The Oregon daily journal., April 25, 1905, Page 6, Image 6

Ji u'
7
S. (Continual from rg On.)
. . other federal decision, notably In the
case of the lotted Hum againat Ben
on and Hyde, where the same .ucatlona
" arose. The Ui of California prescribe,
" in Oregon, that Juror must be en
the aeaessmeat roll. The California
; penal code provide for the challenge of
grand Juror upon certain enumerated
ground. It waa held, however, that the
provision disqualifying peraena from
sitting ea the Jury whoa name were
' not on the assessment roil did not apply
to grand Jurora, because It waa not In-
eluded In th only ground of challenge
permitted to he made to arand Juror.
Unlea It waa ground of challenge. It
.could not be a ground for setting aside
:.. -th indictment tii-..-s.
, ln the Benon-Hyd ea th curt
'" said: , ' '" -; - . ' -' "; ' "
". -In thl cas th objection to aome
"of th grand 'Jurora. thai their name
wer not among tn liat of taxpayers
, on the lat assessment roll of their re-
epectlv counties, la technical only.
There I no allegation In th plea that
, th Juror were not In all rasped, a to
ability and knowledge, fully qualified
for the dutiea tmpoaed upon them, of
, that th defendant wer In any reapect
' prejudiced by th abeencev ,of their
' name from th ' aaeeament roll. ' In
-' these circumstance, the objection muet
,:jall under th general rul of the fd
. eral court, that mlaatona which do not
Impair any substantial right or preju
dice th defen of th accused must be
disregarded, unices otherwise required
by poaltlr Utut." ' -
; vJaiT WUy 0ifald.
" As to th argument of Senator Mitch
ell's counsel that the grand Jury was
not. legally' organised because of cer
tain changes In th personnel , of ,1b
Jury, mad' by order of the court. Judge
' Bellinger declared that the defendant
had been In no war Injured, by the
changes. Fred BuSum and Oeorg Peeb
ler, the two substituted Juror, wer
both duly qualified to serv. Both were
. present during air of the deliberation
which led to Senator Mitchell Indict'
menu , Th right of th court to ap
: point substitute Juror In place of otb
era who were unable to aery was too
well established to be questioned.
Th contention of th defense, that
Franrls J. Heney was not qualified to
' art district attorney because not
t resident of tbl stste, was declared by
Judge Bellinger to be of no effect, for
the reason that his right to th offle
could not be attacked collaterally. As
th d facto district attorney, he had
the right to go before th grand Jury
and the law would preaum that ha had
been rightfully aoDOlnted. . ..
"As to the other grounds of objec
tion to th Indictment, that air. Heney
ha been very prejudiced gainst th de
fendant and eery actlr In working up
feeling against htm. and ha been very
vindictive and blttr In hi prosecution
of thl charge, . th are matters of
which this court ' cannot i tak cog.
nlxance," said Judge Bellinger.
. ' A SMi) calafg aty.
"A croeecutlng officer' may not in
frequently appear active against a de
fendant, and bitter and vindictive in and
out of court. Th feeling and Interacts
i of a defendant tend to create In hlav an
, aafavorable opinion respeeiing th. at
titude of th prosecuting c nicer towara
him. What la alleged la a mar matter
of opinion, and a to th affect of th
. conduct attributed . t tn aisinci at
torney b v that opinion. Jio opinion la tx
, pusaid; andl there waa in fact avl
dene of the fact M -which th 'opinion
relate. It could not affect the legality
' af what has been done, or afford! ground
" for aettlng th .indictment said. It Is
stated that If aald JTanela J. IIeny
had mot 99 unlawfully appamrad' bTor
not h".ve been foi--Hg-
other than mer . opinion. If h had
lawfully1 appeared befor them, th
presumption Is that the., aam result
would hav followed. In other words.
Mr. Heney Influence With th grand
lurv cannot possibly be said to hav
been affected by hla residence, and that
la th ground of hla alleged aisquaiin
cation to hold th office."
On of th most important of: th
questions upon which Judge Bellinger
. passed waa that relating to th right of
the defendant to assail the indictment
by plea In abatement Upon this point
Judg Bellinger said: : , ,
Organltli f furl.
' "It remains to be considered whether
th organisation of th grand Jury and
th legality of Its proceedings can be
attacked on the - grounds . alleged, as a
matter of legal right, k
, "Section SOS of th revised statutes
provide that Juror in the United
State courts shall hav th same quali
fication a Juror of th highest courts
of law In the state where th court is
held, and they shall be designated by
ballot, lot, or otherwise ' according to
the mod of forming such Juris theft
practiced la such state court, so . far
as such mode may be practicable, by the
court of th United State, and . for
thl purpose th courts ef th United
State may by rul -or order-conform
the designation and empaneling of Juries
in subs ta ncs to th laws and Manges' re
lating to Juror in th atat courts.
This aeetloa I th act of 1119. with
aom amendments not important In this
connection, v ,'. .'. . .
V''N. express rule or order baa. been
adopted In .thl court 'conforming th
designation and empaneling of Juries to
the laws and usage of the state courts,
although thia court has conformed it
practice in that reapect to state law
and usages since it organisation. It
; I not left however, to the discretion
! of th United State court to conform
their practice respecting the organisa
tion ef Juries to Stat lawa Th re
quirements ef the act of 1I4S ( section
; MO) ar imperative, land (Juries) shall
' be designated, etc, according to the
; Because it isibe) belt. The us
cf it'durinf the) past twenty years
bu resulted la millions of satisfied
(rjC:n::3fcr2Gc:r.l3
V'k AO
f nnrrihinr nnrmnr
mod of forming such Juries' la thai
.....
tala courts.
-In the case of United Statea va Reed.
I Blatch. 4tf (Federal Case NO. is.llt)
tried in th . northern district of New
Tork before Justice Nelson and Dis
trict Judge ftall. It waa held that th
tat law which abolished challenge to
the grand Jury panel and limited th
objection taai mignt o ma a wuw
particular Juror, applied In th federal
courts sitting In New Tork. Nelson,
Justice, delivering th opinio of the
court after explaining th reason for
alio wing th challenge to th array, at
common law, aald: 8o that. In point of
law. as well a In truth, both th ohai
lenge to th favor and th challenge to
th array, directly or indirectly, in each
raa. go t th determination of th
proper qualifications of grand Jurora,
either a Individuals or a a panel.
And, If w ar right In our premises,
it follows, that th two sections
in .question ' ar directly -within the
act of congress of 1840, and are ap
plicable lit regulating the selection,
BummoninsV'returnIng and organisation
cf grand Juries tn th federal eourta
: ' Aecaaed staa'a Viv-vUom. ' 7
The court goes on to say that al
though challengee have been abollahod.
It by n means follows that th accused
haa. no remedy In a case where ther
ha been any Improper conduct or
fraud committed by th public officer la
drawing, summoning or organising the
grand Jury. Such proceeding arei al
ways under th general supervision of
th court Th court has general power
tq preserve th pur admlnlatratloa of
Justice and Its sound discretion will al
ways be exercised freely for th purpose
of securing that cad. .
"The Reed case is approved ana loi- i
lowed In United State va. Tallman. It
Blatch. II (red. cases. No. IU2. The
court held that th atata statute 'having
been adopted by th federal statute.and
the state statute having taken away th
tight or challenging the array, It. had
the effect by Implication, of taking
away th right to f ale objection in any
form a th United State court J -
'The cas of United State vs. Tusks,
14 Blatch I (Fed. case; No. 16H0).
adopts th rul of th foregoing casern.
There waa a plea In abatement averring
that one of the" grand Jurors was a
non-rssldent , Th .court after stating
that the cess is bovered by th decision
In the Reed case, goes on to sayi 'If,
ia ovary criminal prosecution, th ac
cused has th Isgal right by a pica In
beteiaant, to rata th question or th
restdenc and th property of each of
th -members of th grand Jury, and re
quire that issue to bo tried before
Jury, befor calling upon him to anawer
th charge. It la easy to see, that In lo
calities like New Tork. the practice
would, substantially render the trial of
an offender optional with trim, for, in the
absence of any better method of select
Ing Juries for eourta of the United
State than that permitted by existing
lawa, t doubtless happen that aom on
of th grand Jury 1 ope.a to question as
to his residence of property.'
"In th case of tno United States va.
Eagan, supra, which wis tried befor
Justice Brewer and Circuit Judge Thar
r, th court considered the effect of
sections 0 and 711 with reference to
the question under consideration. . Mr,
Justic Brewer, quoting that portion of
section go which provide that. Juror
to serv in th courts , or th United
State, la aoh state respectively, shall
hav the asm qualification and be en-
titled to th same exemptions as Jurors
of th highest court of law tn th atat,
says: 'Mr. Conkllng, In hts treatise on
th practtc of th United State courts.
Insist that ther ar cogent reasons for
holding that thl refers not merely to
the qualification as to ctttaenahlp, age,
residence), etc, but that It extends to
II the proceeding for challenging and
determining tit qualtftcationa of Jurora.
and t that extent incorporate th law
of th' state. ..Clearly, -with these two
sections tot, Til) of th .federal statute
we bv th right tx W ar not bound
In every case la which ther 1 no ex
press provision of th federal statute,
to apply tn laws or the atata in which
thf court 1 held; and. applying th laws
oi Missouri, mere can o no question
but that thl plea In abatement must be
ovrruid. . , ." ... '..
Stat rraetie Obtains.
case, atated it as Ills opinion that under
section 711 th court was authorised to
conform Its rulings to th practice which
obtains tn th state courts of Missouri,
and that under th practice In th atat
courts It was clear beyond question that
the plea In abatement stated no valid
ground or objection to tn indictment.
"Section Til referred to In th fore
going opinion provide In effect that
the Jurisdiction in civil and criminal
matters conferred on th circuit and dis
trict courts by th provision of tltU'll,
and of title Civil Rights,' and of title
Crimes," for the protection of alt' per
son la th United States la their civil
right, and for their vindication, shall
be exercised and enforced in conformity
with the lawa of the United States. But
when the lawa of the United States ar
not suitable, 'or ar deficient In th pro
visions necessary to furnish suitable
remedies and punish offenses against
law. 'th common law modified and
changed' by the constitution and lawa of
tha state shall govern, etc.' The defend
ant upon this hearing contended that the
operation of this section waa limited to
offenses under wnat ' is anowa a tn
ctvll rights' aot and that the phrase
civil rlchts' employed in th eeotlon
means only such rights as sro provided
for in that act But there la no amblgu
ltv whatever In th provision, and ther
can be no queatloa as to Its general ap
plication. ..,-'
"In the ess of the United State va
Cluno, tl Fed, ft I. Judg Rosa held that
ther being no provision of the unite
SUte statute regulating challenges to
arrand lurors. it I proper lor the rea-
eral court to follow the practice) of the
eourta of th atat In which - It 1 held,
with referenc t such challeng.-
"In th cas of Crowley v. united
States, 104 U. 8. , the court held
that it was the duty or th court in
Porto Rico to recognise any valid list
ing local statute relating to th quali
fication of Juror. By th local law,
challengee wer allowed to Juror, for
th disqualification relied upon in tn
Die. Th question a to whether th
objection allowed by th local law to
Jurora, and by It made a ground of chal
lenge, could be taken by plea In abate
ment after the- return, of the indictment
Is not In Porto Klco controlled ny any
statute; and th court therefore, upon
nrlnclple of general taw, sustaineo in
plea.'statlng In its opinion that the au
thorities are not In harmony as to th
general law. - -.-.
. Th Baasom On.
"In th cas cf th United SUte vs.
Sanson, supra. Justice field, applying
the local law, rerused to set an indict
ment aside when the aui of a grand
Juror did not appear on th laat pre
ceding assessment; roll. This was a dis
qualifies t ton-' under th statute, bufnot
a grouad for challenge. Tha court re
ferring to th state law, said Turn
ing to th eeusW-for which a chalUng
to the panel, or to so Individual grand
Juror, may bo Interposed, we find none
which" embrace tn objection laxen ty
the plea In abatement' v - ;
1 believe there i no eae wner nn
dbJectUm to an Indictment In a federal
court ha been sustained whan th mod
employed to present th Objection was
contrary to the provisions of the local
law. . - .... ,
Section lift of th Oregon cod pro
vide that no ehallang ahall be maVie
or allowed to the panel from which th
grand Jury ia drawn, nor to an Indi
vidual grand Juror, unless when mad
by the court Cor want of qualification as
a.i..iL.j a i wattl - . - .-r -
nrtu-r(W Id untloa 111.
"Section 12tt orovldea that before
accepting a peraon drawn aa a grand
Juror the court must be satisfied that
such, person Is duly qnallnad to ao as
auch turor. but that when drawn .and
found qualified h mut be acceptedTin
leas he la sxoused by the court tc
"Th Only plea In addition to th pleae
of guilty and not guilty allowed by the
statins, la th plea of former conviction
ae au-nulttal. and there are only two
grounds upon which an. Indictment can
be at aside on mollon. and neither of
these la Included In the plas In Ques
tion. . .. . . ..
"Section H4t provide that Th In
dictment null be set aside by the court
upon the motion cf the defendant in,
kelther of th following cases: 1. wnen
It la not found Indorsed and preaeniea
aa prescribed In chapter J cf title -IS of
thl code; 1. When tne names oi
witnaaaaa HUnined before the grand
Jury are not Ineerted at the foot of the
indictment or Indoraed thereon..
"Thar la an other BrOVlslOtl for Bet'
line aa tnitlotment aald. arvJ th4f X-
presa mention cf this mod..ljf cours
th exclusion or ny otner. .t.-...
Attorneys Borers tfraad Juris. ..
"Ia Stale vs. Whitney. 7 Or.. 1(1. ft
waa held that when a parson other than
the district attorney appeared before
th grand Jury and amlned wltneaaea.
thl waa not a ground for netting an
Indictment aald. Inaemuch aa it wa
nnt within either af the only two. case
upon which such action "ouldDakenrl
"In Rtata va Carlson. ur,
decided by the supreme court of Oregon
that challenge to the panel ana io in
dividual grand Juror r abolished In
thl atat (It waa prvloualy ao hld tn
Stat v. ntshugh. S Or.. lT)l that th
statute In, sffect interpoea a challenge
to each grand Juror,, drawn; that th
court in empaneling" th grand Jury 1
presumed t hav determined th qila
tlon of each grand Juror qualifications,
and that such determination ia conclu-
alv and 1 aot aubject to appai. '
"I hav not referred to all th cases
th support -thh views contained In this
opinion. Tho referred to are. In my
opinion, conclusive of th qUtlon con
sidered. The rule by which the pro
cedure In th federal courts, relating
to the organisation of grand Juries and
objections to tndlctmcnta, is made to
conform to th local law 1 too firmly
established to admit of question at this
late day. It ha existed In this court
sine Its' organisation, with th stsb
llshmsnt of th stat govrnmnt -without
objection until th present time.
And th state court procedure haa re
mained without material change since
It adoption, mors than 40 year ago.
notwithstanding th facility with which
laws are amended in the atata It may
be safely aaaumed that It baa not been
productive of injutlc or wrongs and.
it can never . so. operate whll courts
have, la th general supervision and
control of their proceeding, power to
d reserve th our admlnlatratloa af
luetic. ' '
-"It follow from thss considerations,
that all objection to an Indictment not
provided for a hereinbefore sst forth,
must be ddrd to tho court for th
exererne of It discretion; and when It
Is mads to appear that there ha been
fraud practiced, or' bther acta com
mitted.' that Impair a defendant's' sub
stantial tight, the court In th exercise
of a sound discretion wui grant appro
priate rllf. -;
, v h "Abundant Oautton,"
' fa I conclusion Judg Bellinger' ald
that h would allow th district attorney
to Introdue evldenc to establish th
cltlssnshlp of Oeorg -Oulstln. one of
the grand Jurora, notwithstanding tha
fnot that objection to the. Juror could
?ot now be made by the defense. This,
udc Bellinger said, h would do "out
of abundant caution" and In order to
obviate all question which might be
raisea on appeal. . - -
Mr. Heny atated that h would at
one f II th proof of Qulstln's eltisen-
ship. Judg Bnnttt excepted to th
rulings ef th court end objected to ta
filing of . th affidavit relating to
Oulstln. but bis objections were over
ruled. : A request for a Jury trial upon
tho question of fact raised by th pie
la abatement was denied.
"Do you wish to introdneo any. evi
denoe to ahow that Oulstln Is not a clt
gnTs1rer"Hni1 1 -
"I do not replied Judg ' Bennett
"I do not consider that the question is
now befor th court In view of th
ruling which hav been road." replied
Judge Bennett
-A brier discussion ensued as id tn
demurrer which waa filed by Senator
Mitchell simultaneously with his pi
in abatement It was agreed that briefs
should bo submitted by both sides and
that th court should pas upon th de
murrer without argument
Mr. Heney will leav for San Fran
Cisco tomorrow or tha next day. He
haa an Important civil case to try next
Monday in Fresno. Th length of his
stay In California is uncertain,
OREGON WHEAT
TURNED THE TIDE
(Continued from Page One.)'
"To Wall Street: Don't get rattled by
Thursday' and today's flurry. This Is
only a tiny whiff of what la coming,
Walt until they break t point between
quotation and on of th great lights
of financial dominions throws up his
hands and trie to untanglo a few hun
dred millions of liabilities with three
great systems and a number of Indus
trials involved. When this gentleman's
affairs go into court, then there will be
revelations. J would adviae tne trader
to hold their lines steady until my full
nan advertisement gets to the moneyed
of Berlin, London and Paris. Then Wall
street will have something to dance ta
- "THOMAS W. LiAWBOW.
The Milwaukee defalcation. ' together
with, th Bqultabl squabble. Is In line
with Lawson's prediction, and pas
taken th edge off th market Pitts
burg report approaching overproduction
In ateel ana iron. ' .
Today'e trading on th toe it market
was sensational, inasmucn aa moat or
the transaction wer by professional
The blc advance in lxulsvm a Nash
ville yesterday aomewhat foretold what
would baopen today, nut no one ouuiae
Of the big clique1- believed that prices
would g up aa far as they did.
The largest rise toaay was in Ameri
can Smelter, common, tne aavance
amounting to 1115. i ''- v '
St Paul proved a nig pun nan ana
rose 11.75. ; '-''' ' -:---
Canadian pacing went ii.ib nigner on
forced trading. .-4 - : , -t
Kvei Northern securities received its
share of the attention of the manipu
lators sad valuee at th close were tl
higher. . , t j -
For th part it piayd in neraiding
today's .movement,. Coals villa -Nash-
TuO, of Tragi Kantag.
ar these line from J. M. Simmon, of
Casey, la. Think what might have re
sulted rrom nis terrioie cougn ir ne bad
not taken the medicine about which h
writes: "I had a fearful cough, that
disturbed my night's rest I tried ev
erything, but nothing would relieve It,
until I took Dr. King's New Discovery
for Consumption, Coughs and Colds,
which completely cured ma." Instantly
relieves and permanently eurea . all
throat and lung diseases; prevent grip
and pneumonia. At Red Cross Phar
macy. Sixth and Oak streets, ea the way
o toe pos win ce; guaranteed, eve . an
t.oo. xriai potue ire.
i.diieuii .u u
When Portland
"Citizens Show
4 .theiWay : 1
v;.v.
5
' Ther can be ho Just reason why any
reader of this will continue ta uffr
th torture of aa aching back, th an
aoyaaca of urinary disorders, the dan
ger or aianaiee or any aianey ma,
when relief is so near at head and the
most positive proof given that they can
be cured. Read what a rortiana ciu
sea says; ',,.:'.
Mra John She waiter, wlf tt John
Shewaiter, retired farmer, of t04 ast
High street says: . "I recommend
Doan's . Kidney Pills to any on and
hav don ao whenever the opportunity
haa presented Itself. , Whll I hav
had com kldnay .. complaint . th moat
of my trouble waa located. in the small
of my back directly over my kidneys.
Oftentimes I would hav attack of dla-
lnea and when atooping a blur would
come befor . my aye. . learning af
Doan' Kidney Pills through an adver
tisement I procured a bos. Since using
them th backache ha disappeared and
the apella of dlsxlneas bar ntlrly
lft nt -...,;... i,.. .... : ., i .
For sal by all dealers. ' Prie . St
cent. Foster-Mllburn Co., "Buffalo, N,
T, aole agent for th United State.
Remember the nam DOAN'S and
tak ao other. ,,; . . u ..
villa waa rewarded with ra ria of
tltlU. ... . " - u
Missouri Pactfle with aa advance of
tl.tltt today howd very plainly that
It waa In tha bands of th professional
boosters.
New Tork Central advanced tl.ITU
and, Ontario Western rose ) on th
general upward hov today. , -
Tnneae tMai at - iron .was box
neglected for a single minute by th
cllqu. and a a result of their labor
advanced ta. -j 1 r
Union Paclflo common, waa given
grant part of th attention of th
manipulators and advanced tt.I7H
Both United Statea Steel atocka war
excited, th common advancing Sl.lStt
and-the preferred tl.zi. .- , , :
TWO FAILURES.
Ohrlstlaa Sj Clack Baapeaul and
'; ' Varkeg ft Oo, Aaalgn. '
i (Jearaal BperU get the.)
New ToricApril la. W. K. Parker A
Co, Wall street bankers, aaatgned today
for th benefit of their creditors, Th
amount Involved is unknown,
. The suspension of Christian c Clark
waa also announced on th consolidated
stock exchange this morning. .,
FAMILY SURROUNDS
BOY MURDERER
Mother, Brothers and Sister of
'.Tom Brown Watch Long Pro- t
cess of Choosing a Jury.
4
(Special Dispatch t Th learaaL)
Chehalla. WaalL, AprU St. A special
venlr of 14 Jurora waa returned this
morning.' in th Brown murder - trial.
Th work of securing a Jury has gon
en very-tediously throughout th day.
Th Up bf questioning by attorneys
for th defense show they Intend) to
enter aa tnaanlty plea. i
Brown sits beside hla mother, kls
head cast down and hi eye focused en
tho floor, taking absolutely no lntereet
In th proceedings. Th little brother
and sisters of the boy ar la court, and
th room la crowded with spectators.
. Th ease Is attracting conalderable at.
tentlon from th publlo and promises
to be on of th longest la th history
of twls county on acoount of th tlm
taken In aeourlng a Jury and the great
number of witnesses to be examined..
HOP POOL ATTACKED
(Continued from Pag On.)
Dallas: Charles Buchanan of Cornelius,
and John Ranaau of u rants paaa. v
The following letter, signed by nln
of th larger grower and holders of
hop la California, was , recsived last
night by Conrad Krsbs:
- "To th O rowers in Oregon and waah-
lngton--W, th undarsignod, growers
snd holder f hop In. California, most
earnestly solicit your 00-operaiion m
our efforts to advanc th market value
cf our holding. W ar positively con
vinced of the following facta:
. "That th preaent fictitious hop mar
ket is th result of , the co-operation
and manipulation or th abort seuera
That these same short sailers during th
spring and summer of th year ltoi
and in the face of a shortage of three
years contracted our hops - with th
brewers for It to St cents delivered.
Thl wa befor th vines had appeared
In our yarda.
"The crop-or no has coma on, and
we find today an actual shortage of IK,.
000 balea In th United tSatea, and Eng
land will . need 100,000 hundredweight
more. The bear ar now without stock.
but ar selling continually to th brew-
era. the hop w "how hold, expecting
later to fore us to tak such prices a
they may choose to glv. It I a Ufa-
and-death struggle with us. If ws per
mit manipulators to regulate the mar
ket for lt. what will be the prtc they
will et on our 1901 eropT If they hav
their way. hop will not b worth th
baling. m
"Now we, the remaining holder in
California, ar fully convinced If th
grower In Oregon and Washington will
pool their hop for to or to day, a Just
remuneration for their efforts will be
the result, and the market will forever
be taken from the hands Of .the bears,
and 1(04 hope will be selling st tho true
prlc they should command, t Tou hav
pooled In tne paat put tne occasion wa
never so momentous or vital a at pre,
ent. If ther ever was cans for the
growers of Oregon and Washington to
pool now Is th tlm. Mop should be
worth 49 to It cents. If you pool that
will be the result ; .
"Again w ask you to co-operate with
u and destroy now and forever thee
despicable manipulator and teach the
originators of the m life-long lea-
son," ,. . . . I . " ...
FOB CXTT OAS Jr&AJTTtJ.
(Jearaal Special Serrlee.) ' .
Chicago, April It. At a publlo meet
ing la the city council chsmber last
night i permanent organisation was
formed with the object of accomplish
ing municipal ownership of gag worti
in Chicago, -". .
Alaska Refrigerators are not the cheap, trashy kind that some deparfcnent stores
-wlibut ara ja-firat claat ,; vp-ta-fotsr :f riztrttora, rrTf-'iJ'.jbilb::!
: achievements ' in refrijerator perfection. Lvery ALAS1IA ia liaedwith white .
tile throughout; you can tell them easily don't buy any other recommenced "Just
as good. . We ask that you compare the finish and style cf the Alaska with other
refrigerators shown. .The only refrigerator made having a charcoal lining. The.
ice rests on a corrugated galvanised iron rack,; which is so constructed as to
leave an air passage under the iron. The warm air in the provision chamber rises
through the flues at each end of the ice chamber, comes in contact with the ice '
at the central opening in the lid fine, becomes colder and drops under the ice rack,
where all moisture is condensed and falls through the central opening under the
Ice Into the provision chamber, cold and dry. No other system keeps the air so.
. long in contact with the ice as tne aIjAS&A does, consequently the Alaska does V
its work more thoroughly than any; other refrigerator. v : . v u , , .
M
. 3 -
A' n-u-Tart
R
' The "km department
.The kind department
The kind department
The kind department
Thrkind department
The Jtlnd department
.T 7'';. ' r-i--i
m to in tost
, t..' .-
CONGRESSMAN SHOT i
IN PROHIBITION RIOT
j 4 . . . . - i .. - ';
Representative Pinckney and
Three Others Killed in Texas ;
Shooting Affray. .
(Spectal Dlsssteh te ne JsaraaL)
Hemostead. T. April It. A prohi
bition meeting her last night broke up
in a shooting acrap in which Congress
man John M. Flnckney, Thomas rinca
ney, his brother; John A. Mills, a lead
ing prohibitionist, and J. N. Brown, a
lawyer and antl-prohlbltionist; . wer
klllCtt. Doc . Tompkins, p rival aecre
tary to Reprassntstlr Pinckney, and
Rollln Brown, soa of J. X. Brown, ar
seriously wounded. -:. - .
Tompkins waa making a speecn wnicn
offended -Brown, who began the snoot
ing which precipitated th. Hot. - A num
ber of men appeared to b engaged la
th shooting and- something Ilk , 100
shot wr fired. ' -
Tha fnaatlns? W Called for tha Pur-
poa of petitioning th governor to sand
rangers nr to .more me i F"
law. Th. entire community is in a mr.
moll, and tha rangers ar n rout to
nMiinl firmer - , -. ,
flnokney waa a nairr oi e
to, waa a eonfederat eoidier. ror many
rn imin of Waller county and wa
elected In 1I0S a congressman from th
Eighth Tesa district.
CVBAJTS FBOTBOT TaTXBTaW.'
. (laBnal 8 Dedal Serrlee.)
HmnL AnrU It Tha house cf rep
resentative has refused to expose the
eongrsmn who stol publlo docu
ment on.th night of April 14. Th
raanititloa nrorldlnr for a search for
th. stolen document, waa tabled by an
almost unanimous ot. Th missing
papers showed conclusively that publlo
fund wer miausea ny fii t'
NOTICE
.,Th sun .shtats. ;Vj;.;vv.'i
Harvett when fbe (rain is ripe.
Grace SIabWood, xfl Inch, $1.75
per load. . 1 ',.'' 'v :'v "
Dry wood, 10 Inchat, $s.so p.r load.
355 Front iSt.
PortknJ Sawiit Ccrsny
Park and Washlofteej, PorUsad, Orcfoe
JThe'5chool of Quality"
MODERN, PRACTICAL. COMPLETE
; Obm all the rear. Cetalega f re .
A. P. ASJRSTK0N0, LL. B PRINCIPAL
Mm ml :m
I j A O v. -
Szx$&2 Tta Veil C:n't
Highest awards at the World's Columbia Exposition, ..
Atlanta Exposition, Tennessee1 Centennial . Exposition. -
d T7ACZ.
Sold On Ecoy Terms.
Over
stores' ask $14.00 for, we .ask' but. . ; r ; . . ; : . s . .910S0:
stores ask $15.00 for we ksk -but. V . ,v. . . . . . .913,00
stores ask $2.00 for, we J ask but .V, :..:9io.oo
stores ask $23.00 for, we ask .but.. Vsrf.e.'ei.e ,,.?18.C0
stores ask $32.00 for, we ssk but.T..i... ..t25.00
stores ask $39.00 for, we ask but. ...;.. .130.00
: ; v ' ..' .-.v.."' J . -y -1 i ,''-i . 7. A.-v
' i I i 1 . :
1 u 11 . '. 1 1
THE HOME KJgUflSHZllS
$t.
319 to
PORTLAND HAY BE
' THE CHOSEN CITY
' . ,- : ... .
" (Continued from Pag On.
ha assumed such proportions, Bol ha
practically dropped out of th race. ' ,
Th. - contingent fayorlng, Portland;
while not to vigorous tn their efforts st
th outset as th contending cities, hs
nrrertheles been working quietly and
faithfully with th nd In view of ulti
mately succeeding la landing the coy.
eted prise. It now appears a though
FREE TRIPS TO LEWIS AMD CtAKK FAIR!
THE JOURNAL'S
Lbwis ahel Clark Contest
read tONcmoNS, in Yotti rAvoi?iTrs? m
I a p'UMW AND GET TO WORK' AT ONCE
Owing fo-ih wld general Interest In th. twls and Qark Fhlr. THE
JOURNAL wUl pay th. expense of twenty trips to. th fair, lor th. moot
popular person putsld of Multnomah aounty, ; -v .
i . THB JOURNAL, wlU pay th. ntlr zpene. Including railroad and sleep
ing car fr. admUslons to th. x position for on. wsek, hotel bUls for 0n.
wk and ausmata . . -.v. . f-y ,' 4 v . f
; i' The TripsVi:i Ca Divided as followa it t. S :t M:
To th. most poputar person In Cop or Curry county, n free trip to' th
most popular person In Josephln or Jackson county, on free trip: to the
most popular person In Douglas county, on free trip; to the moot popular
peraon tn Lan county, on free trip; to the moet popular person in Benton
or Lincoln county on free trip; to th mct popular person in Tamhtll or
ryi wmi'ir, rw rii, i n raw
Tillamook county, one free trip; to th
on free trl
p; n cne moat popular person in Marion county, on rre trln
to the moi
1
pocular person in Clackama count, ens fraa trln: to ,h
popular peraon In Columbia or Clauop county, one free trl pi to the moet
populse person in Wasco, Sherman
most popular person in Morrow,'
tne most 1
ular perso
st popular peraon In. Umatilla county, on re trip; to th moat pop.
rson In. Union or wallow county, on free trip; to the most popular
in Baker county, one free trln: ta tha moat annnl,, mm., tm vr -1
r county, ci
Mo: to t
one free tn
person
hour. Harney or Orant county, one
XAKe or Kieraam county, one -rre
m Washington, one free trip; to th
Ingfon, one fre trip,
" Tn nasi on wnicn creoic zor vois
IS centavpald In adranc for new or old
Th basis on which credit for vote
The contest open at one ana closes st midnight rn June 10. Plrk out
our favorite, flu out coupon below
ot in, roriiana, uregon. coupon
AU aurtng tn conteet. ., .
Th. tlm. Is short, writ for sampi.
Subscription Rates"
... - trmi wj vmmmwt
Vf Jenrnsl. with Sunday, 1
thillr Jnorqal, 1 year.,
Pally JearMl, WHS Banner.
yaar..T.M
...... 6.00
S.T5
... ISO
laiiy narsai, s montna. ......
pally Jnarnal. with Seadtf, ,
paiif jearaal, s sieatBa.
Pally Journal, with Sunder. 1
month .SB
paiiy. er
liw laded
Dally, per
eseepted
' .1
week, aelleered, Soadsy
... .10
Tm, V. Stall .
Pally JiHirnal, with Suneay, 1' year.. IT so
Pally Jaarnal, 1 year.,....,..,.....,.. BOO
Pally oaraal, wttk Sunday, S aie... S TB
Pally lenrml, sieathe ITS
Pally Journal, with Sunday, S SMS., l.M
Pally Journal. mentis 1.40
Pally Joarnal,' wttk Snnday, 1. Bteatb. .M
Pally Jeuraal, 1 SMatk.,, ,.. .BO
Similar Joersal, 1 year SOU
Saaaay Joiuoal, t saeelks........w. 1.00
Ts Seal-Weekly Jearaal,
Seml-WJwklr Jonmal, te II rt
, eeeh lent, lllsatrsted, roll . aaarket
rennet. 1 yr , SI. BO
i -
- - - ."'",
,.i". Vr :
650.C00 b Ux9
227 YeAtlKXL ST.
th foTti of th. delegate : from
northwest would b crowned with sue
cees, and PorUnd, will certainly b &
strong factor 1n th. contest to b de
cided Thursday. .' i . ' . J
btobjc auansTaro).
?V-.-,-.'. t .
ilii
;V-. ' IJaanal' SpecUl jsrefe.)-: , ' $ ,
Dnvr, Colon April It. Th Horm.
which for th last , two day has rgd .
throughout -th west from Arlsoae,
throughout Stontana. Is ubsiding. Snow
covers th ground In - many ' places.
Wires ar. still prostrated -and railroad
trafllq badly demoralised. Colorado
rivers ar. rising rapidly and damage
from floods is feared. . V, y
.J. .
pnpuiar pereon in waaninglon or
moat popular person In Line county
arton county, on free, trip!
inpj w ine 1
ipi to the 1
rre. trip; to
on free-trli
to the moet
he most poj
person In
opular perec
n.i.nii I. .
or Crook county; on, free trip; to th.
,'uunam or wneeier county, on free-trip: to
free trip: to the most popular per eon In
trip; t. tne moat popular peraon In east'
moat popular person In western
1 wash-
will be gives I, tm. vet. for
win d gives ia, tm vet fee va.
subscription to th Dally, Daily an J
ti
JJ
and mall It f onoe to THIS JOURNAL
win appear erery pay In TUB JOUR-
, A . . i . ... 7
copies and get to work at one.
Thl Ooupoa la OooS fo
ONE VOTE3
for
AddMM
a,,f
Moat popular person In
county. . , , . r '
Thl eonpon must be voted oa or
before May -If. - , , .. . ,
Write name and hddrea plainly and
mall at one to lh Joaraatj Portland.
Oregon.
Ku
J
V
v
a-
'.
-4-,.