1 I P*QR 2 Portland O b M rvw Thumoay August 1C. 197« ttaagregatioa adwMstrators: Oaca feeders, aow darks We see the world by Herb L. C tw ih o n x ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- —— ----------------------------------— ----------- Thundoy by E x « P u b ish in t Company. 2201 North KUbntswonh. Portland. Oregon »7217. Mailing addrem P .O B o i 3137. Portland. Oregon Telephone 2S3-24M Sabacnptrau: 37 50 per year in the Tn-C ounty area, M 00 per year outside Portland. Sacond Clean Pontage Paid at P o rtlan d . Oregon The Portland O b a tn tr 't official position is exprented only m its Publisher s column (W e See The » o rld Through Black Eyes) Any other materia, throughout the paper is She opinion of the individual writer or submitter and does not necessarily reflec- the opinion o f the Portland Otnervcr ALFRED L HENDERSON Editor F u b M w ' National Advertising Rapraaantabva 111 5 7 .5 0 Nam e - s a ----- — — a — n a _ w - — f7onor«uK RRtnnon Herrick Editorie) Award NNA 1873 2nd Pleca Bnet Editorial 3rd Pleca Com m unity LaedorsWp ONPA 137S M ÜM M I 1 *n Tri —C o u n ty A r e a __ ___ 5th Pleca Beat Editorial NNPA 7*73 3rd Piece Com m unity Laederahip ONPA 157« New *ork •«e mat ‘ [Oregon Newspaper Publishers 1 Association '■et Piece Beet Ad Resulta ONPA 7873 $ 8 .0 0 ° ' h«' _______ _______ PORTLAND OBSERVER A d d re s s P.O. Box 3137 Portland. OR 87208 C » t y ------- --------------------------------------------__ I I l ts not a carol o f joy or gift, Bai a prayer that he sends from his heart’s deep core. Bai a plea, that upward to Heave» he flings - I know why the caged bird sings’ ’ ’Sympathy" Paul Laurence Dunbar htmed with the 1964 report of the Committee on Race and Education and a hag full o f special money, some adm inistrators in the local school district began to make ap­ pointments with many reputably fine Black teachers Social pressures and federal legislation had convinced the local school system that something needed to be done about integration, although the future would show that they did not know exactly what. Ses eral years ago. numerous Black teachers heard a consistent proposition, which probably began with a question: “ How would you like to assist your district in its desegregation efforts?” The local white adm inistrator perhaps elaborated thusly: Due to T itle V I I o f the Elementary and Secondary School Act of 1965, and the Schwab Report of 1964, we have created some excellent new positions which, we feel, would be ideal for selected Black teachers. Our atm is to lower the percentages o f Blacks in the Northeast Portland schools, and we need your help Your salary will be much better, and you can teach us all how to face up to the difficulties o f racially isolated children. The cause is a good one — an integrated school system here in the City of Roses. One o f the disheartening develop­ ments o f desegregation history in Portland is the reality that a number o f Black teachers jum ped at the chance to secure these “ special" positions. Frequently, after a con­ versation and the o ffer o f more money, the Black teacher was enticed from the classroom. While the ad­ ministration of the “ racial balance“ program got tremendous boost, the classroom atmosphere for Black children suffered a destructive dram. And as a result, the Black com­ munity became the victim of a swift backhanded blow, the sting of which smarts more today than at the moment of actual impact. One by one. several Black teachers were plucked from the vines of in­ tellectual vitality and delivered to the morgue of desegregation. Some per­ ceptive observers in the Black com­ munity have lamented that as time passed some A fro -A m erica n educators in Portland have com­ pleted in essence a full transfor­ mation from the creative teacher to the spineless clerk. From the teacher to the clerk — a journey a number o f local A fro - American professional educators have made in the hope of facilitating what they undoubtedly believed initially to be a sincere effort to har­ monize the racial elements in Port­ land. Yet, the concerned member of the Black community cannot help but question the exodus of some Black teachers to become arrowheads in a desegregation program which notoriously deceives the community by con tin u ally saying busing is voluntary when it is not. The trans­ formation has been dramatic. From the teacher's vantage point for shaping the positive images o f children in the past, several Black employees have become the pawns in the deception o f the Black com­ munity in the present. Under the dubious structure of desegregation here, those who have opted for a few more bucks and a vague hope have actually forfeited their right to self-assertion. They no longer have the freedom to assert their influence on the tender minds o f society's Black children, and their weakness renders them only m in im ally effective at purging d iscrim ination and prejudiced outlook from the school distnct From self-directed teaching to the mechanics o f desegregation — a journey which undoubtedly was begun with the impression that the teaching o f young minds was less significant than the opportunity to forge a new relationship among professional Blacks and whites in local education. Yet, the attentive member of the Black community finds it hard to leave unnoticed the lifeless stagnation and utter complacency of those who adm inister the desegregation program. They give no information; they avoid the Com­ m unity C o alitio n for School In ­ tegration like the plague; they refuse to unify with Black teachers; and they continue to implement, without pause or question, a desegregation process found in increasing disfavor by the Black community. In search o f better salaries and an elusive notion o f “ racial balance,“ some have thrown away the rewards of an appreciative public, substituting a scornful position whereby they sim­ ply sit by the window as the chief display o f the commitment o f a generally timid administration. W hile I am sure some did not know it at the time of their decision, the educators who chose to become the technicians for desegregation have denied themselves the incom­ parable honor of truly sparking the future o f Black people in this city. Instead of a focus on a generation of hope and faith, their visions are shackled by a limited opportunity for a fleeting personal security. Instead o f facing the hungry eyes of children suffering from the pervasive insult of prejudice in Portland's society, they see now only the cold stare of an in­ sensitive white supervisor. From Black progress to white en­ trenchm ent — a journey which clearly began with a genuine hope has soured into professional disaster. Because the desegregation effort has been totally inequitable, because it has “ iso lated" children from children, parents from parents, and teachers from teachers, the desegregation adm inistrator has become the most “ isolated" of all. In order to persuade Black parents to engage in an unequal process, they must speak language which degrades the schools in the local A fro - American community. And once the students arrive at schools away from their neighborhoods, the desegrega­ tion professionals are so lack­ ing in power, understanding, unity o f purpose and community support, they are forced to "blame the victim” in the face o f conflicts in the predominantly white schools. Thus, what began as perhaps a positive concern for meeting federal and social pressures toward better racial understanding has in Portland turned into a negative drain on the talent to teach Black children. Sadly, the desegregation workers no longer are seen as the creative sculpturers * who carefully mold the formless minds of tomorrow's Black wealth. Now, they are seen as inhibitors of progress. Once they were loved for touching the struggling hearts o f Black children, now they are seldom trusted. Once they were teachers, now they are clerks. Neo-conservatives and tax policy by Bayard Rustin Every time 1 pick up the New York Times and find one o f those slick cleverly written advertisements from Mobil, I gain new insight into the varieties of conservative thought in America. Unlike the ratheT crude and half-baked positions of the New Right and its allies, the neo- conservatism o f the M o b il ads is supremely intelligent and proper. F or the average reader, the philosophy espoused by Mobil and its intellectual disciples appears moderate and sensible But as harm­ less as it appears, it poses a serious threat to the movement for equality and justice in America. In the area o f tax p olicy, fo r example, the neo-conservatives in both political parties have already emerged as a powerful force for in­ creased inequality. According to their model, society is divided into two broad "classes” , the productive and unproductive. T o insure con­ tinued economic grow th and prosperity, the neo-conservatives propose a further redistribution of income and resources away from the so-called “ unproductive” elements of society to the productive sector. Stripped of its elegant ideological garments, the neo-conservative position is little more than a rehashed version o f classical economic conservatism, the tame conservatism made so unpopular by the disastrous economic policies of C o olid g e, H o over, and as more recently, Eisenhower, N ixon and Ford. While the New Right engages in various forms of morality plays, the neo-conservatives have been busy transforming their philosophy into concrete legislative proposals. For example, on tax policy they have already produced two highly seduc­ tive bills which will almost surely receive even more attention during the upcoming Congressional elec­ tions. Both bills, I think, would be disastrous if adopted In writing the “ Tax Reduction Act” , Congressman Jack Kemp (R- New Y ork) has relied on the old strategy of coating vile medicine with sweet sugar. To sweeten the effects o f a S i22 billion loss o f revenue, Kemp’s bill provides some tax relief to everyone. But the thought o f reducing the federal budget by such an enormous am ount is simply staggering. Everyone fro m the poorest pauper to the richest cor­ porate president is going to feel it. Kemp, o f course, has a quick retort. By reducing taxes by thirty percent over the next three years, we w ill stim ulate investment in the private sector which, according to the optim istic Congressman, will create millions of jobs and produce billions in revenue. As proof for this highly dubious theory, Kemp points to the Kennedy tax cuts and the beneficial results they produced. U n­ fortunately, as W alter H eller has pointed out, the economic environ­ ment in the early 1960’s was substan­ tia lly d iffe re n t from the dismal economic environm ent o f today. Heller warns that the Kemp-Roth analysis is as misleading as the old “ Free Lunch” signs in bars. Kem p's b ill is misleading in another way as well. Although he claims to be a friend of minorities, workers, and middle-class people (all of them hard pressed by high taxes), Kemp's bill is a lucrative tax bonanza for the rich, that is the tru ly “ productive elements" o f society. According to Kemp, our present tax system “ is strangling the incentive for investment and savings that are so necessary to the production of goods and services.” I find it difficult to believe Kemp's assertion when I look at a Congressional report indicating that huge corporations like Texaco, A R ­ C O . United States Steel, Xerox, IT T , and Union Carbide all enjoy effec­ tive tax rates below twenty percent. Interestingly enough, M o b il O il. which provides us with reams o f brow-beating essays, had an effective tax rate o f under two percent in 1975! T o boost production, Kemp proposes massive tax reductions for those who already enjoy a high stan­ dard o f living. Under the Kemp bill, 44.5 percent o f the $122 billion in lower taxes will go to the richest tenth o f the American population. A family with an income of $100,000 will receive $8700 in tax reduction, more than many working people earn in a full year. By contrast, a family earning $15,000 will receive a mere $500 or $600 in tax savings. This same type o f "welfare for the rich” is provided in a companion bill known as the Hansen-Steiger amend­ ment. Like the Kemp-Roth bill, this legislation — which drastically reduces the capital gains tax — is aimed at “ stimulating" investment by providing even more wealth to the rich, and shifting the tax burden even more heavily on those least able to bear it. If we accept the political line so b ea u tifu lly summarized in the M o b il ads, we should greet the Kemp-Roth and Hansen-Steiger bills with humble gratitude. For accord­ ing to the neo-conservative, we — meaning Blacks, workers, and mid­ dle-income people — are the lucky, but unworthy, beneficiaries o f the great wisdom and generosity of the “ productive elite,” those who own and operate the great corporations. - But if we reject this new corporate paternalism, we and our allies must present rational and creative alter­ natives aimed at increasing economic equality in A m erica. By doing anything less than that, the moderate gains achieved after years o f struggle will be swept away by the rising tide of business conservatism. *