Page 4, Portland Observer, February 26, 1986 ROCK A R O U N D THE CLOCK History and Status of Affirmative Action Why Affirmative Action H\ Ahlnn \h>rrn American society was founded on ihe principle of equality The Declaration of Independence declared lhai 'w e hold I he ce truths to he self evident, that all men are c re.ited equal, thjt they are endowed hy their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness ." This is one ol Ihe most profound statements rewardinit human euualitv ever written Yet there has always been a huge gap between American principles and what it actually practices Ihis has been especially true in regards to Blacks Enslavement of Alro Americans had already taken root by the time the Declaration of Indepen dense and Ihe I ' S Constitution were written Some "founding lathers''including George Washington, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson owned slaves at the federal government established the Equal Employment Opportunity Commis sion (EEOC) whose purpose »as to investigate and resolve complaints of dis crimination and initiate suits against guilty employers If discrimination was proven, the government could deny or terminate any federal funds to such employers But it soon became clear that these limited measures would not correct the problem President Johnson responded by issuing Executive Order 11 246 in 1965 which called for employers to take Affirmative Action This meant that employers had to make extra efforts to recruit, hire, and promote minorities so that they could bring the number of minorities in their work force up to the jxrrcent of minorities in the local community Nevertheless, Executive Order 11246 did not go far enough because it relied on the good faith ettorts of employers to implement affirmative action Under the Nixon Administration in 1972, several Amendments were made that strengthened Affirmative Action A key amendment required that employers keep records of their hiring practices and ol the racial and gender composition ol their labor force Based on these data employers could determine whether they were overtly or covertly discriminating against minorities and women Draw ing on such data, employers were to establish Affirmative Action goals, targets, and timela bles geared toward correcting the obvious results of employment discrimination In short. Affirmative Action called tor developing concrete action plans which could he scrutinized by employers and the government This measure had sub­ stance because it stijsulated that no government contract could be withheld, denied terminated, or susjiended in which a contractor had an affirmative plan unless the employer had deviated substantially Irom that plan Ihese measures were ex­ tended to educational institutions and had relevancy lor minority businesses desiring to receive federal contracts In Ihe early 1970s it apjx-ared as it the nation was headed in the right direction toward solving serious racial inequality rooted throughout Ihe ixcupational and educational structures ol this countrv Outcomes and Setbacks 5T y ,9 ■ ■ ■ r e PCE e le c tr ic ity w o rk s a ro u n d th e c lo c k . W hen yo u co n sid er all It does f o r y o u , i t ’s ZZZZ a m ig h ty good buy. lx * , Support Our Advertisers! Say you saw it in the fixlay. Affirmative Action is under serious attack hy Ihe Reagan Adiilinisira non An objective analysisol Affirmative Action reveals that it did reduce sour -of the discrimination painfully experienced by the black community For example, lairenzo Morns, in a study on the plight of Black Americans in higher education found that "more black Ph D 's in virtually every major field graduated between I974.ind 1977 than had ever graduated in American history " Edmund Newton in Hhh ( / n terpriii ,s unis out that when Coleman 1 oung became Mavor of Iletroit in the very time they wrote those magnificent words proclaiming freedom lor humankind I he constitution itself maintained that Blacks were only three filths ol a person Iheieforc. from the very beginning. Blacks were denied equal opportunity in Ihe Culled Stales Black slavery lasted for nearly two hundred and filly years Shortly atlei slavery was abolished. Blacks were confronted with another system ol inequality legally enforced racial segregation known as Jim Crow Racial segregation applied to every aspect ol Black life Ihe law required lhai Blacks attend separate school», ride in the hack section of public buses, go to the hack door ol restaurants, use different bathrooms, and the like Blacks were disenfranchised politically because they could not vote nor did they serve as judges and jurors In lad. rac aal segregation denied Blacks due process ol law Jim Crow also shaped tlx- economic life ol the Black community A Jim Crow work force deselo|X'd Iheie weie "Black ' and “ White" jobs Blacks became the sharccropjxTs. porters, janilots, cooks, maids, domestic servants, and unskilled laborers thus. Blacks weie crowded into the bottom of the American occupational structure where the pas was low and the work difficult and dirty Such jobs did not lead to promotions or advancement Blacks who wanted to burst out ol these dead in jobs could only aspire to become a Black preacher, teacher, undertaker, doctor, or lawyer But even here only a lew slots were available for over three hundred and fifty years. Blacks were crippled by a system that was separate and highly unequal Dus oppression was backed by white domination consisting ol both legal and violent repressions Lynching was a favorite tool used Io keeps Blacks in their place Between IKN2 and 1956 at least .1,440 Blacks were lynched. Moreover. Ihe system ol racial segregation was hacked bs Ihe highest legal authority of the land the Supreme Court I he Court, in IX96. ruled in the I’lessy v Ferguson case that separate but equal did not violate the U S Constitution Clearly the Supreme Court went on record backing a system ol racial segregation that was in tact separate but unequal Past and continuing discrimination has had a devastating affect on the Black community In the |9H0s Blacks are still disprojsortionately crowded at the bottom ol tlte occupational ladder Black family income is still less than sixty percent of w lute family iikoiik " Blacks are still more than tw ice as likely to be unemployed as whiles Blacks are still grossly underepresented at major colleges and universities at both the student and faculty levels Therefore, the future tor Black America is uncertain at best Affirmative Action was a measure implemented by the federal government Io address Black inequality that resulted from tragic proportions of past discrimination and continuing racism deeply rooted in the very fabric ol our instituiions and daily habits But why did "affirmative action" come into being in (lie lust place ’ Portland Observer! VIRGINIA SLIMS You’ve come a long way, baby. Origins of Affirmative Action /Mtit illative Aclion resulted Irom a jvowerful and creative struggle know n as the civil lights movement I his mass movement attacked black inequality and racial segiegalion al ihe cote It mobilized thousands ol ordinary and extraordinary Black people who decided to lake a clear-cut stand tor equality and dignity these freedom lighters made countless sacrifices by confronting the Ku Mux Kian. While Citizens Councils, local Southern government», established laws, and the “ Bull ( onnois Children, students, and adults, along with the elderly shook off apathy and caution as they became disciplined workers in a movement lor freedom anchoied on a solid rixk the Black Church I he 196.1 Birmingham. Alabama confrontation led by Dr Martin Luther King. Jr and Reverend l ied .Shuttlesworth was the key force that generated the 1964 Civil Rights \ d Irom which the idea of Affirmative Action emerged In the historic battle al Birmingham, demonstrators were attacked by vicious dogs, high pressuie water hoses, billy club sw inging policemen, and a legal system dedicated to maintaining racial segregation Yet, on every day hetwen April Ird and May 10, Blacks denionstiaied. sat in, marched, and went Io jail by the thousands while singing We Shall Overcome" and other Black spirituals This movement gener­ ated such pressure that the racist power holders ol Birmingham were forced to concede 1«» (he demands of the movement But Dr King and the Freedom Fighters were alter more than concessions from local Birmingham authorities they wanted a National Civil Rights Bill from President Kennedy and the federal government that would outlaw all forms ot racial inequality I he movement in Birmingham was so beautifully organized and effective that it geneiated protest movements throughout the nation By Ihe end of 196.1. protest had spread Irom Birmingham to at least K00 cities John Kennedy, shocked by widespread demonstrations, declared that it was a lime to act On June 19, 1961, Kennedv sent what w a s to become Ihe I964 civi I Rights Bill Io Congress President Johnson signed the bill into law on July 2. 1964 It is beyond a doubt, then, that Affirmative \ction came as a result ol political struggle and sacrifice by the Black masses and concerned W hite citizens rather than descending from a benevolent government Intent of Affirmative Action Ihe 1964 Civil Rights Act banned all forms ol discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex. or national origin Titles VI and VII of this bill sjiecifically addressed discriminalin in employment Ihese measures were based on Ihe know ledge that rampant racial discrimination existed in terms of employment Indeed, hei ause ol their conspicuous absence in many jobs, n was clear that members of minority gioups were being discriminated against in both federal agencies and the private sector One intent of the 1964 Act was to correct this discrimination Thus. », . - C»X . a - ' v’ , ’ S- « • '•v ,'? 'rtf.-v’'.*V* • cP.. . ' 'a 1 r. « '» . . .» S U R G E O N G E N E R A L 'S W A R N IN G , S m o k in g By P re g n a n t W o m e n M a y R e s u lt in F e ta l Injury. Prem ature B irth. And Low Birth W eig h t. * * »? . . »• * 4, • » •» • • - > . z • 5 • * . * M» ‘ .. ■ ’ ' Aigliit 8 mg taf nicotina 100*«' 14 mg lai 1 9 mg nuolina a* ; « r O p o " .. FTC Report f jM f s WO i H mg 'la f' 1 O H «kotina iv paaeWfratte b» FTfm affiod ’ ' * a ' -1 ' . • \ '