A4 East Oregonian Saturday, January 5, 2019 CHRISTOPHER RUSH Publisher KATHRYN B. BROWN Owner DANIEL WATTENBURGER Managing Editor WYATT HAUPT JR. News Editor Founded October 16, 1875 OUR VIEWS State needs to fix faulty buying practices O regon state government has been stunningly inefficient when buying computers and other technology. In fact, agencies’ buying habits are so bad that the state unnecessarily spent an extra $400 million to $1.5 bil- lion during the 2015-17 budget period, according to a recent report from the state Audits Division. The problem is ironic: antiquated systems of purchasing goods and ser- vices for information technology. Some of the purchasing systems date to the 1990s. As a result, whereas one agency might pay $176.40 for a 24-inch Dell monitor, another paid $241.15. The state bought 1,300 such monitors during the study period, according to the audit report, and could have saved more than $16,500 if it bought at the lowest price. In another example, agencies paid 131 different prices for the same Ricoh surge protector, ranging from $65.90 to $173.98. Prices also fluctuated widely for some software licenses and service contracts. The state’s woes in managing IT projects have been well-known, and the audit report says more improve- ments also are needed there. National studies have shown that the majority of IT projects run into sig- nificant issues, whether in the public or private sector. The technology itself EO file photo is not to blame. The problems arise from human faults: arrogance in deci- sion-making, internal rivalries, unreal- istic expectations of what technology can do, equally unrealistic timelines, changing desires, mismanagement, lack of oversight and inadequate atten- tion to testing. All those showed up in the infa- mous Cover Oregon debacle. As for buying IT products and ser- vices, the audit report criticizes tech- nology as well as procedures. We are well into the 21st century, but unlike most corporations, the state lacks an overall purchasing system for prod- ucts, whether computers or those little adhesive notes known as “stickies.” The lack of a viable eProcurement system is indefensible and illustrates how public officials’ claims of cost-ef- ficiency do not always match reality. Technology purchases represent a frac- tion of the state’s multi-billion-dollar budget. But if the lessons learned from this audit were applied to all state pur- chasing, the estimated savings could average from 5 percent to 20 percent. The state is making progress, hav- ing launched OregonBuys as a pilot program for eProcurement in 2017. Ten state agencies participate so far. It won’t be fully implemented until mid- 2021. Secretary of State Dennis Rich- ardson, whose Audits Division per- formed the IT purchasing audit, and Republican legislators are outraged about the long timeline. Gov. Kate Brown and Democratic lawmakers should be, too. Brown proposed some expansion of OregonBuys, but the state should move much faster. Investments in eProcurement will save money and potentially time. There are all sorts of reasons to oppose centralized purchasing. It lim- its choice and reduces personal deci- sion-making. Some jobs might become unnecessary. The technology of such a system is fallible. But so is the cur- rent decentralized approach. The audit report said, “purchase-level data is only available for approximately 12.5 percent of procurement expenditures.” The report also noted, “Without the ability to analyze detailed purchase data for all procurements, Oregon is unable to identify opportunities for potentially millions of dollars in cost savings.” In contrast, states such as Georgia have achieved significant sav- ings by tracking and analyzing such purchase contracts. If the governor and Legislature truly are serious about saving money with- out harming services, as they should be, the audit report is a good place to start. OTHER VIEWS Useless knowledge begets New Horizons mission n October 1939, as Hitler, Mussolini think of the American dream in materialis- and Stalin were plunging the world into tic terms — a well-paid job; a half-acre lot; children with better opportunities than our war, an American educational reformer named Abraham Flexner published an own. Or we think of it in political terms, as essay in Harper’s Magazine under the mar- an ever-expanding domain of ever-greater velous title, “The Usefulness of Useless freedom and equality. Knowledge.” But prosperity, freedom, equality for Noting the way in which what? The deep critique of the lib- eral society is that it refuses on the concerns of modern educa- tion increasingly turned toward principle to supply an answer: worldly problems and practical Each of us lives in pursuit of a vocations, Flexner made a plea for notion of happiness that is utterly “the cultivation of curiosity” for subjective, generally acquisi- tive and almost inevitably out of its own sake. “Now I sometimes wonder,” reach — what psychologists call he wrote, “whether there would the “hedonic treadmill.” Religious B ret be sufficient opportunity for a full cults and authoritarian systems S tephenS life if the world were emptied of work differently: Purposes are COMMENT some of the useless things that given, answers supplied, questions give it spiritual significance; in discouraged or forbidden, and the other words, whether our concep- burdens of individual choice and tion of what is useful may not have become moral agency largely lifted. They are dicta- torships of meaning. too narrow to be adequate to the roaming Flexner was acutely aware of this. “In and capricious possibilities of the human certain large areas — Germany and Italy spirit.” I thought of Flexner’s essay while fol- especially — the effort is now being made lowing the New Horizons flyby of minor to clamp down the freedom of the human planet 2014 MU69, better known as Ultima spirit,” he wrote. “Universities have been Thule. This comes right on the heels of so reorganized that they have become tools NASA’s Osiris-Rex probe entering into of those who believe in a special politi- cal, economic, or racial creed. Now and orbit around the asteroid Bennu, barely then a thoughtless individual in one of the a month after the InSight lander touched down on Mars, and not six months since the few democracies left in this world will Parker Solar Probe began its trip toward the even question the fundamental impor- tance of absolutely untrammeled academic sun. You don’t have to be a space geek to freedom.” appreciate the awe and wonder involved Flexner’s case for such untrammeled in these missions: New Horizons’ stun- freedom isn’t that it’s a good unto itself. ning close-ups of Pluto and its moons; the Freedom also produces a lot of garbage. breathtaking ambition of Osiris-Rex to col- His case is that freedom is the license the lect rocks and dust from Bennu’s surface roving mind requires to go down any path and return them to earth. The marriage of it chooses and go as far as the paths may disinterested science and technological wiz- lead. This is how fundamental discoveries ardry on the farthest-flung adventures of — aka, “useless knowledge” — are usually the human race is what John Adams had in made: not so much by hunting for some- thing specific, but by wandering with an mind when he wrote that he had to “study interested eye amid the unknown. It’s also Politicks and War that my sons may have how countries attract and cultivate genius the liberty to study Mathematicks and Phi- losophy.” It is among the greatest fulfill- — by protecting a space of unlimited intel- lectual permission, regardless of outcome. ments of the American dream. It is not, however, among the most com- All of this, of course, has its ultimate monly understood ones. Typically, we uses — hence the “usefulness” of Flexner’s I Unsigned editorials are the opinion of the East Oregonian editorial board. Other columns, letters and cartoons on this page express the opinions of the authors and not necessarily that of the East Oregonian. NASA via AP This illustration provided by NASA shows the New Horizons spacecraft. title. Newton’s third law of motion begets, after 250 years, the age of the rocket; the discovery of the double helix delivers, sev- eral decades later, Crispr. It’s also how nations gain or lose greatness. The “reorga- nized” universities of fascist Italy and Ger- many had no place for Leo Szilard, Enrico Fermi or Albert Einstein. They became the Allies’ ultimate weapon in World War II. Which brings us back to New Horizons, Osiris-Rex, InSight and every other piece of gear flying through the heavens at taxpayer expense and piling up data atop our already vast stores of useless knowledge. What are they doing to reduce poverty? Nothing. Environmental degradation? Zippo. The opioid crisis? Still less. And yet, in being the kind of society that does this kind of thing — that is, the kind that sends probes to the edge of the solar system; underwrites the scientific estab- lishment that knows how to design and deploy these probes; believes in the value of knowledge for its own sake; cultivates habits of truthfulness, openness, collabo- ration and risk-taking; enlists the public in the experience, and shares the findings with the rest of the world — we also dis- cover the highest use for useless knowl- edge: Not that it may someday have some life-saving application on earth, though it might, but that it has a soul-saving applica- tion in the here and now, reminding us that the human race is not a slave to questions of utility alone. There are plenty of reasons to worry about the state of the American mind today, as well as the state of the university. Speech is not as free; gadflies are not as welcome; inquiry is dictated as much by the avail- ability of funding as it is by the instincts of curiosity, and funding itself is often short. But let’s start 2019 on a happier note. Even in the midst of the shutdown, the New Hori- zons mission was still considered an “essen- tial” activity of government. If Flexner were alive to witness it, he might say, “most essential.” Bret Stephens is a columnist for the New York Times. The East Oregonian welcomes original letters of 400 words or less on public issues and public policies for publication in the newspaper and on our website. The newspaper reserves the right to withhold letters that address concerns about individual services and products or letters that infringe on the rights of private citizens. Letters must be signed by the author and include the city of residence and a daytime phone number. The phone number will not be published. Unsigned letters will not be published. Send letters to managing editor Daniel Wattenburger, 211 S.E. Byers Ave. Pendleton, OR 9780, or email editor@eastoregonian.com.