Jacksonville sentinel. (Jacksonville, Or.) 1903-1906, March 31, 1905, Image 2

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    I
Safe and Sure
■ «
. v r
» v « a s » ■» ;
■
*
•
_____
BALLARDS
HOREHOUND
» -. H'
.k.i
?
______
I »• ’ « ri»
’i à '
i
5
.
>3
À
:
: À
'Î
hl
»
URES COUGHS, COLDS, CONSUMPTION, BRONCHITIS,
WHOOPING COUGH. SORE THROAT. HOARSENESS,
LOSS OF VOICE, LodSENS THE PHLEGM AND EASES
EXPECTORATION, HEALS THE LUNGS.
Endorsed by leading physicians as the BEST remedy for
Children’s Croup and Whooping Cough because
it contains NO OPIATES. The action of Ballard’s Hore­
hound Syrup is mild and benign, it isadapted to infants, as well
asadultsof every variety of temperament and constitution.
C
Read This Remarkable Testimonial.
MRS. B. W. EVANS. Clearwater. Ka»., write»:—“My husband
was sick for three months and the doctors told me he had quick con­
sumption. We procured a bottle of Ballard's Horehound Syrup, and
it cured him. He is now a well man. but we always keep a bottle
in the house, and think it has no equal for pulmonary diseases.”
Easy to TaKe; Sure to Cure. Every Bottle Guaranteed.
THREE SIZES! 25c, 5Oc, «1.00.
BALLARD’S SNOW LINIMENT CO., - ST. LOUIS, MO.
SOLD AND RECOMMENDED BY
CITY DRUG STORE,
JACKSONVILLE, ORECON.
'
The place to get a good square meal at a reasonable price
when at the connty seat of Jackson county is at
HOOLICAN’S RESTAURANT
Which is now located in the
new frame building on the first
corner up from the depot.
Everything neat and clean and
everybody treated right. Give
it a trial and see for yourself.
JACKSONVILLE,
Geo W. Blalock vs J. Schallhorn and
John II Blalock.
J. T. Buck et al vs. W. R. Stansell.
W. L. Young vs. W. R. Stansell.
J.
A. Freeman vs. Daniel Marx et al.
Complete Docket of Criminal and
E.
A. Smith vs. Li/./ic Davis.
Civil Gases Occupying the At­
Mary L. Robinson vs. II. S. Evans,
tention of the Circuit Court Administrator of Estate of J. Holton.
Which is N oh in Session.
Mary E. Owens vs Calvin Owens.
John Coleman, Martha Coleman vs.
MAN\ CASES 01 SOME IMI’OKIANCE Aaron Weatheby and The Med lord
Bank.
Jos. D. Wakeman vs. Nancy Carter,
The county seat is a busy town this John Owens et al.
1 week and is so full ot visitors from al)
Hattie M. Plytnale vs. Francia G. Ply
parts of the county as well *a adjoining male.
counties that beds have been at a premi­
C. M. Wilson vs. Unira M. Wilson.
um and the restaurants and hotels have
C. B. Rostel vs. W. P. Linville.
i lieen doing a rushing business feeding
Tillie Young vs. Geo. Young.
the hungry. Not only is the Circuit
William Bylae vs. F. E. Bylxc et a).
Court in session but the grand jury also,
Thus. C. Berry vs. Lillie J. Berry.
hence the crowd is unusually large this
Ashland Mfg. Co. vs. John W. B.
week. Ik-low is a complete list of the Morris.
cases on the docket:
Mary E Stock vs. II. C. Stock.
CM IM IS A I. CASKS.
Geo. W. BlaliM'k vs John If. Blalock
State of Oregon vs. George E. Bloomer. and John Sci.allhorn.
State of Oregon vs. Jonas Justice and
N. H. Latimer anil S. C. Ruble vs.
F. M. Howard.
Jos. Morris and Rosa A. Haymond.
State of Oregon vs. John l>oe.
t lias. G. Thumlxrg vs. Ida C. Thum­
State of Oregon vs. Mitchael M. Reed. lxrg.
State of Oregon vs. Bert Ball.
Fannie Adams vs. Jas II. Adams.
State of Oregon vs. John Smith
Mary E. Ashurst vs. Bert Ashurst.
State of Oregon vs John Dor.
R. R. Dunn vs. Theres., M. Prim.
State of Oregon vs. Edward Graham | William Scott vs John F. White ami
State of Oregon vs Chas. Wilson.
Bcnj. Trowbn<lgc.
State ot Oregon vs. Je-.se Madison.
J. B. Welch et al vs. William Smith.
State of Oregon vs. Charles Johnson.
Zenas Howard vs. 1. R. Dawson.
State of Oregon vs. Jesse Howard Ed
Eliza Corwin vs. Charles L. Corwin.
Howard and Allxrt Scrantoll.
State of Oregon vs. J. C. Hall.
Roseburq Idnd Office.
State of Oregon vs. Ten Mills and
Camillie Clark.
There is much interest just at present,
State of Oregon vs. F. C. Morrison.
throughout all Oregon, in the Ro* luirg
State of Oregon vs J. V. Robinson.
land otice. as to when it will open for
ACTIONS AT I.AW.
business
and to whom will 1>e given the
B. B. Lee vs William M. May.
appointment
ol Register ami Receiver of
John W. Prall vs. Frank W. Wait.
the
same,
since
it is given out positively
Fish Lake Water Co. v*. Katie Walch i
that
neither
Booth
nor Bridges will lx-
et al.
reinstated
in
office.
From what can lx-
Fi*h Lake Water Co. vs. Neil Walch.
learned
it
is
Ix-lieved
th.it the office will
H. M Cuss vs. Theresa and Della.
l»e
opened
for
business
within a very
Bryant.
short
time.
AH
pipers
have
been filed
Laie County Oregon vs. A J. Neilon
in
their
regular
order
since
the
office has
et al.
lieen
closer)
ami
will
fx-
taken
up
in the
Geo. W. Blalock vs. John if. Batrak
same
order
utx»n
it
Ix-ing
opened
for
W.J. Brandenstein vs. Kate J. Kel­
business, which evervlxxlv hopes will be
logg-
E. E. Redfield vs Ashland Iron Works. very soon as many important matters are
Allen & Gilbert-Ramaker vs. F. M. i being delayed by this delay.
There also seems to be a great interest
Gregory.
regarding
who will sucieed Messers,
Nancy Carter vs. Miles Wakeman.
Booth
and
Bridges us there are many
Thus. O'Hara vs Condor Water and
aspiran
’
s,
from al) portions of the
Power Co.
district.
Among
those whose names are
J. V. Ebwegan vs. William Carns.
Ix-ing
mentioned
in connection with
William J. Godfry vs. Jas. Musty L.
these
offices
are
D.
II Jackson, C. H.
G. Gardner, F. Cosenburge.
Pierce
and
B.
F.
Mulkev
of Ashland, J.
P. J. Corwin Co. vs. T. C. Norris.
S
Cochran,
and
N.
L-
Nam
gan of Med
T. C. Norris vs. W. I. Vawter.
ford
ami
Gits.
Newbury
of
Jacksonville.
W. J. Freeman vs. Jas R. Howard.
The outcome of ltie- matter is of much
Wm. Scott vs White & Trowbridge.
interest and importance to |>cople of
J. B. Welch vs. Wm. Smith.
Southern
Oregon.
EQt'ITV.
THE CIRCUIT COURT
5 i” 5 .
OREGON.
______ __ __________________________71
A. A. Davis vs. I’. H. Oviatt.
Stella 1’. White vs. D. White.
Melvina Conklin vs. Thus. D. Conklin.
Sadie O’Neil vs. John O'Neil
E. Edwards vs. J. J. O’Neil.
Allen Davis et al vs. H. C. Chamber­
lain.
Claiborne Neil vs. Jefferson Neil.
D. D. Bosse vs. J. Gauvin and E. C.
Gjourneijl.
J. E. Olsen vs. W. R. Bradbury.
Alfred Crance vs. W. R. Mamie Crance.
William Mendenhall vs The Roaring
Gimlet Gold Mining Co.
M. F. Hanley vs. J. W. Slinger and
Z.Cameron.
Jean St. Luc De Roboani vs. August­
ine Schmidling.
Caroline Swacker vs. Oscar Swacker.
Ashland Mfg. Co vs Jim Lan and M.
L. links.
May R. St. Earl vs. Harry R. St Earl.
Caroline J.- Willett vs Geo. H. Gar­
nett.
Ruth E. Vann vs. James G. Vann.
J. C. Parslow vs. Louisa I’arslow.
i
Orders taken for custom and tailor
made clothing. Grxxls are right, prices
are right and you will lx- treated right at
Furness the Chothiir's.
NOTICE OF FINAL SETTLEMENT
In the County Court of the State of
Oregon for the county of Jackson.
In the matter of the Estate of Henry
Weyderman, deceased. Order ap­
pointing day for final settlement, etc.
Emil Britt the executor of the estate of
Henry Weydertminn, deceased, having
rendered and presented for settlement,
and filed in this Court his final account
of his administration of said Estate.
IT is okpkkkii . Tint Wednesday the
12th day of April, A. D. 1905, being a
»lav of a snbsecjuent term of said Cor.rt,
towit: of the April term thereof A. D.
1905 at MMX) o'clock a. m. of said rlay.be
am) tin- same is hereby appointed for the
settlement of said account, and that no­
tice of said settlement lx- published in
the Jacksonville Sentinel, a newspaper
published in Jacksonville, Oregon, as
often as once a week for four successive
weeks prior to said day of settlement.
Done in open Court this Kth »lay of
March, A. I). 1905. G eo . W. D itnn .
.‘J-10:4-7
County Judge.