"iTf»' - vi
¿•m
SEMI-WEEKLY
V
ol .
22: No. 81
I
HERALD.
N ew
Criminal
L aw s
A m endm ents
~~
Y
ito-
ear
K1
Besides a complete stock \
| ol Drugs and Druggist’s Sun- j
| dries carries Kodaks and Sup
\ plies, Phyrography outfits ard §
V -,
\ Supplies.
L. H. HAZARD, Ceshler
R. E. SHINE, Vice Pres
A. J. SHERWOOD, Pres.
F IR S T N A T IO N A L
op
BANK
C O Ç U I L iU E , C R Z G O p .
T ra n sa cts a General B anking B u sin e ss
Board of Directors.
Correspondents.
R. 0. Dement,
A. J.Sherwood,
L. Harlocker,
T* H. Hazard,
Ismail Hacker,
R .E . Shine.
National Dank of Commerce, New York City
Crocker W ool worth N’l Bank, Han Francisco
First Nat’l Bank of Portland, Portland, Or.
Blue Andalusian
Hens,, Prize Winners.
Eggs per Setting, $2.50.
W hite Faced B la c k S p an ish
E g g s p er S e t t in g $2.50.
The above named fowls are the best layers
'
. I —
eu
and
Salem, April 10.- -Twenty-five
1479. W H S Hyde v s J P Maxton
a corporation, C A Sehlbrede atty
Lumber Co, action at law. A J
criminal
laws, passed by the last Leg­
et al. Suit for partition. D L
for pltf.
J W Bennett atty deft.
Walter Culin, M. D.
Sherwood, atty for plif. Ha'J k
islature, will become effective May
Watson, atty for plaintiff.
2234.
Johu
Marsh
vs
Bandon
Oil
Hall for deft.
P h y s ic ia n a n d S urgeon
1529. Kathrine West vs A D
Co, a corporation, action at law. 18. Some of these are merely mod­
2202.
Gee' On vs Ah Sing, action
C o u u il l e C i t y , U kk .
ifications of existing laws, while
Morse, assignment, J M Upton
Sperry k Chase attys for pltf.
for conversion of property. Mo-
.<roiiuuborg lilil^.
atty for assignee.
2235. Joseph H Smith vs Wm J others define new crimes and provide
Telephone 3.
Knight and Seabrook, attys for
N .xt Door to P. 0 .
1750. J B*Hunt vs Geo P Topping,
Marsh* suit in equity. J*A Buch­ for their punishment. Some relate
pltf. W U Douglas, atty for deft.
assignment.
anan atty for pltf.
Crawford, only to suoh offenses as the viola­
1758, T J Stillwell vs A L) Morse, 2203. 8 H Brown, as exet, etc, vs
Cardwell & Watson attys for deft. tion of game laws, acts which in­
Stanley & Burns,
A H Mulkey, action at law. J C
assignment. J M Upton, atty for
2236. Wm It Panter vs Bandon volve nu great moral wrong, while
Attorney s-at-Law,
Fullerton, atty for pltf.
C A
assignee.
Block Coal Co, a corporation, suit others are designed to prevent acts
Real Estate, Collections.
Sehlbrede, atty for deft.
2032. Margaret Kardell vs E \V
Specialties—Criminal and U. S. Land
in equity. Sperry k Chiso attys which are greatly injurious to pub­
Cases, Notaries Publio.
lic morals or which endanger pro­
Karde!!.
Suit for partition. 2204. J H Guorry vs North Bend
for pltfs.
CoQUILLK,
-
O b EQON.
Woolen Mills Co, action at law. 2237. John P Hunter vs Catherine perty.
Hall k Hall, attys for plaintiff.
KEEP GIRLS OCT OF BOXE%
Guerry <t Hollister, attys for pltf.
20G9. Harvey T Schwoors vs Sarah
E Hunter, suit for divorce, Hall
One
of these laws, which, if rigid­
J M Upton, atty for deft.
A Watson, suit for partition.
& Hall attys for plft.
ly enforced, will bring about a
Sperry
&
Chase,
attys
for
pltf.
2205.
Isaiah
Hacker
vs
Asa
M
2238.
George
D
Mandigo
vs
E
A
Geo. Russell, M. D.,
A J Shhrwood and J W Bennett
Simpson, action at law.
E B
Beckett action at law, appeal marked reform in the larger cities,
P h y s ic ia n a n d S ohgkon ,
attys for deft.
Watson and A M Crawford, attys
from Recorder's Court, T M Blake is that which makes a crime for the
Office in RUSSELL PHARMACY.
owner, proprietor or employe of any
2206. John 15 Anderson vs Coos
for
pltf.
W
U
Douglas,
atty
for
atty
for plft.
Calls promptly answeiod day or night,
Bay Mill k Lumber Co, action at
deft.
2239. W F Waite vs Hary E Waite place where intoxicating liquor is
Phono, main 136.
law. Hall k Hall attys for pltf. 4206. Mrs E A Batch to Robert
Suit for Divorce, Stanley k Burns sold or served to permit any female
under 21 years of age to remain in
J W Bennett atty for deft.
Burns,
assignment.
Robert
Burns
attys
for plft.
Oregon.
C oquille,
2107. Flanagan k Bennett Bank
assignee.
2240. Thos Wilson vs Angus Mc­ such n place. The act also makes
vs Coos Bay Mill k Lumber Co., 2207. F M Friedberg vs North
Donald et al suit in equity, Sper­ it a crime to sell or give intoxicat­
ing liquor to a female under 21
action at law. Bennett Swanton,
Bend Woolen Mills Co, action at
ry k Chase attys for plft.
atty for pltf.
law. Hall & Hall, attys for pltf. 2241. Thomas Wilson vs A Mc­ years of age, in any saloon or place
A. J. Sherwood,
2108. Flanagan k Bennett Bank vs 2208. J W Grout vs J D Johnson
Donald k Mary McDonald, ac­ where intoxicating liquor is kept
A t t o r n k y - a t - L a w ,
Coos Bay Mill k Lumber Co, and
et al, suit in equity. Guerry &
tion
at Law, Sperry k Chase attys for sale. The punishment provided
N o t a r y P u b l io .
is a fine of $100 to $1000 or im­
M Rosen. Action at law.
Ben­
Hollister, atty for pltf.
Hall &
for pits.
C oqu ille,
:
:
Oregon
's . nett Swanton, atty for plaintiff.
Hall, attys for deft.
2242. Louis Dufault vs Catherine prisonment iu the county jail three
2109. Frieda Hagelstein, admx vs 2209. Henry Campe k Co, vs C O
Dufault, suit for divorce, Hall months to ono yoar.
The penalties in this act are
Coos Bay Mill & Lumber Co, ac­
Gilkey, action at law. A J Sher­
k Hall, attys for plft.
Walter Sinclair,
heavy
enough so that 8«loon-keep­
tion at law. Hall k Hall attys
wood atty for pltf
2243. John Hartley vs H L Under­
ATXOBN*Y-AT-I ì AW,
for pltf. J W Bennett, atty for 2210. Nina L Hughes vs H W
wood k J E Underwood, action at ers are not likely to run any risks.
N ota ry P u b l ic ,
deft.
Dunham, action at law. Guerry
law Sperry A Chase, attys for plft, Under the decision of the courts,
Coquille,
:
:
Oregon.
2111. Coos Bay Ice k Cold Stor­
k Hollister, attys for pltf. A J Stanley & Burns attys for Defts. the fact that the saloon-keeper was
age Co, action at law. J S Coke
Sherwood atty for deft.
2244 John Marsh vs Wm H But­ mistnkjn or deceived in the person’s
atty for pltf. J W Bennett, atty 2211. W O Williams, as Treasurer
ton actiou at law Sperry & Chase age is no offense. Tho act does not
I. Hacker,
for deft.
of the Pioneer Pool Association
W Sinclair attys for plft. Geo. P apply to any female accompanied by
her husband or parent or to any
AllSTKACTKK OF TlTLBB.
2112. J P Farley vs Coos Bay Mill
vs F W Wegner. C A Sehlbrede
Topping for deft.
open
and public restaurant or din­
k
Lumber
Co,
action
at
law.
J
atty for pltf.
C oquille C it y , O rb
2245.
—S D Magnes vs J V Pugh,
ing-room.
The act prohibits the
S Coke atty for pltf. J W Ben­ 2312. Simpson Lumber Co vs T
suit in equity. A J Sherwood atty
serving of liquor to minor females
W Clark et al suit for appoiut-
nett, atty for deft.
for plft.
2113. J S Coke vs Ceos Bay Mill
ment of receiver.
W U Douglas 2246. John Tawse vs Coquille Coal in restaurant boxes,
Hall & Hall,
SO SUBJECTS I s WINDOWS.
atty
for
pltf
J
M
Upton,
ELC
k
Lumber
Co,
action
at
law.
J
S
k Lumber Co corporation, ac­
.Vr ror.NKYs-AT-L.vw,
Another act that carries a penalty
Farrin and Guerry k Hollister
Coke, in person, and E L C Fnr-
tion
at
law.
Sperry
k
Chase
attys
Denier ia K kai . E state o ( «11 kinds.
heavy enough to insure effective­
rin, attys for pltf. J W Bennett,
attys for defts.
for plft.
Marshfiehl, Oregon.
atty for deft.
2213. King Keystone Oil Co vs 2247. Eugene O’Conuell vs E O ness is that which prohibits the
North Bend Woolen Mills Co, ac­
2114. Leon Wund vs Coos Ray
Hall k M E Hall, action at law. public exhibition of hypnotized per­
Mill & Lumber Co, action at law.
tion at law. Dinkenspiel and Hall
J W Bennett atty for plft. Cake sons, The penalty is a fine of $100
Ellsworth B. Hall,
to $1000 or Imprisonment 50 to 500
A J Sherwood nndGeo Iv French,
k Hall attys for pltf.
k Seabrook attys for defts.
days.
attys for pltf. J W Bennett atty 2214. Robert Marsden vs County 2248- John F Hall, trustee, vs Ida
Atlorney-nt-Law,
NEW LAW FOR WIFE-BEETER8.
for deft.
Commissioners et al, suit for in­
P Patterson, suit in equity, Hall
O oquu.i.K.
:
:
'■ O r k o on .
Tho
wife-beating law was enacted
Coke & Seabrook and
2115. .T S Coke vs Coos Bay Mill ! junction,
Hall attys for plft.
in
the
form of an amendment to
C ollections and Insurance.
J
M
Upton
attys
for
pltfs.
Geo
k Lumber Co, action at law. J S !
2349. Arthur H Noah vs Mamie
the law for the punishment of as­
M Brown for defts.
Coke atty in persou for pltf, J W
B Noah, suit for divorce.-J L Up­
sault and oatterr. The amendment
2215. Michael Wieland vs James
Beunett,-atty for deft.
ton atty for plft.
provides that any person who shall
Stinsou,
action
at
law.
L
A.
2116. F S Dow vs Coos Bay Mill
2250. J N Shanan vs Belt Line
K. D. S perry.
W . C . Ctiase.
be convicted of assault' and battery
k Lumber Co, action at law. J S Roberts atty for pltf.
Railway C o,
a corporation,
upon his wife shall, in the discre­
SPERRY & CHASE.
Coke, atty for pltf. J W Ben­ 2216. J H Guerry vs E A Beckett,
action at law. C A Sehlbrede atty
tion of the court, be sentenced to bo
actiou
at
law.
Guerry
k
Hollis­
nett, atty for deft.
for pflt.
Attorney s-at-Law.
whipped not exceeding 20 lashes,
ter attys for pltf.
2120. Geo Beale vs Coos Bay Mill
2251. J W Chase vs Thomas Chap­
the punishment to be inflicted by
Office in Robinson Bnilding,
k Lumber Co, action at law. 2217. Stella Fox and Claud Fox,
man k E A Beckett, writ of re­
the sheriff, constable or marshal.
her
husband,
vs
Julia
Hayes
etal,
Hall
«
•
Hall
attys
for
pltf.
view.
J M Upton atty for plft.
C oqu ille,
-
-
•
O regon.
REGULATIONS FOR R1SORTS.
suit in equity. Stanley & Burns 2252. J M Perkins vs Julia Ran-
2121. Matt Lassila vs Maria Las-
The
law forbidding the keeping
attys for pltfs.
sil i, suit for divorce.
Hall k
dlemen et al, suit for injunction
of houses of ill-fame has been made
2218.
B
Swanton
vs
North
Bend
Hall
for
pltf.
Stanley & Burns, attys for plfts.
E. G. D. Holden.
much broader in its terms.
As it
Woolen Mills Co, action at law
2128.
IV E Baines vs City of
A J Sherwood atty for deits.
L aw ykb .
now
exists
it
merely
makes
it a
Marshfield, Oregon, et al. suit for) J W Bennett atty for pltf.
2253. John H Diers vs Belt Line
City Heoorder, D. 8. Commissioner, Gen
crime to keep a house of ill-fame.
injunction, etc. C F McKnight, 2219. Bertha Humphrey vg Johu
Railway Co., a corporation, ac­
ernl Insnranoo Agent, and Notary
Tho amendment makes it a crimo
and Coke k Seabrook attys for ’ Humphrey, suit for divorce,
tion at law. J M Blake, atty for
Pnhlio. . Office in Robin­
also to permit a house of ill-fame to
pltf. E L C Farrin, atty for deft.
Stanley k Burns attys for pltf.
plft.
son Building.
2129. E C Atkins k Co, vs Pacific j 2220. Bessie M Lawrence vs Rob- 2254. John Wall vs James H Wall, be kept in any place which the per­
son accused may own or hold under
C oqu ille, Oregon.
Furniture k Lumber Co, action
ert Lawrence, suit for divorce,
suit in equity, J W Bennett k J
a lease.
nt law. A J Sherwood, atty for
Guerry k Hollister attys for pltf.
M Upton, attys for plft.
LONG TERM FOR TRAIN ROBBERS,
pltf. W Sinclair, atty for deft.
! 2221. J H Hibbard vs Mary Hib- 2255. E (J Hall vs Eugoue O’Con­
Heretofore robbing of railway
bard, suit for divorce. Guerry k
2132, Etta Andrews vs Guj An­
nell, suit in equity, Coke k Sea­ trains has been punished under the
A. F. Klrshman,
Hollister attys for pltf.
drews, suit in equity for divorce.
brook atty for plft.
genoral laws regarding robbery,
D e n t is t .
J W Bennett, atty for pltf.
2222.
Hans P Clausen vs Olive E 2256. M E Hnll vh EuSene O'Con­
but the Legislature of 1905 passed
Office at Residence, one block east o f 2158. Emma M Lyons* at al, vs W
Clausen, suit for divorce.
A J
nell et al, suit in equity, Coke k an act which applies particularly to
Sherwood atty for pltf.
T Kerr et al, suit to* foreclose
Tattle Hotel.
Seabrook, attys for plft.
railway trains and fixes the penalty
mortgage.
J W Bennett, atty 2223. F B Waite vs Belt Line 2257. E B Seabrook vs Coos Bay
C oqaille
.
-
.
Oregon
at imprisonment from two to 40
for pltf. L A Roberts, and W
Railway Co et al, action at law,
Ice k Cold Storage Co. action years.
Coshow k Rico attys for pltf.
Sinclair attys for defts.
nt law, Coke k Seabrook, attys
BE CAREFUL OF BRUSH FIRES.
C0QU1LLE RIVER STEAMBOAT CO. 2160. Mary Flanagan vs Mary 2224. F E Nelson vs North Bend for plft.
A new forest fire law establishes
Woolen Mills Co, action at law. 12258. J T McCormac vs Henry a closed season from June 1 to Oc­
Florence Mullen et al, suit in
Str. D IS P A T C H
equity. A J Sherwood, atty for \ J W Bennett, atty for pltf.
Sengstacken & E G Flanagan, ac­ tober 1, during which time it is made
Tom W hite, Master,
pltf. J W Bennett and J S Coke 2225. James H Guerry vs S E
tion nt law. Hall k Hall attys for unlawful to set fire to slashing or
Leave-«
I Arrives
R a n d o n ........ 7 A-M. | Coquille-------10 A-M.
Hines, action at law. Guerry &
attys for defts.
plft.
fallen timber, or no timber land, or
C o q a ille ....... 1 P-M. | B a m lon ------ 4 P-M.
Hollister attys for pltf.
Connects at Coqaille with train for Marshfield 12161.
R II Rosa vs Eliza Boice
! 2259. Schiller B Herrnnn vs Henry in the vicinity of graiufields, with­
and steamer KAio for Myrtle Point.
and J T Boice, suit to foreclose 2226. Hellen Snedden vs Altie A
Ward et al suit in equity, S D Pul­ out first securing u permit from the
lien. J M Upton, atty for pltf.
Gardner, suit for injunction.
J
Str. F A V O R IT E
ford for plft.
County Clerk. No fco is required
J . C. M oo in aw. Master,
M Upton and H M Brownell attys 2261. W M Wood nud Henry Mc­ for a permit, which must ho granted
A J Sherwood, atty for defts.
Leaves
I Arrives
C H Merchant vs W S Chan­
for pltf.
C oquille........ 7 a m . | Bam lon..10:45 A-M. 2164.
Culloch vs W II Shepherd, suit to on request, tho purpose being to
Bamlon.......... 1 p m . | Coquille. 4:45 p-M.
dler, receiver, action at law. W 2227. James Rolandson vs Sarah
foreclose mechanic's lien.
F. M. restrict the setting of fires and keep
W Cotton, W U Dougias, attys
A Teubrook and A R Tenbrook,
Str. ECHO
Rummill atty for pltf.
a record of shone starting fires. Vio­
E. dames. Master,
for pltf. A J Sherwood atty for I suit in equity. J W Bennett and 2262. John S Coke, jr, vs .las H lation of the law is punishable by a
Leaves
|
Arrives
deft.
Bennett Swanton attys for pltf.
Wall et al, action at law.
E B fine of $100 to #1000 or imprison­
M yrtle P o in t .. .7 a m . | oquille CTy 9 30 A-M.
quille C ity. .1 p m . | M yrtle P ’t. .4 00 p - m
2168.
Prosper Mill Co vs J D 2228. W H Smith vs E I Braddock,
Seabrook and C F McKnight attys ment Irom one month to one year,
D aily except S u n d a y.__________
Stewart, action at law.
A J
action at law.
Sperry k Chase
for pltf.
aud half the fine goes to the in­
Str. W E L C O M E
Sherwood, atty for pltf. J M Up­
attys for pltf.
W Sinclair atty 2263. Mary M Nosier vs J \V Nos­ formant.
W . R. Pan ter, Master.
ton, atty for deft.
for deft.
HUNTERS MUST SOON PAY.
ier, suit for divorce.
Walter
1-eaves
I
Arrive»
M yrtle Point 1:30 r-M. I C oq u illeC y I S I r - » . 2183.
E B Fish vs C B Hines, suit 2229. Blumauer k Hoch vs E A
The hunters license law will go
Sinclair atty for pltf.
Coquille City 7:00 A-II. | M yrtle P’t 10:00 a *.
to foreclose mechanic's lien.
F
Beckett, confession of judgment 2264. IV T Kerr k Co vs C N into effect May 18, after which time
Connect» with lower-river l»,aU at Coqaille
C ity for Dindon and intermediate point*.
M Rumraell, atty for pltf.
J H
without action.
Guerry k Hol­
Wigant, suit to foreclose mort­ it will be unlawful for any person to
Ampie barge» for handling freigh t.________
Geary, atty for deft.
lister attys for pltf.
gage. Stanley k Burns attys for to hunt on grounds not his own un­
Sewing Machine Repairing
2184. Nettie Miller vs Margaret 2230. A H Snyder vs E A Snyder,
less he has secure ! a licens and paid
pltf.
David Fulton, of this city, is an expert
* -• » *
und J W Strong, action at law
suit in equity. Sperry k Chase,
a fee of $1. Violation of the law is
rieaher and repairer, and anyone in
need of bis services will do well to call
for slander. S D Pulford, atty
atty for pltf.
«
Don’ t forget I am still agent for the i punisliable by a fine of $25 to $100
at bis residence or drop him a cani.
for pltf. L A Roberts, atty for 2231. Wm M Hite vs J I Snead, old reliable De Laval Separator. If I or impriponment from five to 30
For Sale.
deft
action at law.
Stanley k Burns you want a separator I can sell you I days.
one on any terms you desire; money is
2186. Henry Havercamp ve L Har­
attys
for
pltf.
FINK BILL-JUMPERS.
A good home m this city, on
j no object, so it is up to you, Mr. Dairy-
rison, suit in equity for disolu- 2232. W O Williams vg Belt Line . man,
"Jumping board bills” will be
8. M. NOSLER, Agent,
easy terms:
i tion of partnership. C A S e b i-1 Railway Co, a corporation, action
(Concluded on fourth page.)
Coquille. Oregon.
Enquire at Ibis office.
Z
$2.00 P
COQUILLE, COOS COUNTY, OREGON, APRIL 21, 1905.
at law. W W Graves atty for pltf.
brede, atty for pltf. L A Rob-
Entered uh second-class matter July 8, Circuit C ourt D o c k e t for A pril
Í904, at the posto dice at Coquille, Ore­
2233. Belt Line Railway Co, a cor
ers, for deft.
1905
Term.
gon,
(ÍOI1 under act of Congress oí March 3,
poration, vs Fiauagau estate Co,
1H7Í)
2190. John A Reese vs Riverton
S3
hnown to the poultry man and mystocli is all prize
winners
.
J. A. Wimer, Coquille, Oregon.
C o q u il le
Steam Laundry
PH O N E 116
S. M. NOSLER.
HO FRIETO R
Experienced Help
Best of Work Reasonable Rates
Special Kates to Families and Hotels
We make our own soap ami know '.ts ingredients. No injurious chemicals used.
Our baskets will bo left at all the principal points on the river.
Goods called for and delivered in Coquille City.
'■
T
!
I
The New Store,
&
MRS. M. NOSLER, PROP
GABBIES A F U L L LINE OF
Ladies Furnishing Goods, etc.
Novelties, Fancy Goods
Notions, Nuts, Can­
dies and Tropi­
A
cal Fruits.
F ron t S tr e e t,
C o q u ille , O regon.
■ ■
»•