Oregon sentinel. (Jacksonville, Or.) 1858-1888, January 30, 1858, Image 1

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    fe "sr-SP'-r a
aamx$x
u
"rh
' ---V i.rLmiv-
WreesisjIfWSNeSBss1i
it .CjiS
At
-ff)f '' '
o . ... J
.. -"WWt
,. . "i.T
"' K , "
aattifctt
:i?t'... '...J. , jj,'.
' ?;, a
. r.
iVf--
v It ' '.MB
0emtoeL
V
JACKtoILLE, QKE&frN, SATUEDAY, JANUARY 30, 1858.
NO. 3i
VOW
a W'
Bii'-!Lll!i:i".l' II J
Wi
' tsktsaMBBssjMkssssssssssssssssi
ataat4l
jarfeeoffJ
torn Orryon.
JturdHV,
TvU:
Proprietor.
ff
,!-'!
v
; ifcj. .
v twt,
itlm, 93 001
poo.
1, Lr I
; m
itB,.
10n5l
lea. Orit In
(trUua,)
uent Insertion,
!N.
s
n Tear,
: month. $10.
'Umi
irsons wishing
(41
four square
'M
V
.To XMIwiiOffice.
. " -"c
J ji' T i
rpH
a Botxi van
jLlband, I pre
psNdtl
.flj
tSTAL
JOB
ltng,
3, and on tho
B ; such as
Ort iU
tROSil
Bee,
I1
Ctwh
Bards,
1 Can!,
VC ivc.
.
B1LA(DIK
Un
incited.
I ItSSi 1 1 11H
Bt
TC-'
iarite.
KOJO
K K 'm .-J
UUKIMU
!J2om'u2
oo.vrrmirrs,
;jo. t.
TLT
JMMwqtel
llf
mm,
gcons.
iJ1Jj,, H,or
o.
"Drugs
aud
vi;
. ianATT.
snFraftcisco.
ljOTcjI
:oe,
CtvuiM
Commer-
Hen,
l.
tl.J.l
er Louisiana
.TUBXKM
IMER.
,A.W,
ioloInK tbo
Ifuart
L OIBce. Yro
23tf
:n,
ZJiW7
at Law,
J8INE8B In
irlet uf Ore-
Itf
.1.
at law.
,V'1
m.lm
etnH
eUsoa.Ca.
'.ty.
to anu 'Hit
Sling Offioe.
in
A-W1
v
T7M
AW.
&
B
Jckion
Wtipbi
Heme hh1 Friends.
Ob, there' a power to msko c&ch.hour
A sweet ft heaven designed It
Nor need wo roam to bring It home,
Though few there bo that And It;
Wo seek to high for things close by
And lose what nature found u(
For life Iim hero no charms so dear
A hone and friends around nt,
Wo oft destroy tho present Joy
For futurahope, and pralso them,
While flower a awt bloom at our feet,
If wo'd but stoop to raleo them I
For1 lhl8g aftr ttlllmeMr art.
VI
u. -M 7. ..nt. -tml kmaII kit (TftAMftit
Dut soon we'tr taught that earth has nought
R7:Er.& IS At that earth haanouchl
IlUt home ami menus orounu us.
V
Xli ftlcnds that speed In time of need,
When hone's lust reed lr shaken.
To show you still, that come what will,
lou nro not quite rorsakeu ;
Though all weru night, If but the light
From friendship's attar crowned us,
Twould prore tho bliss of earth were this
Our homo and friends around us.
Tho Iitttlo Shoo.
nr mnr kbxl.
I found It here a worn out shoe.
All mildewed with tloio end wet with dot;
Tie a llttlo thing; yo would pass It by
With never a thought, or word, or slsb,
Yet It stirs !n my spirit a hidden well,
And In eloquent tones of the past doth til
It tells of a little, fairy child,
That bound my heart with msglo wtld, '
Of bright blue oyes and golden lulr,
That ever shed joy and sunlight there-
Of aprattllng iolce, so sweet and clear,.
And tho tiny feet that were ctcr near.
It tells of n form that Is cold and still
Of a little mound unon Tonder hill.
That Is dearer far to a mother's heart
Than tho classic "statue of Grecian art''
Ah I stranger may pass with a carelrnsilr,
norureomoi woiioptsi&niare wuiemorc.
J5"annotknow of the little thing,
1 rOm uiflrvl. BtlAnl Aiiint Attn li.tni.
The toIcobQ form that weru onco o dir t
J! ". ?u brK w" lay en'T h"'
That could fwi wlll, ao when ,u ,t jriib
I found it this tirarntBR, U.U luite shoe)
From the Democratic RUs4rd
Tho AMsewrtlemwont f Iile
. . . Meeeewi- " .
OK'itmHMisV tWeaHert'te te re-
eeat aeUen ,ef ih TerrHerlel J)erratk
Ceatral Ceewlttee, wWeii met at shh nr
tho purpose of fiilng upon a day forpe as
sembling of a Democratlo ConrentSn, at
which are to be nominated such ora as
will bo required under State orgaitl".
The duty aleo doroWed npon tbtatniroi
Commtttee to regulate tho apporinmeni
of the sereral counties, in regaro the
number or Delegates eaeh county Untitled
to. Theso two matters were pa upon,
and tho Commltteo adjourned.
Since the adjournment, complsla havo
been made by bo ineonslderablo iptlon of
the Democracy in every section olioler
.iir fmm titeh advices bare reted, that
great injustleo I done them by ilappor-
iionraeai. a cursory gianee otwio who
of last, and other preceding year In con
trast with that for the Contention lied for
the 16th March ensuing, will eaustven the
nntnltlated to wonder by whatlsgular
freak or community tho peculiar cnge Ti
dble ha ben produced. Inqulnnd mo
dilation will eeue the curious preem.
Fortunately for us, who bateot been
long in Oregon, the records of jtpait are
preMrred, and are attainable all that
may care to examine them. 4'n again,
there U a prlnclplo Involved! deciding
npon the questions which bejprovoked
dhuenslou among the Deaocnwf Oregon,
and which still seem to threaVM T.elure
If persisted in, that can be al.ll under
stood by Intelligent Demecr&fbo have
never set foot upon the toll of tjferrltory,
as by him who has passed the Uer portion
of ue llfo here. Demeeratlo nelples era
the same everywhere. TheyiimmuU-
ble, fixed, eternal, pervading. I
With these record befero h(iko shall
be no Imitation in the course ub pursued,
nor will impartial men deem ollkeuselon
of these vexed questions IwleliA. A life
time passed in strict adhereeeelDeiseera-
tlo doctrines, some doten yean mere de
voted to active connection wlUJesteentlo
aaseuLUgei, fr,priary org4tWa on
wsrutolt highest domestlo bBMlf,ha
render U8 qUua oompeteut t duty .we
here essay.
Throwing u6 fw tb, preJueowHS
muB.ioiw oi MMsanowpAllsa.sswHS
ourDemooratlo brethren in Orfc, we shall
row use argument strictly , U jBelplsa
and nBlversally reoeaU.f.!. ,1 at the
party elsewhere In the Unloijvnd, It U
In no spirit of vanity thatweit,-whsn
we may be sailed to warned pea cause
.of this disruption, wbleh exist loeal prej-
olees, our stsnd-pelnt win 0 M to
a more caimiy ana dl ueleMtely
u men of fur superior abllli might, who
hi
o been entangled with th , yTe oame
touregon some Ix months ago We brought
noprejuciJeea with nj.norhn.,, r.
ea.weir baneful JuOmoco y,Uh . our hwi
f j ' r i v UJ W!lt"
or
men
fbe beepjlaUtj ef the oao wu nqt exceeded
by the otber ; it could not hayo been.
We llteed to both Intently,. nnd bollCTe
that meet of llioeo wo eonvewd with, ln
terely beltered their own coureo was the
correct one to purtu. From all we could
gather, there might bo, lienest Judgment
warped'on ellherelde. "Wo can eo no real
cftUo why tho Dcmocraoyof Orton should
bo dlrided, and will gladly hall the day
when aBgry feelings shall benomoro nmoog
I them. Bat It 1 not to bo exueetert thai
. . ,
I a ft U-wi pjt 11. 1lftifMv ft0p liAvlnir
o J ....
wMen under foot, as It were, will rl.e
up to do honor to their oppressors. It Is n
true apothegm, that power lugets tyranny
Can It bo urged that thosa who gained pow
er hero net lone ntro. baro 1cm fnulta than
their fcltowmen, and that they are lnfalll
blet Or, granting, for the sakeofnrgu
ment, that tho proscribed merited the oblo
quy Inflicted, Is It not the noblest nttrlbuto
of power which restrains the heavy hand of
thomsitcrJ Why, oven In nbsolti to gov
ernments, on great occasions, dark dungeon
doors aro throwu wldo open, and pMtitul
prisoners aro permitted again to breathe the
pure nlr of Heaven. Hut we havo digressed.
It Is a recognised usage in Democratic
party government that no new sputsm can
1)0 foisted upon Its adherents, without first
consulting tho maiscs in reference with Its
propriety, nor ore they bound In honor to
submit to It regulations, until fair means
I be taken to secure public sentiment In sup
port or tne system proposed, ino vory
namo of Democracy signifies tho liberality
of Its fundamental principles. It Is a gov
ernment of the people, with the orcatlvo
power lodged only In tho hand ol tbo peo
ple This power rises paramount to all re
presentative domlnton, and wherever In our
country's brief history the representative
has dared to usurp this high prerogative,
like an enraged giant, tho people have turn
ed upon tho recreant, and smoto htm unto
political death. If this be tho creed of our
party In tb. loftiest ranks of government, is
It not frivolous to assert that In Its own do
mestlo regulations oven a modicum of tyr
aaay or arbitrary power would be counte
252$ Liajie?45L'iirjj,sJ7.
IrarytoWt Lehesta of aeenstltnesey, ean
a representative clothed simply with consul'
tatlve powersTtUreet and control tho body
whom ho Is choien la. represent I Kren In
the older States, wli.'VAtrlalu line ofpri
msry organisation lmSTWtfpnd satlsfacto'.
rlly obtained In one, that some ilem can
not at the mere dletum and caprice of a
Committee be engrafted upon another Stato,
by which a before recognised, established
system shall be superceded. The Democra
cy should first be made aware of the cbango
proposed, and afterwards their representa
tlves must sanction or reject it, agreeably
to InstrtntloBS,
This brings us to tho aotiw of the Cen
tral Committee recently convene! nt Salem.
Let us see whether they acted In accordance
with these prescribed party regulations.
Heretofore tho apportionment In Oregon
bos been in oecordsnee with her legislative
representation, with specIQo provisions
made for the sparsely populated counties.
This system seemed to have given genoral
satis&ctlon. Then why change It for an
other which comes in the form of innova
tion ; of which no mention was made in but
few places that we can bear of; and which,
wo confess, seems moro llko ftTunlslilng
Angel that the Vormou occasionally send
out, than any other similitude we can just
now una of. In the administration of Jus'
tlce, even the wreUh guilty of the most
heinous offence cannot be punished for his
crime If there be no epeclflo statute to meet
bis case. And shall the adherents to Dem
ocratlo principles be less scrupulous than
Justice? Evidently the basis or tho pro-
sent promulgated apportionment u ..).
found in tbo dealro to punish many Demo,
crats who failed to support Hon. Jos. Lane
mills canvass. These men erred In this
step, we grant, to otllge the chastising
Committee, bnt though we have searched
the eld flies of all the pape. in onr office,
truly we have yet to discover that this wai
specific-ally classed as an unpardonable po
lltlcal crime before they committed it. To
be sure we find it condemned as such after,
wards, by an Incompetent, self-constituted,
biased trlbanal j but neither does that per
haps old fogy, Justlee, allow transgressors
to do punished, ex pott facto. With crimi
nals, or rather transgressors, In either of
these cases, commualty baa no alternative
but to submit that they shall roam at large,
Htyeet merely to such censure as the moral
teas or society may Unlet. Tbo people have
no remedy beyond the enactment of statutes
In tl wnien wall govern the malefaetor's
next osTence, If they can eateh him nt It
Can tM power be malatalned to punish these
proeeribed either for an effn not speci
fied, o by Pott fotto pvoiUIon, any more
than ! the. other eases sited f Qr can the
dietuwerthe Committee eoereo the great
massoftheDtmoorftcyto wlthM commu
nion wtth. th brethren, wither they pro-
of tbo nw stylo apportionment. A thought
given M .rogara to mo peculiar political
tenets df the favored flvo counties, taken In
contradfeWnollon with tho faith professed
nnd'tieatamt In the emasculated fourteen
ceuntles, might perhaps, bolter evidence the
desire which agitated and roso paramount
In the Committee's mi mis than any other
oxogesls we Can offer. 'Wo nppend tho ap
portionment of 1850 under tho otdovatcm,
anil stmt of 1867, In accordance with the
newersUm: - .-..
WC 1857
1 1
1 1
3 2
4 4
fi -t
I 4
7 ' 0
r,. , m
n 7
j 2
s ,
1 1
1 1
.2
4 H
4 ,
4 0
1 1
1 1
Cotnmbta,
Wasco,
Washington,
Multnomah,
Claekames,
Yamhill,
Marlon,
I.lnn,
I.nno,
Umpnua,
Douglas,
Coos,
Curry,
Josephtnc,
Jackson,
Denton,
I'ollc,
TIllnmooK,
Clatsop,'
Total,
CI
Thus wo seo that In 1650, whllo tho Are
largo counties of Linn, Marlon, Lane, Jack
son and Folk had but 27 votee or three nnd
half less than one-half tbs wholo number
of Delogate, in 1817, under tho new pro-
nosed svstem, those same counties havo to
gether 40 votes, or Just three more than
one-half or tho body to be elected.
From the Oregon Weekly Times.
Tho ApportlentaoHt.
The .Viamartf, under Its new, and as wo
very fervently hope, abler and better msn
agement, has enlisted In opposition to the
action of tho Democratlo Central Commit
tee In tho matter of tho apportionment of
delegates to tho approaching Stato Con
ventlon.
As Mr. Olleara, In the nrtlclo to which
wo purpose this replication, Lur churned
hlsowu latitude of argument, w may be
llaaralUsd to Mil" WdJMl sIT f ""
MipjBPSIsWsssj,Jlr't JssjWWssJIssBWlWfWH BTvwe1
own position In refertnee to all of these
vexed question of usage.
As n public Journalist and as a democrat,
our minion Is that of tho promulgation and
advocaey of democratlo principles. The
prosier!ty and success of the party nro ob
jects with us always above and beyond any
selfish and personal considerations what
ever J and however wtdely wo may differ
with many of our party friends in matters
of policy and expediency, the time will
never come when Justly wo shall bo charged
with the prostitution of our position as a
public Journalist to any purposo of personal
gratification or avengement at the expense
of our political principles, or tho sacrifice of
the interests and harmony of the party.
That which our reason and Jnognftnt de.
olares tho Jiight, we shall advocate with
what of honest earnestness nnd nblllty we
may command, and the wrong, whenever
nnd wherever it may arise, wo shall as ear
nestly and promptly condemn and repudi
ate. The usages nnd customs of the party
command our approbation and support for
no other reason than that they are not only
necessary but Indispensable to the mainte
nance of our principles and the protection
of tho party from fraud and Imposition, and
this consideration is common with us all,
and equally entitled to the entertainment
of others as or ourself. That which mena
ces and impinges upon the rights nnd liber
ties of the humblest member of the party,
menaces and affects tho rights and princi
ples of us all, and while we should never
either advocate or defend any measure of
encroachment upon tbo rights or others as
mulws of tbe party, wo should take irood
care to resist and oppose ay7sbc: Wok
ing to the gratification, of the wfrtow and
caprices of the faotleus and interested fwr
at the expense of the ,muy, We support
as well la action aa In ithkoy the usages
and customs of tbevsvty, because they aro
reasonably and rightly necessary for tho
self-preservation of tbe party, and from no
other motive As a partisan, wo are ame
nable to the public judgment for our ac
tlons If we wantonly and unjustifiably vio
late tbe rules and observance) of the parly,
no resolves can or should avail us .to avoid
tbe rightful consequences of our own action.
If one of tbe consequences of such a viola
tion of usage and duty, be a temporary de
privation of certain partisan rights, it is tbe
judgment or tbe people, the majority, and
imposed not for "punishment," but or the
protection or the many from, tbe impositions
of the few, and u this light aloof is suob
action Justifiable. These rights accrue
from tbo observance or the moral obliga
tions imposed npon us as partisan; and tbe
power and aetion whleh oenfff them has
tbe right to .suspend or refuse them. Jt U
therefore elosr that at oacstbe right, and
duty of the party as mieb Is to protest itself
from every wrong jtttaaeipg and endanger
ing the iategvityand asrmoay of its or
dear that this po-
Won of every truo 'democrat at heart sin
cerely solicitous for tbo, prosperity and boo.
cess of the principles of the democratlo par
ty. Individually, wo nro (Irmly of the opi
nion 'that wo can best contribute to the sue
cees nnd triumph of the democratlo pwty
by the advocacy and obscrvanco of all hoc-
ornble and rightful measures nnd policy
tending to the dissemination and practlco
f tho principles of tho democratlo party,
and this course wo shall irteedf9tly jwrsne,
relying upon the Intelligence and soand
judgment of the people for their approba
tion nnd endorsement. Wo desire tho cor
dial union nnd harmony of tho party, be
lieving It to 'bo essential to our success, ond
If It Is to bo obtained without n sacrifice of
principle, tbo establishment of baleful and
pernicious precedents and manifest Injustice
to tho tried nnd tho true, no ono will go
further or moro cheerfully In tho line of
concession to accomplish the noblo and pa
triots purpose than ourself.
Tho Standard, in assailing this appor
llonm.ct ssys, that It was tho duty of tho
committee to fix upon a day for the assemb
lage of tho convention, and adds:
"The duty ulso devolved upon this Cen
tral Committee to regulate tbo apportion
ment of the several counties, in regard to
the number or Delegates each county is en
titled to."
If It Is conceded here s It evidently Is If
there Is any meaning In language, that the
duty devolved upon tho commltteo to "rtg-
latt" the apportionment, then the only ques
tion in hsuo Is whether the committee in
adjusting tho apportionment havo estab
lished a basis In accordance with fairness,
equality and justice. If tho apportionment
Is unfulr and unjust, it is properly a subject
for the remedial agency or the convention
when assembled. The Central Committee
possess no power not delegated to them by
the convention, nnd the limited powers they
do nossess aro subject In all cases to tho
supervision and control or the convention,
H, therefore, any county Is wronged by this
apportionment, tholr proper recourse Is up
on tho convention. To suppose that tho
members of the convention when assembled,
and the matter submitted to their decision,
$imitf'&
say meanly dishonest. We treat that In
tho discussion of this question, all Intlma
tlons of vhls nature may be studiously avoid
cd. Malicious and unfounded aspersions
cost upon tbo motltes the committee wo
place in the samo category.,.
LIn every State in the Ufflon without, as
we ore quite confident, a eingls exception,
the rule is to apportion the delegation to a
State convention according to the deraocra'
tlo vets of the counties. Tbo purpose of
such a convention Is to ascertain tho will of
the ronjo-jty of tho party ( and this can only
be effuotod by delegate apportionments in
conformity with the numerical strength of i
the party In tho several counties. This is
the rule, and it Is Connded-opon -principles
of strict justice and supported by reason
and common sense. It Is morally impossible
that the rulo can in any case work Injustice
to any portion of the party ; and while tbe
doctrine that the will or the majority must
prevail Is respected, this basis or apportion
ment will be maintained and adhered to un
der all circumstances.
Nominations aro-Undlng upon the party
becauso they are the nominations or the ma
jority, and because we hold to ths doctrine
that tlie minority aro under moral obliga
tions to acquiescence In tbo will of tbo ma
jority. Are not these positions undeniable?
Uut let us look at tho reverse proposition,
It is claimed that the committee should bavo
adhered lo the old legislative apportion
ment. That apportionment was made In
the year 1854 by tho legislature for purely
and exclusively legislative purposes, and
II"' t-w v vvavvw W W
mtit upon tt, UiU ot population Bt tbat
Tho country bsd far outgrown that, and
hm otMMwiieal convention for this reason,
and beeauwi It had beeesas unequal and un
jh, eBu4 it. ,jm) rw..Wva iAwe
and uent fer the purpose for wuMiitw
originally adopted, the precious fessH is
now paraded for our "aloud -and nllUr" 1-.
guide to a just and.cqultable basis of demo-il
cratlo apportionment I Tbe Idea is a fancy
one. but we confess we haTO no fanpr far it.
and desire none. The question of the whole
.--.- .. ....-.,..
population in tbe sereral counties bos no
thins on earth is do with an rational Im
of tbe subject under consUeratlen. Sup
w V "" V -'
poso that Multnomah eonuty had a popula
tion of twonty-firethousaod, of voters, fire
thousand, and that Clackamas had tbs ssms,
both holding a representative delegation of
five msmbera eaci and suppose that of the
five thousand vottr In .Multnomah, .four
thousand of tbera were blsck-repnblloaas,
while Jn Clackamas there should be four
thousand democrats to one thousand repubs
licone then, according to thesyetem urged,
in a democratic 0e comentioi
thousand demoersls from Vultnoi
have.flTo vptss Jn the convention
four thousand democrat ,of Ci
wniiM have no vtoto. and thus
fioiusnd democrats would offset f
tnd, virtually "dlsfranohlstiig". a
(iAiflg" three thousand democrat'
it should fall npon tbe black-republicans
and those who veto that ticket, rather than
npon democrats who show tberr faith of
their works.
Ths former lath, If It may be dignified
by that name, was established in tbe first
Instsnco by the chairman of the Central
Committee without any expression or opi
nion from the remaining members cf the
Committee, and was universally acquiesced
1. . . .. ' t -i .. .i'U.'ll
in beecose wft e scares Tsrioaiamuoi
capital was not quite so lcccn as unfortu
nately it happens to be now. What then
was right and proper for the Central Com
mittee to do, is right and proper In them at
thts dsy to regulate and adjust II It did
not require the action of tbo assembled
convention to establish that most unjust
and Inequitable basis of apportionment,
why rcqulro such Interference now todo
that we all know and admit to be fair, equi
table and just. We arc told that tbo Com
mittee havo transcended their powers; that
they should have awaited and submitted tbe
movement to tho action of tho convention
when in session. Why so f If It is right
that tbe delegation to a democratic conven
tion should bo in proportion to tbe party
strength in tho respective counties, what
matter Is It who first declares it) The right,
como how or from what quarter it may, Is
always wclcomo to tho heart et the honest
and right-thinking mind.
If It Is admitted, as sarely It must bo, that
the delegate representation should bo lt
proportion to tbe party strength In tho sev
eral counties, how Is this strength to be as
certained! Certainly by refcrenco to tho
returns of tho previous election. If you
are asked tbe question, "How many demo
crats baveyon In yoor county?" do yon
answer any how else than from your memo
ry of the result or the election t It is not
tho fault or the Central Committee that n
particular county has not ft record as many
democrtitlo votes as It should have, and this
Is sometimes an evil moro to be attributed
to a faalt-findlng disposition than to tho
realous and earnest advocacy of democratic
principles.
We therefore maintain that tbe action, of
she eemmUte In UrU matter was In all ft
sfeeti rfsjfct and proper,' and we predict now
that la less than a single year, 'ths wisdom
and expediency of the action will net be
questioned.
Rather than persist in being intolerably
tedious, we shall rest here, and recar to thts
subject again.
nirronr or Vilusjim. Tho origin of this
game, according to a little book lately pub
lished by the Appletons, like tbe btrth place
of Homer, is a contested point and its an
tiquity, like that of many elderly spielers,
is Involved In considerable doubt, Soma
suppose It to have been Imported intdlomo
from Persia, under tbe consuWblp Lucullur,
while others hold that Caligula Introduced
It from the East. Tbe records are unauthen
tic unllH4io..return of the Templars from
the first Crusade. "it -soon became tbe fa
vorite amnscment and means of exspise to
which the cloistered monks of the day wero
permitted to have recourse. Tbe game fell
with the Knights Templars, and ras re
vived by Louis XL, of France, who prefer
red it to the bloody tournaments then in
vogue. Henry III. still moro widely pat
ronised it ; and we find that Mary Queen of
Scots, in a letter written tbe evening before
her execution, complains that her "billiard
table has just been taken away from her, as
a preliminary step to her punishment'-'
It became a favorite game with tbs ladles
In France and Germany. Madame de Slsel
was an enthuslastlo adrceste of billiards.
Even when exiled In Switterland by Napo
leon, she overstayed the time limited for her
departuro from l'aris, In order that the
might personally superintend the remove!
of a billiard table. Tbo Dncbeas de Bern
was also noted for br fondness for tbe game.
Mr. Fbelao says seat "the Frenchman is tbe
tstost brilliant Kngbllsh the most csre
fl, the AoxricftM tbe most successful, and ,
tLrefef f that rasy be any argument as
it k cxsamoely admitted to be tho mostcon
clw-tvev-the vsry best of billiard plsyers."
r "Mr, I'sseh, how is it you hsve never
Icalled en ste fcr vour rrnnnl?i'
. - - .....,
"Ob,l said Mr. Peech. "I never ask a
gentbvsMq for mQney,"
"JnCeed : then bow do you get on if he
don't pay T
"Why," replied Peb. "after a certain
time I conclude he t not a gentleman'oad
then J ask him."
fin) ' mil i "" .
tv We have no sympathy for a ruined
railway speedster. None for an IH-tea-
pered man wf to tbs toothache. Ken for an
alderman pith the gout. None ttr dasJr
splasheJ Jy a mud cart.
In tho choice of a lovsr. a weaun
L
pf.',
k
1 ...
Wt. "IsBsssssbKIssssHbr,
iV VftffS"flasmV.Anw I
local
(tut tj
I' i
J a
'I. A
H"t .
l?i&4
L, H?
... -. - 4 i
Asu-aiCb AjUeJ.Jsst--- -.
!x ""-4f juaB2r
JSyWj' "I ! i
W-B.4