Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Morning Oregonian. (Portland, Or.) 1861-1937 | View Entire Issue (Dec. 7, 1921)
TTTE JITORXIKO OREGONIAN, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1021 FIRST BUDGET TRANSMITTED TO CONGRESS BY PRESIDENT HARDING HQ (Continued Frflm Pafe 21.) theory that It was Independent, while there existed no one to place before them the necessities of the corpora tion considered aa a whole. Tenth The subordinate members of a departmental organization of the corporation were encouraged to state the needs of their particular subdivi sion of their department directly to the agency of the corporation (con gress), which made the deBlred levy upon the stockholders (the public) This custom, in violation of all the rulea aroverninir the correct function ing of the successful corporation, tended to increase the confidence of these subordinate officials In opposing- anv change operating to subor dinate departmental control in rou tine business to an executive control of the corporation. Eleventh A general public interest In the operations of the corporation encouraged subordinate members of Its . business organization, including its administrative vice-presidents, In making programmes of business ana expenditure to consider their relation to popular approval, wnether right or wrong, thus often foxeclosing a ques tion of policy which was properly in the purview of the president of the corporation alone. A premium was often placed upon the expenditure of money as distinguished from Its sav ing, since uninformed public approval Is often reserved for activity and apparent enterprise in extending the corporation's functions. Irrespective of their wisdom. Practically all of the last ten de fects of ths corporation were the di rect result of the first one, to wit that the president of the corporation gave practically no attention to Its ordinary routine Dusiness. Faults to Be Rectified. For the imposition of unified meth ods In the ordinary business of the f overnment the president has estao Lshed. hv executive order, the follow lng agencies, which are engaged In co-ordinating, in all matters of rou tine business, the activities or the separate departments and establish ments; First The federal purchasing board. On the federal purchasing board there Is detailed the chief purchasing offi cer of each department or establish ment, with a chief co-ordlnator as chairman, named by the president. The chief co-ordlnator has the au thority, limited by a right of appeal In case of any difference of opinion, to Impose co-ordinating orders. He can thus prevent competition between the different departments in outside furchases. not only by preventing hem from raising the price on each other, but where large quantities of standard commodities are to be pur chased, by ordering one department to execute the purchase for Itself and as agent for the others. By executive order It was directed that In each executive department and Independent establishment of the government there shall be a director of purchases and a director of sales, who shall co ordinate all activities involving pur chases and sales within their respec tive departments and be In direct liaison with the chief co-ordlnator. These directors of purchases and ales are subject to call by the chief Co-ordinator for conference In all matters involving the co-ordination of sales and purchases In -the various departments of the government serv ice. This was the system adopted in the American expeditionary forces. It Is the exact system existing In many large private industries which have been formed by the amalgamation of original units located in different parts of the country. The power In shaping a unified purchasing policy for the government is as great as that which would be possessed by a central organisation which would take over all govern ment purchases, but with this great advantage over a central organisation -that there Is no Interference with the pressure from a point of depart mental supply necessity tipon a pro curement agent directly responsible to It. Even where there Is a co-ordinating order Imposed, a representa tive of the head of the department which needs supplies is always able to Interpret Its necessities, both as regards speed In delivery and loca tion or delivery . . - , ,ef "not In.f";0,"0;:" ! does not Interfere In a multitude of small purchase transactions by the department where the question of competition is not Involved A cen tral purchasing Hgency for the gov ernment of the United States which would assume to take over the pro curement and distribution of all gov ernment supplies would be a complete failure. Not only has the federal pur chasing hoard proved already bv its uccessful operation its adaptability to the necessities of the situation, hut the principles which govern It have been tested out by years of recogni tion in .practice by private business enterprises. Surplus. Storks Sold. Second The federal liniiidatinn board, created in accordance with the same principles and form of organi- partmental traffic departments, s f,1, J0n' 3 nw . c:rdlnatlng sales. ' difficult to compute, but should be under a unified plan, of the large very large me'r''.-nvrlltenr10 if dePart- The federal traffic board is estab 5U?LT - government. It is com- Ughed under the chief co-ordlnator, u ... ..n.w- 1 1 u iii . i m i department or establishment having I eales activity, presided over by the chief co-ordlnator. general sunply. The decisions of the chief co-ordlnator. general supply, as to any co-ordinating action is final, subject only to appeal to the head of his depart ment by any member. The Import ance of the work of this board is self-evident. Under the old svstem, where surplus stocks were sold by the Independent departments Irrespec tive of each other an absurd and de moralizing situation existed. It was the custom of the Independent depart ments to sell their surplus storks with practically no reference to the reeds of the other departments for the material sold. In some cases property was sold at public auction by one department, purchased bv an outsider, who then resold It at large profit to another department of gov ernment. At the time of the Institu tion of this board departments were in the open market for large amounts of material which were on hand in the other departments. An enormous loss has resulted to the government from this condition of things. The federnl liquidation board for mulates policies and plans designed to knit the activities of the several departments and establishments con cerned with the liquidation of stocks Into a federal business association to bring about business methods calcu lated effectively to safeguard the in terests oi tne government Third The organization of corns . . . . .. area co-ordinators. For the nnrnose pf making a practical extension of th principles Involved in the federal pur chasing board and federal liquidation board over the entire country a sys tem of corps area co-ordinators lias been created. The points of location of government stocks are so scattered, and the diffusion of the points of pur chasing activities so great, that cen tral boards at Washington would be unable to cope with the situation with out representation at all renters of governmental purchasing and sale ac tivities. Accordingly, for convenience, the territory of the United States was divided into nine areas, corresponding to the nine army corps areas, and in eacn area an official was selected by tne president bv detail from a depart ment, who is known as the co-ordlnator for general supplies for the several executive departments and in dependent establishments having M tlvities in that area. It is to be noted that these corps area co-ordinators are responsible to the chief co-ordlnator, genera! supply, and through him to the president of the United States, and not to the heads of the departments and independent estab lishments. They locate and inspect surplus accumulations of government stocks, regardless of whether or not these stocks have been reported sur plus by the departments, and report thereon to the chief co-ordinator, general supply. Washington. D. C as well as to the head of the department, having particular reference to the ex istence of accumulated stocks which appear to he In excess of reasonable reserves or current needs. Hundreds of Million I,of. In connection with the Immensely Important matter of interdepartment al transfer of surplus stocks, the neg lect of which In tne past has involved the United States government In the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars, the corps area co-ordinators play a most Important part In determining the field needs of the separate de partments and establishments. They extend the power to Insure uniformity in prices received and sales effected In the corps area. They exercise gen- erai supervision over the purchase functions of the seversl departments and establishments in their section. They have the power to fix, over th head of the department, the price of the commodity Involved in interde partmental transfer, which, of course, la slmnl.. - K . 1, 1, , . . . . i . . ... D,tii,ij ,i timiLCI i ' ' r. ' 1 , . i . i . but which, under the old system or Independent functioning between the departments, proved a great obstacle to the transfer of property. In short, this corps area organiza tion, together with the federal pur chasing board and the federal liqui da Oc n board, the latter two locat ed at Washington, enables the en tire purchase and supply situation throughout the country to be properly handled. Fourth The surveyor-general of real estate determines, subject to the approval of the secretary of the treas ury, as provided by law, In what man ner and to what extent the premises of the government of the United States outside of the District of Co lumbia shall be occupied and used, oy what departments, bureaus or offices and establishments. He has the power to assign and reassign rooms therein to all such federal officials, clerks and employes as In his judgment and discretion should be thus supplied, but he makes no assignment or reassign ment until after full and complete conference with the head fit the par ticular service directly concerned. He has the power to abrogate or ter minate existing leases by negotiation or by notice or other action there under. No leases for government uses for a period of longer than one year or for an annual rental of more than $500 can be made except upon approval of the surveyor-general of real estate and the secretary of the treasury. The creation of this power in the surveyor - general of real estate oy executive order prevents the large waste occasioned by renting from private owners space which the gov ernment. In Its buildings, already has at its disposal. In this power to de termine what changes should be made In the Interest of economical and effi cient use of lands, buildings and por tions of buildings for the benefit of the general government, he is assisted by the area co-ordinators, general supply, who report to him the neces sary Information as to real estate holdings under ownership or lease which are located in their corps a re, us. Fifth Federal motor transport agent. A general survey of the motor transport situation throughout the United States revealed the fact that the rule of absolute fixed assignments of motor vehicles to executive depart ments and independent establishments of the government was handicapping the government in the use of Its motor transport. The motor transport of a department might be overtaxed when there were motor vehicles standing Idle In another department. Civilian trucks were being hired when a de partment was confronted by an emer gency when the same service could be performed within the limits of the pnvprnintillf ccn-inn ItaaW T , Ik., it ferent corps areas of the' country the co-ordination of motor transport wtll ! be put Into effect by the area c. ordlnators. general suonlv tinon the approval of the plan by the chief co ordinator, general supply, at Wash ington. The head of each department or establishment names a representa tive under the corps area co-ordinator for each area in which the department or estaolishment has motor vehicle in operation. The district of Colum bia has been made a separate area fo the purpose of co-ordinating motor transportation. A co-ordinator for motor transport has been designated for that district and large savings are being currently effected by these organizations. Service Is Overlapping. Sixth The federal traffic board. The overlapping of service and dupli cation of effort are nowhere more ap parent than In the conduct of the traf fic bdsines.-t of the government. The expert. R. C. Oaples. who examined this situation for the director of the budget, estimate? that the govern ment's transportation hill annually ts approximately $2li0.000,e00. In the j i ii da n ri, .iii,iiui;,itiju. in i lie fS itua.iono attention is given to the proper classification of articles shipped by the United States, and government classification is out of line with commercial business. Gov ernment property should be relisted under commercial names. Raw ma terials should be billed out as raw materials and not as finished prod ucts. The classification committees of the railroads in specifying rate" applicable to the thousands of articles listed In the classification have given the government little or no considera tion as to the volume or nature of i's business. The savings to be effected through proper handling of the gov ernment's traffic, including reclassi fication, the correct routing of Its business, and a reduction In number general supply, rts activ ties are rti reeled hv ItTohsirmen , WJll rectcd by Its chairmen, under th tide of co-ordinator for traffic, who shall, under the general direction of the chief co-ordlnator for general supply, select the committees for the board and direct the time and place for their meetings. The head of each de partment and establishment making shipments from time to time shall designate one representative to serve as a member of the board. The classi fication of commodities and the in structions governing shipments' and methods of settling transportation ac counts, approved by the co-ordinator for traffic, shall, as far as applicable and in conformity with law, be bind ing uport and govern all departments, bureaus, agencies, and offices of the government in all shipments made by them. All questions pertaining to the classification of materials, or termi nal switching, freight rates, etc.. which require the application of remedial measures, will be submitted to the co-ordlnator for traffic either for adjustment with the classifica tion committees representing the car rier or for the presentation of a com plaint with the Interstate commerce commission. The decision of the chief co-ordinator. general supply, shall be final in the event of disagreement as to classifications, instructions govern ing shipments, and methods of set tling transportation accounts, subject only to an appeal to the head of the department concerned. A committee composed of practical railroad men will be consulted In con Tie,-' ln, 1th . . . ....... r .. . . . u nection with securing from the ear ners co-operation in imposing co ordination in government traffic as regards classifications and economi cal methods. Board to Save Money. Seventh The federal boarll of hos pitalization. The total appropriations in 1921 for the administration of the veterans' bureau, the office of the surgeon-general of Public health the 1 surgeon-general of the army, the sur- .e.iii-Hciici,ii oi tne navy, tne superin tendent of prisons, the president board of managers national home for disabled volunteer soldiers, aggre Ifif. 45.985,292. Of this amount. $489,000,000 were paid In pensions, leaving as a total expenditure outside of pensions. $256,985,292. There are engaged In the functions of these bu reaus 47.512 people, with a total cost of salaries for 1921 of $85,430,177. In these departments at the present time, including the army and navy, the ("tilted States is feeding and housing about 500.000 people. The property under their control represents hun dreds of millions of dollars. It is necessary that the expenditures of these groat departments should be co ordinated, thus preventing overlap ping of service, extra ownership of supplies, overemployment, unneces sary rentals, prevention of unneces sary Installation, and various other Incidental matters which naturally pertain to such large activities. The federal board of hospitalisation is created for that purpose. THe duty of the board is: (a. To consider all questions rela tive tt. he co-ordination of hospitali zation of the departments repre sented. (b) To standardise requirements, to expedite the interdepartmental use of existing government facilities, to eliminate duplication in the purchase of supplies, and the erection of build ings. (c) To formulate plans designed to knit together In proper co-ordination the activities of the several de partments and establishments, with a view to safeguarding the Interests of the government and to increasing the usefulness and efficiency of the aev- i eral organizations, and to report to me president thereon. The chief co-ordinator of the fed eral board of hospitalisation presides over the board and is responsible for its efficiency and for developing Its activities along practical lines. After a full discussion of any question by the board, the decision of the chief co-ordinator of the board will be final ctlon to be take nor any nolicv to h nitrsn.-rt hut Anv mem Ber may appeal from the decision of the chief co-ordinator of the federal board of hospitalisation to his own immediate superior. The recommen dations of the board will be carried into effect by the head of the depart ment or establishment directly con cerned. Specifications to Be Standard. Eighth The federal specifications board. A federal specifications board has been created, of which the direc for of the bureau of standards, de partment of commerce, is ex-offlclo chairman. The head of each depart ment and establishment purchasing materials or services in accordance with specifications prepared in such department designates one represent ative to serve as a member of the federal specifications board. The duty of the board is to compile and adopt standard specifications for ma terials and services, and to bring specifications into harmony with the best commercial practice wherever conditions permit, bearing in mind the desirability of broadening the field of supply. In event of disa greement on specifications, or on methods of procedure, the case will be submitted to the chief co-ordinator, general supply, whose decision shall be filial as to the action taken, subject only to appeal to the head of the department concerned. There was formerly in existence an interdepartmental standardisation committee composed of representa tives of the following departments: War department, navy department j treasury department, department of agriculture, department of the inte rior, postofflce department. Panama canal, shipping board. United States employes' compensation commission, commissioners of the district of Co lumbia and department of commerce. The findings of this committee as to a common specification are In the na ture of what la called "a recommend ed specification." No one had the au thority to approve and make man datory the adoption of such speciflea tlon by the various departments of the government: neither was there any authority competent to settle the case on its merits in the event of a disagreement. There is also In existence a com mittee on the standardization of pe troleum specifications, authorized by executive order dated July 31. 191$. The federal board for- the standard ization of specifications will take up and carry to a prompt conclusion a complete survey of all existing speci fications, with a view to the adoption of common specifications where more than one now exists for a particular commodity. Contracts to Be Adjusted. Ninth- The Interdepartmental board f contracts and adjustments This ?rd JL. Pr"8t'rnlai1.c:n.'.1"d A I 1 I . ( I L I' ' II Wl I . .1 I. i ......... .. anil field of activity is contained in the executive order Just issued for its establishment, as follows: 1. Without l.miting in any manner the Jurisdiction or authority of heads of ex ecutive departments and independent es tablishments over the subject matter of government contracts as the same la now defined by law. but for the purpose of standardising contract forms, securing the adoption of uniform policies as regards eonatruction work and uniform practices of Interpretation and negotiatlone both preceding and following the actual ex ecution of auch contracts, there is hereby established in the office of the chief co ordinator, general supply, a board to be known aa the interdepartmental board of contracts and adjustments, the members and functiona of which board shall be aa follows; The head of each executive depart ment, including the department of Juatice. shall organize a department board made up of one representative of each bureau having the independent right to eater into contracts on behalf of the United States. Much department board ahall recommend policies to control in the etiindardizatton of contracta within such department. They shall choose from their number a chair man and any other necessary officers. 3. The chairman of the several depart ment boards, together with a representa tive designated by the head of any in dependent establishment now- authorised by law to enter into Important contracts, and the chief co-ordlnator, general supply, shall constitute the Interdepartmental board of contracta and adjustments, and shall serve without additional compensa tion. 4. This board shall be presided over by u chairman, who shall be the representa tive of the secretary of the treasury. The chairman shall, upon being advised of the complete membership, call the members of the board together for purposes of or ganization. The board shall adopt such by-laws and appoint auch committees and subcommittees as may be deemed advis able and neceasary to accomplish the end sought. 0. The functions of this board shall be: First To standardize in general, where ever possible, the forms and methods of contract letting, to the end that a uni form policy on the part of the government may control the making of auch contracts, and with a further view to auch changes in the form thereof an will tend to enlist the Interest of the contractor on behalf of economy and promptness of execution and eliminate those uncertainties of construc tion and hazards to be assumed by the bontractor which have hitherto operated to Increase the cost of government work and supplies. Second To recommend general policies in the settlement of outstanding obliga tions arising out of contracta of th United titatea, such aa methods of determining and enforcing damagea, of aettltng dlsputea as to queationa of fact, and of determining the final compensation of contractors. Third In an advisory capacity and when requested by the head of any de partment or eatablishment of his represent ative upon the board (a) To review and reviae important con tracts and agreements made or about to be made on behalf or the united states. (b) To advlae officers authorized to con- I tract and operating under contract aa to the proper interpretation of contracts in process or execution. (c) To assist in the negotiation of im portant contracts and agreementa relating to personal servlcea, supplies or construc tion work. 6. The chairman of the board la charged with the reaponslblllty for the efficient working thereof and for its development along the practical lines above indicated, and in such other waya as may become apparent after full study of the situation by the board or any committee thereof. After a full discussion of any queation by the board and a full opportunity to the membera to be heard thereon, the decision of the chairman will be final aa to the action to be taken or the policy to be pur sued. But any member may appeal there from to the head of his department or es tablishment, who shall have final authority In the matter. The chairman of the board may detail an asaittant to sit with the board to repreaent him in matters of routine. Committee to Handle Supplies. The general supply committee was created by section 4 of the act of June 17, 1910 (36 Stat.. 531), which directed the secretary of the treasury to advertise and contract for all sup plies of fuel, ice. stationery and other miscellaneous supplies for the execu tive departments and other govern ment establishments in Washington. I'. C. when the public exigency did not require the immediate delivery of the article. By executive order of December 10, 1918, the general supply committee was designated as the agent through which the handling and transfer of surplus office mate rial, supplies and equipment of the executive departments and other es tablishments of the government In the District of Columbia should be carried out. and the executive order nf September 3, 1919. extended this activity of the general supply com mittee to the field services outs'i.e of the District of Columbia. These ex ecutive orders provided that purchtse In the open market should not be made of any materials or supplies which could be obtained through the general supply committee. The general supply committee, func tioning under this act and these or ders, handled large quantl'iet, of sur plus material and supplies for the government departments and estab lishments, but It could deal oniy with those articles which were reportei to it as surplus and had not definite means of enforcing the obvious inten tions of the regulations where the materials or supplies available dif fered slightly from those required. With the establishment of the chief co-ordlnator, general supply, the fed eral purchasing board and the federal liquidation board, the general supply committee, working In the closest co- operation with these agencies, has been of material assistance in work ing out practical operating systems, and has in return received great as sistance in the matter of locating surplus supplies which In some cases had not been yet reported surplus, as well as In securing the acceptance of materials and supplies differing slightly from the original request where this would result In preventing a purchase In the open market. This is unquestionably resulting !n greatly Increased economies In Hie matter of interdepartmental transfer of materials and supplies, thereby eliminating the necessity for many open-market purchases. Co-ordlBatlaar Machinery In Use. Where the statutes of the United States prescribe methods to be fol lowed in governmental business -.d-mlnlstration they, of course, limit ex ecutive discretion by their terms, but in all routine business of government, where a method Is not prescribed by law. it follows of necessity that meth ods may be impoaed by the executive, as in all other forms of business or ganization. An executive regulation covering governmental business meth ods is simply a formula In which a method of conducting business Is out lined in an order. The executive powers which the president has invoked in the estab lishment of co-ordinating machinery for the unifying of governmental business are therefore only those In herent in the position of the head of the government business administra tion, where not limited by law. The executive orders creating these agen cies are signed by the president and are announced through the budget bureau. In any discussion of these agencies created through executive order by the president to assist him In the imposition of a unified plan for the transaction of the routine business of the govern ment it cannot be too strongly em phasised that they are concerned only with routine business and not with matters of governmental policy. Poli cies of government are determined by the executive and by congress. When congress passes a law approprlat'tig money for the cost of governmental activities and projects it becomes the duty of the executive, insofar as these expenditures are concerned, to see that the money Is devoted to the ob jects of , appropriation in the most economical and efficient manner pos sible. These co-ordinating agencies established by the executive are for the soie purpose of enabling the pres ident In matters of routine business to so co-ordinate the activities of the different departments and establish ments as will Insure the most effi cient and economical expenditure of the money appropriated by congress. The powers they exercise, the ques tions which they consider, the circum ference of their activities are all con cerned fundamentally with the rou tine of business methods as distin guished from anything in the nature of governmental policy. They operate simply as a mechanism to make more effective the policy adopted by con gress and the executive. These agencies, concerned alone with efficient and economical meth ods, should operate In the same man ner wnatever the political changes which may occur In administration. Like the budget bureau and othfr agencies for the imposition of busi ness policy, they are impersonal, im partial and non-partisan. They can never properly become the subject of partisan dissension. Thev must exist as agents concerned with routine methods of business at the disposal of the executive and congress Indefi nitely. If they are not kept in exist ence there will be an immediate re version to the demoralizing lack of CO-OrdinatiOn among the indpnenHenf departments and establishments which Has oDiained in the governmental business administration In the past. Made up from the continuing bodv of public employes and concerned simply with the unification of the business machine, their sphere la one outride of oolitic and nf policy and In the realm alone of busi ness common sense. President's Authority Supreme. These agencies derive their author ity solely from the president, but the same reasons of convenience and effi ciency which led the president to use the -lachlnery of the budget bureau lu connection with the imposition of executive- business policy upon the Lu. . fli administration make advisa ble a clsse supervisory contact be tween the director of. the budget and the co-ordinating agencli s created by executive order now n operating ex istence. The condition of govern mental business administration, de veloped by the Investigations of the budget bureau, brought to the atten tion of the president, resulted In his decision to establish them. They are concerned, as is the director of the uuusei. nun a Dira s-eye view of the government business situation and with the doing of business in terms of a single government and its Inter ests as distinguished from, but con sistent with, the Interests of the sep arate departments and establish ments. To strengthen their super visory relations to the separate de partments and establishments they need a constant and sympathetic liaison between themselves and the president of the United States, who is the source of their authority. If in the future there should at any time come into office an executive indifferent to the operation of the government as a business machine there would, under the immutable laws of human nature, immediately spring up an effort on the part of the Independent departments and estab lishments at first to curtail and re strict the activities of the co-ordinating agencies and then to wipe them out of existence. The fact that this country may be so unfortunate as to pass through an executive adminis tration indifferent to its obligations to apply correct business prinoiples to the functioning of government busi ness makes it a supreme duty for the president to now protect as completely punaiuic. u - executive regulation. the co-ordinating agencies recently vjr I.U91UHI, aim uy nis authority -eBi.cu. uy null. The director of the budget, being of necessity not only under the law but under the practical exigencies of the situation, in close contact Zith the president of the United 'States In the heads of Independent establish all matters of routine business policy, ments. there has been evinced from heenmes th noioeni o. Yv''the first a determination to think in Interpretation of the situation and r needs of these co-ordinating agencies i to the president. It Is essential, too, that the director of the budget, charged with the dntv of iHvU t the president in connection with the' economics s nj .reii.. .1 ' " J ! the government ir. its ord nary bust- essarlly pertain In anv wel -managed nes. should himself have the . closest Private business organization. This contact with them, since through them ou'red abrogation on their part of alone can he be properlv advised as to' m.any of,t1ie oId cus.toms arising out correct business and interdenart- I of Over 100 vears of a decentralized mental relations. Besides being agen- I s'atus quo in the governmental busi eies for the execution o' executive ness organisation, which presented an "uucy, tnesi; CO-ordlnat nn- sirenele. become the natural collectors of in formation regarding the processes of routine governmental business, which in turn may become the basis of ex ecutive policy involving changes in the co-ordinating agencies themselves, and the creation of new ones. Red Tape Thing of Past. In the well-maf(aged business or ganization the closest contact between the source of Information and the power which can compel corrective action is always maintained. It must be remembered that we are discuss ing only routine business function ing. What we call "red tape' in gov ernment business largely results from the lack of contact between those sensible of errors In administration and these In authority responsible for the transmission of the executive will, and the closer the contact hiurAn those associated with it and the pres- uv.n. iiiiuDca inc inure eiiective win be the functioning of the government as a business machine. To sum up. the president, in as suming for the first time his position of business responsibility over gov ernmental buslnes administration UPOn the advice Of the director of I the budget, based upon information nection with the establishment by the w-hich the Investigation of the bureau president of the co-ordinating agen or the budget has supplied, has cles essential to the carrying out of created certain agencies of co-ordina- the unified business policy in govern tion through which his business pol- ment. The detail of an employe from icy will be transmitted to the busl- a department or establishment to the ness organization. This emphasizes co-ordinating agencies established by the Importance of the passage of ex- executive order occasionally evoked ecutlve advice and instruction through the objection that the salary of sucli the director of the budget to the co- employe should no longer be charged ordinating agencies. The same prin-1 against the department In question. cipie is uivoivea as was recognized ' in the budget law Itself when the oureau or tne Duaget was made to operate directly under the president and not under any department of a lesser but co-ordinate authority. The only agency in existence which bears such a relation to tbe chief execu- tlve that it can be made a proper conduit for the transmission of ex ecutive authority in routine business matters to the co-ordinating agencies for transmission to all departments smi establishments Is the bureau of the budget. Co-ordinating agencies should be created from the body of existing employes and not by legislation, where their personnel would neces sarily be built up by outside appoint ments. If the creation of these co ordinating agencies were to be at tempted by act of congress, they would sink at once into the position of bureaus and lose almost entirely the power Inherent in direct repre sentation of the president. The ad vantages of the creation by executive order from the body of the adminls tiatlon of these co-ordinating agen cies, which are now in succeasful op eration, are: First They more authoritatively will convey the pressure necessary in carrying out the plan of the chief executive In the interests of the gov ernment as a whole. Second Thev will be headed and composed of men appointed because of their experience and ability in connection with the work in ques tion, familiar with the environment in which thev are to work, and with out the outside and distracting pres sure of political considerations. Third While more effectively func tioning because of the above reasons, they will operate without appropria tions being made necessary for their own salaries or for a large personnel. They will not afford, therefore, a nucleus for a steadily incraslng cost and complexity of operation. Co-ordinating Agencies Xon-Partlsan. An examination of the executive or ders which form the basis of the or ganizations of the co-ordinating agen cies above mentioned will develop: First that they Involve no transfer of authority the location of which has been fixed otherwise by statute. Second That they involve the dele gation of no question of policy save that of economy and efficiency. Thled ThnT thev are slmiily agents by which, where not otherwise de termined by congress, unified methods of ordinary business can be imposed oy tne cnier executive. Fourth That thev are created sim ply to give the president of the United States In his rlstlnn In the hUSinfcSS administration, the same agencies of contact and transmission or autnorit as obtain in anv private organization. Fifth That they involve no mate rial addition to the expense oi gov ernmental administration. Sixth That they are non-partisan, I enmnnsed nf men already in the government service, simply detailed for this duty. t Seventh That they are in effect simply a regrouplpg under an execu tive leadership of certain of the pres ent employes of government of such experience, contact, and relation in its routine business as enables them, detached from departments and act ing directly under the president, to make possible the application of common-sense business methods. It cannot be too often reiterated that this most important reformation in tbe governmental business system is dependent upon tne presiaent oi tne United States himself, and upon his continued assumption of his respon sibility as Its. business head. The min ute he relaxes his attitude of atten tion to this duty there will be felt the natural null of the departments anri establishments toward the old system of complete Independence and decen tralization. This is because of laws flrmiv embedded in human nature which have existed since man began Budget laws or other legislative en actments cannot change human na ture, and. while compelling the letter of co-operation, cannot compel Its spirit, which is. above all things, essential in business organization. The president, and the president alone, can do this, for his attitude toward the heads of the departments and the In dependent establishments is a matter constantly in their minds What h desires it becomes their interest as well as their duty to do. where con sistent with right principles and in accordance with law. In the absence of ills expressed desire what becsomes their selfish Interest In action Is In evitably along the lines of decentral ization and the re-establishment of the old '-ondltion of things, wilh everything running haphazard. These great co-ordinating agencies have already effected large savings in government business' administra tion. They have prevented the absurd duplication and competition existing among the departments and establish ments. They have corrected the prac tice by which the supplies and facili ties of government have been kept in water-tight departmental compart ments, compelling recourse constantly to the open market, notwithstanding the government already had on hand the supplies or facilities purchased. They enable the government to trans act routine business with the advan tages enjoyed by private business or ganizations, and prevent its spoliation, made easy bv the former ignorance and indifference on the part of a de partment of the business status and transactions of another. Through their agency the routine business of the government, for the first time, is being conducted along sound business principles. Bureau Related to Cabinet. As stated before, the use of the budget bureau by the executive as an agency for securing economy and effi ciency in routine business has devel oped tbe fact that the advice and in formation emanating from the intet 8ted departments alone is not suffi cient to enable the bureau of the oudget to carry on Its functions with full effectiveness. The first lien of a departmental policy upon a departmental mind, whether it be that of the head of the department, budget officer, or the chief of a bureau, is such that the executlv. to be safe in imposing a business policy In terms of the gov ernment's interests as an entity, must have an impartial consideration of the departmental view in order to deter mine the necessities of departmental programmes as related to an executive policy for the whole. The director of the blidget Is glad to state that, with the cabinet and with impersonal terms, and to favor ail regulations, customs, and precedents which afford the director of the budget, in so far as he acted as the representative of the president, the same ease of access to them and to their subordinate chiefs as would nec- liSHinia ". w.ajMiisi proximating unity of policy or plan In government business administration. Under the regulations and customs now established, any such action and contact as the director of the budget must hsve with the heads of the dif ferent departments and establish ments where he represents the president in the imposition of a unified policy, he meets no obstruction arising out of per sonal dignity or past precedent. The cabinet heads and heads of inde pendent establishments Immediately acquiesced In the principle that the president must establish an agency so empowered in its relations to them that, as In any private organization, his agent in gathering Information could compel a contact of separate de partmental authority in the consider ation -of any co-ordinated action for the benefit of the executive. The di rector of the budget, therefore, under the regulations and customs now es tablished, has the same powers that an agent of the president of a corpo ration would have under the same cir cumstances. The departmental trend of thought, stabilized by over 1UU years, mani . - ..I l.lf o som tvlnl In eon The thought that through tne agen cles to which such detail Is made an enormous saving will Inure to the de partments during the existence of such a co-ordinating agency was. In some cases, overlooked by the affect ed department head. It is. above ail things, necessary In tbe institution I I of a proper governmental business I ..-. . u., .. . .... 1..- J.- At :n iu 11. 111-., .. .... 11 ....... - thought arising out of the old status quo which has been responsible for the destructive chaos In government business arising out of the independ ent attitude of departments unsub Jected to executive control. Hundred nf Millions Loat. It Is to be remembered in this con nection that no criticism can be prop erly directed against the department heads under tha old system for think ing alone In terms of the Interests of their department and Its programme The head of a department is not In a position, except under very excep tional circumstances, to have a bird's eye view which will enable him to reason in any other than in terms of his own department. Again, it is his duty to think In such terms. The planning of co-ordinating action along the lins of unified business policy is the function of the chief executive. A general line of demarcation be tween the viewpoint of the interested department or establishment and the viewpoint of an agency thinking In terms alone of the general business situation of the government obtains practically in every department and Independent establishment of the gov ernment. The absence in the past of any authority thinking in terms of tbe common interests of tbe .govern ment as a whole has involved the United States government in hundreds of millions of dollars of unnecessary loss. Questions of business policy important enough to demand the at tention of the executive and congress have at times not even been presented for consideration to the department head himself. There must be but one business head. Let no one misunderstand the Importance of the power of the presi dent of the United States in its rela tion to this universal disposition to submit to business co-ordination manifested by the individual depart ments and establishments of the gov ernment at IBIS time. Underneath whatever nas been done in the way of correcting- the chaos in govern mental routine business which the president of the United States con fronted was the sense of responsibil ity to him In the mind of each man to be affected. The director of the budget was au thorized bv the president to make a public statement of certain funda mental principles which must under lie the budget, to-wlt: 1. The director of tho budget in gathering Information for the use of the president acts for the president, and his calls upon the chiefs of bu reaus and other administrative offi cers for purposes qf consultation or Information take precedence over the cabinet head of a department or any head of an independent organization. I. The budget representative in each department, being, appointed by the cabinet head, will present to the director of the budget the views of the cabinet head upon the wisdom of conclusions drawn by the director of the budget for the use of the chief executive and congress, but. as in the case of bureau chiefs and other offi cers, the call of the director of the budget for their presence and advice takes precedence over the cabinet head. Upon the continued recognition of these principles the effectiveness of the bureau of the budget must depend. How Budget Stsipui Works. The same principles involved in the relation of the president of the United States to the director of the budget are involved in the relations of the department head to the official named bv hint as the budget officer of his department. The latter, charged with the duty of collecting information and the giving of advice relating to gen eral departmental business for the use of the head of the department as wel! as for the use of the director of the bureau of tbe budget, should be a man whose relation to the separate activities of the department is Im partial. A department head should never appoint as budget offic r of bis department one who is in control of an activity which will be materi ally affected by budgetary recom mendations. The act approved June 10. 1921 (Public. No. 13). entitled "An act to provide a national budget syBtem and an independent audit of government accounts, and for other purpuses," provides In part that Section 214 (a) The head of each de partment and establishment ahall desig nate an official thereof aa budget officer therefor, who in each year under hta direr tlon and on or before a date fixed by him shall prepare the departmental eatlmatea. (b) Such budget officer ahall alao pre pare, under the direction nf the head of the department or atabllahmenl. such supplemental and deficiency estlmatea aa may be required for its work. Section 2I.Y The head of each depart ment and establishment ahall reviae the departmental eatimates and submit them to the bureau on or before SJeptember 15 of each year. In case of his failure so to do, tha prealdent ahall cause to bo pre pared such estlmatea and data aa are nec easary to enable htm to Include In the budget estimates and statements in respect to the work of such department or estab lishment. The foregoing provisions of law re quire that the departmental estimates. Including supplementary and defi ciency estimates, shall be prepared by the budget officer under the direction of the head of his department or es tablishment. They further require that the estimates shall be revised by tlu head of the department or estab lishment prior to submission to the bureau of the budget. The spirit of the budget law contemplates that the budget officer of each department or establishment shall represent the head thereof in the restriction of esti mates to economical figures, and in such other fiscal operations as may be necessary from time to time in the administration of the budget law, and to this end that the budget officer should report direct to and perform his work directly under the head of his department or establishment. This should not be construed as investing in Duaget onicers any powers or aus thoritles which properly devolve upon the heads of bureaus or divisions within a department or establish ment, but Is intended solely to indi cate that the duties devolving upon budget officers, as such, should be performed directly under the head of the department or establishment. It is essential, of course, that there be full and complete co-operation be tween budget officers and the heads of the operating, administrative, or supervisory bureaus or agencies with in a department or establishment. To the end that nothing may Inter fere with the responsibilities devolv ing upon budget officers, it is desir able that the beads of departments and establishments clothe their bud get officers with authority to call for such information and data from thel several divisions and branches of the departments and establishments as may be necessary to enable the bud get officers to prepare the estimates under the direction of the heads of ' the departments and establishments. It is similarly desired that the plana and policies formulated by the heads of departments and establishments a. the basis of estimates for appropria tions be communicated to the budget officers and through them communi cated, by and with the authority of the heads of the departments and es tablishments, to the several divisions or branches of the departments and establishments where such communi cation is necessary. w The adoption - of the general pro cedure as above outlined will enable the director of the budget to obtain from the budget officers definite and accurate information at all times concerning departmental estimates or the requirements upon which depart mental estimates are based, and there will be avoided the lost mo.tion which might be occasioned if budget officers were not made the medium of the head of a department or establish ment by or through which all infor mation essential to the preparation of estimates would be transmitted and received. F.ireutlrr Hrgulntlons. The executive regulations provided by the budget law to be Issued by the president as governing the opera tions of the bureau of the budget have been a matter of evolution aris ing out of the new environment of the budget bureau and the determina tion of the president to use It as an agency for the imposition of execu tive pressure. It would have been Impractical for the president to have drawn these regulations at the incep tion of the work of the bureau. Hav ing directed the bureau to proceed along certain lines, he has Issued such regulations as, in his Judgment, were necessary, afte.r a report to him by the bureau of the authority re quired as determined by Its experi ence. The executive purpose which under lies these budget regulations, in addl- tion to outlining the method of pro cedure under the express terms of the budget law, was to secure the ma chinery for the transmission of exec utive policy and control in the rou tine business of the government such as exists In any well-organised pri vate business organisation. It could only be determined from the actual experience of the bureau Just where latent opposition having its roots in human nature and in a century of undisturbed departmental independ ence would show itself to the impo sition of executive authority along the lines of proper co-ordination and unified business policy. The bureau has, under these regulations, the same standing which similar agencies in private business must have to their heads to successfully function. Deficiency Appropriations. The effect of continuous executive attention and pressure accompany ing an executive plan for economical and efficient methods upon the old custom on the part of the depart ments of an easy reliance upon de ficiency and supplemental appropria tions should be emphasised. It is dif ficult to overstate the influence upon the current administration of gov ernmental business of a determined attitude on the part of the chief exe cutive against requests for deficiency appropriations. The head of a de partment or establishment will en deavor to evade, in every possible way, the asking for s deficiency ap propriation, and his one best way is oy the reduction of expenses and the more efficient administration of his department. The director of the budget feels confident, therefore, that the esti mate for expenditures for 1923. upon which the budget is based, will not be Increased except through appro priations initiated by congress or by the executive as a result of emer gency or unforeseen conditions aris ing after the preparation of the budget. There exists In government now. because of the attitude of the execu tive, a prime essential in the success ful functioning of all private and public business organizations, to wit. a continuing strong sense of respon sibility to the policy and business plan of the organization as imposed by the executive head. In any pri vate business organisation, in pro portion as a lack of responsibility to the executive head develops In the minds of subordinate officials of de partments, the efficiency of the or ganisation diminishes. There can not be, of course, in an organisation as large as the government, a con tinuous contact with the executive head himself in the matter of the details of functioning in the subordi nate business units. There is in every properly organised business or ganization decentralization in con nection with authority over the method of the functioning of a sub ordinate department, but machinery exists hv which the head of tbe sub ordinate" department is at all times, through contact and explanation thoroughly advised of the general policy of the organisation in accord ance with which the activities of tts subordinate units are to be carried on. The cabinet Is one agency for the establishment by the chief executive of his business policy. He has made the bureau of the budget another agency so far only as the conduct of the routine business of the govern mem I concerned The co-ordinating organizations created by executive order are also means of supplying the df-partments the contact with the business policy of the chief executive as it relates to routine business. The continuity of executive pres sure through these agencies upon the body of the business organization is certain to be reflected in an almost complete cessation of the habit of re. nance upon detictency appropriations. Besides preventing requests for de- flclencv appropriations, the imposi tion of executive pressure along the line of a unified governmental busi ness policy, and the Information de veloped by the contact provided by the ro-ordlnstlng agencies between the departments, bring about a com parison of standards of expenditures and efficiency, with resulting Im provement. This contact also en courages initiative In suggestions from the body of the different or ganizations along the lines of proper co-ordinating action. There are now Implanted In the minds of the business organisation of the government three principles: First That the business organisa tion of government hereafter assumes that the minimum amount of money to be expended in any fiscal year Is eiot of necessity the sum appropriated in advance by congress, but the smallest amount upon which the business 01 the government can bo efflcently ad ministered under the programme out lined by congress. Serond That there should not he In the minds of the business administra tors of government a too easy rell- ance upon the custom of deficiency annrnnriations Third That where congress has di rected the expenditure or certain -tZLJZKZ ill ..J. . i.et..H for more efficient and economical ad- discharge of his duties. The first re ministration In order to produce lates to Information and the second greater results from the given ex- relates to control, the cot tro heins !11I7. -j ...1 ... nmrefi through ir critical func- nendlture. and also, wherever pos slble. to complete the given project for a less amount than the total ap propriated for the purpose Similar rules obtain in every well organised private business institution. That they have not heretofore char acterised the business operations of government has been because of the absence of executive control and th habit of department heads of appeal ing direct to congress, unsubjected to any business plan made in tne In terests of the covernment as a whole. their action being determined by their conception of the needs of their de-. nartment or establishment as an In dependent organization. In this at titude of the chief executive lies the hope and expectation of a great less ening of the amounts requested under deficiency appropriations. Brs;rnuplnK of Activities. Section 209 of the budget law pro vides that Tho bureau, when directed by tho preal dent. shall make a detailed study of the departments and establishments for the purpoae of enabling the president to de termine what changes (with a tflow rf se curing greater economy and efficiency In the conduct of public service) ahould be made In (1) (2) (S) the assign ment of particular activities to particular aervlces. or (4) the regrouping of services. By Joint resolution of December 29, 1920. congress has provided for the organization of a "iolnt committee on reorganization to make a survey of the administrative services of the government for the purpose of secur ing all pertinent facts concerning their powers and duties and distribu tion among the several executive de partments and their overlapping and duplication of authority: also, to de termine what distribution of activ ities should be made among the sev eral services with a view to the prop er correlations of the same, and what departmental regrouping of services should be made." This joint resolu tion was supplemented on May 5, 1921. bv another authorizing the pres ident to appoint a representative of the executive to co-operate with this Joint committee. In order to prevent an embarrassing overlapping and duplication of activ ities between this congressional Joint cofhmlttee and the bureau of the budget the president, at the sugges tion of the director of the budget, concurred In a recommendation that the consideration of a general re grouping of activities should be left to the Joint committee, who could. In their discretion, call upon the bureau of the budget to act for theem as an agent In gathering information. Since, at this date, the report of the joint congressional committee is not avail able, the budget herewith transmitted is necessarily framed upon the as sumption of the continuance of nor mal activities of the government al ready In existence and as now consti tuted. The alternative budget, ex cept as to changes In form oniy, is likewise based upon the samas8ump tion. If the report of the Joint com mittee Is accepted in principle and followed by appropriate legislation, or If any of the existing proposals of civilian employes should be enacted i Into law. such legislation would greotlv simplify the preparation of the budget in future years. Neither the Isudget nor the alterna tive budget, therefore, contains any recommendations as to the elimina tion or regrouplnlg of activities. lucre CAinis in inr piroriii Binu'- i inn- of setivliles under the di ns rt - There exists in the present group ments a juxtaposition in many eases j of activities so entirely unrelated to each other in their nature and scope' that a regrouping of them will result in not only a larger measure of direct co-ordination by a single supervising authority, but in a more effective common functioning. Old System l:lrntagunt. The great waste and extravagance heretofore existing in governmental business administration, nowever, has not resulted so much from an admit tedly improper grouping of activities In oertaln departments as it has from a complete lark of executive control Imposing co-ordination between de partments and establishments them selves. From his contact with the departments and establishments of the government the director of the budget Is glad to state that as u rule they operate with efficiency and with a considerable degree of economy, considered as Independent organiza tions. Insofar ai the regrouping of scattered activities under the one department head reposes in him a power of co-ordination by order, re grouping l in the Interests both of efficiency and economy. It must be remembered, however, that there Is a limit, in a government so large as this, to effective regrouping. In every well-organized business Institution there must be. of necessity, in tome of its constituent parts, certain agencies which function for the bene fit of the part, to enable it property to fulfill its relation to the wheat. w bat is. therefore, an apparent si,. aration among tne constituent pa or a Dusiness organisation or ay given activity is often because 1 1 resulting efficiency of the part ts more important than anv cconoiJjy which would be produced by the con solidation of the activity. For example, If the secret serv es nf the United States, now dividtd into many. separate independint agencies responsible to differo-nt t e partment heads, should lie cotisol'd ated as a whole, tbe resulting econ omy in expenditure might produce an inefficiency In departmental func tioning wholly Incommensurate with the savings effected. t'enturles of evolution in military organization have preserved the principle that In any separate service there must be a continuing responsibility upon any agent responsible for supply directly to the representative of tne service at the point of necessity. At the cost of certain theoretical economy each de partment, to he kept in the most tf flclent condition, must have reserved to it a complete control over certiln vital functions. The secret service 1 f the postofflce department and of tie treasury department, for Instancu. . 1 highly specialized. The Instructions of the head of either of these depart ments to the agents of a consolidates national secret service would prob ably not be carries out as effectively and promptly as where there is a di rect responsibility and dependence on the part of tbe agent to the head of the concerned department. Pressure. to be most effective, must come from the point of necessity direct upon the I agent upon whom Is the responsibility for meeting It. The co-ordinating control exercise. I In the government business organiza tion by co-ordinating agencies unii in the military organWHtlon bv the general staff, in no wise lmilies a substitution of a central body fir the separate departments or servlcts. Whether a regrouping of certain gor ernmental activities will result In economy or not, great care must be taken under u general plan to laOi build up central organizations to IsJss over activities heretofore scattered among the departments where such a course will break down, to a ilan-'cr-ous extent, tho autonomy of the aep srate departments. In all successful business organlr. tlons there Is a compromise, deter mined by experience, between a com plete centralization of each activity and Its decentralisation. A regroup- lng of activities should therefore. In the first Instsncc. not be accompanied by plans setting up new organiza tions to take over. In their entirety, certain functions now separately ex ercised by tbe independent depart ments until the practical effect of such a course has had most careful consideration from the standpoint of the resulting effect on efficiency. System of Accounting I nlforni. The purpose of the budget act is to enaole the president, as the re spnnslhli) head of the administration of the government, m present to con gress an annual business progiammo which shall rontaln ti e necessary in formation concerning the financial re quirement of all the departments and establishments f the government, and the resources from which this pro-gt-imme of expenditures uvi he met. in surh form as clearly to indicate the application of business principles to the government's administrative activities. One of the most important aids In budget making lies In the system of accounts. The object of keeping ac counts is twofold: First, to rurn so k"n open record of the financial trans I anions of the officers of the govern ment charged with the responsibility of spending public mopeys: and. sec ond, to furnish the means of hoIdLng the dlsbutsng officer to the faithful exercised through the critical func tions of audit operating on the ac counts. The bureau of the budgot Is primarily concerned with the Intor matlon feature of accounting, while the general accounting office Is pri marily concefned with tho control aspect. The detailed preparation of the hud get is largely based upon tho ac counts. The presentation of the es timates must necessarily follow Hie form of the accounts. If there b confuson in the system of accounts It will reappear in the liurlgel. A uniform system of accounts la, there- line, i-.tnriiiini lu lite iiiiriiiftciii oc-.- sratlon of the budget In whatever form the latter may be eventually presented The records of the dutalled receipts and expenditures of public money should be kept In accordance with some uniform clasxif Icat Ion In order that (1) the requirements of the different departments and estab lishments may be fully and readily compared; (2) statements of expendi ture for the same objects may be stated in Identical language in each spending office, thus facilitating easy, rapid and Intelligent examination and control: (3) to furnish a basis for the estimates, the appropriation sets, the reporting of financial data, and the audit all upon a uniform system: and (4) to enable a sufficiently con crete picture of . the total financial operationa of the government to bo assembled within a reasonable com pass, thus greatly facilitating tin- x- nmlnatlon of the budget by congress and eliminating the necessity for much detailed examination of wit nesses. Departments nt Variance. At the present time there is no such uniform classification in use bv all departments, und the established Practice of many years varies widely In the different departments. Indeed, in the majority of cases there Is no clear distinction drawn between ex penditures of such widely different character as those for ordinary cur rent expenses of operation and expen diture; for the ncijtiisitiou of prop erty which Increases the permanent assets of the country. There Is also no un'formlty In nom enclature. Accounts are kept for Identical objects of expenditure umli r various names, and this variety has naturally found ltn way Into the esti mates. Into the approprlat iop acts, ami into departmental reports of receipts and expenditures. For example, "con tingent expenses" may Include one class of objects for one department and another class for another. Tin same id true of the loose terms, "gen eral expenses," "miscellaneous ex penses" and "necessary expenses." Each organization unit has, to it con siderable extent, its own system of accounts. Congress lias attempted to control this situation by m'nute ami specific designations and limitations for each appropriation In the appro priation acts, but this effort a legis lative control has. as la generally col oeded. broken down. I; perhaps did operate with some degree of effe t -Iveness when the government organ isation was relatively small and t'" expenditures hut a fraction of the present annual outlay K Is strongly urged thai the troller-gencral prescribe the I svstems and procedure for admin tlve appropriation and fund him lng. Including a uniform standal classification for use In the si I departments artd esla bllshmi: nt 1 ' government, and thai rhs tin ... .. .... sv st em and st tinoardlzed elasirii be !! d through 1 he admin ' - v exam'''-' ' i"ii " . f tCenciulod uu l' -i ) i