• *--**»«*«* »V* Page 2, Portland Observer, August 10, 1988 EDITORIAL P O R T L A N D 'OBSERVER OREGON S OLDEST AFRICAN AMERICAN PUBLICATION Gary Ann Garnett Nyewusi Askari News Editor/Staft Writer Joyce Washington Mattie Ann Callier-Spears Sales/Marketing Director Danny Bell Sales Representative Ruby Reuben Religion Editor Richard Medina P hotocom position Lonnie Wells Sales Representative Circulation Manager Rosemarie Davis B. Gayle Jackson Sales Representative Comptroller PORTLAND OBSERVER is published weekly by Exie Publishing Company In c 525 N E Killingsw orth St • Portland. Oregon 97211 P O Box 3137 • Portland Oregon 97208 Phone Numbers: (5 03 ) 288 0 03 3 (Office) • ••» • ,Q* (5 0 3 ) 288 1756 (Classified/ Display) Deadlines tor all submitted materials: Articles: Monday. 5 p.m.: Ads Tuesday, 5 p.m. The Portlend Observer welcomes freelance submissions Manuscripts and photographs should be clearly labeled and will be returned if accompanied by a self-addressed envelope Subscriptions $20 00 pat year in the TnCounty araa The PORTLANP OBSERVER — Oregon's oldest African-American Publication — is a member of The National Newspaper Association — Founded in 1885. The Oregon Newspaper Publishers Association, and Tha National Advertising Representative Amalgamated Publishers. Inc . New York. Low-Income People Victimized Again! - Vote NO On Measure #5 - nce again, the lower income people in Oregon have been singled out as easy tax targets. Once again, those who can least afford it are asked to pay the bill for those who could afford it. This time, the jab is more cynical and arrogant than ever - and it’s called Measure #5 on the Oregon November Ballot. Measure #5 -remember it and vote against it. What Measure #5 pretends to accomplish is to save Oregon intercollegiate sports. It even infers that Rose Bowl winners and big time PAC-10 success will be made possible it this sales tax measure passes. None of these promises can be accomplished with this unfair and misguided excise sales tax bill on beer and cigarettes. What it will accomplish is higher profits for some retailers and wholesalers : and an economic benefit for a handful of State System of Higher Education campus towns (Corvallis, Eugene, etc.) Here are the facts: Measure #5 would more than double the state tax on beer, jumping it from $2.60 per barrel to $5.70 per barrel - an increase of 120%! A companion increase on cigarettes of one-cent per pack would raise Oregonian cigarette smokers' tax to 28-cents per pack. The huge beer increase would make Oregon the highest taxed of all neighboring states and in the top third nationally. This punitive tax - aimed squarely at one small segment of Oregonians - would raise about $8.5-million to underwrite varsity, big league sports on the seven state campuses. But consumers would pay more than $18-million per year in order to reach that tax goal - and the $18-million-plus would come from big mark-ups in beer and cigarette retail prices. Every statistical study proves that beer drinkers represent the middle and lower income segment of the population - working people - the usual targets when the rich want someone else to bankroll their fun and games. Notice this: those who propose soaking the beer drinkers are not asking anything of martini drinkers, pipe & cigar smokers, or wine drinkers. Only the beer people will foot the bill for the entire state. Only one part of the Oregon population will be forced to pay for the Big Games - games they can’t afford to attend. Measure #5 is flying under false pretenses. It won’t buy big winning teams. In the PAC-10 now, five schools receive state tax sup­ port for sports and five do not. In the past 30 years, the five teams with no tax support have been to the Rose Bowl 23 times; the five teams with tax support have gone only seven times. And another thing: remember that this new tax money would not help student sports programs, intramural activities, or community | colleges. The whole $8.5 million would go to the Big Show sports -the varsity action - for the benefit of athletes who are mostly pre­ professionals already on sports scholarships - and to the fans of the Big Game, who will not be asked to pay anything additional to support their enthusiasms. It is amazing that a bill so ill-conceived, so lop-sided could ever have reached the ballot. And it wouldn’t have, except for the huge | amount of money its backers spent to hire professional initiative petition peddlers to come up with the required signatures. This bill is unfair to all Oregonians because it punishes the few | for the benefit of the many. Measure #5 is punitive, regressive, discriminatory, unfair - and it won't accomplish what it promises! Vote NO ON MEASURE #5! O L-. ♦y l\$-' •- • •*4 ’ ?► •*» \ ?<> 'î V4 L3« ■ix *- <7 * Æt «V ?>> •-< *. /M i ’V •-■ fi , t.* 'î PORTLAND OBSERVER OREGON'S AWARD WINNING BLACK NEWSPAPER r.o- 'X * * » r i .