Image provided by: YMCA of Ashland; Ashland, OR
About Valley record. (Ashland, Jackson County, Or.) 1888-1911 | View Entire Issue (May 15, 1890)
Promotion “is a good pollay to >lls up ths profits of the pratactad monop olist, but a bad one for us out of whom ths profits ars drawn. THE FALLACIES OF (Dally Oregonian, Dec. 11,1880.) PROTECTION! From the Standpoint of the Daily Oregonian Wool and Lumber Ought tO be Free. A Tax on Sugar is for Revenue and Not Protection. A Characteristic Ruse. Free Whiskey and Tobacco. An inquiry is addreesed to the Oreiron- ian by a pereonwho read its remarks of yesterday on "Loes of the carrying Trade.” The inquiry is as follows, via: Since we produce all materials that enter into shipbuilding, vis: timber, iron, etc., I am at loss to determine wbat you reler to by remarking; "But such are the duties levied on materials that go into shipbuilding," etc. Will you please explain In what manner »aid duties are levied on home-produced materials? « Ttiis inquirer is misled by his own confusion of terms. Though duties are not levied on home-produced materials that enter into shipbuilding, yet the cost of such materials are enormously in creased by our system of protection. We refuse to let in the foreign article, but in vite the producer of the home article to make tbe price excessive, and “pro tect” him in doing so. Just as our tariff on steel rails increases the cost of all steel rail« in this country, whe'her im ported or produced here, so our tariff on shipbuilding materiels increases the cost of all materials of this class. Herein is one of the causes why shipbuilders of the United States cannot compete with those of other countries. That we have in our country all necessary shipbuild ing materials is a bootless boast, so long as our tariff policy makes them so costly that we cannot use them. A duty ought to be laid on these arti cles which will produce a clear revenue at least for collection. • • • Sugar is one of these. * * * It is a tax for revenue, and is directly opposea in principle and effect to a duty imposed for protection.—Oregonian, Feb. 24, 1881- The reduction of the revenue on sugar proposed by the bill is $11,759,799, and excepting the woolen schedule, is nearly twice as much as are all others combined. * * * But on correct prin ciples of taxation there ought to be a higher duty on sugar than on any other article on the dutiable list.—Roger .Q. is Mills. July 21, 1881. can fives to frauds and so defeating the object. Another thing, if we strike off the one hundred millions of revenue an nnally obtained by the national treaaerv through these taxes, then no modifica tion of the tariff on imports will be pen si ble. There is a tax on the necessari m of life amounting to probably $500,000.- 000 a year, which is paid by consumers, of which, however, only about one-third goes into the national treasury, while the other two-thirds are divided as special bounties among favored individuals and corporation». Free trade in these neces sary commodities is not expected or de sired, but a reasonable modification and and reduction of the rates of duty ought to be granted. At any rate, whisky and tobacco ought not be the only free arti cles which the American citizen is allowed to buy and consume. and means committee have been induced to advance the rate by a statement from I’ittsburg to the effect that if congress will sufficiently protect the tin-plate in dustry “it will provide a livelihood for a I large number of people.” But why should our industry here be taxed to create an industry at Pittsburg? Is it I fair ? The Chicago Times states the ease for us when it says: “If it will not pay to make tin plates without protection, it is because men can do better at some thing else and for no other reason that it is possible toassign. It is much the bet ter way to let men do things at which they can make a living without taxing their neighbors. To take them from do ing those things and set them at things at which they cannot earn a living with out the help of taxes paid by their neigh bors, is the same thing essentially ae taking them from useful employments and setting them at carrying buckets of “ Great Britain pays higher aver water from Lake Michigan to Lake Su age wages under free trade than perior.” A far greater industry will be taxed by the increase of the duty on tin either France or Germany under plate than can possibly be created by it. protection, and the United States "The mass of the people want jus pays relatively no higher wages in tice instead of swindling, freedom in- her crowded mining districts, in stead of monopolies." proportion to the relative cost of liv A Live Question. ing, than Great Britain." (Daily Oregonian. May 14, 1884.) • The talk of protecting American labor is a juggle and a farce since the system does not protect, but, on the contrary, actually oppresses the larger part of the labor of the country." “ 77i« lumber duty is the most in excusable Jolly and iniquity of the whole monstrous bundle of iniquities and absurdities called the tariff law." •A.----------- S— The Lumber Tariff. [Dally Oregonian, February 23, 1883.1 • • • • “We tax the raw materials of the port to the legislature” merely such tablee in regard to the railroada ae the woolen manufacturing industry in previous law, approved February M, 1885, had compelled the various railroada a way that protects nobody. It to file in the office ot Secretary of State, keeps out foreign wools that we thus relieving the entire board and its clerk of all work except the onoroua need to mix with our native fl eces work of drawing their salariée quarterly and riding on free passes all over the and by restricting the variety of State. There is another serious objection to the bill. Under our system of State fabrics which can be made here, government, it in the legislative preroga limits the demand for American tive to make the laws, and it is the exec utive function to enforce the laws. If, however, the legislature can, as is pro wool." posed in this bill, create a commission " Manufacturing industry is fas of its own appointment, to enforce the laws of its own enactment in regard to tened as a leech upon agricultural the railroads of this State, it can create commissions in regard to any and all industry and is gorging with the other matters of State control, and thereby entirely rob, if it so chooses, profits." both the executive and judicial branches the State government of all their pre Thus our labor suffers from a of scribed powers. This usurpation oi system of robbery, disguised under power by one of the departments of the State government would lead to the forms of quackery for protection of practical subversion of our free institu tions. Under the law as it now stands American labor. The stupidity with the powers of the commission de fined as it has been by the decision of that doesn’t eee it, particularly on the supreme court of the State, one com this coast, where the producing missioner without any clerk would have been all that could poetibly find em classes are so plainly the victims ployment, and this bill which adds te the number of the commission withont of t, it is dhenominal and perhaps in the least enlarging its powers, is toe much like offering a stone to the people hopeless.—Daily Oregonian, Octo of this State, who have been justly clam oring for bread. I veto the bill. ber 21, 1881. Less than a hundred capitalists en- _ gaged in the Bessamer steel ring make two or three hundred per cent, profit on their money invested, but they pay their workmen only the average wages, w hich "No imposition is too great to provide a bare subsistence. The same is true in other protected industries. The catch stupid people, and herein lies tariff question can no more be smothered than could the slavery question a quarter the great strength of our 'glorious of a century ago. The mass of the peo ple want now, as well as then, justice in protective system." Protection is a place of swindling, freedom instead of monopolies. If just and real reforms are legalized form of robbery, which denied the refusal will only intensify the makes the farmer foot the bills of the irritation which will presently sweep away a system w hich, whatever may be \ manufacturer." said in favor of its moderate and tempo rary application, is seen to hive become “ But these men must be hypocrites, the means for gross abuses ¡.nd system atic robberv and oppression. for they leave the American laborer • • a a ♦ B ylvesteb P ennoyeb , Governor. b'EMOCKATIC fUlVUKH. The démocratie party of the state of Oregoa. In convention assembled, renew their pledge« to democratic principle» and enunciate the fol lowing declaration»: First—We congratulate the democratic parq in thia and other aiale» upon the signal victories achieved in the last general elections in Iowa, Ohio and Rhode Ixleud, and the municipal election» held recently th'onghont the tlnlow; and we bail their results as a certain harbinger of the disintegration of that party which, oham pioniug the cause of special interests »nd priv ileged classe», is bound together only by the oa heaivehets of public plunder, and the prefer ment of that which has ever stood for the equal rights of lhe whole people. Second—We denounce the fraud by which th» people of Montana were deprived of their right of representation in the United States Senate by senators of their choice. Third—We believe in equal rights to all and special privileges to none, and therefore favor a tariff for revenue, limited to the expenses ef the government economically administered, be lieving that more than this u class legislation, and is especially detrimental to the interest of lhe farmers and laboring classes. The lumberman of this country, so far as their views have found expreseion, to starve while they run their mills care nothing one way or another abont ‘“What does Senator Edmunds wiih 'paupers' imported from Europe. the question of free lumber. The busi ness is here so well adjusted upon the ■ or Mr. Blaine think to-day about This is protection for the master and On no other subject [Protection] proper basis of supply and demand that'*g„;__ * .1___ _ »i. » * »• they have no fear of competition with j ^eir P6* theory that a protective not the man. there eo much effort made to uiis- Sugar, Revenue and Protection. British Columbia. In any event, there tariff makes a ‘home market’ for is no danger of over supply or reduced I tlfy and befog the people. Perhaps (Daily Oregonian Feburary 24,1881.) “There is no phase of protection THS BsrUBLlCANB ÀBKA1ONBD. price. But in the old northwest there is • the American farmers’ wheat, corn Fourth—We arraign the party in power for its Again the principle known as free mush division of sentiment. Lumber-1 the reason is it pays to do so. It , that will bear examination. Ev ntler disregard of all Its pledges made to the trade does not contemplate the total re men are opposed to removal or reduc- i an<d pork by keeping out foreign people, whereby its ascendency was secured at must be owned, too, that the bene moval of duties. Such a result would the last national election; and especially do we tion of tbe tariff because, thev rankly ; a e ery part of the system is as weak condemn the tariff bill now pending before the ficiaries ot the system are highly not lie contemplated, even if it were for say, it will bring Canada lumber into P00“®? Does the American farmer house of representatives as an aggravation ef any reaeon desirable. Revenue must he the country and reduce the price. From seriously believe to-day that he is as the argument for the protection existing evils. successful in their duperies of the had and no method for raising revenue the point of view of the conaumers of J Fifth—We condemn the attempt of the repub of wool. The system is through Ucau has ever been devised which has, on the majority in congress to reduce the surplus people at large.—Oregonian,' Feb- whole, been so satisfactory as levying lumlier, who outnumber the dealers sev- specially enriched by a protective in the treasury by squandering and misappro eral hundred to one, these are excellent priating the same, and we especially denounce out a short-sighted game of greed, duties on imports. The whole question reasons for reducing or removing the ‘ tariff which promised to make for ruary 3, 1882. the attempt to appropriate a portion of such at issue turns on the principle u[>on duty. From the point of view of the surplus which to the whole people to except for the great monopolist the payment of belong» a bounty on sugar, which com which these duties are to be imposed national good, without reference to the him a ‘home market.’ It looks pels the many to pay tribute to the few. A dutv ought to be laid upon these aiti cost of the article, a change in the law very much as if wheat rose and fell whom k creates and supports, Sixth—We denounce the action of Speaker des which will produce a clear revenue which will increase the importation of Ri-ed in counting as voters democratic represen at least for collections. Sugar is one of lumber, and check the rapid consump without any reference to our pro “ The laborers in unprotected in- tative» whe had not voted upon pending meas these. Coffee and tea are also admira tion of our own pine, is most desirable. urea and in declining to reeogulse suoh repre INTRODUCTORY. upon the floor of the house; the one bly adapted to the same end, though our The lumber duty is the most inexcusa tective tariff, as if wages were high dustries in this country receive higher sentatives is in conflict with the rights accorded to the mi laws blunderingly exempts them from ble folly and iniquity of the whole mon nority by all political parties since the forma Extracts contained in this paper duty. When such articles are taxed the strous bundle of iniquities and absurdi or low without reference to a protec wages relatively than the operatives tion of our government, the other is utterly ra- <-on»i»tent with freedom of speech and equality whole of the tax goes into the public ties called the tariff law. It cuts two are editorial articles taken from the ef represents!! n. In protected industries.’' treasury. It is a tax for revenue, and is ways. It taxes the consumer to encour tive tariff.” Seventh—We reaffirm the position which has Oregonian, covering the period from directly opposed in principle and effect age the destruction of the forests. Lum ever been maintained by the democratic party Wheat and the Tariff. "But at least we can say let it be that gold aud silver are equally, the peo to aduty imposed for “protection.” The ber is a peculiar product, in that it is ple's m <ney; we are opposed to all measure» Jo! 1880 to 1887, inclusive. They object of those laws is not revenue, but limited in quantity, and, once the sup (Dally Oregunlan, Nov. 4, 1886.) discrimination against silver, and demand free known that we are not so gullible as prohibition of importations, in order to The Milling World recentivsaid, ‘ “ The coinage to supply the need» of business, and comprise only a part of much that •give the borne market to the protected ply is exhausted, cannot be replaced for farmers of the United States would to- that all money issued by the government re several ^uiiuutuuiir. obviai generations. The xiic mvv law nnuuiu should . .------ ------- --------------- » « v— to accept without protest, and as if made legal tender lor all debts both public and that paper has bad to say during class at high prices. The members of study the preservation of the forest« in- • “•y he getting 20 cents a bushel less for private. the Iron and Steel Association profiting stead of encouraging their extinction, p^eir wheat than they now get were it we were perfectly satisfied therewith, Kighth—We direct the auentioa of the vote* of Oregon to the reedrd of the democratic parW the time mentioned on the subject immensely under thia system, under should stimulate instead of prohibiting tiot for the protective tariff of 20 cents a tlis subject of Chinese immigration; and stand its effects well enough, how mt ch the importation of supplier from other bushel imposed ™ on ; imported wheat by the tophisms and the resulting injus upo.1 ----- we demand the strict enforcement of the I» srtt of protection and tariff reform, and soever their organ may attempt to dis countries. our government.” This is saying that exclusion act, aad the passage by congress oi further rigorous legislation which will prevent protection raises the price of American tice and loss of the policy of protec Uhineee in exposure of the impolicy and in guise them. entering our territory by evasion of the to me the exact amoum amount oi of luo the tarin tariff tion." a rpi „I si wheat 10 law Ih, unprotected classes not only ¡*¡4 on imported wheat, and thus Ninth—That we not only favor the forfeiture justice of the present system. They Fortunes tor the Few. ef the Northern Pacific Railroad laud giant supply lhe whole country with their puts $90,000,000 or so a year into the “ By the operations of a protective from Walluia to Portland, but we also favor ths [Daily Oregonian February 2,1882.1 jackets of our farmers, estimating the demonstrate the soundness of the i lu m-diet» unconditional forfeiture of all uu • ••••• products free of bounty, but export wheat crop at 450,000,000 bushels. This tariff, the Government undertakes to I •sr.ed lend grants and the restoration of lhe | pub*! don ein A limited class have conceived and put views contained in President Cleve is absurd, liecau.te thetprice of onr wheat BOSSY rOB SOLPIBBS. in practice the doctrine that it is a go-ni ed a surplus exceeding fSOOJiOOf/OO is not affected at all by our tariff ou im make employment for a certain few land’s tariff message, and are in scheme for them to make the great l>ody '1 i-mh— The g-atltude of a generous people ported wheat; the price of our whole a wise ne louai policy alike demand that of the people pay high prices for commod last pear, turning the balance of \ crop depend.* on tbe price of our surplus, of the people by taring all the rest." 1 a>.d ib- ». re iin.e • should provide with a libérât perfect accord with all the essential ities which the comparatively small class i h u-i forth« wan:« of those who suffered with which ie eold in the free market of Liv trade heavily in our favor, paying i • it in*ts and di>- a»» in the ale war. aud like erpool iu competition with the surplus features of the Democratic position have to sell, and the government is "Among the false claims of pro wise of an<-h dep. uoenl p« rson» as were de called into rob the many for the lienetit off our foreign indebtedness and dif wheat of all other grain growing coun prived of tn*ir natural protectors aud support- on the tariff. They show conclu of the few. This is “protection” and tries. Of course, since onr tariff on tection it (the census of 1880) ex . « But it should be remembered that in this Iwhait w- sere already been liberal layond all there is of it. On no other Mpjeet is fusing prosperity over the land in wheat cannot fix lhe price of wheat in ’ !>.- eed mini»* ivllised world and we insist sively that wool and lumber should there so much effort to inistify and befog Liverpool, it does not fix its price in plodes is the pretense that our almost that in ere;- a 1 u anil udmliiirtratiou touching l>eople. Perhaps the reason is that it defiance of the high tariff handicap Uhicago. What does Senator Edmunds I Pvtesi ■< eCa r-, n regard to honorable past be free, and that the tariff »n Bugar pays to do so. It must be owned, too, ! and .....-nt meritorious le-cessity. We or Mr. Blaine think to-day about their prohibitory tariff makes work plenty | i servie« Are r.ppo »• to ail measure» which draw e ping of pampered greed, which, like j j»et theory that a protective tariff make« and keeps wages high." » ti.tim ti’ u b- ' ween the veteran in lhe Held and is “ a tax for revenue.” These ar I that the beneficiaries of the system are highly successful in thy practice of "their the horse leech's daughter, cries a “home market” ior the American | tne ca -pf«l.ow«r or adventurer in the rear 1er ..'toning a cruel wrong to the soldier aud a ticles t xpo-e in advance the fallacy duperies on the people at large. ; farmer's wheat, corn and pork by keep- «•oiton wa-is of tre- p- op e'a money. always for more." VETO MESS AGE. | ingout foreign goods? Dots the Ainer- Elerentii- We rg upon congress the passage of revenue reduction, proposed by i iran farmer seriously believe to-day that ; ot such appropriations aud the adoption of E xecutive D epabtmetk I Thus our labor suffers from a sys Protected and Non-Frotecled Indus •he ie specially eniiched by a protective I sueb measures as will lend mor t speedily and the Republican platform, by abol S alem , O b ., Feb. 19, 1889j i ( C. euvi-l tbs opeuii'g of the Columbia aad ; tariff which promised to make for him a try. tem of robbery, disguised under io«.u»«'te river« u> 1res navigation. j “home market? ”$Wt looks very much as i To lhe Honorable, the Senate of Ore<jon: ! V. Twe're ishing the internal revenue tax, —Ws favor u.e adoption of an amend [Daily Oregonian, January 28,1882,] • if wheat rose and fell without any refer- I herewith return senate bill No. 75 ' . aient to me Faderal constitution providing tor forms of quackery for the pretended ♦ *♦*«» rb- election of seuatois by direct vote ot the thus making whisky and tobacco i ence to our protective tariff, as ¡¿wages with my dissent. This is a bill for »n Thus it appears that ninety oer cent, i were high or low without reference to a Act amendatory of the tailroad commis ] miopls protection of American labor. The Mi ¡-teunth— The sais» tanpulw that impels us free, while the necessaries of life of our exported products are of the I protective tariff. sion law, w hich was approved February | ' to r- aions y uphold lhe right» oi the states I at ?,• m* prompt» u» to hope for the establish stupidity that doesn't see it, particu “non-proiected" anu only ten |>er cent, 18, 1887. The amendments proposed in , or home rule for Ireland. are ma le dear. Iu short, these ar of the ‘protected” class. Fifty millions “ Our system now tends to foster the bill herewith returned, consist aim | m.-nta F ••• teenth—Beil g profoundly impressed larly on this coast, where the produe of people are taxed constantly to the ex ply in the enlargement of the number ot wi i. t o c*-ovictM>u that the chief pil.ars of ticles are unanswerable arguments home monopolies rather than to pro ¡commissions, without providing for auy nr r-piihik-aa tor.n of govsmment are an en tent ci 40 to 100 per cent, on all the man- ; ing classes are so plainly the victims Ilgriened yeomenrv aud a free aud hon<-n ufaetured goods they consume. This1 in support of the policy of the ieeof iha elective tvanchiee, we pledge tect tite wages of the workingman." enlargement of the powers. It provides, iieri of it, is phenomenal and perhaps tax is collected of the coni-uiners whether also, that the commission shall be elected th* deiacralie parly ef tbe state- af Oregon la *vr rial support and mivansemeut of our ex Democratic platform and candi they use imported or domestic -manu by tbe legislative assembly, instead of the ee- « nt «omaon. scb>«! system: to the passage hopeless.—Daily Oregonian, Oct. S1, factures, and was imposed for the pur being appointed by the Governor, and ofefi'i ttv» la«» farihe prevention of the cor "You might as well say that, if jow dates upon the tariff question. pose of giting to the capital and labor omits that clause of the iaw of 1887 r p ase mansy In election» and iha »aactmom 1881. »ncn measures as will »-cure to every votai of one-teuth of the people a special j cut <ff a dog's tail and ears the same which provides that the Governor may of Aside from their intrinsic value, the right to i sat • balkH framed in saeordanoe bounty and subsidy under the falla remove any commissioner for cause wnh lhe dicta'-» of hi» ewn cou» muce. W» arge the adoption m this state of as a contribution to Democratic “ Mr. Carlisle is in no sense a free cious pretense that it would add to •day he has reason to feel highly The board condsting, under tbe law as unqualifiedly Australian system of voting, and the peas the wealth of the whole country. Yet it r.ow stands, of two commissioners and the •ye by tbe lewtelaiive assembly of the bill drawn ! amused, entertaened and grateful, as campaign literature, these articles trader. one clerk, the compensation of whom by iha Ballot kaform 1 «ague of Oregon There is no reason to be out of the nearly $800,('0t),0j0 surplus products of the country exported to for • to say that a tariff on coal, which amounted to $7,500 per anum, had not Flftaentb —W. are In favor of tbe régulation have a special value as an expres- \frightened over Mr. Carlisle's inten eign nations this subsidized and pro ' really enough to do, owing io the pre of railroad» and other transportation ageucio» tected class contributed lees than ten per enables the coal combination to re- scribed limitation of its poweas, to keep hy law van ismiLiTm oognigsm sion of the opinions of one of the I tentions, and the Republicans who cent. The unprotected classes not only ! one man in healthy, steady employment, Mnoentb—Ws ooixlama tbe extravagance of last legislator» whereby tbe axes of the ablest and best known Republicans are commencing an alarmist's cam- supply the whole country with their I strict production, which reduces the i and there is no reason why the taxpayers the people war» greatly increased ; the sxpondltnre products free of tx uotv, but exported a of Oregon shonld be burdened with the of llo.OOh for c ork hire (a large portion of which earnings of the miner and artifi on the Pacific Coast upon the vital î paign for 1884 are making a mis- surplus exceeding $800,000,000 last vear, expenditure of $2,500 moro for the em wa> paid for services raver performed, and ths i turning the balance of trade heavily in cially puts up the price of coal, thus ployment of another comm'Sei mer, who scandal» growing ont of the ‘'clerk »yt soi" t» need by tbe republican yarty call loodiy questions of the canvass, made take." our favor, paving off our ioreign indebt will really have nothing to do but to trod for reform. \ swelling the cost of the workingman's ! (haw his salary quarterly, when but for Bsvan’eentb—Ws approve of doclsriag eight edness and diffusing prosperity over the years during a series of a day 's lar>or la fa*-*orie*, mines and land in defiance of the high tariff, handi this unaccounta .le nenefaction of tbe hours sad opoa pobl.s works; and s*s also Tbe projiosat to abolish internal taxes, capping of pampered greed, which, like ■fuel, was 'protection to labor." : legislature of Oregon he might be able workshops when these questions were not in while favor law* giving the laboior lhe I rat lien on keeping up tilt* exeessive and even the hor-e.eecti’s daughter, cries alwavs I to earn an h'mest living on a iarm or in thspo'dvoiot his labor. g-.gh'oor»—Wa deaounoe tha convict cou issue between the parties, and when • prohibitory duties levied under tbeexis- for more. “ He is for protecting one and all a wort shop The om.ssion from the to et system »■ it now'exists and arraign lhe re- ' isting system of “protection,” means j bill under consider .tion of the granting penlicar far having fastened it opou their consideration was not biased ; < bean whisky and dear clothing; an un- , “ Why should our industries here and dau:.t’.eB.-lv advocat b the great of the power of removal bv the Governor thr slate Io party tbs dMrlmetil al oar beneo* labor. i taxed lieer barrel and an excessive tax —We favar sneh state legiilotion by the prejudice of party politics. | ou iron in any tor® ; iree tobacco ano be taxed to create an industry at principle that we can all can get is an unwise omission. Under the ex as Kinetoealb will req 4rw ths slectiva of an inspector of ¡sting law the Governor removed the two weight» Bed messoiee. sad legtslaltve provis dear salt; cheap cheroots and higti- commissioners for th» reason that after iou for the sppointmeat ef sanitary and baild- •- l*ong ere now, hail not t he Demo- j priced printing pajier. The purpose of 1 Pitt*burgf" ! rich by taxing each ether ’’ their at tention n»<l been called to tbe Ing lurpe* tors la inoorpuraled id'leh crutic party with its characteristic j all this is to assure continnnce oi enor- aatnt with pride to the wire, mandatory provision of r.b® law, which Tweali* th - Ws The Tin-pinte Tax and Sloan administration of The time will come when men required that in their biennial report to oowservsrivs piiiheailoilness, persisted in it-s at , tnons profits to eastern iron masters, ' <rv. roor "eaaoyw. and So lhe st mpulouslv (Dally Oregonian, Jani,.-try 20, !W.) | salt boilers, wood pulp pr prietors, and the ¡eg-.s.ative assembly, they should re honest maaMosno't of tbe financial dcpertineid tacks on the settlements of the war, the whole train of mou ipoiists wt... ar • I There is an industry here that is very will find it as difficult to conceive port “particularly what change« in the nt ths eta's osdoe Goa. W Webb, and we com maid ro the slaslem -f this sommon we»'th a there would have been a reckar.in# ■‘protected” at tbe expense of th*- ■ on- much in'ereste I in tin-plate. It want’s .‘that t i» obstructive and ab-urd ciaaeificatiofl oi treignt., or what changM oo-tineaace of ht ewUting order of affairs oq the subject of tariff plunder, the I aumers of the country.—Daily Or.-4 .n- tin-plate to be as cheap is possible, so in the rates o: fr-ight or fare» are advis- with a confident assaraare that It merits aad I ian, Oct. 2ti, 1881. that something n.ay h made out of the policy could ever have prevailed as ible or necessary,” they had failed to will recHv*- their cordial ladormme :.t navigation laws, dishonest nieney Twenty fltsb -We ewptiaUcally declare It to canning business. Thtwfore the prop-! comply with su -h mandatory provision, be :be iosm of the democratic pony of the ewi ’ ion l * double the eti'v on this article ' and the entire scheme of quackeries th, y now find it to acc< unt for the »tv.» of 'mrerm that in bls veto of the bill A Brest Diacsvery. and ha<l made their report, in which is not a pleasing one. fortland’s board I rm*sed bv tbe tn iegislsitlve ereembly, knrwn they entirely disregarded that specific sustained by greed, ignorance aad (Daily Oregonian. Novamber W. I*! rhe Portland Water bill, btu»*<d upon the ex o- trade and AstO’ia’s ciremoerof com perversity which once denied free mandat* of the law. Fea ate bill No. 75 a- emption frrm lamulen ef the bonds therein demagogery in combination—and All ti>e tnxe« that spirituous honors merce have protest <j. Htnilar protests provided for, tevorsor Pennover exert isod » j »trips the Governor of the power of re dom of speech and press, or the in w;»e and »es»mendabte- nee 'of the •■eust»- now if the Democratic party is done and tobacco can tie made to pay should have been addressed to Congress irom ar. I leaves the comiesioners fr a, , j tut ’.onal prre«a<vo vosSed in the executive tie collected. That, is the taxe« on th.se other q ¡arters. Many newspapers have fatuation which believed in witch moval, to follow the foo steps of their predeces arid npon Wi- question thereby raised we with its follies, the reckoning will not evuimodilks should t>- k.-pt xt as high j jinrd in the effort to prevent the in Pledge biot our unuoahfled active»uppurt. sors “ with the simple power to investi : a rale •».-> possible without creating iu- crease ui the duty. It seems the ways craft and slavery.” •ery much longer delayed.” I gate, make recommendations, and re- Yoke for Prof. A. LeRoy.