(Continued from Page 4)
0s,Car Athei li FusJi . EV NW lvinS S of canal
co Buford L. & Cleta M. Witherspoon Sec 24 N 26 EWM
(contract buyer) Irrigon
Arnold & Mary Lou Braat
Charles Wilson
E'a Sec 28 4N 27 EWM
Irrigon
All lots 13, 14 & 15, Blk 41
Irrigon
Frank Edward Wiley-Floyd William All lots 13 to 21 inc, Blk 31
Wiley-Frances Marie Wiley Irrigon
Ruth Umiker, Est.
Lee J. & Ada Connor
Frances McMillan
Delbert T. Vinson
Billy D. & Jo Ann Griffin
Guy E. Hastings
R. B. & Josephine Rands
Frank & Mary Marlow
Russell K. & Hazel H. Miller
Russell K. & Hazel H. Miller
Leonard Bedford
A. E, & Cecil Stefanl
A. E. & Cecil Stefanl
Alice Wiles Est.
Adon & Eva M. Hamlett.
Gordon White
Gordon White
Gordon White
Saben Hastings
J. E. Morgan
Lewis & Ann Ball
Archie & Verona Esteb
John C. & Hazel C. Jackson
Oscar Rippee
All lots 1, 2 & 3, Blk 30
Irrigon
N. E. 66' of lot 1, Blk 7
Lexington
N. E. half of lot 10, Blk 10
Lexington
All lot 7 Blk 4
Lexington
All lots 4 & 5, Blk 17
Lexington
Lots 9 & 10, Blk 26
Penlands Addition to Lexington
1957- 58
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1959-60
' 1960-61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1957- 58
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
All N of OWR&N Co RW Sec 10 4N 24 EWM 1959-60
Boardman 1960-61
1961- 62
1962- 63
N SWy4 SWy4 Sec 15 4N 24 EWM
Boardman
SS Sec 11 4 N 24 EWM
NNWy4 less sold Sec 13 4N 24 EWM
All SEy4NWy4, SHNEK, NN4 lying N of
Hwy 30 Sec 14 4N 24 EWM
Boardman
SEy4 of Sec 12 4N 24 EWM
Boardman
House on Guy Ferguson land
WttNVi NWy4 SW4 See 17 rN 25 EWM
Boardman
W 5' lot 2, Blk 15
All lot 3, Blk 15
Wills Addition to lone
All lots 9 & 10, Blk 8
Sperry 2nd Addition to lone
S. 80' lots 5 & 6, Blk 2
Cluffs Addition to lone
All lots 4 to 7 inc, Blk 2
Halvorsens Addition to lone
Ntt lots 9, 10 & 11, Blk 3
lone
All lots 1 & 2, Blk 4
Sperrys 2nd Addition to lone
All lots 3, Blk 4
Sperrys 2nd Addition to lone
All lots 3 & 4, Blk 3
Adams Addition to Hardman
All lots 5 & 6, Blk 2
Cluffs 8th Addition to lone
Tract No. 39, Bgn at S. W. cor of lot 3,
Blk 1, Halvorsens Add. to lone, Thence
E 220', Thence S 200', Thence E 140'
Thence S 32' to center of Willow Crk,
Thence N along E line of A St.
420' to p.o.b.
Begn 42' S of the S E cor of lot 5, Blk 1,
Town of Morgan, Thence W 300', Thence
S 250', Thence E 300', Thence N 250'
to p.o.b. 1.72 acres
Ny2 NW4 Sec 25 IS 24 EWM
lone
Cabin on Claude White land
Sec 32 5N 26 EWM
Hardman
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962-63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1955-56
1958- 39
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1958- 59
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
1959- 60
1960- 61
1961- 62
1962- 63
.60
.71
.74
.76
.65
.53
233.62
237.38
242.53
197.85
33.85
37.38
38.09
39.17
29.44
27.53
54.42
55.62
46.72
17.80
26.30
27.42.
19.20
138.06
165.78
194.49
243.44
222.43
D.45
9.91
11.63
10.91
11.51
469.01
491.95
517.12
345.b5
297.00
32.64
34.24
40.17
37.78
20.71
.65
.86
.75
.69
56.69
59.47
69.76
66.32
61.36
73.88
86.67
81.43
79.77
.24
.23
.18
.12
.05
.01
56.84
38.76
20.20
2.30
10.94
9.09
6.22
3.26
.34
6.70
8.89
4.63
.54
4.33
4.29
2.28
.22
4.82
2.07 .67
2.07 .50
2.70 . .44
3.09 .26
2.78 .03
3.09 1.25
3.45 1.12
3.46 .84
4.51 .74
4.64 .39
3.48 , .04
26.91 8.70
26.95 6.56
35.14 5.74
35.54 2.96
34.75 .40
20.01 6.47
20.04 4,88
26.13 4,27
27.04 2.25
33.36 .39
2.07 .50
2.70 .44
2.32 .19
.70 .01
5.08 1.24
5.34 .87
5.36 .45
4.05 , .05
37.68 11.34
79.52 18.55
141.26 23.07
152.22 12.68
131.45 1.52
25.44 8.22
27.07 6.59
28.48 4.65
29.05 2.42
22.00 .26
815.67 263.71
868.00 211.18
913.14 149.12-
933.41 77.75
706.96 8.20
39.76 9.67
41.83 6.83
42.81 3.57
32.42 .38
47.25 15.28
49.56 12.06
58.14 9.49
54.5S 4.54
40.65 .47
28.74 16.19 '
30.07 9.72
31.54 7.67
37.00 6.04
35.26 2.94
39.b8 .46
39.51 12.77
41.45 10.08
48.62 7.94
46.17 3.85
30.68 .36
44.63
40.33
31.76
20.28
2.58
3.06
2.41
1.90
.91
.13
151.63
119.69
94.24
28.79
3.45
10.55
8.33
6.56
3.15
.24
.16
.14
.06
.01
18.33
14.47
11.39
5.52
.71
17.98
14.15
6.78
.73
207.78
205.05
101.84
14.61
27.01
183.65
144.84
8.93
22.44
609.29
154.18
4,947.14
177.27
292.00
245.51
241.43
1,103.78
61.82
2,579.13
194.37
3.32
364.02
361.59
HEPPWSR GAZETTE-TIMES, Thursday. March 21, 1963
Human Pressures Held Threat
To Hunting Sport in Oregon
1957- 58 11.30 4.56
1958- 59 12.49 4.04
1959- 60 13.16 3.20
1960- 61 15.95 2.60
1961- 62 14.52 1.21
1962- 63 12.94 .15 96.12
1958- 59 124.92 40.39
1959- 60 131.58 32.00
1960- 61 159.48 26.04
1961- 62 147.97 12.33
1962- 63 13182 1.53 808.06
1959 60 42.57 10.36
1960- 61 56.89 9.29
1961- 62 32.02 2.67
1962- 63 22.87 .27 176.94
You and each of you are further notified to appear within thirty days from the date of the first publication of this
summons and defend this suit or pay the amount provided by law for the redemption of said properties, and if you so
appear you are further notified to serve a copy of your appearance, objections or answer on the undresigned at his post
office address as herein below stated.
If you fail so to do, judgment and decree will be entered in the above entitled Court foreclosing the liens of said taxes
as shown by the said tax foreclosure list, together with interest and all costs as shall be due upon each of such prop
erties. Said judgment and decree will order that the Clerk of this Court shall deliver a certified copy of said judgment
and decree to the Tax Collector of Morrow County, Oregon, and said judgment and decree shall be considered to all intents
and purposes a certificate of sale to the County of each of the properties therein described.
And you further are notified that plaintiff will apply to the Court for such other relief as may be just and equitable
in the premises.
C. J. D. Bauman, Sheriff and Tax Collector
For Morrow County
Herman W. Winter, District Attorney
For Morrow County, Oregon, and
Attorney for Plaintiff
Post Office Address: Heppner, Oregon
Date of First Publicaton: March 14, 1963.
Date of Last Publication: April 4, 1963.
1,029.48 By JOHN McKEAN
Oregon State Game Commission
Will hnntinci onnHmm t u
- - -rs v.ii.jiui. kj uc
one of Oregon's most popular
auurces 01 ouinnnr reprentinn
- ... wut.vit, VII
win numan pressures reduce the
wildlife resourcps and himtinr,
access until hunting is no longer
aiuatuve 10 ue average citizen?
This is a question that every
hunter Should ask htmcalf w
the Game Commission, or the
legislature, or Uncle Sam for
me answers rest nrociv ,hvi
- . . B .
uuiueis.
Laws are enacted and ao-pn.
cies of government are created
10 DrOVlflP SPl-VlPPa that ara nrsn
. - - . - ...... WH-
sldered necessarv for n mninritv
m me peopie; tnereiore, it rol
lows that thp pffiplpnrv nf
ernmental programs is directly
affected bv the knnwlpd up nnH
will of a majority of the people.
Perhaps an examination of our
past ana present conditions and
a recognition nf thp trends In
more populous states will give
some insignt into the future of
nunting.
Gig Game
The deer is Oregon's mnst nnn
ular and nrnduptivp cm ma an
imal. Huntpr nnrtipi not inn anA
kill figures illustrate the in
crease in public enjoyment and
annual yield of mule deer dur
ing the past decade. A similar
trend has occurred with both the
DiacK-tauea deer and elk ex
cept that current inventories do
not indicate a 1962 decline In
those populations.
The fact that the number of
persons hunting deer and elk
has nearly douhlpd and th on.
nual yield of those species has
tripiea during the past ten years
is an enviable record, but there
is no assurance that similar in.
creases in yield will be possible
in ine next decade.
The Principal factor rnntrih.
Utine to the kupppss nf thn loct
decade has been a public awak
ening to the fact that big game
populations cannot be stock
piled. Thev can pithpr hp nsod
as they are produced or be
taken from thp rnniro hv ctm.
vation, disease, predatlon, or
other controls.
Ever sinpp 1Q3Q U;hon th lor
islature delegated regulat o r y
authority to the Game Commis
sion, the Commission has been
continuously seeking a level of
harvest that would statiHi tha
bier rams herds In hal nnro unfit
winter forage supplies and min
imize conmcts witn agriculture,
forestry, and other primary land
Uses. It now annpars that afto
25 years of cautious demonstra
tion, iuu utilization of the an
nual production is beine- achipv.
ed on somp rancps and uith tha
assistance of mother nature, who
iook ner snare last winter, de
sirable reductions In hrppdinrr
i i ; i .
uuuuiauons nave occurrpn nn a
few ranges.
Another factor contributing to
me niKn yiem or tne past decade
has been thp fapt that a carina
of mild winters permitted a
nigner carry-over of animals
than should normally be ex
pected. With knowledpp that muph nf
the waste inherent in antiquated
management concepts has been
eliminated, and with nn assnr.
ance that mother nature will be
as kind to game herds as she
has been during thp nast tpn
VearS. it is nrnhahip that mm.
parable increases in the public
aemana ior Dig game hunting
will have an pffprt nnnn tha
Quantity nf tramp avnilahla (n
each of us as individuals.
Whether this condition is good
or bad depends upon the adap-
laDiiuy ano pnnosopny or the
People. PerhaDs it is tl mp tn
quit looking at deer and elk
hunting as a cheap source of
meat and dpvplnn a crrpatnr nn.
preciation of the fine recreation
avanaDie in nunting. Observa
tion of current hunting meth
ods leads onp tn susnppt that
there are few hunters but lots
oi people with a vehicle, a gun,
and a lust to kill something.
Everyone likes tn hp supppss.
ful and by present standards
is embarrassed if he isn't. This
Philosophy must rhancp tn nns
hunting for fun and greater em-
pnasis on skiii and ethics, If
hunting is to maintain its
present status in our variety of
recreational opportunities.
For the benefit of the many
persons who yearn for the good
old davs. uhon thou had tha
woods to themselves and deer
were so abundant that they ate
themselves out of house and
home, it should be explained
that there is little chance to
turn back to that era. Corrective
action was too slow to save the
forage resources that made those
populations possible, and the de
mand for other products of the
lands and waters of the state
requires that the game resources
be maintained at levels that are
compatible with primary land
uses. In the event this is not
donp. the landnwnpr has thn
legal and physical means of re-
aucing game production on nis
land. For examnlp. thp Dps.
chutes National Forest, after re
peated failures, has found it
necessarv to fpnrp thp mnlp dppr
off of 4,266 acres of winter range
in order to successfully re-establish
a ninp fnrpst Thpsn fpnppa
cost the taxpayers about $65,000,
ana tne eno product is tne com-
nlptp loss nf dppr nrnduptlnn nnd
hunting opportunities inherent
in those lands until the young
forest grows beyond the reach
of thp dppr. Similar pyamnlpe
can be cited on private timber
ana agricultural lands in other
parts of the state. With these
conditions it is nhvlnuslv mnph
better to maintain populations
at reasonable level than to
force landowners tn lisp nthpr
means ot controlling wildlife on
weir rana.
The principal opportunity to
Increase hiT tramp nrndnntinn
and hunting opportunities rests
in constructive development of
winter food supplies and more
uueiisive management of every
available acre of productive hab
itat. In some instances this will
require acquisition and develop
ment Of lcPV trapts nf urlnm.
range in order to attract ani
mals away from areas of conflict
and assure maintenance of a
reasonahlp wlntpr fnnn ..,i..
for migrant herds. Research is
needed to develop practical tech
niques for improving winter
raneCS and a PrPatpr Irnnurladno
of both the biological and social
iacis mat are pertinent to the
management of game.
Game Birds
Uttland ffamp htrda on4 mnin
, .v. . o ujtu waici-
fowl arp rplattvolv ahnrt M.rA
- . ....... , v. . j aiiuivtiTCU
and flUCtuatp in ahnnHan on.
nually in response to climate
ana otner environmental factors.
As with deer and elk, we are
learnine' hv pvnpripnpp thot
game birds rannnt hp srnpkn11o1
They can either be used in the
years they are available or
mother naturp will tako thom
her way. Fortunately, nature's
way oi nandiing birds is not as
damaeins tn nthpr rinrai no
with big game. The fact that
the people fail to fully utilize
a oira crop seldom jeopardizes
the future production or ser
iously conflicts with primary
land uses.
During the past decade the
chukar has added much to Ore
gon's hunting opportunities, and
the Commission is currently
searching for an exotic that may
fit the cutover forest lands of
western Oregon. Merriam's tur
key is another bird that has
been recently Introduced and
shows Prpat nrnmlcn tnr
- v ..... .uv, iui me
future.
These additions to the resource
base, combined with the know
ledge that nnail rhuknr on1
pheasant populations are not be
ing fully utilized with present
seasons and pressures, provide
much Pa lisp fnr nntlmlam Kr
bird hunters.
It also follows that bird hunt
ers have not been plagued by
a great increase in the number
of people participating. During
uie pusi aecaae upland game
hunters have only increased by
aDoui- zu.uuu, and there are
about one-third less waterfowl
hunters than in 1Q?9. r.ama
birds provided approximately
1,083,000 man days of hunting
in 1961 and a total of 1,545,700
birds were reported taken.
Therp arp manv nnnnrttmfttaa
to Increase game bird hunting
through more Intensive manage
ment, devplnnmpnt nf hahitot
ana introduction ro desirable ex
otics. The matter of landowner
tolerance and access to produc
tive bird hunting areas will be
the principal limiting factor of
Dira nuntinfir in trip tuturp
Huntincr Accprh
ihe real challenge to be faced
in the future is maintpnanpp nf
a reasonahlp apppss tn thn lnnio
that produce the publicly owned
wuuiue.
With half nf thp statp In nnh.
lie ownershln and mnst land.
owners possessing a keen Inter
est in me wnaiue resources, Ore
gon is in a much better posit
ion to mppt this phallonrro than
most states. However, the fore
cast of a half-million more resi
dents py 1975, combined with
the nrohahilitw th at mnra lntcntn
time and improved transporta
tion will make Oregon more at
tractive to non-residents, is
cause fnr advanrn nlnnninn anrl
the Initiation of constructive pro
grams mat will make the land
owner's position more tenable.
The states that have failed to
meet this challenge find that
most of their productive game
habitat is available only to
those who arp ahlp tn nav fnr
access. These states have cause
to welcome the new u. S. De
partment of Agriculture program
wnicn win suosidize commerc
ialization of hunting, fishing,
and other forms of out door
fishing opportunities available
I to more people.
Perhaps this is the answer to
Oregon's access problems, but a
recent survey of over 1,700 farm
landowners indicates that about
85 percent of Oregon's farmers
allow free access to those who
are considerate enough to ask
for permission and only 4H per
cent sell access. This condition,
combined with the fact that
Oregonians enjoy free access to
the half of the state that is in
public ownership, gives cause to
believe that with constructive
programs a reasonable access to
huntinp arpaa pan ha maintain.
-r. ....... - .. . luiuiiiuiir
ed.
Nearly all nf rimnrnn'o
Problems arp thn dirnt rncnlt
of abuses the landowner has suf-
iered irom either wildlife or rec
reationists. As previously point
ed out, a landowner who awak
ens to the fact that his land
is producing more deer than
COWS has a rpnl innnnfl.rn
Canitall7P nn tha rlo nnA tv.n
landowner who finds cut fences,
dead livestock, and littered prop
erty during hunting season log
ically fppls that tha
" ----- lilt UOLI J
ShOUld heln rpnair tha damn era
It, therefore, follows that if
the people of Oregon want to
continue to enjoy the land
owner's hospitality during hunt
ing seasons, they will have to
show greater respect for his
rierhts both in fprma nf that
personal conduct while hunting
anu in terms oi tne abundance
of game they expect to be pro
duced on his property.
More aggressive enforcement,
management, and educational
PrOEXams and an ovnonelnn
services tn land nwnpro ara qd .
.. ..... .j 11 v.
sential.
In conclusion, the future of
hunting rests with tha
" wc WtU(JIC
OI Oreenn. and nartlpulariir tha
300,000 persons who dirertlv
participate in hunting. They will
either awaken to the fact that
both Wildllfp numhpra nnd h,,n.
ter conduct will be compatible
with other land uses or, as in
Europe, hunting will become the
sport of kings and beyond the
means of the average citizen.
The Game Commission is
fully aware of the challenges
ahead, and will mnirn fnii nan
of the authority and financial
weans ueiegaiea to it lor the
promotion of Oregon's wildlife
resources and hunting oppor
tunities, but it cannot do the
joo aione. ine understanding
and cooperation of the people
of Oregon are the essential
forces.
Ontario Girl Wins
Betty Crocker Award
Delores Mae Overman of On
tario high school has been
nnmpd Statn RnttiT I, -
Homemaker for Oregon and will
receive a $1,500 scholarship from
General Mills. Miss Overman,
the daughter of Mr. and Mrs.
Kenneth Overman of 985 S. W.
Second Strept. Dntari
first among 4,673 girls in 151
uiKii sunoois in tne state.
Linda I.nui.SP Rlapklimldnr nf
The Dallps Spnlnr hirrh o,.r,i
, ......... ...h., BVIIUUI
ranked second In Oregon and
will receive a $500 scholarship
Eight other Rpninr crirla In f 1,n
gon received honorable mention
in the Homemaker test. They
are: Nanpv Vllnn rvnceomwn
Minnville high school, McMInn-
Vllle: Marv -In Fltynntrlnb- Con.
-J - " - - ......11, UHl.-
red Heart Academy, Salem; Mar-
lena ivay rowier, crater high
School. Tpntral Pnlnt- illnn
Neale Kaseberg, Sherman Coun
ty high school, Moro; Cathy
Frances Krall, Sunset high
school, Beaverton; Carolyn Lee
Pavnter. Sutherlin hinh sphnni
Sutherlln; Carolyn Perry, La
Grande Senior high school, La
Grande and Marion Flnwprrpp
Theus, Parkrose Senior high
school, Portland.
If you typewrite but don't
type right, you may need some
of the new "magic" Ko-Rec-Type
to correct your errors. It's inex-
pensive; drop In to the Gazette-
Times for a demonstration.
in PORTLAND
OREGONbb
EXECUTIVE SUITES
All KING - LENGTH BEAUTYREST BEDS
COMPLETELY AIR CONDITIONED
DIRECT DIAL PHONES
AIL CHANEL T. V. . FAMILY UNITS
INDIVIDUAL ELECTRIC HEAT
PRIVATE LANAIS & POOL . MOUNTAIN VIEW
EXCELLENT RESTAURANT . ROOM SERVICE
CLOSE TO CITY CENTER
BANQUET FACILITIES
MEETING & DISPLAY ROOMS
4' a' eii a OP
11
X HOTEL
2401 S. W. 4th AVE. PORTLAND 1, OREGON
PHONE CA6-U2I