FOUR MEDFORD (OREGON)
UNE
Tveryone to Southern Oregon
PubU??,..!.1X Saturday bT
MZDfORD PRINTING CO
27-M North Fir St Phone 2-8141
ROBERT W H.UHU Editor
HTRB GREY Advertising. Manager
GERALD LATHAM Bukmch Manager
ERS JR Mana8.ni, Editor
IARL H ADAMS. City Editor
HARRY CHIPMAN Telegraph Editor
RICHARD JEWETT Soortl I Editor
OLIVE STARCHER Society Editor
PALE ERICKSON. Circulation Mgr.
An Independent Newipaper
Entered aa second class matter at
Medford Oregon under Act ot
March 3. 1897
.S!;p,sc'R;;T:r iN " rates
By Mail In Advance Per Copy 10c
Daily and Sunday One year f 15 00
Daily and Sunday Six months 8 00
Daily and Sunday Three moa 4.23
Sunday Only One year S4.20
By Carrier In Advance Medford
Ashland Central Point Eagle Point
Jacksonville Gold Hill. Phoenix.
Shady Cove Rogue River. Talent
and on motor routes:
Daily and Sunday One year S18 00
Dally and Sunday One month UO
Carrier and Dealers 10c per copy
All Terms Cash In Advance
"rJ?rJ.21 p"" ct ot MedfoTd
Official Paper of Jackson County
United Press Full Leased Wire
MEMBER or AUDIT BUREAU
w umcuLATi on
WEST-HOLIDAY COMPANY INC
Offices In New York Chicago de
trolt. San Francisco Los Angeles
Seattle Portland St Louis Atlanta
Vancouver B C
NATIONAL EDITORIAL
I association
I . J
TTimrwii'im
NEWSPAPER
PUBLISHERS
ASSOCIATION
Flight o' Time
Medford and Jackson County
History from the files of The
Mail Tribune 10. 20. 30. 40
and 50 years ago.
10 YEARS AGO
Jan. 7. 1947 (Tuesday)
Committees to head various
functions in the annual March
of Dimes drive are being named
by Mrs. O. A. Eden, Medford,
chairman.
From Arthur Perry's Ye
Smudge Pot column: Mountain
roads are now icy. Considerable
flirting with the undertaker at
the. curves is reported.
20 YEARS AGO
Jan. 7. 1937 (Thursday)
First meeting of the Rogue
Snowmen this year is announced
today by Sam Jennings, presi
dent. Twenty inches of snow rests
on the ground at Fish Lake, ac
cording to the Medford and Tal
ent irrigation districts.
30 YEARS AGO
Jan. 7, 1927 (Friday)-
The plant of the Southern Ore
gon Clay Products company
near Central Point has been
taken over by the West Coast
Clay Products corporation.
An all-city boy scout hike,
which will provide opportunities
for signaling, first aid, cooking,
pace and tracking tests, starts
next Saturday.
40 YEARS AGO
Jan. 7, 1917 (Sunday)
Medynski forces this after
noon quashes plans for debate
between Earl Fehl and John G.
Pierce on merits of Hansen plan.
From Local and Personal
column: John Grebb of Eagle
Point was a Medford visitor yes
terday. What's Your I.Q.?
Nina or ten correct Is snperlor; sev
en or eight Is excellent; flva or
six Is rood.
7. Was Montgomery the capi
tal of Alabama in 1845?
2. Who was nicknamed "Good
Queen Bess?"
3. "Now it came to pass in the
days of Ahasuerus" is the open
ing line in which Book of the
Bible? .
4. Correst the following: "I
love fine materials.
3. London: 10 Downing street
is the residence of which offic
ial? 6. The most frequently order
ed dessert in American restaur
ants is pie; true or false?
7. What is a "sanctum sanctor
um?" 8. Is the city of "Buffalo Bill"
In Montana, Wyoming, or Kan
sas?
9. "Or" is used with "either;
should it also be used with "nei
ther?"
10. "She watches him as a cat
would watch a" what?
Answers: 1. No. Tuscaloosa
was until 1846. 2. Elisabeth L
3. Esther. 4. "I like fine mater
lals." 5. Prime Minister of Eng
land. 6. True. 7. Holy of Holies.
8. Wyoming. (Cody). 9. No. "Nor"
should be used. 10. "Mouse.
Swift.
Goose-Step To Be Out
In New German Army
Bonn, Germany OJ.R) The
itt r-arrtnn nrmv will not
new west ui' .......
reintroduce the goose-step De
fense Minister rraiu
Strauss declared toaa.
y:i,a mill it hrina in a
"snappier" form of saluting as
press reports have stated, he
said "Both reports are a sheer
invention intenaea to a ...
Strauss said.
MAIL TRIBUNE
Annexation Costs
Next week the city council will conduct a public
hearing on the proposal to annex the Kenwood and
Grandview districts to the city of Medford.
After the hearing it has three possible courses of
action :
1. It can vote the area into the city;
2. It can vote to prevent the area from becoming
part of the city; or
3. It can refer the matter to a vote of Medford res
idents for decision.
THE decision is one of some importance.
If annexation is denied, the residents of the areas
involved (who voted by a good margin to approve an
nexation) will be right back where they started, lack
ing the basic city services, principally sewage dispos
al, they need so badly.
If, however, annexation is approved, it will cost
the city and its taxpayers more money than they are
now paying. Not much money, as those things go these
days but still a sum which should be considered.
THE added expense will be chargeable to the water
department (for the added costs of other city ser
vices will be paid for by added income resulting from
annexation) and will total just under $14,000 per
year, much of it for debt service on bonds of the two
existing water districts.
If the council approves annexation, there are at
least two ways in which the money could be provided.
One would be by a small property levy (0.41 of a mill
on all city property). Another would be an increase
in water rates.
Since the needed money is chargeable to the water
department, the latter method seems more equitable
than making it a general obligation of city property.
IF THE water-rate-increase method is adopted, the
amount of the increase would average about 18
cents per water connection per month.
But since there are 26 different sizes and classes of
service, the increases would vary with the type of ser
vice, some more than 18 cents, some less.
Bob Lee, the city water superintendent, has pre
pared a schedule which could be adopted if the rate
increase plan is adopted for financing the water de
partment's added costs due to annexation. The in
creases proposed range from 15 cents (for 58-inch
metered connection in residential and commercial
classifications) to $2.50 (for a 4-inch metered service,
of which there are only a few, mostly institutions or
major commercial concerns).
Most of the increases would be 25 cents, for cus
tomers on a flat rate service with 34 or 1 inch con
nections. I TNDER this schedule, the highest amount anyone
now in the city would pay as his share of enlarg
ing Medford would be $30 per year. The minimum
would be $1.80. The largest number would pay $3.
Why should city residents pay more to make it
possible for those outside the city to come in? What
would they get out of it? Would it be worth it?
Like so many other questions which arise in the
course of progress, the benefits are difficult to mea
sure in the same dollars-and-cents terms as the costs.
LJOW CAN we measure lessened hazard of disease
,n and epidemics, brought about by improved san
itary facilities for our neighbors?
How can we measure pride in a larger, more ef
fective city, with better police and fire protection for
those now living on the outskirts :
How can we measure
better lighting, better sewer and water service for
chose now doing without them :
We could, of course, rise up and say, in effect, "To
heck with them. They built their homes outside the
city. Now let them stew in their own juice. Not all of
them want to come into the city anyway."
"IR WE could, on the other hand, provide the an-
swer which has been so often given before in simi
lar situations welcoming the chance to assist in the
orderly and progressive growth of Medford as a city
in which we can take pride.
This takes time; it takes money; it takes patience
and understanding of the problems of others.
But in the long ran it is the course of wisdom and
progress and good government. E.A.
"Thank You" Letters
What to do with "thank-you" letters? .
That is a problem which frequently faces news
paper editors. The type of letter to which we refer is
the one which is submitted for publication which
thanks "everyone" for their
illness, or after a fire, or flood, or at some sort of per
sonal crisis.
The problem for editorial decision is whether or
not to permit the "letters to the editor" column to be
used as an easy way for a person to say "thank you"
to a lot of people.
COMETDIES the letters themselves, due to special
circumstances or conditions, have a pathos or
human interest or newsworthiness which justify their
publication. In other cases,
well, or better, have written
volved.
The Mail Tribune's policy in printing letters in
the communications column is probably as liberal as
any in the state, and we shall continue to print those
"thank you" letters which have something of special
interest about them. On the other hand, we cannot
print routine "thank-yous" which might better be in
a personal card oi thanks.
Monday, January 7, 1957
benefits of better streets,
kindness during a recent
the writer might just as
personal notes to those in
E.A.
Polish Leader Facing
Test at Elections January 20
By CHARLES M. McCANN
United Press Correspondent
Vladyslaw Gomulka, Poland's
Communist leader, faces his big
gest test since he led his coun-
pyw.mim try's fight
a g a i nst Rus
s i a n domina
tion last Octo
ber. On Jan. 20,
about 18 mil
lion Poles will
vote in an elec
tion to fill the
459 seats in
Charles Met ana me oejm. Hie
single-chamber parliament. To a
great extent, the election will be
a vote for or against Gomulko
personally.
There is no doubt that Gomul
ka's Communists the United
Polish Workers' party will
win.
But unless they roll up a con
vincingly big vote, the stocky,
hard-faced man who used to be
called Poland's "little Stalin"
will be in a dangerous position.
And though Gomulka is a ded
icated, hard - core Communist,
there is little doubt that Soviet
Russian leaders would be glad
if he took a beating. They have
accepted his victory for inde
pendent Communism. But they
have done so only because they
had to.
Purged as Titoist
A card - carrying Communist
Matter of Fact
IN THE KREMLIN AND
THE WHITE HOUSE
Washington At almost the
same time that President Eisen
hower was conferring last week
with Congres
sional leaders
in the White
House, Soviet
Boss N i k i t a
K h r u s hchev
was addressing
a banquet in
the Kremlin.
There was a
t--1ta direct connec-
Stewart Alsop tion between
what happened in the Kremlin
and what happened in the White
House.
Khrushchev was, it seems, in
an ebullient mood. The most sig
nificant part of his speech has
been largely overlooked. The
United Nations, he said, had
called on Britain and France to
halt the aggression in Egypt.
And what happened? Nothing.
Then comrade Bulganin had sent
a little letter to Eden and Mol-
let. And what happened? Within
hours, the British and French
had promised to withdraw their
forces.
At the White House, the Presi
dent, to support his request for
a Congressional resolution em
powering him to oppose Soviet
aggression in the Middle East,
gave the Congressional leaders
a briefing on the situation there.
It was described as "somber."
And Secretary of State DuUes
added a further somber note
when he remarked: "If the Rus
sians go into the Middle East,
and we don't stop them, we are
gone."
'THE connection between the
scene in the White House and
the scene in the Kremlin is
clear, if one recalls the sequence
of events during the Middle East
crisis. On Oct. 31, without prior
consultation with the United
States, British Prime Minister
Sir Anthony Eden announced the
forthcoming Anglo-French inter
vention in Egypt. On Nov. 1,
Editorial
Comment
'THEY NEVER GO BACK
TO POCATELLO'
So our old friend Harris Ells
worth is slated for an appoint
ment to the U.S. Civil Service
commission in Washington, D.C.
with the gracious consent of his
Democratic rivals and he will
not return to Roseburg where
he still has a lovely home and
substantial interests.
"They Never Go Back to
Pocatello."
So wrote Dick Neuberger a
few years ago in one of the most
amusing pieces he has ever au
thored a comment on the fact
that seldom does a defeated
statesman return to his home
town. There are many reasons:
Public life get into the blood.
It's a "come-down" to return
to private life.
Federal pensions, nowadays,
"ain't hay."
In fact, from the day a mem
ber of Congress takes office he
begins to 'lose contact with the
state or district which elected
him. Most of our congressmen
and senators become absentee-
citizens whose only first hand
knowledge of what goes on at
home is gained on quickie trips
in election years.
This accounts for much stupid
legislation. Kiplinger once wrote
about "Pandemonium on the Po
tomac" as a place where "every
body wears a halo," or tries to.
They never lay a halo down.
Port Umpqua Courier,
Reedsport
'V s f 1
since his youth, Gomulka was
purged in 1948 as a "Titoist." He
was brought back as first secre
tary of the Communist party aft
er the Poznan riots which open
ed the east European satellite re
volt against Russian dictator
ship. Since that dramatic week late
last October when Gomulka and
his fellow leaders defied Russia
and established an independent
Communist regime, Gomulka
has been walking a political
tight rope.
First, he has had to keep un
der control the bitter enmity of
Poles to Russia and to the con
tinued presence of Russian
troops on Polish soil.
An outbreak which could de
cide the Soviet government to
intervene as it did in Hungary
could come at any time if Go
mulka lost control.
Secondly, Gomulka has had to
take the blame for Poland's des
perate economic situation.
Poland may have won free
dom from Russian domination,
but it still is faced by bad hous
ing conditions, food shortages
and high prices.
Thirdly, Polish workers, stu
dents and intelectuals are de
manding greater political free
dom. They want a really repre
sentative parliament, Gomulka
is in no position to concede that
even if he wanted to.
By Stewart Alsop
Secretary Dulles submitted to
the United Nations a resolution
calling for an immediate cease
fire. It was promptly vetoed by
Britain and France.
Meanwhile, the Soviet press
suddenly blossomed with ac
counts of how 75,000 "volun
teers" were 'to be sent to fight
with the Egyptians against the
imperialists. On Nov. 5, Mos
cow Radio broadcast the pur
ported text of a letter from
Soviet Premier Bulganin to Eden
and French Premier Guy Mol
let, asking them how they would
feel if a "stronger power" used
rocket systems against Britain
and France.
The threat was scarcely veiled.
On Nov. 6, at 7 p.m.. Eastern
Standard Time, a cease-fire in
Egypt was declared in effect.
TOUGLAS DILLON, American
" Ambassador to France, spell
ed out the" meaning of this se
quence of events when he was
in Washington a few weeks ago.
He said, in effect, that the con
trolling factor in the French and
British decision to accept a cease
fire in Egypt was not the United
Nations resolution or United
States' policy but Soviet threats
to use force. This was perhaps
a tactless thing to say, but, like
many tacUess things, "it was al
most certainly true.
It is true, at the very least,
that informed persons, whether
in Cairo or London or Washing
ton or Moscow, believe that the
Anglo-French intervention was
halted, and Colonel Nassers
bacon saved, not by moral
forces" but by Soviet threats.
And the fact that this is be
lieved especially that it is be
lieved in Moscow represents a
grave danger to the West. For
where threats have succeeded
once, there is always a strong
temptation to threaten again.
At the time, there were those,
especially in the Pentagon, who
believed that the Soviet threats
were sheer bluff, and that the
bluff should be called. The
United States Sixth Fleet, they
believed, had the undoubted
capability of stopping Soviet
volunteers from reaching
Egypt in significant numbers.
The United States had at least as
much right to send volunteers to
Hungary, where brutal Soviet
actions had been condemned by
the U.N., as the Soviets had to
send volunteers to Egypt.
FINALLY, the United States
" is absolutely committed to
retaliate against any attack on
Britain and France with a mas
sive counter-attack on the Soviet
Union. Those who wished to call
the bluff wanted these facts
spelled out as quickly, firmly,
and publicly as possible. The
President ruled otherwise. Per
haps he was right. There is al
ways a risk in calling a bluff,
since it may not turn out to be
a bluff after all. At any rate,
the connection between Khrush
chev's boasts and the scene in
the White House is obvious.
The proposal for a Congres
sional resolution restating the
American intention to resist with
force Soviet aggression is not
motivated by any real belief that
the Soviets are planning an arm
ed invasion of the Middle East.
The resolution is intended, in
stead, to quote one of those pres
ent at the White House briefing,
"to tell the world, and especial
ly the Russians, that the United
States has not suddenly turned
pacifist.
No doubt the Congressional
resolution will serve that pur
pose. But it will not erase the
damage to the West resulting
from the seeming success of the
Soviet threats. And it is at least
worth asking in retrospect
whether the world should ever
have been permitted to conclude
that the United States had "sud
denly .turned pacifist."
Copyright 1957, New York
Herald Tribune Inc.
Biggest
As the election machinery has
been worked out, there will be
about 730 candidates for the 459
seats in the Sejm.
Candidates Hand Picked
The candidates are being se
lected by commissions represent
ing various political, trade and
other groups.
The candidates will be put on
a single ticket under the names
of the United Workers, United
Peasants and Democratic par
ties. All are really Communist.
Voters wiU have some choice in
electing candidates, for there
will be more candidates than
seats. Gomulka is permitting in
dependents to run also, provided
they are approved by the nomi
nating commissions.
The danger to Gomulka is
that some of those who complain
of bad economic conditions, who
want to get the Russians com
pletely out of the country or
who demand a representative
parliament threaten to boycott
the election. .
If there really is a substantial
boycott, Gomulka will be weak
ened. ;
Hence, it looks as if a con
vincing victory for Gomulka,
even though he is a Communist,
will be a defeat for Moscow and
a good thing for Poland at the
moment.
Today and
By Walter
CONGRESSIONAL POWERS
Although a group of northern
Senators attempted to limit the
right to filibuster the right.
that is to say,
of unlimited de
bate in order
to prevent a
vote on a bill
it would
have been a
spectacular sur
prise if the Sen
ate had voted
to amend its
Walter Udsouiid
rules. The
amendment would have required
not only a big majority of the
Senators. The Senators would
have had to have been in a
mood to fight for the amend
ment to the bitter end and at the
risk of stalling all the other
business of the Senate. For Rule
XXII, which allows the filibus
ter, is in effect a veto, held by the
southern states, on Federal leg
islation dealing with the rela
tions of Negroes and whites.
It is interesting to note the
history of the filibuster. As sum
marized by Mr. Irving Brar.t. the
biographer of President Mon
roe, the right to filibuster did not
exist in the early days of the
Republic. From 1789 until 1806
debate could be ended at any
time by a vote of the majority of
the Senators present. From 1806
until 1917, there was no limita
tion on debate. In 1917, on the
eve of our entrance into the
first World War, the filibuster
was used to block war-like mea
sures which the Wilson adminis
tration was proposing. It was
then that a cloture rule was
adopted, providing that a debate
could be ended by a vote of two
thirds of the Senators who were
present and voting. As Mr. Brant
points out, under this rule, sup
posing there were 20 Senators
absent, debate could be ended
by a vote of 51 to 25 that is
to say, by a very few more than
a majority of all the. Senators.
THE interesting and significant
fact is that in 1949 the Senate
amended its rules in favor of
the filibuster, and to make it
virtually impossible to limit de
bate. It adopted the famous Rule
XXII, which some of the north
ern Senators are now trying to
amend.
Rule XXII does two things.
Debate can be ended only if 64
Senators are present and vote af
firmatively to end it. Thus if 63
Senators voted to end debate,
while only 13 voted not to end
debate, the 13 would prevail and
the debate could not be ended.
Then, to protect this right of
filibuster, Rule XXII provides
that there is an unlimited right
to filibuster against an attempt
to amend Rule XXII itself.
VUHAT happened in 1949?;
What happened was the Tru-;
man administration, with its '
determination to pass Federal
laws dealing with race relations. j
Although there was unlimited
debate in the Senate for more
than a century ' and until the
first World War, the right to
filibuster was never entrenched ;
as it has been since 1949. The !
proof is that in 1917 the Senate
did adopt a rule for closing de
bate. It was not until 1949 that
Rule XXII virtually deprived
the Senate of the right to amend j
Rule XXII. It is plain enough j
that Rule XXII was designed to !
establish what is tantamount to
a southern veto on the problems
which may be subject to Fed
eral legislation. - --
The real issue in the argument
about Rule XXII is whether Con
gress may legislate in the field
of race relations. It is because
Truman and then Eisenhower
have wanted to legislate in this
In the Day's News
By FRANK JENKINS
President Eisenhower present
ed to the new congress Saturday
his much-talked-about-lately pro
posal to head off communist con
quest of the Middle East which
has seemed to be forecast re
cently by heavy concentrations
of Russian military power in
Syria.
The gravity of his proposal is
indicated by the fact that this
is believed to be the first time
in our history when a President
has addressed a new congress
on a specific issue BEFORE de
livering to it his State of the
Union message.
That conveys the thought that
the President believes no time
should be lost.
THE message contains 3,200
words, but the heart of it is
included in three basic recom
mendations, of which this is the
first:
A grant of authority (to the
President by the congress) for
the United States to cooperate
with "any nation or group of
nations in the general area of the
Middle East" in the development
of economic strength dedicated
to the maintenance of NATION
AL INDEPENDENCE.
That means maintenance of
the status quo in the Middle
Eist.
Tomorrow
Ltppmann
field that Rule XXII will almost
cetrainly be kept in-force.
The movement in this century
towards desegregation and
against legal and economic dis
crimination is one of the most
impressive phenomena of our
era. But it is highly unlikely
that Federal legislation will be
allowed to play much of a part
in this movement. The move
ment will proceed mainly by
lecal actions that reflect extra
ordinary change of public
opinion in almost all sections of
the country.
A NOTHER interesting question
about the powers of Congress
is posed by the President's re
quest for authority to use force
in the Middle East. The theory
of the Constitution is supposed
to be that when the President
tells Congress that a state of war
exists or that a state of war
should be declared. Congress
then has the power to legalize
the waging of war. In a case
where the President is convinced
before Congress is convinced
that war in inevitable or that
it is necessary as for example
President Roosevelt before Pearl
Harbor the legal authority of
Congress has acted as a power
ful check upon the President's
pre-war actions.
The Eisenhower procedure is
to ask Congress to underwrite in
advance, even if it means war,
the moves the President may de
cide to take. In the nature of
things it is impossible for the
President to be specific or clear
as to what moves he may feel
impelled or compelled to make.
Therefore, a Congressional vote
of the kind President Eisenhower
is asking is in effect a vote of
confidence and a Congressional
commitment to support him in
what follows.
Not every President would
ask or could hope to get au
thority of this kind from Con
gress. If President Eisenhower
asks for it, he will get it. But
he will be incurring an obliga
tion to keep Congress fully in
formed and closely advised not
only as to what he does, but as
to why he does it.
Copyright 1957 New York
Herald Tribune Inc.
An estimated 50 miles of per
manent piping for water lines
and steam services are installed
for tenants in the Empire State
building.
FUNERAL
SERVICES
In Every Price Range
Since 1908
PERL
Funeral
Home
" Phone 2-6675
RECOMMENDATION No. 2 re
quests from the congress au
thority for the President to un
dertake in the Middle East pro
grams of military assistance and
cooperation WITH ANY NA
TIONS DESIRING SUCH AID.
That means we won't force
our aid on anybody. If any ex
isting nation or group of nations
in the Middle East wants our
help, they must ASK FOR IT
first. (That also is slanted to
ward maintenance of the status
quo which means keeping
things as they are.)
TJECOMMENDATION No. 3
asks for authority from the
congress for the use of Ameri
can military force to protect na
tions of the Middle East "against
overt armed aggression from any
nation CONTROLLED BY IN
TERNATIONAL COMMU
NISM." That is the recommendation
that puts teeth in the Eisenhow
er proposal. It asks authority to
USE AMERICAN MILITARY
FORCE TO PREVENT RUSSIA
FROM TAKING OVER THE
MIDDLE EAST.
THE President added that the
measures he recommended
would have to be in agreement
with present U.S. treaty obliga
tions, including the United Na
tions charter. This means, he
said, that any program now
adopted would, in the event of
armed attack in the Middle East,
have to be subject to the over
riding authority of the United
Nations security council.
That is to say, any military
action we may take will be taken
with the agreement and consent
of and probably in the name
of the U.N. It indicates, how
ever, the President's belief that
in itself the U.N. is weak and
powerless. He is proposing that
if worse comes to worse WE
SUPPLY THE POWER the U.N.
lacks.
A WORD more here In the
way of backgrounding:
In any intelligent considera
tion of the Russian problem, we
must remember that Russia's
long-range program is to DE
STROY US. Our policies must ,
be tailored to prevent that:
Russia, of course, is against the
West but primarily her inflex
ible objective must be to destroy
us, because we are the STRONG
RIGHT ARM of the West. With
out us, the rest of what we call
the free world would be help
less. We are believed to be present
ly superior in modern arma
ment to Russia. But the general
expectation is that in time Rus
sia will catch up with us. She
is directing her whole economy
toward that end denying the
comforts of life to her people
so that her whole national ef
fort may be concentrated on in
creasing her power to make "
war.
We are undertaking to do both
to provide our people with an
ever-advancing standard of liv
ing while at the same time build
ing our armament. Russia hopes,
by concentrating on armament,
to move faster in that direction
than we can move.
THIS is the big question:
Shall we just WAIT until
Russia tackles us, or shall we
begin NOW to take preventive
measures (such as holding the
Middle East, with its strategic
location and its vast stores of oil)
that fall short of a preventive
war?
CASH!
I PACIFIC
'Sam
INDUSTRIAL
Dick Hans, Manager
16 S. Central Ph. 3-5308
A1 PERL'S ev'erv family
may make funeral ar
rangements which are In
keeping with its means. A
selection of services In
every price range is of
fered to satisfy Individual
preferences and to meet
all financial circumstances.
Convenient Terms?
Certainiyl