OPINION Wallowa.com Wednesday, July 7, 2021 A5 LAYIN’ IT ON THE LINE Steve Kerby Bulls, bears and the deer “I have a million dollars in the stock market because if I lose a million dollars, I don’t per- sonally care.” Suze Orman, as once quoted in the New York Times. Many fi nancial experts sell the path to success by using their all-knowing system. Suze Orman, Dave Ramsey, Jim Kramer and most of the players in the fi nancial expertise game, who write books or have talk shows or podcasts, have made fortunes giving people advice. Suze Orman’s quote sets the tone for many of these experts; she makes money giving them advice, money from those searching for help. Let me break down the concept of investing to a very basic level. Animals can help us understand how the market dictates movement, up or down. The fi nancial world can seem much like a zoo. Over the years, many terms now used derived from animals you may fi nd at the zoo. The reason is simple — the animal terms are easy for people to relate to. For example, a bear hibernates, so if the market is in decline or negativity about investing is in circulation, it might be time not to invest or “hibernate.” The bull represents aggression and growth; thus, a bull market signifi es growth. In years past, many fi nancial terms have used animals as a synonym, such as a duck, which meant fl oating along without any direction and doing noth- ing except quacking. Or a fi sh that meant to take a chance and buy any stock that looked reasonable regardless of any spe- cifi c goal. Over time, we have three ani- mal terms as surviving topics. Bear: The word normally associated with a bear market is pessimism. In other words, a feeling that the market will go down or may stay down. Investors fear- ing a down market are negative to invest- ing. Or, like a bear, they go to sleep and do not invest. Many short-term investors often confuse a bear market with a cor- rection, and a market correction is usu- ally a shorter time period of about 1-3 months. Bull: A bull market is just the oppo- site of a bear market. Bulls are aggres- sive and think the market will grow and increase. Just like a bull, the market is expected to be hard to control and is heading up. Bull markets are optimistic and confi dent; bulls thrust their horns up in the air signifying a belief in growth in the market. Deer: Not often used by many inves- tors but still meaningful. A deer market is a market doing nothing, simply stay- ing neutral or fl at. It can be a time of low activity with a specifi c defi nition much like the bull and bear market defi nitions: timidity. The market is not trending in any real direction, staying fl at. As inves- tors, most people will follow trends, up, down or neutral. It all depends on your view of what the market will do. The best approach to investing might be to have your goals evaluated and your investments redirected to an allocation that makes sense over the long run. There is an old saying about investing in the stock market: “The bulls make money, the bears make money, but the pigs get slaughtered.” Investing for specifi c goals is a solid approach. As you edge closer to your anticipated goal, many smart investors begin the move toward safety. Annu- ities can be a solid choice for you when it becomes your turn to run to safety. For the most part, watching fi nancial television shows or videocasts is a harm- less habit. You may glean a few pieces of wisdom here and there or discover a via- ble retirement and income strategy. Con- suming this type of media content can also help you keep money matters top of mind. Still, if you are within 10 years of retirement, you should consider fi nd- ing an expert in the “spend-down” part of fi nances. Remember the Golden Rule many professional advisers and experts do not want you to know. The reason they do not want you to know this secret is if you did, you would no longer need theirs or anyone else’s advice. Everyone at some time in their life runs to safety. Maybe it is time for you to re-think your retirement vehicles? ——— As an avid outdoorsman, Joseph and the Wallowa area have been a big part of Steve Kerby’s life since 1964. Steve is a Syndicated Columnists member, a national organization committed to a fully transparent approach to money management. With over 50 years in the fi nancial services industry, Steve special- izes and focuses on each individual cli- ent’s goals. Visit stevekerby.retirevillage. com or call 503-936-3535 for more. Consider what it means to be an American ON LIBERTY Devin Patton n Congress, July 4, 1776 “WHEN in the Course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation. “We hold these Truths to be self-evi- dent, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with cer- tain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness — That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organiz- ing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to eff ect their Safety and Happiness. …” As we refl ect on the celebration of our nation’s Independence Day, it seems pru- dent to consider what exactly it means to be a citizen of the United States of Amer- ica. Growing up, my wife was often encour- aged (required) by her parents to write short I essays any time she was home from school in honor of a public holiday, with the objec- tive of cultivating a richer understanding of our nation’s history and values. Since July 4th always occurred during summer break, research and writing on the topic of Independence Day was generally left for in-school assignments. Many of us mem- orized some (or all) of our nation’s found- ing documents during our time in school, but unfortunately today people know very lit- tle about these documents, or our govern- ment in general. A 2017 CNN article enti- tled “Americans know literally nothing about the Constitution” cited polling from the Uni- versity of Pennsylvania that exposed the dis- heartening condition of civil ignorance in our country. The research found that only about one in four Americans could name all three branches of the government. One in four. This year, my wife and I had the honor of helping our 5-year-old daughter begin to memorize the preamble to the Declaration of Independence. Children are such sponges. It inspired my wife and I to recommit these lines to memory as well, but sadly the data suggest that those who take the time to mem- orize and learn about our founding docu- ments are in the minority. As I ponder what it means to be an Amer- ican, I can readily see values of liberty, inde- pendence and freedom coursing through both the Declaration of Independence as well as our Constitution. These ideals are import- ant, but I assert they are not supreme. We read, tucked in the last line of the Declara- tion of Independence, these weighty words: “And for the support of this Declaration, with a fi rm Reliance on the Protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” With fi rm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we pledge, to each other, our lives, fortunes, and our sacred honor. One after another, each of the signers of the Declaration approached the table to sign what was, in the words of Pennsylvania’s Benjamin Rush, “believed by many to be our own death warrants.” These are not the words of anarchist reb- els seeking to “live their best life” free of responsibility and the hindrances of social structures or law. These are the words of devoted kinsmen, united not by blood, skin tone or social class, but by common purpose and conviction. I ask you, in this present time of racial, gender, political and cultural tension, are you willing to consider what it means to be an American? Will you consider what it would look like to be united not by blood or skin color or common hobbies or geograph- ical location, but by a deep unity in pur- pose, conviction and brotherly love? Pause to contemplate the magnitude of pledging to another your life, fortune, and sacred honor in order to support the tenets of our founding documents. The weekend festivities are over, but we are left with the opportunity to remember, presently and for years to come, the impor- tance of our nation’s founding principles as well as the sacrifi ces required in order to pro- tect them. Patriots of this day continue to pledge their lives in defense of liberty, the same kind of liberty that allows us to burn our nation’s fl ag, protest our soldiers and riot in the name of “peace.” Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. ——— Devin Patton is a third-generation Wal- lowa County native whose pastimes include the study of ag economics, history and free thought. Oregon needs an independent voice in D.C. OTHER VIEWS Kevin Frazier n the 2019 legislative year, there were 236 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives, four of whom were from Oregon. Out of those 236, though, the Oregonians were nearly indistinguishable from the rest of the Democratic block. Reps. Suzanne Bonamici, Earl Blu- menauer, and Peter DeFazio all recorded nearly perfect party-line records; CQ Press reported their party unity scores as 99 out of 100; Rep. Kurt Schrader came in at 93. Comparatively, on the other side of the aisle, then-Rep. Greg Walden had a far lower party-unity score of just 81. On the whole, these scores go to show that Oregonians have lacked an independent voice in D.C. Sure, Oregon’s Democratic representatives have spoken out against their party from time to time and, though less frequently, even voted against their ideological colleagues; but, from a voting record perspective, there’s nothing distinc- tive about the state’s congressional dele- gates — especially on the Democratic side. In defense of Oregon’s Democratic del- egates, they’re just following a much larger I trend. The average party unity score in 2019 for House Democrats was 97.6 — up from 75.8 in 1983. Oregonians have a chance to elect a voice, rather than an echo, in their sixth congressional district. Now more than ever, independent voices in the House have a chance to sway the conversation by virtue of the fact that nei- ther party has a controlling presence in the chamber. Right now, there’s 219 Demo- crats, 212 Republicans and four vacancies. Electing independent representatives in a handful of districts would upend politics as usual by forcing both parties to cater to this party-free caucus. Of course, the odds of state legislators drawing an independent district are low. It’s in the interest of both parties to draw “safe” seats. These are seats with such skewed party registration diff erentials that it’s a Sisyphean act for someone from the other side to run a credible campaign. These sorts of seats save both par- ties money because the general elections are so uncompetitive. They also reinforce the faulty idea that we’re stuck with two options when it comes to our elected offi - cials and, therefore, entrench the dominance of the two parties. So as legislators start to redistrict, Dem- ocrats will push for a map that has fi ve safe, blue seats and that off ers the Republicans one safe, red seat; Republicans will push for a four-two map. Neither will advocate for a purple district. That’s why the rest of us, the voters of Oregon, must do so. A competitive district in Oregon will give at least some Oregonians a meaningful choice every election cycle. The two par- ties will have to put forth their best candi- dates, and third party or nonaffi liated can- didates may even have a chance at running competitive races. This district can become an example of the sort of democratic com- petition that voters have long been denied due to closed primaries, gerrymandered dis- tricts and undue infl uence aff orded to ideo- logically exclusive parties. If just a few other states take this brave approach of thwarting party eff orts to draw safe seats, then we could see the emergence of U.S. Representatives capable of off ering their voice and not merely an echo of the party line. Our democracy is not broken; it’s fi xed. The rules, the game board and the players are tilted to two sides. Let’s create space for an independent voice in Oregon again; someone who can truthfully share these same lines from Sen. Wayne Morse: “I will exercise an indepen- dence of judgment based on the evidence of each issue. I will weigh the views of my constituents and party, but cast my vote free of political pressure and unmoved by threats of loss of political support.” ——— Kevin Frazier was raised in Washington County. He is pursuing a law degree at the Uni- versity of California, Berkeley School of Law.