PAGE
HERALD,
Minister ta Egypt
VOM»™ M. jMdioe. U
THftFEATHERHEADS
K m «*!
(oraar Secretary ol AgricolMM, w t o
■sss
NOTICE o r SHERIFFS SALE
UNDER EXECUTION
NOTICE 18 HEREBY GIVEN ttat
by virtue of an execution Imued out
of the Circuit Court of the State of
Oregon for Umatilla County to dm
directed and delivered upon a Judg
ment and decree and order of aed,
rendered In eaid Court on the 19*1
day of September, 18JO, In favor ol
the Federal Land Bank of Spokane,
a corporation aguinat Agnes M. Hill»
and L. M. Hill«, wife and husband, li
the suit therein pending wharelh ttor
Mid The Federal Land Bank of Spo
kane, a corporation, is plaintiff and
the Mid Agnes M: Hills, and L. M
Hill», wife and husband, J. E. Masoi
and Stanfield National Farm boat
Association, a corporation, are defont
ants, for the suqi of $£8.00 with In
terest at the rate of 8 per cent pe:
annum from the 2nd'day of August
1928; and the sum of $-28.00 wttl
Interest at the rate of 8 per cent ffle
an nun. from the 2nd day of Febnt
ary, 1820: and tho sum or $t8.0<
with interest at tlio rote of 8 p--
cent per annum frtyu the 2nd day o
AuguM. lOL’O. and the sum of $28,8»
with interact at the rate of 6 per oen
per on nun, train the 2nd day o f FW<
ruar» MB0; mid the sum of fFiMtSi'
with Jhtereet at the rate .of € per eon
per atUMim. from Uio 2nd day of Bob
ruary, 1D30; and the sum of $38.80
with interest at the rato of 8 pe
cent per annum from the 15th day o
October, 1929; and the sum of $81.81
with Interest at the rato of 8 pe,
cent per annum from the 22nd daj
of March, 1930, and the sum
$113.03, with lntoreit at the rate ol
8 per cent per annum from the lJ tr
day of July, 1930; and the sum o
$16.Oo as abstract charges, and ih
further sum of $100 attorney's fees
and the further sum of $24.80 cost
and disbursements In this suit, las,
the sum of $10.00 stock In plalnllil
The Federal Land Bank of Spokane
a corporation, hold by said plalnt'f
for the defendant, Stanfield Nations'
Farm Loan Association, which sal.
derree and Judgment and order o
sale have been duly dorketed and en
rolled In the office of the Clerk o
said Court, and In and by which salt1
Judgment, aeeree and order of sale I'
was directed that the hereinafter dee
rrlbed real property in Umattlk
County, Oregon, together with th<
tenements, hereditaments and appur
tenances thereto belonging or In any
wise appertaining, and also all of th<
estate, right, and Interest of said de
fondants In an,) to the same, be sol<*
by the Sheriff of Umatilla County
Oregon, to satisfy said Judgment an,'
all coats.
THEREFORE, I will, on the 2Stb
dsy of October, 1930, at the hour o'
two o'clock In the afternoon of sal,'
Bay. at tho front door of the court
house In the City of Pendleton. Umn
tllla County, Oregon, soli all thr
right, title and Interest, which th,
said defendants or either of them
had on the 2nd day of February
1933, or slnre then have acquired oi
now have. In and to the followlnt
described premises situated In Uma
tllla County. State of Oregon, to-wlt
The Northwest Quarter of th
Southwest Quarter oi tun South
went Quarter of 8ertlon Thirty
, four In Township Four North
Range Twenty-nine. East of th»
WlUamettn Meridian, Umatlll,
County. Oregon, subject to the re
nervations In deed recorded In Book
$1 of Deeds, page 203, and subject
to the rights acquired by agree
went recorded In Book 83 oi I
Deeds, page 421, records of Uma
tllla County, Oregon, to which
fereace It hernby made,
together with the tenements, hered
Itaments and appurtenances theret,
belonging or In anywise appertain
Ing; and also all of the right, estate
title and Interest of aald defendant,
In and to the same; aald lands to b,
•old nt public auction to the hlghee
bidder for cash la hand, the proceed,
of Mie to be applied In Mtlsfaetloa
of said execution and all coats.
1 9 3 0 thU JStd d*y ° l 8*plwab,r
TOM B. OUKUANE,
Sheriff of Umatilla Countv r h . ._ .
SWF
A Neighbor’s Warning
AGAINST
*
c
•
Power Districts Amendment
<•<
Fou can't get something for Nothing"
fmpestibfe Promise?*
Say« a leading Seattle newspaper in referring to cur
rent propoganda fo r so-called "public ownership"
and to the promise of m *ny a candidate now seeking
political office.
I t give« thia w arning to the people
of Oregon:
“His program restates the promise that has been
made in many other campaigns and in many parts of
the country. He promises a vast public power and
electrical development ‘without cost to the taxpay
ers/
“This is a promise that has never yet been fulfilled.
Wherever the people have been beguiled into permit
ting the experiment it has proved a failure and a dis
appointment, and has imposed heavy additional bur
dens upon the taxpayers. It is a promise that only
the fanatical few nowadays venture to voice any
where within hailing distance of a city or a section
wherein the experiment has been tried.
“Nothing of the kind can be done without cost to
the taxpayers. Bonds may be sold and debts incurr
ed to get such a development under way, and for a
time everything may seem to be moving serenely.
But the day of reckoning comes around and the sad
Vote 325 X No
results are apparent both in the evidences of waste
and mismanagement, and still more palpably in the
recurrent upward leaps and« bounds of the general
tax rate.
“The people of Oregon h a |e only to east their eyes
in the direction of Seattle and Tacoma to learn much
on this score; they have onty to coek their ears to
catch the loud complaint that rises against these two
cities from all the rest of the State of Washington.
Seattle and Tacoma launchtd heavily upon power
development schemes to be perfected without cost
to the taxpayers.’ The tax rate in Tacoma has gene
up to 81 mills, the highest in the whole Northwest,
an<| the Seattle rate of 76.85 mills claims second
place.
Tax Rates 1929
Tacom a, 81.89
Se*ttle, 76.88 nulla.
Portland, 48.00 mills.
W H O L E S T A T E S U F F E R S T A X LO SSES
"Existing
owned utilities
o f K in g and PSaocu counties have
increased taxes in every other oity
and community in the State o f
W ashington."— T a x p a y o » ’ Econ
omy League o f Spoloane.
«
“Both Seattle and Tacoma have stripped the tax
rolls of millions of dollars’ worth of taxable proper
ty for their power projects. They have taken this pro
perty not only within their own corporate limits and.
the limits of the counties in which they are located,
but they have invaded numerous other counties and
* helped themselves freely. All this has added im
measurably to the taxes of property remaining on
the rolls. That is why the rest of this state so bit
terly complains and so earnestly demands that these
city utility projects be compelled to resume a share
of the tax load. Should that be done, the city tax
payers again must suffer, by increases in the direct
tax levy, by increases in utility rates, or by both.
“Seattle and Tacoma have gained nothing by these
veatuues. Oa the contrary they have lost much and
stand to lose still more. The people of Oregon will
be weB advised to turn away from the foolish
thought of getting something for nothing. On a
state-wide scale, as promised in Oregon and as pro
posed in the so-called ‘district power bill’ initiated
for vote in Washington, the results would be so much
the more disastrous."
E d ito ria l Seattle Sunday Times, Aug. 31, 1930
Vote 325 X No
PEOPLE OF OREGON . . .
Heed this Warning Against Confiscatory Debts and Taxes
by Voting 325 X NO!
Against Power Districts Constitutional Amendment