* • • ' . . *A G E ■ ........... ' * * ' • . . • »J. . r . .- ■ ■ . , . /.•-•;» • - * ‘ - .<* <:< J f •• • . • 5, .*•*«. ALVI I , . , AB - « •> * ’ .♦ •. ‘ . ;p£cr* -«»< A2 J uly 12, 1995 • T he P ortland O bserver Editorial Articles Do Not Necessarily Reflect Or Represent The Views Oj The Jlo rtla n h ffibserucr he progressive com­ munity is under attack, especially people of color. The wedge issue being used to drive a much broader rs g re s s iv e an re p res s iv e agenda is a affirmative action. The extreme right-w ing has had u ; under the gun before, yet we have s ill made progress and won. The P eagan and Bush Adm inistrations at- ti mpted to turn the clock back on civ il r ghts, and in some ways succeeded. > et, even under their administrations, v e passed 24 c iv il rights laws w ith the s ipport o f 85% o f the House and Sen- a e, including strengthening the V o t­ ing Rights A ct by: (1 ) adding the bilin - g ual dimension; (2) preserving the “ re- s jlts ” versus “ intent” standards o f proof; and ( 3 )extending it for 25 years. W hat RAW W C O A L IT IO N Action We can w in again i f we fig h t back W hat we need is affirm a tive action A c tio n ! here’ s what to look fo r and where to act: The President. The courts made a ffirm a tive action more d iffic u lt and more costly, but they did not close the door. Therefore, the outcome o f affirm ative action w ill be decided more in the p o litic a l arena (executive and legislative action o r inaction) than in the courts. President C lin to n must teach and lead, not ju s t referee and review. The House. Reps. Canady (R- FL-12)and F a w e ll(R -IL -13) w ill soon introduce legislation to outlaw all fed­ eral affirm ative action programs. The Senate. Jesse Helms (R - D k . M anning M arabi . e he difficulty in assess­ ing the political and ideological debate over * affirmative action” is that there i i no coherent definition within t i e public discourse on what t ie term actually means. Reforms w hich may be described b y liberals as “ goals and tim etables” f ir the achievem ent o f gender and r icia l d ive rsity are characterized by conservatives as “ quotas.” In gener­ al, most w h ite Am ericans s till want t i be perceived as being “ fa ir” to- v ard racial m in o ritie s and women on issues o f d iscrim in a tio n . A c c o rd in g , t i t h e M arch 17-19, 1995 U SA T o ­ ri a y/C N N /G a llu p p o ll, when asked, “ Do you fa vo r o r oppose a ffirm a tive a ctio n p rogram s,” 53 percent o f v hites p o lle d expressed support, com pared to o n ly 36 percent op- p osed. N o t su rp ris in g ly , A fric a n - A m ericans expressed much stronger s jp p o rt, 72 percent fo r a ffirm a tive action program s to o n ly 21 percent against. Despite widespread rhetoric t