The Oregon state employee. (Salem, Oregon.) 1944-195?, May 01, 1945, Page 20, Image 20

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    18
Board of Directors Meeting
A meeting of the Board of Direc­
tors was held in the Marine room of
the Marion Hotel in Salem.
The meeting was called to order by
the President at 10:15 A.M. Officers
and Directors present were DeFranCe,
Ford, Chidsey, Carpenter, Clymer, An-
ning, Terril, Query, Clark, Cooper
and Campbell. Committee c h a i r men
present were Morris, Gemmell and Bet­
ty Dotson. Forrest Stewart,' Executive
Secretary, Leo Smith, Legal Counsel,
and Margaret Vroman, Secretary, were
also present.
The minutes of the December 3,
1944 board of directors meeting were
read and approved. The minutes of the
December 2, 1944 board of directors
meeting were approved. The granting
of charters to Round-Up Chapter No.
24 and Forestry Chapter No. 25 was
confirmed. The mail ballot authorizing
the incorporation of the Association
was confirmed.
Mr. Carpenter read a financial state-?
ment asw follows: Receipts as of March
23, 1945, $8,370.88; Expenditures $7,-
404.63; Cash on hand as of March 23,
1945, $966.25.
The board noted the fact that the
magazine was in red financially and
recognizing the value of the education­
al and promotional campaign conducted
therein, still urged an advertising cam­
paign to make the magazine self sup­
porting. The editor, the officers and
all members were requested to promote
advertising. A campaign to solicit sub­
scriptions from non members was sug­
gested.
The president reported that all obli­
gations incidental to the legislative
campaign had not heen taken care of
and reported that the League of Ore­
gon Cities Public Employees Retire­
ment Committee, on which he had rep­
resented our Association, had engaged
the services of Mr. Ralph R. Nelson,
actuary for the California State Retire­
ment System and for the San Francisco
Municipal Retirement System, and Mr.
Coates, Consulting actuary of San
Francisco, to analyze the proposed Ore­
gon Retirement Plan. This actuarial
analysis was duly received and no doubt
strengthened the case with the legisla­
ture and materially advanced the cause
of the legislation.