TO THE EDITOR
Doing Something
Time for new directions downtown
T
axpayers for Sensible Downtown Development would like to take this op-
portunity to thank the 63 percent of voters who supported the effort to
keep our downtown locally oriented and utilize public money responsibly.
We would also like to extend our appreciation for the hard work of the supporters
for the KWG proposal and those who served on the West Broadway Advisory
Committee. We respect the passion and sense of purpose they put into their ap-
proach. We empathize with their disappointment and want to reassure all involved
that we do not intend to rest on our laurels. We all recognize downtown is in need
of revitalization and share the goal of making the heart of our town as special and
lively as possible.
We optimistically look forward to “doing something” downtown as soon as
possible. Fortunately both developers, Beam and Kemper, have maintained pub-
licly that they still wanted to build their original, incremental proposals, if the bal-
lot measure failed. The Beam proposal would reclaim the Centre Court building,
including constructing a building on the adjacent Aster pit, and renovate the
Washburne building. The Kemper proposal would construct 106 units of housing
with 5,000 sq. ft. of neighborhood scale retail on the Sears pit. The Sears pit
development has the potential to be reconfigured to accommodate a park across
from the library. Both of these proposals can be paid for with funds already on
hand. There is plenty of room for flexibility if specifics of these projects need to
be adjusted to respond to emerging circumstances. We hope the strength of the
election mandate will keep the city’s actions in line with what the community is
willing to support.
The next logical step would be to convene “charrettes” (independently facili-
tated public design forums) to determine the community’s vision for revitalizing
downtown. An important aspect of this process would be to identify community
values, such as local economies; small businesses; dense housing; and the look
and function of downtown. Given the passionate feelings about downtown, it is
sensible to seriously seek out meaningful public participation this way.
Urban renewal money may have benefited the library, but it is atypical for
urban renewal money to result in a public project. In either case it is more honest
to give voters an up or down choice by offering a bond measure for expensive
projects. In the spirit of a truly participatory city government, citizens need to be
empowered to decide on large expenditures by voting — especially given the cur-
rent budget climate, where there is not enough revenue to pay for basic govern-
ment services. With the involvement of the taxpayers and the ability to scrutinize
the costs and benefits of specific proposals, the city can generate democratically
driven visions, leading to community supported projects.
In order to help promote accountability and eliminate costly and destructive
speculation, it would be prudent to immediately adopt a revised “sunset” date
for the Downtown Urban Renewal District (URD). December 2009 is date of the
last library payment and the original ending date for the district. Council should
amend the plan to reinstate that ending date. It was only in 2004 that the coun-
cil majority voted to extend the ending date from 2009 out to 2024. If the dis-
trict remains intact throughout that period, taxes are still being diverted from
the impacted jurisdictions and will accumulate in the district account. A portion
of that money can still be spent, without voter approval, on a limited list of eligi-
ble expenses. The rest of the diverted tax dollars will simply wait in the account
for voters to forget this election and a new council majority to approve an
increased spending limit. In light of the election mandate, that would be inappro-
priate.
O
nce the “promise” of a massive URD subsidy is eliminated, those property
owners who have refused to sell or lease their properties can no longer
profit from that approach. Waiting for the public pot of gold while proper-
ties deteriorate and values decline, won’t pay off anymore. That alone will have a
positive impact on revitalization. When vacant buildings and properties that have
been kept off the market are offered for lease or sale, entrepreneurs will be able to
bring new and varied investment into downtown.
The most obvious, forehead-slapping revelation of this election defeat is the
degree to which city officials are out of touch with the folks who actually pay the
bills. Hopefully, that message will finally resonate with our city’s bureaucracy,
which has an established track record of embracing public relations instead of
accountability and reform. It is time to commit to true reform, starting with cre-
ating an incremental and affordable approach to downtown revitalization and
ending the URD, including shutting down the URD account. That will be a greatly
appreciated and positive gesture towards creating trust with the voting commu-
nity. There is a lot of work ahead, and we need to work together.
Contributing to this letter were Gavin McComas, Bonny Bettman, George & Melissa Brown, David Monk, Betty
Taylor, Lisa Warnes and Paul Nicholson for Taxpayers for Sensible Downtown Development.
8 NOVEMBER 21, 2007
America to what it was before Teddy
Roosevelt was president. Grover Norquist,
a Republican strategist, said something to
this effect as well as wanting government
to be “small enough to drown in a bath-
tub.” Basically, they want to undo the
progress of the 20th century.
If you liked the 19th century, you’ll
love the Republican vision of the future.
We all can get to have our say about this
next year. Vote!
Charles Dalton
Eugene
GET CONGRESS TO LEAD
Rep. Peter DeFazio is attempting to
persuade the chairs of the House Armed
Forces Committee, the Foreign Affairs
Committee and the Select Intelligence
Committee to hold oversight hearings on
the Cheney/Bush plans to attack Iran. We
can support this effort by calling his office
and offering our agreement. We can also
call the offices of the rest of the Oregon
congressional delegation and ask them to
sign the letter requesting the hearings.
We can call the offices of the committee
chairs themselves and request hearings.
We can call Sen. Wyden’s office and urge
him to do the same thing in the Senate. (A
copy of the DeFazio/Lee/Kucinich letter
requesting hearings can be found in
Democracy Rising, U.S., Oct. 15)
We must get Congress to take the lead
in framing this issue. If the Cheney/Bush
team spins an attack on Iran as necessary to
support our troops in Iraq, then it’s a done
deal. Even a progressive such as Rep.
DeFazio might have to vote for it as he has
voted to fund the occupation of Iraq.
Jere C. Rosemeyer
Eugene
TIME TO STAND UP
U.S.
Congresswoman
Debbie
Wasserman-Schulz (D-Fla) voiced baf-
fling imagery in opposing impeachment
hearings for Vice President Dick Cheney
when she was a guest on Air America
Radio, Nov. 9. She claimed impeachment
hearings would “block out the sun,” divert-
ing time from worthier issues. Has the
good congresswoman from the Sunshine
State not noticed our country has been in
ever-darkening solar eclipse starting on
Day One of the Bush-Cheney regime?
She also claimed that impeachment is
not a high priority of the American people.
The Judiciary Committee, tasked with de-
termining the merits of impeachment hear-
ings, is comprised of dozens of congress-
folk, a very long list. I’ve spoken with vir-
tually dozens of congrssfolk’s aides who
tell me over and over again they are being
swamped with calls demanding impeach-
ment … period.
Patriotic Americans know that we must
take a strong stand so that future “leaders,”
regardless of party, will not usurp their
power at the expense of our democracy,
our Constitution, our nation’s treasure, our
soldiers (who are our nation’s treasure),
our privacy and untold innocents.
Call the Capitol switchboard at (202)
225-3121, ask for Judiciary Chairman
John Conyers and request open public
hearings for the impeachment of Dick
Cheney. Junior to follow.
Carol Berg-Caldwell
Eugene
IS BIODIESEL BOGUS?
I understand Michael Kelm’s viewpoint
(“Offsetting the Benefits”) regarding the
difficulty in being energy efficient in a
4,000 sq. ft. McMansion style home.
However, I think he’s incorrect on the
biodiesel equation. He refers to the “con-
verter” needed for biodiesel. Unless some-
one is using straight raw veggie oil that
isn’t transesterified (say that 10 times fast,
or just say processed for short), this isn’t
needed. A diesel car doesn’t need any con-
version to visit a retail biodiesel station.
For cars manufactured prior to 1993, new
fuel lines are needed after six to 12 months
($50 for parts, or around $200 to have a
mechanic install them), since natural rub-
ber fuel lines were used. Nowadays, cars
are made with synthetic rubber fuel lines.
You may also need to change your fuel fil-
ter a couple of times as all the build up left
by regular diesel is being cleaned out of the
engine.
In Eugene, we are lucky enough to have
Sequential Biofuels (with a great new gas
station off I-5 that I actually look forward
to visiting). Currently, the B-5 blend (a 5
percent biodiesel blend), B-20 and B-99
blends use already processed waste veggie
oil from Kettle Chips in Salem. That’s
right, a waste product not drilled out of the
ground, from 70 miles away. That’s a
pretty good efficiency rating for fuel in my
book. Check out www.sqbiofuels.com for
more info. However, I couldn’t agree with
Kelm more that driving less is the most ef-
fective way to reduce your transportation
footprint.
Ali Gartlan
Eugene
UTTERLY TASTELESS
I’m appalled that you’re actually print-
ing the column, “¡Ask a Mexican!”
Strangely, last week’s issue even had
printed in bold letters on the cover
“STEREOTYPE FREE!”
I had to re-open the Weekly a few times
just to make sure I hadn’t dreamed the
whole thing up!
How can a community that prides itself
on its progressive, open attitudes even
think of running this utterly tasteless col-
umn that does nothing to build others up?
Please drop it immediately and apologize
to our Latin American neighbors.
And as for those full-page meth ads. If
run them you must, I challenge you to in-
clude in each issue a full-page image
equally beautiful and inspiring.
For the time being, I might just skip di-
rectly to the event listings.
Rachael Wassenaar
Eugene
LETTERS POLICY: We welcome letters on all topics and
will print as many as space allows. Please limit length to
250 words, keep submissions to once a month, and
include your address and phone number for our files. E-
mail to editor@eugeneweekly.com (please put “letters”
in the subject line), fax to 484-4044, or mail to 1251
Lincoln, Eugene 97401.