The Oregon state employee. (Salem, Oregon.) 1944-195?, December 01, 1944, Page 17, Image 17

Below is the OCR text representation for this newspapers page. It is also available as plain text as well as XML.

    LUBMUL
15
PERSONAL FITNESS . . .
Positive recruitment and modern job
classification and testing enable a cen­
tral agency to furnish employees who
possess not only technical skill and
knowledge but also desired personal
traits, aptitudes and capacities.
Method: For many years oral or inter­
view tests, if given to applicants at
all, were rated on a fleeting impres­
sion of the examiners as to the can­
didates’ appearance, manner and
bearing. They were largely subjec­
tive, often unfair, and of little use
in evaluating candidates. Modern
practice calls for verifiable evidence
of past demonstration of capacities.
Where such qualities as initiative or
ability to carry through a program
are important, only those applicants
can qualify today who have actually
demonstrated in action, in past ex­
perience, the possession of the need­
ed capacity.
TRAINING AND MORALE . . .
Well-developed in-service training
techniques, performance rating, super­
visory conferences, and employee rela­
tions practice are part of accepted mod­
ern merit system procedure. Affirma­
tive practice of personnel management
constantly maintains and improves the
morale of employees on the job.
Method: Progressive jurisdictions today
require periodic group conferences of
employees and supervisors at various
levels. Cooperatively they analyze
the quantity and quality of produc­
tion and the flow of work at each
level of responsibility, In this way
the activity and the strength or
weakness of each employee, in the
organizational effort, is periodically
reviewed, and the interest of super­
visors and employees is kept alive
through joint effort to improve ser­
vice.
ADVANCEMENT BY MERIT . . .
Complaint that civil service em­
ployees have no incentive to do more
than "warm their chairs” in order to
hold their jobs applies to the negative
civil service process which is now out­
moded. Competitive promotion, under
modern merit system practice, places a
premium on continuing employee ini­
tiative and outstanding service. In
many of the more progressive jurisdic­
tions promotion examinations are be­
ing held to fill the most responsible ad­
ministrative and technical positions,
positions which have in the past been
open only to patronage. So long as top
positions are filled by political appoin­
tees, political considerations affect the
work and progress of the lesser em­
ployees in an organization; ambition is
killed and stagnation is inevitable. Mod­
ern practice in progressive jurisdictions
proves that the career system is prac­
ticable.
Method: Top management posts have
been filled through competitive ex­
amination in New York, California,
Wisconsin, etc. Posts such as Direc­
tor of Unemployment Insurance, and
City Treasurer are examples.
PRESTIGE O F MERIT EMPLOYEES
The prestige of merit system em­
ployees in progressive communities has
increased tremendously in recent years.
They are recognized leaders in the civic
life of their communities. They enjoy
the highest credit ratings, and are mak­
ing outstanding contributions to the
social and economic life of America.
Method: The record of Sanford Bates,
or of Mark Graves, illustrates the
opportunity for distinction and ser­
vice open to merit system employees.
Sanford Bates, through years of
faithful service in various ranks with
the Federal Bureau of Prisons, help­
ed to revolutionize the practice of
penology. He has also served as a
trustee of the National Probation
Association, a Director of Prison In­
dustries, Inc., Director of the Boys’
Clubs of America, the Citizenship
(Continued on page 33)