Heppner gazette-times. (Heppner, Or.) 1925-current, May 01, 1975, Page Page 10, Image 10

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    Page 10, THE GAZETTE-TIMES, Heppner, OR., Thursday, May 1, 1975
contest wirier Scoutshofd Dirfricl fennis tournament resulls
gets $35
a, !
fl 1
rT f
Larrene Montgomery, lone,
was the lucky winner in last
week's Who's Who Contest.
She correctly identified Gene
Pierce as the Mystery Person
and had the correct amount of
clues.
The five clues she identified
were as follows: member of
the board, (Pierce is president
of the Board of Directors for
the Bank of Eastern Oregon);
5 kids (he has five children);
Board of directors, (he serves
on the Board of Directors);
Horse nut (he is fond of
horses); active in the com
munity); he has served on
various committees for both
the city and the county.
Mrs. Montgomery wins a
total of $35 for her efforts,
$27.50 for the correct answer
and the correct amount of
clues plus a $7.50 carryover
from the previous week. This
week's win will be worth
$27.50.
ccmporee
The Oregon Trail District
Scouts held their Spring Cam
poree last weekend at the
mouth of Rock Creek on the
Joh.i Day River.
A total of 64 scouts attended,
along with a number of adults.
The main feature of the
program was "Historic
Trails". Guest speaker was
Marion Weatherford, Arling
ton. Troop No. 661 won several
awards. The Flaming Arrow
Patrol won the outstanding
patrol trophy. This trophy is a
traveling award and was
sponsored by the Oregon Trail
District.
G-T WANT
ADS PAY
The District 7-A tennis
tournament was held Satur
day, April 26 at Pendleton.
Schools participating in the
event were: Sherman County,
Pilot Rock, Condon, lone,
Echo, Weston-McEwen, Uma
tilla, Stanfield and Riverside.
In the boys tennis Rick
Gilbert was defeated 0 6, 14,
by Steve Doherty, Riverside,
in the first round singles
action.
In doubles Kim Gutierrei
and Joel Peterson won first
place. They defeated the
teams of Carlson and Martin,
I'matilla 6-1. 61, in the first
round. They went on to
win split sets 6-2, 34,
and 6-4, in defeating the
team of Collier and Cohn of
Echo in the semi finals. They
then proceeded to defeat the
team of Robinson and Munck,
Weston McEwen 6-4, 6-4 in the
finals.
In girls tennis, Carol Holtz
defeated Teresa Kaup.
Weston-McEwen 06. 16. in
preliminary action. Arlene
Cannon lost 1-4, 04, to Gina
Carrollo, Umatilla, in the first
round.
In doubles play, Ione's two
girls teams placed third and
fourth in the tourney.
Gayle McNary and Cindi
Martin paired up to defeat the
team of Henkle and Skoubo,
Riverside, 6 0, 6-1, in the first
round. In the second round
they won a split' set from
Sherman County as they
defeated the team of Bvrd and
McNab. 2 6, 6-0, and 6 3. In the
semi finals they lost to the
team of Patee and Rattray of
Condon, 6 1 and 6-1; who went
on to win first place.
In the consolation round, for
third and fourth place, Mc
Nary and Martin lost to Vicki
Edmunson and Sherri Wilson,
also of lone, 6 0 and 6 4.
Edmunson and Wilson ad
vanced by defeating Sharp
and Miller, Sherman County
6-1 and 6-2 in the first round.
They went on to defeat the
team of Johns and Ison, Uma
tilla by taking straight sets of
6 4 and 6 4 in the second round.
In the semi finals they lost to
Wade and Disque, Condon 3 6
and 7 5.
This win by Condon gave
them finals for first and
second pluce. with lone win
ning third and fourth place.
rSS&i'W
'7 A
SLt'J 1 i x
K1 IS
AMERICAN
tafttrnwa - - - - assssi aua - - - - -
LiJUIjO is
MONTH
talNMMHRttHMNNNMNMNNXa)
(Ml Year Ago in llrppner
Several thousand sheep die
from exposure due to un
expected cold rains. Wheal
growers benefited from the
moisture.
"Another thing ... I don't
like the way you pronounce
our last name!"
IIHII II CIIII lltlllj
MMKNMKXKNMXMKNMIIMMNNI
IKTffi lit!
BEV PHEGLEY, picks the name of Larrene Montgomery as
the winner in the Who's Who Contest.
lone girls tennis learn
lies 2, loses 1
The lone Girls tennis team
tied two games and lost one in
tournament play recently.
In a team meet against the
Sherman Huskies, the Cardi
nals tied their games with
Sherman.
In singles play Rita Hatrup,
S. defeated Cindi Martin, 1, 64
and 6-1. Vicki Edmunson, I,
defeated Vicky Martin, S, 6-1
and 6-3. Arlene Cannon, I,
defeated Mary Ann Fanning,
S, 8-3. Carol Holtz, I, defeated
Aria Page. S. 8-2. Susan
Thompson, I. defeated Kathy
Cruse, S, 9-7. Kathy Cruse, S,
defeated Jan Peterson, I, 8-2
and J. Wainwright, S. defeat
ed Marilyn Warren. I. 6-4.
In doubles play Gayle Mc
Nary and Sherri Wilson, I.
defeated J. Byrd and D.
MacNab, S, 6-4 and 6-2. The
Sherman doubles team of K.
Sharp and D. Miller defeated
Donna Rea and Carrie Haynes
and the Sherman team of J.
Moreau and K. Buck defeated
the lone team of Kristy
Edmunson and Carol McEUi
gott. April 15, the girls traveled to
Condon and lost four of five
single matches and all three
matches in doubles play.
Susan Riney defeated Vicki
Edmunson 6-2. 6-2. Robin
Kackley defeated Sherri Wil
son 6-3 and 6-1. Jana Miller
defeated Arlene Cannon 8-1,
Ten Devine defeated Carol
Holtz 8-4 and Susan Thomp
son, lone, defeated Kathy
Lacey 6-3.
In doubles play Mary Ellen
Pattee and Rena Rattray
defeated the team of Cindi
Martin and Gayle McNary 6-2,
6-0. Cindy Disque and Barb
Wade defeated Donna Rea and
Carrie Haynes 6-1. 6-1, and
Barb Froman and Leah Potter
defeated Kristin Edmunson
and Jeanie Piening 8-2.
April 18. the girls hosted the
tennis team from Arlington
and lost the singles and won
the double events to even out
the matches at three and
three.
In the singles play Julie
Steward. A, defeated Arlene
Cannon, I, 6-3 and 6-1. Carol
Holtz, I, defeated Wendy
West. A. 6-4 and 6 3.
Robin Cough, A, defeated
Tammy Tucker, I, 8 2.
In the doubles play Holly
West and Irene Davison, A,
defeated Donna Rea and
Carol McElligott 6-2. 24 and
6-1. Carrie Haynes and Jeanie
Piening. I, defeated Peggy
Grubaugh and Chris Vela 9-8.
The lone team of Kristi
Edmunson and Susan Thomp
son defeated Janice Steinke
and Tammy Morris 8-1.
Destruction
derby set at
speedway
A big auto racing double
header has been set for the
Umatilla Speedway Sunday,
May 4. It will be an all slam
bang affair with a big 8 event
Jalopy Destruction Derby plus
the "scare tactics" of the
Figure Scars as they test their
course in racing action.
A giant field of junkers will
be in action when time trials
get underway at 1:30 with the
first of the big smashup racing
events starting at 2:30. Speed
way gates open at 12.30, with
regular track admission
prices prevailing.
The smashing, crashing ac
tion begins with the fast four
car trophy dash and four big
heat races Two giant main
events allow cars to do
anything to their opponents to
eliminate them from further
competition except head on
collisions.
Perform a
act
Untjottr
Uood pressure
checked.
Oregon Heart Association
STUI
.
T ae twa tf M
Ssrnptt Besot
81ICT1M BALLOT
lumi bubal rm raoTBCTioa
Start '
(I)
DIUCT0R3 FOB rXAU YEAS TERM
Volt far Tn
NO. 4 IN A SERIES: Questions about the cam potability of Alumax with Oregon's liuibility.
Is it possible for us
to have a healthy
environment and an
aluminum reduction plant?
As a wheat and cattle rancher, I want
to be assured our area will maintain its
high standard of livability.
TTrrEuvEiNo
X a8r'cultura
W Pacific Noi
iNONEofthe finest
tural areas in the
iorthwest. It also
just happens to have assets which
potentially make it one of the most
attractive industrial centers in this
part of the country. There's no rea
son the two types of activity can't
coexist in the same area, provided
the environmental impacts of the
new industries are compatible wiih
agricultural production.
"The first real test of this com
patability has been raised by the
proposed Alumax aluminum plant. ,
But, knowing Oregon's Depart
ment of Environmental Quality
has a reputation for heing one of
the most careful and stringent en
vironmental regulatory agencies in
the country, and that they will
make the final decision as to the
environmental acceptability of the
Alumax plant. I feel we really have
nothing to worry about. If the plant
is approved, it will mean Alumax
will have negligible impact upon
the surrounding area and upon our
public health and welfare. I am
told by Alumax that before the
Dt.Q makes their decision, the fol
lowing questions are the tvpes of
things they will consider. If Alu
max can meet the DFQs tough
standards, that's good enough for
me."
What hinds of environmental controls
will Alumas um?
Although the U.S. Fnvironmental
Protection Agency has established
a standard for fluoride emissions
from new aluminum plants of no
more than two pounds per ton of
aluminum produced. Oregon's
standards require that these emis
sions be kept to one pound.
In order to meet Oregon's stan
dard. Alumax went to aluminum
plants throughout the world to
evaluate the latest and best avail
able technology. They found no
single plan utilizing all this tech
nology. Alumax has combined the
best available resources into a total
control system which will meet
Oregon's requirements.
Now ihat Alumax has demon
strated that these standards can be
met. and designed the cleanest
aluminum plant presently planned
anv where in the world, the) may
have established a new environ
mental standard for all future alu
minum reduction plants in the U S
In th past, fluorides Irom other alu
minum plants have effected agricul
tural production al other location.
Can wa risk letting Alumas locate in
on of our key developing agricul
tural artas?
Because Alumax has insisted upon
environmental security. thev have
contracted with nationally known
fluoride experts lo evaluate pi
lential effect of their emissions
upon vegetation and animals in the
area.
,
y -cr-' . f '
r
V
Is Alumai using good, productive ag
ricultural land tor In plant tit?
The plant site is partially used lor
livestock grazing, where the most
obvious plant species is cheatgrass.
an annual grass invading ovcr
grazed rangelaiuls. I he site is
classed as deteriorated laiigel.unl
of marginal livestock value.
Thr ar tvral wlldlll rlugt
near the plant. Will Alumai ndangr
these area?
7 iFi 'v-rTr
m- .JC, ;
If J fit: K-mX sL;
Fluoride Emission
Standards
ifis n t ion or
71
n ...
it -
"FT
Pi
i
i j
mo
S'MIOO
it
limine
AMIS
imim
Kit 1)1
nwis
Dr. Harrison t.. Cramer, nation
ally recognized air pollution scien
tist, used plant emission data and
local meteorological conditions lo
project short and long term flu
oride concentrations over the sur
rounding area. I luoride experts,
after visiting the local area und re
viewing current land use. evaluated
the effect of Alumax's fluoride
emissions on local vegetation and
animals. Dr. John W. Suttie, an
expert in the clfccl of fluoride on
animals, concluded that the fluo
ride concentrations from this
aluminum reduction facility would
have no adverse effect on cattle
production in this area or any other
livestock enterprise. Dr. Michael
Treshow, a consulting plant pathol
ogist, projected no injury to exist
ing vegetation.
Ar Alumax's air t minions going to
endanger the local population?
The National Academy of Science
has found that airborne fluoride
concentrations that produce no
effect on vegetation are also neg
ligible in terms of possible adverse
effect on man. This is in keeping
with Df.Q standards which provide
for the protection of public health
and welfare.
Dr. John W. Sutue has concluded
that wildfowl could salely nest
right on the Alumax property.
Will Alumax endanger the aquatic
III of any of Oregon's lakes and
rivrs?
Alumax will discharge mi process
water into the Columbia or any
other waterway. Beak Consultants,
aquatic biologists, projected the
effect of sulphur dioxide and flu
oride emissions from the plant and
concluded Ihat there would be no
measurable change in Columbia
River water quality or aquatic life.
Won't Alumas discharge black
smoke, contaminants, and odors Into
the air?
There will be no black smoke or
odors discharged by the plant. Ihe
atmospheric discharge of air con
taminants will meet the Dl Q s
stringent air quality standards.
CU-ntt Thome
( in. ;)(( C'oimn Riim her
site, at the quietest lime of day.
average between 35-40 decibels,
emanating priiiianl) from traffic
on Oregon Koute 7.10. Ihev have
projected the average noise leu-Is
Irom Alumax would not exceed
existing background noise levels
late at night in the nearest residen
tial area this will be in compli
ance ith Dl'.Q noise regulation.
What about nolae when In plant Is
In operation? Will It kp people
awaka?
In projecting the operating noise
level of the plant. Bolt, licranck
and Newman have concluded that
there will be no signilicant acous
tical impact on (he surrounding
community from the introduction
of this new facility.
Won'l Alumas general solid waste?
Alumax and ( II2M Mill. Portland
consulting firm recognized as ex
perts in solid waste, have deter
mined the maximum quantity of
waste would he approximately
3.(KK) tons annually, composed pri
marily of brick. Much of this solid
waste will be beneficial to local
landfill in that it will allow stabili
zation of the soil and refuse, de
creasing blowing litter and wind
erosion of ihe existing soil cover.
M
, t
I J rprim
IV deal
rprinlt of thl entire xerlet
iliiifi with "Alumax in
Orenon" ait available for you 10
ue In tliu iiuiiiH ihi vital huie
with your frieiuli. To receive
your cuplri. write to hi at:
J0J I ml Stain Street, llermhton,
Orenon 97US.
Will the noise Irom Alumas construc
tion disturb any of the residential
rea In Ihe vicinity of the plant?
doii, ucranck, and jNcwman, a rrv
consulting firm nationally rccog- 2ZZK3QJL4rvfJX
nized as one of the foremost -pacihc cohpoaation
experts in noise, has found lhal ex- People Working to huild
isting noise levels in Ihe nearest a itrunger economy compatible
residential area, the McNary town- with Oreuon'i environment.
12 Q Donald Bennett
n r
I l
This message from a concerned resident of Eastern Oregon has been published in the public interest.
, Honta Krlt Evans
HrrFNrrS: CommmHr Imurt m,y,i, ( H)M Hill. Amll. I11 A.miitt talnmikm nl Alurntt Slif um t)mnll, Ornnn.
K.rtl, Urrtntk ind Nfmn. April. I7, Hrr M Alumai. Rttk (iHKulianti, Inc : nmmumfmlkmi w Alumtl, H I ( nmt,
IH i. W. SWIM, Ur, MKhMl Iftthow; Hmnidtt, Ntiuntl Andrm lit .Vwnc, IV'I. tertoat Almmu turn nd dotmmmi.