Crook County journal., February 27, 1919, Page Page 6, Image 6

Alb
fATEMiEM
TO THE
1 1 I
BECAUSE the name Albers Bros. Milling
Co., a corporation, has been mentioned
in connection with that of Henry Albers in
the newspaper reports of his recent trial, the
'stockholders, of whom there are ninety-five,
. feel the necessity of this statement, to avoid
unjust reflections. '
The Company is in no way implicated and
was not on trial, the case being strictly individual. Court
proceedings repeatedly brought out and emphasized this
fact. Henry Albers is in no way connected with the Al
bers Bros. Milling Co., as a stockholder or in any manner
whatever. He was at one time an officer and stockhold
er, but even then held but 10 per cent of the stock of,
the corporation. These facts are of record.
This firm, as an institution, is entitled to its
fairly earned place in public regard, and to be considered
separate and apart from anything which has arisen in
the Henry Albers matter.
eir Broth
e
hi ,i
Milliimg Co : j
FEnnt'AltY 87, !I0.
TP