Image provided by: University of Oregon Libraries; Eugene, OR
About Street roots. (Portland, OR) 1998-current | View Entire Issue (April 12, 2013)
Street roots 12 April 12, 2013 JT T F relationship continues to hide behind ‘trust us’ facade by the FBI. The FBI’s investigation guidelines and policies permit them to carry C O N T R IB U T IN G C O L U M N I S T out “assessments” and “preliminary n March 27, with dissenting votes investigations” without a reason to believe from Commissioners Fritz and that the target of the inquiry is or may be Novick, the Portland City Council involved in terrorism activity. voted to accept the annual report on the Based on other Freedom of Information Portland Police Bureau’s collaboration with Act requests and investigations by the Office the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF). The tighter restrictions of Oregon laws and the of Inspector General, we know there is a report, submitted by Chief Mike Reese, was Oregon Constitution under which the city of greater likelihood that FBI “assessments” nearly identical to the report that was Portland must operate. We remain and “preliminary investigations” will result accepted last year and provided very concerned that cooperation between the in surveillance and collection of information minimal detail about the number and types police bureau and the JTTF will inevitably related to political, religious and social of cases where PPB is lending resources to expose Portland officers to violations of activities that are lawful and constitutionally the FBI’s terrorism investigations. Oregon law. We in Portland are left to wonder not only protected. Only inquiries at the “full We frequently remind the Council that, how and when PPB is lending resources to investigation” stage require a factual the FBI, but also whether we should predicate towards a specific individual, s Ï •* !jf «A M B i fir continue to endorse a partnership we know Æ F 8® group or organization. KMÌH * very little about. Thus, if the FBI request of PPB is made ...1 * ■r 1 J® » Without adequate detail of the during either the “assessment” or implementation of the JTTF agreement, we “preliminary investigation” stage, it should are forced to accept a “trust us” approach to automatically trigger heightened inquiry by oversight. And while we all wish we could the chief, the commissioner-in-charge and trust our government to do what is right, the active involvement of the city attorney history has taught us that unless there is to ensure that the city’s involvement will not adequate oversight and opportunities for violate either the resolution or Oregon law. accountability to the public, we should not. Especially because the “criminal nexus” The ACLU has appeared before City standard of the resolution is undefined and Council on numerous occasions over the fuzzy, it is critical for the public and the past 15 years in order to educate the Council to know how many inquiries PPB Council and the public about inappropriate officers have participated in and at what political, religious and ethnic surveillance stage (as classified by the FBI). If we knew carried out by the FBI and other federal, that few, if any, of our officers worked on state and local law enforcement agencies. either “assessments” or “preliminary With our coalition partners, we investigations,” it would go a long way endeavored to sound an alarm regarding toward public verification that the city is in inappropriate investigative techniques and (R E U T E R S / S T E V E D IP A O L A ) compliance with the resolution and Oregon surveillance prior to the attacks of Sept. 11, law. Conversely, if PPB officers were 2001. Our efforts, at least in part, led to the involved only in “assessments” and decision in 2005 by former Mayor Tom Once again, missing from this report was since 1981, Oregon law has prohibited any “preliminary investigations,” it would Potter and the Council to withdraw from data indicating the number of investigations, state or local police agency from collecting in d icate th e r e w as a m u ch g re a te r likelihood formal participation in the FBI’s JTTF. th e ty p es of inv estig atio n s, a t w h a t stag e of o r 'm aintaining any In fo rm a tio n ’ ab o u t ' that the city was in violation of the When Mayor Adams renewed public the FBI inquiries PPB was asked to work political or religious or social activities of discussions concerning the relationship Resolution and Oregon law. with the JTTF, and the total number of individuals or organizations unless they’re between the Police Bureau and the JTTF in Before casting his no vote at Council in hours the investigating criminal intelligence directly related to criminal activities. 2010, the ACLU provided expert testimony . March, Commissioner Novick talked about unit officers worked on terrorism inquiries. We arrived at our position in support of and documentary evidence regarding the the ongoing frustration with receiving a The ACLU has never asked the city to the resolution in 2010 in part because we conflicts between Oregon law and the JTTF report that cites so little detail about disclose specific factual information considered it to be the continuation, not the guidelines and policies under which the FBI PPB’s involvement. While the ACLU regarding the individual matters on which end, of an ongoing conversation regarding and its Joint Terrorism Task Force operates. disagrees that abandoning the reporting PPB cooperates with the FBI. Disclosing the appropriate boundaries and safeguards Two years ago we testified in support of requirement is the appropriate response to the number of inquiries and the stage of the for PPB’s task of protecting the safety of all Council Resolution 36859 which now this frustration, we wholeheartedly agree inquiry at the time of the FBI request to the Portland residents, workers and visitors, governs the relationship between the Police city, however, would not disclose information with Novick that until we can break the while at the same time complying with and Bureau and the JTTF. We did so despite our cycle of presenting and accepting such bare that could compromise an ongoing inquiry respecting the constitutional and statutory continued high degree of concern over the bones reports, the mechanism over which or investigation. rights of individuals and organizations. ability of the Bureau to navigate and respect In 2011, we had urged that the Resolution JTTF activities are monitored will remain In 2011 we set out very specific the great differences between the very inadequate and we in Portland will be forced limit PPB involvement to only those expectations that we had for the annual malleable federal guidelines and polices to accept this “trust us” approach. inquiries designated as “full investigations” reports on the city’s relationship with the under which the FBI operates and the BY BECKY STRAUS O Becky Straus is the Legislative Director with the ACLU of Oregon. She directs advocacy and lobbying efforts before the Oregon Legislature and is the ACLU’s primary lobbyist on City of Portland matters. Much of this commentary comes from testimony delivered to the City Council on March 27 by ACLU of Oregon Executive Director David Fidanque. JTTF and the FBI. We urged the mayor and police chief to put the systems in place that would ensure both that the terms of the resolution would be honored and that Portland would be a model of transparency. After significant revisions to the first draft, the 2012 Annual Report was submitted with some detail, but not enough detail to truly inform the public of the nature of PPB’s participation on the JTTF - certainly not enough to compel anyone to point to Portland as a model of transparency. This year’s report was similarly disappointing. c •"v __ 2 1 1 in fo Get Connected. Get Answers. Changing Lives If you need help with any of the following: Food Resources, Health Care, Public Building Communities Creating Opportunities Agencies, Legal Services, Employment Resources, Counseling/Support Groups Housing/Emergency Shelter and Much More! We tmEBTOsinq |'T ■ I I Iplants early and the planet. Yjgur membership gives us the power to (fight Pacific Power’s coal investments} • Support CUB today. http://oregoncub.org/streetroots w w w .c e n tr c d c ity c o n c e rn .o r g From your cell: 503-222-5555. 5 0 3 -2 9 4 -1 6 8 1 C itiz e n s ’ U tility B o a rd oregoncub.org/sfreefroots Thank you for giving a hand up in PDX and supporting your neighborhood vendor!