N® '1 il CHBISTIA » fact is based oiir plea for Christian hhibh. Ntrtt If Urb in the New Testament “ Church of Christ,” as freely admitted, and this same X I scribe us alone as an organization, then in every Sitbh bahte llib jihrase 4< Clitirch bf Christ ” is Used in a inere restricted ahd sectarian sense, and the fchtirch thiis adiijAihg ahd Uslhg it becomes a sectarian church »-just to that extent. We have-no right to wrest "words and phrases from their proper connection ami Scriptural meaning and restrict thehi a use unknown to the word of God. We can hold on to lucre names and Scripture forms of expression and still become secta- • rians. It is not so much the use of words and phrases themselves as theii4 cdifrently accepted, 'meaning that constitutes sectarianism. I t is bail enough when we are sometimes compelled by the force of circum­ stance to use nam.es in a restricteil ami unauthorized sense; Inti for a convention to adopt sU’cli a use by which we aixi to be always known, we think is without excuse. 2. When we come to look into the New Testament Scriptures, we find that the church is to be known by different names. The question of the name of the church has been settled from the Very beginning,and that too by the inspiration of God. What need we then to attempt to legislate in this matter ? Now see- ing that the church is to be known by a number of names if we shall adopt one to the exvlUsioh of the rest, we endeavor to liecome wise above what is written, and to set up our knowledge against the posi­ tive legislation of God. If God in- tenled that his church should be uniformly known by one name, then why has he given to it more than one { We should accept all the New Testament names of the church and use them in their differ­ ent relations to the institution, and to one another, and not one to the exclusion of all other. In this way only can we expect to ' avoid drifting into sectarianism. Remember we are not finding fault so much with the phrase “ Church of Christ,” but it is its uniform and restricted use to which we object. “Churches of Christ,” and “Church of Cod ” are found in the New Testament, and hence we are au­ thorized to use them : while such ex­ pressions as Camphellite church, and Disciple church are as/nnscriptural and sectarian as Methodist,’Baptist, or Presbyterian church, for none of ✓ a HEHALD. ~v ter who refuses to enter this fight with all nis consecrated power and talents tor God and Humanity, is a betrayer of bis trust, a Benedict Arnold, a Judas Isca­ riot, a traiter to his country and church. Unite ffud fight a common foe and the best agent of the devil, with half the zeal that the doginas and doctrfgevdEtT' S alvation E asy • claimed that it is iffin|>ly used as a least moral and conscientious people are ‘‘The terms of salvation are easy. fought and the end of the traffic in synonym of1 Chilrch of Christ. But Whosoever believeth. Mark the word homes, hearts and souls, will come like we aiiswer, the phrase Christian Lelieteth. Mark tile word Whosoever.”— the “crack of doom.”— The Worker. church is almost itivaHubly em­ Christian Index. them are to be found in the Bible Neither