Sagten DAYTON. OREGON. DECEMBER 1, 1922. VOLUMM XII NO. 1 NEWSLETS GATHERED ABOUT COUNTY COURT HOUSE Minor Matter ol More than Passing Interest Prorate Court I v ember 28, 1922. ClulriiM amount of 19119.75 for labor performed for sal I Orexon Face Urick Co. H. W. Martin, claimant, vs Oregon Face Urick Co., defendant. Filed No­ vember 28, 1922. Claims amount of 979.70 for labor performed for Bald Oregon Face Brick Co. Mas than three weeks ren.sin for The haivest Festival and Bazaar de­ Frank llonsey, claimant, vs Oregon disabled war veterans of thia district tails are being completed. The doll Face Brick Co., defendant. Filed No­ vember 28, 1922. Claims amount of to make application for vocational ■how by the girls will be a feature. 9130 51 for labor performed for said training at the expense of the govern­ Much competitive enthusiasm is al­ Oregon Fuco Brick Co. ment L. C. Jetaeph northwest district ready being displayed by the girls who C. II. Towles, claimant, vs Oregon head of the United States Veterans’ are going to exhibit their dulls. Prizes Face Brick Co., defendant. Filed No­ Bureau has announ-ed. December 16 will be given the girl showing the big­ vember 28, 1922. Claims amount of 962.16 for labor performed for sai l is the last dav requests for training gest doll, smallest doll and the beat can be considered under tne present «reseed doll. Oregon Face Brick Co. Special entertainment 8. E. Bryant, claimant, vs Oregon federal Jaw governing soldiers [rehabil­ ^programs are being arranged for the Face Brick Co., defendant. Filed No itation he slated. free amusement of the people on Friday 994.70 for lala>r performed for said “ The government ia anxious that all and Saturday nights. December 8tli vember 28, 1922. Claims amount of ex-service people who are entitled to and 9h. The following firms are going Oregon Face Brick Co. J. LePage, claimant, vs Oregon Face the benefits of the Rehabilitation Act tu fix up booths for exhibits and dis­ Brick Co., defendant. Filed Novem­ take advantage of thia opportunitv be­ plays:—F. J. Randal) Perferred Stock ber 28, 1922. Claims amount of 9119.70 fore it io too late,” said Mr. Jesaeph. Coffee: Haynes Foster Baking Co., for labor performed for said Oregon “Veterans whose war injuries have Dixie Bread and pastry; Swift and Ar­ Face Brick Co. F. Fisher, claimant, vs Oregon Face prevented them from resuming their mour Racking Companies with meat Brick Co., defendant. Filed November pre-war occu psi tons are entitled to vo­ prodcuts, Albers Bros., milling pro­ 28, 1922. Claims amount of 979.70 for cational training under the direction of ducts; W. S. U’Ken. Maytag Washing labor performed for said Oregon Face thexVeterans' Bureau. The law states Machine; Pacific Coast Biscuit Co.. Brick Co. Boy Clark, claimant, vs Oregon Fare that application for such training must Cookies and Candies; Weinhard Co.. Brick Co., defendant Filed November be mad« prior to December 16. 19’2.“ K-Porter; Porto Co , Porto; Crown 28. 1922. Claims amount of 919.41 for Mr. Jesaeph announced that applica­ Milling Co. Crown Flour and products; labor performed for said Oregon Face tion may be made by writing a letter Pacific Coast Syrup Co., Syrups; Lantz Brick Co. A. W. Billings, claimant, vs Oregon to the nearest Bureau office expressing Uil Burner Co., oilburners; E. Dem- Face Brick Co., defendant. Filed No­ a desire to spply for the training which aray, Detmering Garage; and Miller vember 28, 1922. Claims amount of the government offers. Where the post Merantile Co. There are many more 9109.70 for labor performed for said mark of the letter of application shows who have not yet made definite ar­ Oregon Face Brick Co. that it waa mailed on or before Decem­ rangements who no doubt will hsve an Marriage Licenses Nov. 25—Ixdo Mae Campbell of Mc­ ber 16, the application will be consid­ exhibit. Minnville and Edward Bernard Ben­ ered. The Harvest Festival and Hazaar has son of St. Helens, Ore. There are nearly 3,000 disabled vet­ been adv.rUsed in Dundee, Newberg, Johannah Dietrich of Carlton and erans in training in this district at the LaFayette, Carlton. Yamhill, Amity John Berollnger of Carlton. Nov. 27—Ijouise Edith Nyberg of preaent time, each one receiving train­ and McMinnville and should bring a Willamina and Alfred Joseph Rodgers ing psy of 980 or 9100 a month addi­ big attendance from out of town Many of Loomis, Calif. tional allowances for dependent«. More articles will be for sale and this will Nov. 28—Iva Inez Surgeon of Izi- than 1,100 others have completed their provide an opportunity to buy Christ­ fayette and John Rosa Scott of I a - vocational courses and been declared re­ mas presents. The Ladies Aid will fayette. Elsie C. Christianson of Newberg habilitated, it was stated. have an apron booth, candy booth and and Ralph I^hmann of Newlierg. Country Store. A Fish Pond will pro- 1 I ANOTHER OLD SOLDIER PASSES AWAY Filed No- SUBSCRIPTION SL 75 PE YEAR APPLICATIONS FOR VO- HARVEST FESIIVA1 MRS. LENORA PEFFER j NOraOANiED CATIQNAL TRAINING AND BAZAAR HERE Ouurdiamihlp of Ambrey U. Grace, Incompetent. Filed November 25. 1922. Petition. Order. Citation. Filed No­ vember 27, 1922. Volney C. Mead, deceased. Filed November 28, 1922. Petition approv­ ing report. Order approving same. J. E. DeVore, deceased. Filed No­ vember 22. 1922. Final account of ad­ ministratrix. Order fixing time for hearing final account. Esther Mau Devore, a minor. Filed November 22, 1922. Petition for ap­ pointment of guardian. Order ap­ pointing guardian. letters of guar dlanshlp. Clyde Johnson, deceased. Filed No­ vember 24, 1922. Petition for order to borrow money, etc. Order authoris­ ing administratrix to borrow money. Guardianship of Ivan Everest, an insane person Filed Nov. 28, 1922. Additional bond on the sale of real property and oath of the guardian. Or­ der approving bond. Peter J. Johnson, filed notarial commission on Novemt>er 28, 1922. Ad­ dress, .McMinnville, Oregon. Win. Romacly sold all right, title and Interest In the Sheridan Feed company to Herman T. Wife on on No­ vember 24. 1922. for the sum of 91.00. Circuit Court Complaints: Mary Brill, plaintiff, vs F. J. Pin- gry, et al, defendant. Filed November 22, J922. Mortgage foreclosure. B A Kllks, attorney. Knight Adjustment Co., plaintiff, vs C. C. Pains, defendant. Filed Novem­ ber 24. 1922. Transcript of Judgment. M. II. Kendall, plaintiff, vs City of McMinnville, et al. defendant. Filed November 25, 1922. Suit to quiet title. Vinton * Tooxe, attorneys. Jameson Hdwe Co., a corporation, plaintiff, vs Ethel Martin et al, de­ fendant. Filed November 27, 1922. Ac­ tion for money. Vinton & Tooxe, al- torneys. James W. Coovert wa- born in Preble laiura Kerns, plaintiff, vs Clyde L. County, Oh o, June 16. 1847, ard died Kerns, defendant. Filed November 27, 1922. Divorce. Vinton & Tooxe, at- at his home in Dayton, Oregon, Novim- ber 27, 1922, being 75 years, 5 months iorneys. Judgments: and 11 days old. C. C. Paine, Judgment debtor, vs He was united in marriage to Miss Knight Adjustment Co., Judgment cred­ Suean Frsnkenbergcr in Newton Coun­ itor. Date of judgment Sept. 12, 19-2. Entered November 24, 1922. Costs 97. ty, Indiana, Nov. 26, 1868, and to this union four son were born; Chas. E. Face 972.14. G. W. Shaver, Judgment debtor, vs (Bert) William E. (Kurils), Richard E. Carlton & Sherk Co., Judgment credi­ and James E. Coovert, who survive tor. Date of Judgment Nov. 24, 1922. Entered November 27, 1922. Face him. His wife died December 6, 1905. On October 16, 1908, he was married >214.09. Costs 916. Ell Kurtz, et til. Judgment debtor, to Mrs. Mary M. Howard, who with her •vs Miller Mercantile Co., Judgment three (laughters, Grace, Mabel and creditor. Date of judgment Nov. 15 Vida also survive him. 1922. Entered November 27, 1922. He enlisted as a private in the Civil Face 9142.84. War at Newton, Indiana, Feb. 24, Mechanic Liens: Turner & Christensen, claimants, vs 1865, for one year or during the war, E. A. Palmer, defendant. Filed No­ and was mustered out at Nashville, vember' 25, 1922. Claims Hen upon Ford coupe In the sum of 925.75 for Tenn., Sept. 19, 1865. He became a member of the G. A. labor performed. George Clark, claimant, vs Oregon R. in Nebraska and when Upton Post, Face Brick Co., defendant. Filed No­ G. A. K. was oiganized in Dayton he vember 28, 1922. Amount claimed whs a charter member and had held 993.73 for labor performed by said nearly every office in the Post. Brick Co. He tirst came to this part of Oregon Harold Hadley, claimant, vs Oregon Af­ Face Brick Co., defendant. Filed No­ from Indiana in the fall of 1871. vember 28, 1922. Amount claimed ter seven years residence in Oregon he 956.69 for labor performed by said moved to Dawson County, Nebraska, Oregon Brick Co. and livid there until the summer of E. Branson, claimant, vs Oregon 1890 when he returned to Dayton and Face Brick Co., defendant. Filed No­ vember 28, 1922. Amount claimed vicinity and has lived hr re continuous­ 964.55 for labor performed by said ly till the time of his death. Oregon Face Brick Co. He had been a member of church F. L. Cleveland, claimant, vs Ore­ from childhood and wai a member of gon Face Brick Co., defendant. Filed the Evangelical church since its organ­ November 28, 1922. Amount claimed ization in this part of Oregon, to the $57.55 for labor performed by said time of ilia death, and did much to fur­ Oregon Face Brick Co, ther the work nf the church. He held A. H. Hadley, claimant, vs Oregon Face Brick Co., defendant. Filed No­ office in this church continuously until vember 28, 1922. Claims amount of failing health cauaed him to resign a- >52.90 for labor performed for said bout one year ag >. His sickness waa Oregon Face Brick Co. of two or more years duration and dur­ E. Burden, claimant, vs Oregon Face Brick Co., defendant. Filed November ing all his suffering he was a patient 28, 1922. Claims amount of 966.54 for sufferer. labor performed for Oregon Face Besides his family he leaves a host Brick Co. of sorrowing friends. Funeral services G. Mandras, claimant, vs Oregon Face Brick C q ., defendant. Filed No­ wete held in the Evangelical church vember 28, 1922. Claims amount of here, Tuesday, Ne>v. 28, 1922, Rev. F. $75.72 for labor performed for said E. Fisher officiating. Interment was Oregon Face Brick Co. made in the I. O O F. Cemetery, Rit­ G. Tatum, claimant, vs Oregon Face ualistic services of the G. A. R. were Brick Co., defendant. Filed November conducted al the grave by membtis of 28, 1922. Claims amount of $59.96 for labor performed for said Oregon Face Uplou lost. Brick Co. A. Wood, claimant» vs Oregon Face Orchard Not *o De Pardoned. Brick Co. Filed November 1921. Boise, Idcho—The r. ite hoard of Claims amount of 966.96 for labor per­ pardons deive