charles G. James, the young man etn- why need we inquire into the color of nounced their intention of visiting the
Brown, deceased, defendant, (’onfirma
suance of a writ of review, proceeds to ployed to shovel seed for the Portland money, whether it be clean or dirty, so Lewis and Clark Exposition.
tion. Eddy & Botts for plaintiff. Mo
command the clerk of the county court Seed Company, who learned some time long as it tie given to God. tor tile altar
An interesting display at the Lewis
tion for an order authorizing the slate
to certify to the proceedings. This, the ago that he was to receive $500,000 from sanctities the gift.
and Clark Exposition from the Navajo
treasurer to draw warrant in favor of
administrator for $803.60 allowed.
•• I do not hesitate to say this is the Indian Reset ration will show Indian
court has no jurisdiction to do, except in his Grandfather Whitaker’s estate in
the manner provided4>y statue, that is, England, received a letter on Monday most immoral doctrine I ever heard We blanket-weavers making the rugs that
C. & E. Thaver, plaintiffs, vs. Ben.
have made the Narajos famous.
ton Turner,
defendant.
Action for
its own clerk should idsue a writ of re saving that from new evidence just un must look at the whole question. There
monev. Handley & Thayer for plain
Sites have been selected for the
view. Sec. 601 B. & C. Comp.
covered hi» portion would he doubled, is more in the Bible about money than Philippine village and the Homer
tiffs Continued for service.
Counsel for plaintiff in error seems to making his estate $1,000,000.
regenerrtion
or
forgiveness.
We
must
Tues,
I Davenport pheasant farm. These will
James W. Johnson, plaintiff, vs. The
have been in a state of uncertainty as to day he wears that Surnv Jim smile ask how- God has told us to get money be located near the Experimental
Tillamook Logging Co., defendants.
Gardens and the Grand Esplauude.
whether the said order of December 18th, which w ill not come off. When seen he and to use monev.”
Action for money. Eddy & Botts for
1904, constituted merely an order allow, said he did not know when he would get
plaintiff; Handley & Thayer for de
The richest man in the world, Dr. Pen-
A $150,000 exhibit of the products
fendant. Settled and dismissed on mo
ing a writ of review or was itself a writ ri I of the smile, and the pleasant wrink tecost declared, lias been said to hold of the Philippine Islands will be un
tion of plaintiff.
of review. Upon the face of the docu les about his mouth grew to greater pro from $500.000,000 to $1,000,000,000. interesting feature of the United States
Government’s magnificent participa
0. A. Keep plaintiff, vs The Oregon Writ of Review on Local Option ment it appears to be an order and yet
'* He has given,” he said, “ in charity tion in the Lewis and Clark Expoietiou.
p irtions.
Navigation Co., a corpora.
Election
is
Knocked
Out.
it
contains
some
language
that
w
ould
in
$28,500.000
during
his
lite,
and
some
In the letter which he received Monday
tion, F H. Kkinner, J. K. Lock and A.
Two hundred Igorottes, Moros,
John S. Lamar, plaintiff in error, vs. dicate that it is intended to perform the evening it was stated that evidence had people hail him therefore as one ot the
J. Parringtpn, defendants, Action for
Negritoes and Visayans wilt sail from
The
County
Court
of
Tillamook
County,
monev. J M. Pcarcy and Handley &
office of a writ. Ac the beginning of been obtained that his grandfather had greatest benefactor* of modern times. the Philippine Islands this week for
Thaver for plaintiff. Continued for ser defendants in error. Writ of review. the document, opposite the title, is writ
married a second cousin, which makes They have raked over his lite with a fine Portland, where they are to partici
W. Talmage for plaintiff ; District
vice.
ten the word “order” ; on the back it is her portion of the estate left by her rela tooth comb and this is the sum they pate in the Lewis and Clark Exposi
Attorney
and
Eddy
&
Bott«
for
de
Geo. W. Kiger, plaintiff, vs. G. <)
endorsed “ writ of review.” Not having tives the same amount which was left have discovered he has given. I tell you tion.
Nolan and O. J. Painter-Nolan, defen- fendants.
Mr. Eliza Warren, the oldest living
dants. Action for money. C. W. Tai-
When this case came up on Wednesday been issued in the manner provided by by Mr. James’ grandfather. When the it is no more for that particular gentle
mage for plaintiff; Eddy & Botts for H. T. Botts moved that the proceedings law, it cannot, of course, be considered news was first obtained that the James man to have given that enormous sum white child who was with the famous
Marcus
Whitman expedition and a
defendants. Two cases, both of which
a writ of review’, and in the absence of a id West families were to receive an in than it would be for man with an income survivor of the Whitman massacre,
were settled and dismissed without cost. be quashed upon the following grounds :
First, that the said John S. Lamar, the writ, this court has no jurisdiction heritance from their grandfathers estate of $5000 a year to give 5 cents a year.
will visit the Lewis and Clark Exposi
Louis W. Glaser, plaintiff and re
to proceed. The rule is thus laid down I it was learned that the amount left was
“If the Lord has so prospered him ns tion.
spondent, vs. Tillamook Logging Co., described herein as plaintiff in error was
defendant and appellant.
Transcript not a party to the proceeding which is in the sixth volume of the Cycl ?pedia of about $10,000,000. With the new dis to give him the high genius, the high
The Experimental Gardens at the
Law and Procedure, page 795 : “ It is a covery about the marriage of the grand, integrity to make so great riches, the Lewis and Clark Expoistion have
from Countv Court. Eddy & Botts for sought to be reviewed herein ;
plaintiff; Handley & Thayer for de
Second, because there has not been ser ru’e of general application that the re. father to his second cousin, it is learned $28,500,000 is not benevolence ; it is a been abandoned, inasmuch as the
fendant
Continued, as the case is in
remarkatle demand of exhibit space
ved upon or delivered to the ’petitioners viewing court has no jurisdiction to that the value of the estate left is twice mere paltry excuse ”
coarse oitrtltouent.
necessitated the utilizing of this tract
for the election referred to, or any of review the proceeding below, unless a that amount, or more than $20.000,000.
for buildings.
Seth F. Moon, plaintiff, vs. R. M
Quartz At $20,000 a Ton.
writ
has
duly
issued
whereby
the
record
them,
a
certified
copy
or
other
copy
of
a
Dmge**, defeuunnt.
I ranscript from
Hundreds of magnificent vases have
SPRUCE.
County Court. Eddy & Botts for plain writ of review herein, nor has any notice of the proceeding is to be removed.”
B aker C ity , Or., April 17.—M. L. teen profusely scattered about the
(iff: Handb-' &• Thaver for defendant. what ever been given to said petitioners And in a note on the same page it is
The good weather is still continuing.
Kiser, president and manager of the grounds of the Lewis and Clark Ex
M< tion t< dismiss disallowed. This case or any of them of the pendency of this said: “ Consent to submit a case on the
In these have been placed
C. Woole and Mrs Anderson went to Cardinal group of mines, situated at the poistion.
went to trial before a jurv, anil a verdict
beautiful palms which will be in lull
record presented with the petition, w’ill
for $147.40 was returned for plaintiff, proceeding ;
town Saturday.
head
of
Stites
Gulsh,
came
to
the
city
bloom by opening day.
Third, that no order has ever been not supply the place of a proper writ.’’
which sustained the verdict of the lower
Mrs. A. Kinnaman and sons, Lon and last night and today exhibited a hatful
A feature of the Government Fish
court.
made allowing a writ of review herein In fact, it necessarily follows from the Clyde, went to town Saturday.
of quartz that was brimful of free gold. eries exhibit at the Lewis and Clark
provisions of our statute that the writ
John Marolf, plaintiff, vs. The Tilla by any court or judge ;
J. Cristenson and Mr. Holgate were at The sample exhibited, it is estimated, Exposition will be a miniature repro
monk Logging (hi., defendant. Suit for
Fourth, that no writ of review as been must issue. Section 595 provides that a the city of Beaver. Saturday.
would probably give an average essay duction ol the Columbia river, illustr
d. mages. A. W, Severance for plaintiff ; issued or served herein ;
party may have a decision reviewed,
ating the various method of catching
Lon Kinnaman is breaking a new bike j of fully $20,000 per ton.
lianoiey &Tli»»>er for defendant. This
aui spawning salmon.
Fifth, that it appears from the petition “as in’this chapter prescribed and not to ride. He has only had his hand tied
case was coni intied as it was liable to be
I
This
morning
there
has
been
a
stam-
settled
fora writ of review filled in this case, otherwise,” and the following sections up once.,
Ventura couuty, (Cal.,) famous for
i pede of excited fortune seekers hastening
its marvelous production oi beets,
Tillamook County, plaintiff and re that the county court of Tillamook require a writ which, under Section 601,
H. Poland and family, May, and to the locality, armed with location cer beans and United States senatorial
spondent, vs. the estate of II. II. Alder County, Oregon, in making the order must be issued by the clerk. L .» a Elbert Ginn visited at A. Kinnaman’«
aspirants, will make a thorough and
tificates and high expectations.
man, defendant and appellant Appeal sought to be reviewed, was not exercis ciirior? ¿k-uce at the papers in this
from county court in probate. Handlev ing judicial functions, and, therefor«., its cause shows that no writ has ever Sunday.
The Cardiual Mining Company is in distinctive exhibit in the California
N. J. Dye and wife, J. Tucker and corporated and owns several claims. building at the Lewis and Clark Ex
& Thayer for plaintiff; Ralph R Duni-
position.
wav for defendant. Motion for change action in masaid order cannot be issued, and, therefore, the court is with wife attended the services at Pleasant
The officers are M. L. Kiser, O. B. Mount
out jurisdiction.
of venue was argued and taken unde questioned upon a writ of review.
A model post office will be installed
Valley, Sunday night.
and Lee Bell* all of who are heavy stock at the Lewis and Claik Exposition.
advisement.
.
With regard to the fifth ground stated
C. W. Talmage, who appeared for J.
Jim Woods and family visited at Nor holders.
It will prove interesting as an exhitit,
Z. F. M./odv, plaintiff and appellant, S. Lamar, only made brief reply, when in the motion to quash, it is to be noted
The strike occurs on the divide which and useful in bandlilig the immense
vs. VV. M. and N. M. Learned, defen B. L Eddy went into the matter some- that Sec. 587 B. & <'. Comp, contem man Dye’s Saturday night and Sunday.
Jake Huston and family were visiting seperates the rich placers of Pine Creek, amount of mail matter received at
dants and respondents. Appeal from
and sent out from Exposition bead-
County Court. Handley
Thaver for what fully and submitted the following plates a review only of judicial acts up East Beaver Sunday.
on the south, and the equally rich pla
brief
;
The
acts
of
public
officers
may
be
judi
plaintiff ; C.^W. Talmage for defendants.
Mr. Brady passed through hereon his ters of Stites Gulch, on the north. It is qtiaf ters.
This was a jury trial and a verdict was
Il is only a party to a process of pro cial, legislative or ministerial. Only
A test has been made of all the
returned in favor of the defendants, ceeding before or by an inferior court, those acts which are judicial can be way to town Monday.
ten miles south of Baker Citv, between
Mrs V. Kinnaman and Mrs. L. Foland the Bridgeport and near the Baklv- electric lighting effects at the Lewis
which sustained the lowei court.
and Clark Expoistion. Ibis proved
etc., who may have the decision or questioned upon writ of review
visited at N. J. Dye’s Wednesday.
Mountain roads.
James M. Mapes, plaintiff, vs John determination reviewed.
ecxeedingly satisfactory and after a
Lamar, the
“The proceedings of the county board
Mr.
Bud
Wallace
and
daughter,
Weiss and J. I). Morris, pat tners under
Kiser has exhibited wonderful patience few minor details have been attended
plaintiff
herein,
was
not
a
party
to
the
of
supervisors,
so
far
as
they
are
judi
the firm name of the The Tillamook
Pheebe were trading at Beaver Monday. and perseverance for, many vears in pros to the Exposition will be ready for
cial, are reviewable on certiorari, but
County I umber Co.. Jobe Foster and proceeding before the County Court.
N. J. Dye and wife were visiting at C. pecting this locality, and it is hoped public inspection.
the Little Nest ticca Toll Road Co., a ! It is true that in the case of Gaines vs. when they are merely ministerial or
Dye
’s Thursday.
Repoits from
Wisconsin would
corporation, defendants. Action tor Linn ’County, 21 Oregon 430, at page legislative they cannot be so reviewed.*'
that this strike will prove 10 be worth indicate that the
legislative body of
F. Jackson and wife called at H. the vears of privations he has offered.
money. Handley & Thayer tor plaintiff.
433, the Supreme Court laid down the
The question then, is whether the act Booth's Thursday.
that state is making haste to recon
Settled and dismissed without cost.
Kiser worked placers in Stites Gulch 12 sider its action in killing the Lewis
j rule that although one may not appear of the County Court in making the
Grandpa Jones has returned home or 15 years ago, and he got it into his and Claik Exposition appropriation
George W Phelps, plaintiff, vs. Tilla
mook County and G. N. Hodgdon, of record to I m * a party, yet he is a party order of prohibition was a judicial act from California, where he has been
head that the placer gold came from bill. An allotment of $24,000 is now
deft ndants. Writ of review. Eddy & ' within the meaning of this section it he or was merely ministerial. “The acts visiting his daughter for some lime.
assured.
some ledge on the mountain, so he piped
Botts for plaintiff; W. II
lias a direct pecuniary interest in the of county supervisors or commissioners
The
cheese
factory
at
Spruce
has
Fruit raisers of Pierce County,
defendant. Judgment and
the loom tip the mountain side as far as
matter passed upon. We take it that may be either ministerial or adminis
Washington, will give away apples and
opened up for the summer.
plaintiff.
he
could
get
gold.
He
came
upon
a
big
Lamar had no such direct pecuniary trative, judicial or quasi judicial.
strawberries at the Lewis and Claik
John Ronetsch, plaintiff, vs. Albert W. interest in this matter as would give him
quarts ledge, beyond which he could not Exposition in order to convince
A ministerial act is defined to be one
and Ellen Mills, defendants.
Fore
A Card of Thanks
sluice another color. Into this quartz easterners that Pierce County is an
closure. Thad W. Vreeland for plaintiff a standing as a party. Hehasnomore in whose perform;»nee no exercise of
ledge he drove 700 or 80J feet of drifts unsurpassed locality for raising these
right to complain of the order made by discretion is demanded. A judicial act.
I wish to thank those who so kindly
.....
products.
Ni B. Thayer, plaintiff, vs. R. M.
helped in the burial ofmv brother. Henry and tunnels. It is in this tunnel, which
the
County
Court
than
any
other
citizen.
on
the
other
hand,
is
one
which
re
and Rolliv \\
.
Watson,
defendants.
H
1
Work upon the Hungarian cbadra
H. Downing, also for floralcontributions is over 500 feet in length, that the strike
Foreclosure. Handley
Thaver for He alleges in Ins petition that he was quires the exercise of judgment or dis anil
at the Lewis and Clark Exposition
the sympathy shown by our neigh
plaintiff ; Eddy N- Botts for defendants. the holder of a license for the sale of in cretion.’’
of
yesterday
was
made
The
p
’
acers
of
bors.
have commenced. The structure is
Demur to answer argued and overruled. toxicating liquors, etc.
Stites Gulch are owned by Sheriff Brown siturated on the East side of Lake
His license,
“ The distinction between ministerial
S arah A. S teinhauer .
Decree as to R. M. Watson.
and Kenyon. The Pine Greet placers view Terrace in front ot the Utah,
however, was not a contract and could and judicial and other official acts seems
E. M. Porter, plaintiff, vs. Arabella be revoked by the legislature at any to that w here the lawuprescriliesand de
are those sold last summer for a big Idaho and New Yoik state buildings
For Sale.
Tone and David Fitzpatrick adminis
and faces the Grand Esplauude.
figure by W. F. Patterson. Dr. Shields,
fines the duty to be performed with such
trator, defendants.
Foreclosure. W time.
For
sale,
cheap,
if
sold
at
once,
$30,
a
The enormous Ionic columns for the
Dr. McDaniels and Fred Eppinger.
As the legislature could, at its pleasure, precision and certainty as to leave noth
II Cooper for plaintiff B. L. Eddy np
Oregon state bidding at the Lewis and
pointed guardian for W. Tone, a minor revoke the license issued to Lamar, ami ing to the exercise of diseretiou or Registered Jersey Bull Calf, solid color.
Claik Expoistion have been placed in
Default ns to Arabella Tone and David us the Local Option Law itself provided
Woman Must Die on Gibbet.
judgment, the act is ministerial ; but Full brother to Mr. Beals’ fine bred bull
position. The building now presents
Fitzpatrick, administrator of estate of
of
the
best
butter
and
milk
strains
a very imposing appearance.
Work
John rone, deceased. Decree as prayed for refunding to him a proportionate where the act to lie done involves the I
in
U.S.
Dam
Veralista,
173,64-0,
made
P
hiladelphia
,
April
17.
—
By
a
vote
upon all the other state structures is
for granted.
amount of the license if paid by him, exercise of discretion or judgment in
progressing
with
much
rapidity.
over 425 lbs. butter, over 6.000 lbs. milk, of five to two. the Supreme Court today-
Tillamook County, plaintiff, vs. Edith he had no direct pecuniary interest determining whether the duty exists, it
Miss Evelyn K. Clark, granddaugb
M Alderman, defendant. Suit to set different from the public at large which is not to la? deemed merely ministerial.” in ten months last year. She traces twice decided that Mrs. Catharine Danze must
aside title. Handley A Thaver for plain, would entitle him to a writ of review.
Sec. 10 of the Local Option Liquor to Brown Bessie, 74,997, champion hut- hang for the murder of her husband, Wil. ter of former Governor William Clark
ot Missouii and a lineal descendant of
tiff; R. R Duniway lor defendant. A The consideration of this phase of the
Law provides, that ’ on the tenth day ter cow at the world’s fair. Her grand liam G. Dans. George P. Hossev, a col I George Roger Clark and Meriwether
motion to quash was taken under advise
dam,
Ida
s
Dream
2nd,
90,217.
made
28
ored
"voodoo
”
doctor,
also
has
received
matter
makes
it
quite
apparent
that
the
after any election hereon, or sooner if
Lewis, will be a visitor at the Lewis
ment.
Miss Clark is
writ of review is not adapted to the dis the returns be received, the county lbs. 6 oz. butter in seven davs. Sire, the death sentence for the part he took and (-Mark Exposition.
George E. Chambeilain, constituting '
Flora
’
s
Chief,
61
478,
who
traces
13
m the murder of Dans. Dans died under prominent in New 1 oik society elides.
the Slate Land Board, plaintiff, vs. position of such a question as is now be clerk, taking to his assistance two
The great crowds which throng
Hiram B. Moore, defendant. Fore fore this court. The matter is a public justices of the peace of the county, shall times to Combination, 4389, the great peculiar circumstances, and a post-mor
closure.
Eddy A Botts for plaintiff. question and not one between private proceed to open said returns and make | fountain head ol a great number of test, tem examination of the remains revealed through the Lewis and Clark Exposi
tion during the pre-exposition period
Order for publication of summons was litigants or affecting individual rights in
an alwtract of the vote for the informa.: ed daughters and champion butter cows, the tact that arsenic poisoning killed have nesessitated more turnstiles,
allowed.
the eyes of the law. Even though there t on of rhe County Court. Said court1 one oft lie greatest bulls that ever lived. him. Both .Mrs. Danz and Hossey were which will te installed immediately.
Augusta Hunt, plaintiff, administra-
shall, on the eleventh day after the! J. F. Martin, South Prairie, Tillamook arrested, charged with the murder of Plans for the permanent entrances
trix, vs. Carne A. Ba dev. W. C. were private rights involved, yet if grffat
Ore.
Danz.
have bee prepared, and work on them
llailcv and the Yellow Fir Lumber Co., detriment or inconvenience would re •lection or as soon thereafter ns practi
The women testified tbnt she bought will be started shortly.
n corporation, defendants. Foreclosure. sult from interfering with the proceed cable. hold a special session; and if a !
Makes a Clean Sweep.
Eddv A Bolts for plaintiff*, Decree and ing, the writ could be denied, and in majority of the votes hereon in the
Designs for the new passes, stock
There's nothing like doing a thing powders trom Hossey and administered
default.
holder’s tickets and commutation
| such case ought to tie denied.
county as a whole, or in any sub. thoroughly. Of all the Salves you ever them to her husband for the purpose of
tickets for the Lewis and Clark Ex
Fred I.angv, plaintiff, vs. Nicholas
But if it lie said that Umnr can lie division in the county as a w hole, or in heart! of, Bucklen’s Arnica Salve is the curing the drink habit. She clamed not position have been received by the
Domtroff, Carl b uclis and Henry Tolil,
Inst. It swvvpM away and cure* Burns to have known the contents of the pow
considered
a
party
to
the
proceeding
111
any
precinct
in
the
county,
are
“
for
Directors ot Admissions. The draw
8 »re®. Bruises, ( uln. Boils, Ulcer*
defendants. Action lor money. C. W.
Talmage for plaintiff. Default and de the County Court, then the persons who prohibition," said court shall iinmedia Skin Eruption and Piles. It’s only 25c., ders. Hossey was first placed on trial, ings are elaborate and depict scenes
cree.
petitioned for the local option liquor tely make an order declaring the result and guaranteed to give satisfaction by and convicted of having sold powders closely associated with the history of
the great Northwest.
‘ has. I Clough, Druggist.
containing arsenic, and which, the prose
F R Peals, plaintiff, vs. Vance Nodine election would also be parlies, and in of said vote, and absolutely prohibiting
The staff work on the beautiful
cution alleged, killed Danz. At the con.
and the Allen «S: Gilliert RanakerCo. and fact they are |>arties as show n by the I the sale of intoxicsting liquor w ithin
Tillamook County, defendants. Fore record, and as no w rit of review or copy | the prescribed Inuits, etc. The order1 On a run from Omaha to Grand Island elusion of Hossey s trial. .Mrs. Danz was Bridge of Nations at the Lewis ami
Clark Exposition is now completed,
closure Default and decree. A. W. Sev
a distance of nearly 2OO miles, the Union
erance for plaintiff. Motion to set aside thereof has ever been served upon any of complained of herein w as made in pur Pacific’s new gasoline motor car proved tried on the charge of murder for having lbe Bridge is almost half a mile long,
administered
the
poisonous
said
petitioners
ns
required
by
Sec
601,
'
suanue
of
this
provision
of
the
statute,
sale granted and order for resale was al.
powders. and is built of wood and staff, in
lowed.
The
B A C. Comp., (his court is without and the County Court is not given any its success in actual service This w as She was also convicted and both were •notation of solid masonry.
Budge crosses Guild's Lake, the larg
the first stage ol its long overland jour, sentenced to lie hanged,
State of Oregon,plaintiff,vs. Ben H iux- jurisdiction of the persons >( the peti discretion in the matter whatever. It
An appeal was est body ot water ever enclosed within
hurst, defendant. Appeal from justice tioners, and, therefore, cannot proceed bases its order upon the abstract of the r.ev to Portland. Oregon.
taken to the Supreme Court by the ! worn- an exposition fence, and connects the
* * *
court W 11 Cooper tor district attor- further with this matter
vole as prepared by the canvassers, and
with
the
Government
Corporation Commissioner Garfield en s counsel, but today’s decision lea ves mainland
i ey. Continued.
An inspection of the only order which it is not given authority to go bach of has began an investigation of the op only the Pardon Board between the peninsula.
Howard Edmunds was arraigned on has heretofore been made herein, liased
the returns for any purpose. Its act in erations
i
E** Emery Dye, author ot
of the Standard oil trust in woman and the gallows.
a charge of gambling on an indictment
the Conquest, ” who has tieen busy
returned by the last grand jurv and was upon the |s*lition for writ of review making the order is as much a minister Kansas. His primary purpose is to find
for several months tracing descendants
S0T1CE Fun I'VBI.n ATION
allowed until the next dav to plead. A filed in this matter, shows that no writ ini act as the act of the canvassers the difference between the prices of crude
Ovparunent ,.f th, |„ eilor ’
ot lbe Lewi* and Claik party othei
demur to the ctnnplaint was overruled, of review has liern allowed in this pro. themselves. A canvassing board is a
1-aiul
(»ffiee
at
Oregon
<
ity.
Ore
and refined oH. so as to get at the profits
tbau the leaders of that famous ex-
w hen Edmunds pleaded guilt v and w as ceeding, and. therefore, the proceeding
None» 1. herebe zlven lhit,"al.‘S*'.t '* 5
bodv of ministerial officers and cannot which the trust makes. The commis
I edition. Las located at Fowler, Calif
fined $75. and when imposing the tine
must
fall
to
the
ground.
oruia, a sou of the “Boy Shannon"
go behind the returns.
the judge kindly admcinished Edmunds.
sioner has had a conference with Gov.
frequently
mentioned in the journals
Sections 596 to 601 inclusive B A C
In view of the foregoing, the motion Hoch, and the two went over the ques
Jennie H I’erry, plaintiff. \s Daniel
of the explorers. He is Judge J. B
Perrv, defendant. Suit lor divorce, and Comp . contemplate that upon the filing to quash ought to be allowed, What- tion together, so far as regards the sur-
Shannon an aged and resjiected resid
w Inch was granted. Thayer .K Handley of a sufficient petition, an order will tie ever may be the view of the court as to
„ ,
HAV1U u JOXKs
ent of ro vler for many years. Judge
face features of it. This investigation is „
H E lt>Sj for tn, X q Se v „ tart «
<
tor plaintiff.
mads allowing a writ of review, and the other points, we think that there in accordance with the resolutions
Shannon has accepted an invitation
in.
Suit Against Mason Thrown Out that the cl» rk of the court shall issue the can be no doubt that this court is entir-'
to be the guest of the Lewis and C'lsi k
traduced by one ol Kansas’ members of
Exposition, which is to be held iu
Tillamook
County,
plaintiff*, vs. writ. It ia also contemplated by Sec ely without jurisdiction tor at least two Congress.
Congress. Phillip
P. Campbell.
t'amplell. It
K is
Phillip P.
celebration
of the centennial ot fbe
to
Homer Mason and his sureties, while tions 596 and 597, that Un |<tiiioii sliall •oOcwnt reMon». namely, first, that no be hoped that it «ill he thorough
L^wis and Clark Expedition, on Jone
conntv clerk, defendants. Action for
money. Handley A’ Thayer for plain
tiff ; Eddy & Botts for defendants.
In the Circuit Court yesterday, in the
case of Tilhnook County against Homer
Mason and others a nonsuit was grant
ed against the county, because the action
had been commenced without getting
leave of the Circuit Judge. In cases of
this kind such leave is necessary, and be
cause the county did not get this leave
it had to go out of court. This ends onc
chapter in the sensational suit against
Mason and his bondsmen.In applying for
the nonsuit, Mr. Eddv, one of the attor.
neys for Mason, who was represented by
Eddy & Botts, stated that the bond
which Mason had given the county was
missing, but he wanted it distinctly un
derstood that neither Mason nor his
bondsmen would take any advantage of
the absence of the bond, and would not
at any time require the county to prove
the bond, but would admit its existence
and legality. But it was further stated
that Mason would claim that the county
is not entitled to any of the fees sued for,
and has no cause of action against him.
I
4
Af .saxos a. tMuaeaa •«Siatcr.
I
1.
1, the opening day.