The Oregon state employee. (Salem, Oregon.) 1944-195?, September 01, 1950, Page 6, Image 6

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    4
in thè e m p I^ ^ ^ a ÌM ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ W . when
they adopted the é S s m S g io n -'plan pre-;
pared by the civil service commission
arid recommended to the 'emergency
board" that funds be I W fd^^^aiTable
for pmmedia|ejimplementation of the
plan. They are to be ^commendecT for
their speedy and judicious action in
meeting”, and solving this administra­
tive problem.
The emergency board, composed of
.S^ia'tqrs' Walsh, Belton and Walker,
R epresenm ® ^| V S Dyke,,. Chadwick,
Semon and Rudie Wilhelm, J r ., a most
B n sferS p H I E group, appw a pheM* the'
prpblem warily but acted witfaEvrs-
dom and d isn atch .fSw ^ th ^ ^ M T '^ ^ S
n i f i c g W B g p tlìe - ^ém ergen^M ^y^
brought into focus.
The Oregon State Employees A s­
sociation is gratefuwfor the’^ a g ry ad­
justments thus^^^yide’d.“ The associa­
Equalization
tion has been very (W sb 3 to; tneg whole
salar^^b’roblem £»and played an im-
Pay Schedule
portant part in its solution. Repre­
sentatives Sa th e te ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ B w e f è
By Forrest V. Stewart
..mindful
of the magnitude of the prob­
Civil service employeesy of the* state
of Oregon, as a group,, are now work­ lem and cooperated in every way pos­
ing under better Ifp nditæ »^ and for sible with lK/frjHlgiBwwi
I go ver nment which holds j ur is die tion
better salariesythan^at any time in the
^VEatàsuch
governmental 11 unctions.
history
M«|MB;y< prevents" us from saying
The salary equalization plan now
pnnre a b o U lM ^ B6[aS ■
O S E A pWyed in
in effectJiS^erhaps the S sti^a|istW
¿bringing about th i^ s B l^ ^ ^ ^ Btm ent.
approach ever made toward compar­
GooeWKaste *d:®Hes that we say noth­
able pay with c'ornnarh^^Mwsnio'hs.
ing about the infantine mouthings of
in private Industry. The equalization
a m ilignant. minority employee o’r -
plan plus the ten dollar cost/of living
^¿an^%tibh»wnat^|cam e withirilla m ea-
adjustment should, to a very large surable degree, (^.defeating the f /ntire
degree, stop the exôdüs from thejs tate
salary adjustment program.
^ ^ e rvice. The monetary cost to the state
during the past few months from the
loss of hundreds ùfL ~semi-||a|féd and
State Civil Service
skilled workérs has - Keen tremendous.
The Çivil Service- Commission did a
“ Department
seldom hap-
splendid ob in readjusting^ and equal-,
■ They prefer
izing the pay ranges for the 593 d i f -
do the »hiring themselw^a And em-
ferent job classifications. It was, ne­ ployees themselves ^ : ^ ^ metimesWdtss|
cessary, to compare each classification gruntled over the way the system of
and corresponding salary rangé with job classification works. These feel­
the results of the salary survey. (Tab­ ings broke efeSt last week in someypub-
ulating the 119,000 individual returns lished protests from unidentified
from the survey was a task in itself.) stdte^lp^sfflinel.
The number of salary ranges were re7
We are confident, however, that the
duced from 120. down to 47 which .will great ma j orit-^Bf';^^e&Gmp lo^^ |pre-
I simplify future adjustment proced^ fer to ' work under l l l O l servitO They
ures.
hajv'egjsecuriS in t h e i ^ S s .— one can
The governor, his budget director, easily imagine what nervousness there
and the board of controffljPBlized the w W lib ^ B /ith anO e g tion coming on,
seriousness of the/recent developm ent
(Continued on Page 24)
ment salary. We are asking ggM th e
employees be allowed to pay retire­
ment on the first $4200 of his salary
and that the state match hi|||ayments
to that amount. This request is m line
with changes in the social security law
recently made by Congres?? Wey;also
are asking other .changes
the retire­
ment law which we feel are necessary
and shoùld bé passed in order that our
; retirement law I will be more in line
with other retirement laO B ffijt .ef fe
across the nation.
The above points are the most im­
portant parts of our legislative pro­
gram and Î have listed the reasons why
we feel they should be g i ^ o w S o a b l^
consideration by the legislator.
—E. F. ChidsèyhJl||esme i^
sSeSSfe>.