LET TERS
MATTHEW KNIGHT
MONSTROSITY
What is the cost of Matthew Knight
Arena (MKA) to the taxpayers of Eugene
and Oregon state?
The MKA is financed by a series of
bond measures provided by the city of Eu-
gene and a “Legacy Fund” (Phil Knight’s
money). Although Knight pledged $100
million for MKA operating costs, I found
zero references to profit. I found nary a ref-
erence to the lack of funds that MKA has
brought to Eugene in the past seven years.
I wanted to find hard numbers on the
cost to the city, budget numbers, anything
that would be concrete evidence that the
arena is a positive asset. When I searched
the University of Oregon’s databank, I
found zero budget numbers despite MKA
being hailed as a huge economic gain for
the university. I found few pieces on pro-
jected windfalls and actual revenue; the
numbers are dismal in comparison to what
was originally predicted.
Looking back, I can see that only 16
games in seven years have been sold out
— far fewer than anticipated. Beyond that,
MKA employs only 44 people, while MKA
sits empty most of the year.
Who is benefiting from the MKA mon-
strosity? It certainly isn’t the university stu-
dents, who are expecting a huge tuition hike
next year; and it isn’t the city taxpayers.
I looked up Dana Altman’s financial
contract, and found that his contract will
expand to $23 million by 2023. Judging by
extrapolation, I would say that it’s the UO
basketball team, the coach and, again, Phil
Knight.
But hey, what do I know?
Cindy Wiley
Springfield
KINDER STEWARDSHIP
“Slow Wood,” Carl Segerstrom’s Aug.
3 article on Oregon’s resilient forestry
movement, captures the newly emerg-
ing spirit of stewardship for working for-
ests. The ethos of these visionary foresters
rejects the rapacious and extractive model
perpetuated by corporate timber compa-
nies.
Many of the leaders of an alternative
forest business model mentioned in the
article are partnering with Beyond Toxics
to raise awareness and increase advocacy.
Our joint work created a statewide series
of Resilient Forestry Tours and town hall
meetings.
During our tours, conservationist for-
esters demonstrate how the Oregon’s out-
dated Forest Practices Act — which main-
tains harmful practices of aerial herbicide
sprays, clear cutting, slash burning and
planting genetically enhanced mono-spe-
cies — must be shunned as a bygone relic.
DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION
Those who attend Beyond Toxics’ for-
estry tours experience the bio-diversity and
beauty of a true resilient working forest —
one that works for everyone in Oregon by
protecting water, wildlife habitat and cli-
mate through carbon sequestration.
The visionary forester David Eisler,
owner of Shady Creek Forest Products just
west of Veneta, is co-hosting the fifth in
Beyond Toxics’ series of Resilient Forest-
ry Tours 5 pm Wednesday, Aug. 23. Come
learn about how healthy forests yield an
overabundance of rewards that extractive
forestry companies steal from future gen-
erations of Oregonians. Call us or visit be-
yondtoxics.org to reserve your spot.
Beyond Toxics continues to lead a
grassroots campaign to overhaul Oregon’s
forestry laws and help rural communities
stop aerial herbicide assaults. We welcome
volunteers and support to bring about a
needed transition to eco-healthy forests.
Lisa Arkin, executive director
Beyond Toxics
Eugene
NO IDLE PROBLEM
In this time, when we as a progressive
state, county and city want to find ways
to combat climate change in the simplest
ways, I think there is an overlooked educa-
tional opportunity that makes a lot of sense
to bring into law: Automobile drivers need
to be aware that idling an automobile en-
gine is a serious contributor to air pollution
and therefore climate change.
The air quality in Southern Lane Coun-
ty/South Willamette Valley often suffers
from stagnation. The lack of air movement
in summer and winter allows particulate
matter to collect at an alarming rate, to the
point where in winter Lane Regional Air
Protection Agency (LRAPA) halts wood
burning in some cities.
The exhaust of automobiles is sub-
stantially more harmful to air quality than
wood burning, which is bad enough.
The first steps could be taken by gov-
ernment agencies — state, county and city
could provide signage in their parking
lots. All public agencies would pass ordi-
nances prohibiting idling. There would be
a requirement that privately owned busi-
nesses provide appropriate signage within
a reasonable time.
The message is simple: forbidding
idling car engines with a monetary puni-
tive damage to be decided upon.
The Environmental Defense Fund has
an in-depth quantitative report that pro-
vides a ton of insight. Beyond that, how-
ever, are the prohibitions that major cities,
such as Boston and Minneapolis, have en-
acted with very strict fines to limit air pol-
lution from auto exhaust.
B Y L A U R A F A R R E L LY
A Tale of Two Countries
A TEACHER’S REFLECTION ON HER VISIT TO FINLAND
“I
t’s all about attention. We all want to be heard.” That was my friend
Tuuli Lehtisalo’s response to how to best serve students. It’s still reso-
nating within me a month after visiting with this dedicated teacher in
Finland.
I had the good fortune to meet with Lehtisalo for a delightful chat
that lasted over four hours. Lehtisalo has been teaching for over 30 years at Helsingin
Suomalainen Yhteiskoulu located in Helsinki, Finland where the students have the dis-
tinction of achieving among the highest scores on the Program for International Student
Assessment (PISA).
The PISA is an international assessment that measures 15-year-old students’ read-
ing, mathematics and science literacy every three years. It should be noted that these
tests carry no high stakes for students and are not used to rank teachers or schools.
I wondered: How can Finnish students perform so well on the PISA when they
take no standardized tests during their K-12 education, whereas Lane County schools
administer up to 120 standardized tests by 12th grade? Why is the Finnish educational
system so highly rated? How do citizens know which schools are the best without rank-
ing schools according to test scores?
Of course, when buying a house or moving to a new neighborhood, one of the first
questions many American parents ask is about the local schools. Who can blame them?
Who doesn’t want their child to receive a great education?
But, thankfully, Finnish parents do not need to stress over these concerns. Accord-
ing to Lehtisalo, emphasis is on public schools that are equitable and neighborhood-
centered. And, they all offer the same education. In fact, there is a national curriculum,
which every school in Finland follows but with the clear expectation that teachers have
autonomy to develop their own lesson plans. In other words, the local schools are in
control of student learning. When I expressed wonder and admiration at her words,
Lehtisalo told me, “The government trusts teachers.”
I further asked her to describe the kinds of assessments she finds most useful to
4
A ugust 17, 2017 • eugeneweekly.com
determine student comprehension, application and critical thinking in her classes. As
an English language teacher, Lehtisalo says she asks students to, among other things,
“Write essays and narrative stories and work cooperatively in groups.” Furthermore,
she believes that it is the teacher’s duty to “find out what kids are interested in and then
develop lesson plans around those passions.” Wow. Imagine that. All of these assess-
ments, by the way, happen within the classroom and are not purchased from an outside
company.
Another reason why schools are equitable is that every school receives the same
funding. Lehtisalo added, “But we also have something called positive discrimination
between schools. Schools that are in so-called challenging areas with a lot of immigra-
tion and families living in poverty get more money because children might lack support
for school. That’s why schools get more money for extra resources to help these kids.”
In Finland, education is treated as a basic human right. In fact, the right to a free,
equitable public education is a part of their constitution.
School funding in Finland is provided through state and local taxes. Lehtisalo said,
“The money for education is pretty regulated. You cannot do anything silly with it.” She
shared that she pays about 36 percent of her income towards taxes, yet I heard no rancor
in her voice. She says it is well worth it due to all of the incredible services she receives,
including universal healthcare and one of the best school systems in the world.
As school resumes shortly in Finland and here in Eugene-Springfield, let’s ask our-
selves: Are we satisfied with our children’s education, or do we want something better
like Lehtisalo has? Are we going to continue standardizing education in an inequitable
fashion, or will we allow teachers the freedom to create interactive classrooms where
all student voices are heard regardless of the zip code? Our public schools need an
answer.
Laura Farrelly is an educator in the Springfield School District and a member of the Community Alliance for Public
Education (CAPE, oregoncape.org), a coalition of parents, teachers, professors, students and community members
who challenge the many assaults on public education and who believe in a strong public education as the foundation
for American democracy. For more information about the PISA International Tests, visit nces.ed.gov/surveys/pisa.