The Oregon state employee. (Salem, Oregon.) 1944-195?, October 01, 1949, Page 10, Image 10

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    8
would hire no new worker above 50,
voting ages; this ratio will rise to 45
and almost one-half set the m axi­
percent by the year 2000.
mum age limit' at 65. This moreover
B. Labor Force and
is regarded as understatement: It is
Employment Trends
likely that much larger proportion
1. The basic economic problem of the
of companies have inforrrial h irin g
aged arises from the fact that the
. limits much more rigid than indicaM
working life ” span has not increased
ed by this survey.
I ™
rapidly as the total life expect-
That is the meat of a/.round-table
ancy-^—hence, an increase in the av­
erage period of dependency in old discussion conducted in San Francisco
this. B j bv the Federal Burg|u-of L a -
age. This fact/, is brought out~by.a
B L S study of working life expect­
I brought these trendsj^and these
ancy.
B y and large, the very forces facts' to ■ your, attention, beqause^ h e y
which- have tended to ^increase the do point-up the plight of the aged and
“nearly old” worker, in general. S o
proportion of the aged in the popu­
lation also limited their opportuni- many valuable people could be lost to
the employment force, to the state, to
I ties for gainful employment.
the private company—because of age
2. The olderworker as an employee
harrieifiW i at I think they should
A . Handicaps:
1. Physical slowing down over age have greater protection—not only in
—affects his ability to perform the name of sentiment buttin the name
where job calls for exacting of efficiency.“ I
It is something, certainly, to think
pw sicat; standards.
2. Less adaptable to new/methods. about, along with many t l a M M Q p r
3. He is regarded as a “ poor in- agenda. The Oregon State Employees
vestment” for training or re­ Association does, indeed, have its work
cut out for it at this conference an^fe
training. I
4. Belief that he increases costs of I, personally, and on behalf of tnw^
workmen’s compensation insur­ Governor wish you" a pleasant, con-
ance and other welfare pro­ structive and fruitful meeting. I
grams. I
5. Public* ^’doesn’t like to deal” INSURANCE:
with old people.
DEPENDENTS CO V ER A G E
B. Advantages:
The O SE A Group Life Insurance I
1. Lower absenteeism and;,^acci­ underwriters have asked ¡¡gOlthe fol­
dent frequency.
lowing announcement be made: “An
2. Advantage of experience—im­ employee-member who ig%g|jH)le to
portant where ^ i l l , judgment apply for t H group insurance in his
or policy making are factors.
or her own right cannot be an eligible
3. Greater stability arid attach­ dependent and would not be covered
ment to firm.
under ,the}M ||| n i .of
;jc q^teact.
3. The older worker as a job seeker Should such a claim occur on a de­
Once out of work, the man or woman pendent who was also an employee-
above 45 finds it progressively more member, it would have to be denied.”
difficult- to s e c u r e reemployment. In/short, husband and wife who are
There ■ is obvioiis reluctance on the employee-members may each carry
part of emploverssED hire dicier work­ .th^^^^^anm r jn their own j^riCTLt^but
ers—unless they have some very spe­ cannot insure one another as d e p e n d ^
cial skill to offer, or unless we are in ents and only one iriay insure the de^^
pendent children. Premiuri^b/afojust-
a period of severe labor shortage.
Prevalence of age barriers in hiring ments will be made following notifi­
—A questionnaire survey conducted cation of - O SE A headquarters;^Bfic^5
members.
recently in .N ® ' ^^aW ta'td^^e^^U
that of 176 employers responding,
rijb^ut , two-fifths reported a formal
Since gold rush days o f . thè; early
age .h a rrier forfenew .employees. O f
1850’s, Oregon has produced gold val­
these, about one-fifth iriclicated they? ued at m R T fh a n 100 million dollars.